A comparative evaluation of floor slip resistance test methods
•Three test methods for floor slip resistance were compared with user perceptions.•A scale of user perception of floor surface slipperiness was constructed.•The JIS A 1454 test method best represents footwear and floor surface conditions.•JIS A 1454 results match user perceptions better than EN 1389...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Construction & building materials 2015-09, Vol.94, p.737-745 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 745 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 737 |
| container_title | Construction & building materials |
| container_volume | 94 |
| creator | Choi, Soo-Kyung Kudoh, Rumi Koga, Junko Mikami, Takamasa Yokoyama, Yutaka Takahashi, Hiroki Ono, Hidenori |
| description | •Three test methods for floor slip resistance were compared with user perceptions.•A scale of user perception of floor surface slipperiness was constructed.•The JIS A 1454 test method best represents footwear and floor surface conditions.•JIS A 1454 results match user perceptions better than EN 13893 and ASTM D 2047.
Floor slipperiness is among the most influential parameters affecting the life safety of users. However, slip resistance coefficients determined using some methods do not correspond well to the perception of slipperiness by real users. From a life safety standpoint, a suitable test method for the slip resistance of a floor surface reflects slipperiness as sensed by users. We compared the results of three slip resistance test methods and their correspondence with sensed slipperiness as reported by users. The JIS A 1454 test method was found to be a better test of slip resistance than EN 13893 and ASTM D 2047. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.152 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A427959700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A427959700</galeid><els_id>S0950061815301781</els_id><sourcerecordid>A427959700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-311b612dd13eab3a8215f7681dcd693a105670b03aee927658ccb7bfc9cd23dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFr3DAQhUVJoZu0_8El19oZyZVkXwLLkrSBhV7as5Cl8UaLbS0a7UL_fRS2hwT2UAZmhuF77zCPsa8cGg5c3e0bF5fhGCY_29wI4LIB3XApPrAV73RfgxTqiq2gl1CD4t0ndk20BwAllFix-3Xl4nywyeZwwgpPdjqWNS5VHKtxijFVNIVDlZACZbs4rDJSrmbMz9HTZ_ZxtBPhl3_zhv15fPi9-Vlvf_142qy3tZO6zXXL-aC48J63aIfWdoLLUauOe-dV31oOUmkYoLWIvdBKds4Nehhd77xovW9v2O3Zd2cnNGEZY07WzYGcWX8Xupe9BihUfYHa4YLJTnHBMZTzO765wJfyOAd3UfDtjWA4UliQSqOwe860s0ei93h_xl2KRAlHc0hhtumv4WBe4zN78yY-8xqfAW1KfEW7OWuxvPUUMBlyAcv_fUjosvEx_IfLCz2jqGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative evaluation of floor slip resistance test methods</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Choi, Soo-Kyung ; Kudoh, Rumi ; Koga, Junko ; Mikami, Takamasa ; Yokoyama, Yutaka ; Takahashi, Hiroki ; Ono, Hidenori</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Soo-Kyung ; Kudoh, Rumi ; Koga, Junko ; Mikami, Takamasa ; Yokoyama, Yutaka ; Takahashi, Hiroki ; Ono, Hidenori</creatorcontrib><description>•Three test methods for floor slip resistance were compared with user perceptions.•A scale of user perception of floor surface slipperiness was constructed.•The JIS A 1454 test method best represents footwear and floor surface conditions.•JIS A 1454 results match user perceptions better than EN 13893 and ASTM D 2047.
Floor slipperiness is among the most influential parameters affecting the life safety of users. However, slip resistance coefficients determined using some methods do not correspond well to the perception of slipperiness by real users. From a life safety standpoint, a suitable test method for the slip resistance of a floor surface reflects slipperiness as sensed by users. We compared the results of three slip resistance test methods and their correspondence with sensed slipperiness as reported by users. The JIS A 1454 test method was found to be a better test of slip resistance than EN 13893 and ASTM D 2047.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-0618</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0526</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Concrete ; Floor slipperiness ; Life safety ; Mechanical properties ; Psychological scale ; Sensory test ; Slip resistance test ; Test apparatus</subject><ispartof>Construction & building materials, 2015-09, Vol.94, p.737-745</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-311b612dd13eab3a8215f7681dcd693a105670b03aee927658ccb7bfc9cd23dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-311b612dd13eab3a8215f7681dcd693a105670b03aee927658ccb7bfc9cd23dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061815301781$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Soo-Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudoh, Rumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koga, Junko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Takamasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokoyama, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ono, Hidenori</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative evaluation of floor slip resistance test methods</title><title>Construction & building materials</title><description>•Three test methods for floor slip resistance were compared with user perceptions.•A scale of user perception of floor surface slipperiness was constructed.•The JIS A 1454 test method best represents footwear and floor surface conditions.•JIS A 1454 results match user perceptions better than EN 13893 and ASTM D 2047.
Floor slipperiness is among the most influential parameters affecting the life safety of users. However, slip resistance coefficients determined using some methods do not correspond well to the perception of slipperiness by real users. From a life safety standpoint, a suitable test method for the slip resistance of a floor surface reflects slipperiness as sensed by users. We compared the results of three slip resistance test methods and their correspondence with sensed slipperiness as reported by users. The JIS A 1454 test method was found to be a better test of slip resistance than EN 13893 and ASTM D 2047.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Floor slipperiness</subject><subject>Life safety</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Psychological scale</subject><subject>Sensory test</subject><subject>Slip resistance test</subject><subject>Test apparatus</subject><issn>0950-0618</issn><issn>1879-0526</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFr3DAQhUVJoZu0_8El19oZyZVkXwLLkrSBhV7as5Cl8UaLbS0a7UL_fRS2hwT2UAZmhuF77zCPsa8cGg5c3e0bF5fhGCY_29wI4LIB3XApPrAV73RfgxTqiq2gl1CD4t0ndk20BwAllFix-3Xl4nywyeZwwgpPdjqWNS5VHKtxijFVNIVDlZACZbs4rDJSrmbMz9HTZ_ZxtBPhl3_zhv15fPi9-Vlvf_142qy3tZO6zXXL-aC48J63aIfWdoLLUauOe-dV31oOUmkYoLWIvdBKds4Nehhd77xovW9v2O3Zd2cnNGEZY07WzYGcWX8Xupe9BihUfYHa4YLJTnHBMZTzO765wJfyOAd3UfDtjWA4UliQSqOwe860s0ei93h_xl2KRAlHc0hhtumv4WBe4zN78yY-8xqfAW1KfEW7OWuxvPUUMBlyAcv_fUjosvEx_IfLCz2jqGk</recordid><startdate>20150930</startdate><enddate>20150930</enddate><creator>Choi, Soo-Kyung</creator><creator>Kudoh, Rumi</creator><creator>Koga, Junko</creator><creator>Mikami, Takamasa</creator><creator>Yokoyama, Yutaka</creator><creator>Takahashi, Hiroki</creator><creator>Ono, Hidenori</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150930</creationdate><title>A comparative evaluation of floor slip resistance test methods</title><author>Choi, Soo-Kyung ; Kudoh, Rumi ; Koga, Junko ; Mikami, Takamasa ; Yokoyama, Yutaka ; Takahashi, Hiroki ; Ono, Hidenori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-311b612dd13eab3a8215f7681dcd693a105670b03aee927658ccb7bfc9cd23dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Floor slipperiness</topic><topic>Life safety</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Psychological scale</topic><topic>Sensory test</topic><topic>Slip resistance test</topic><topic>Test apparatus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Soo-Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudoh, Rumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koga, Junko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Takamasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokoyama, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ono, Hidenori</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><jtitle>Construction & building materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Soo-Kyung</au><au>Kudoh, Rumi</au><au>Koga, Junko</au><au>Mikami, Takamasa</au><au>Yokoyama, Yutaka</au><au>Takahashi, Hiroki</au><au>Ono, Hidenori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative evaluation of floor slip resistance test methods</atitle><jtitle>Construction & building materials</jtitle><date>2015-09-30</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>94</volume><spage>737</spage><epage>745</epage><pages>737-745</pages><issn>0950-0618</issn><eissn>1879-0526</eissn><abstract>•Three test methods for floor slip resistance were compared with user perceptions.•A scale of user perception of floor surface slipperiness was constructed.•The JIS A 1454 test method best represents footwear and floor surface conditions.•JIS A 1454 results match user perceptions better than EN 13893 and ASTM D 2047.
Floor slipperiness is among the most influential parameters affecting the life safety of users. However, slip resistance coefficients determined using some methods do not correspond well to the perception of slipperiness by real users. From a life safety standpoint, a suitable test method for the slip resistance of a floor surface reflects slipperiness as sensed by users. We compared the results of three slip resistance test methods and their correspondence with sensed slipperiness as reported by users. The JIS A 1454 test method was found to be a better test of slip resistance than EN 13893 and ASTM D 2047.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.152</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0950-0618 |
| ispartof | Construction & building materials, 2015-09, Vol.94, p.737-745 |
| issn | 0950-0618 1879-0526 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A427959700 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Analysis Concrete Floor slipperiness Life safety Mechanical properties Psychological scale Sensory test Slip resistance test Test apparatus |
| title | A comparative evaluation of floor slip resistance test methods |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A16%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20floor%20slip%20resistance%20test%20methods&rft.jtitle=Construction%20&%20building%20materials&rft.au=Choi,%20Soo-Kyung&rft.date=2015-09-30&rft.volume=94&rft.spage=737&rft.epage=745&rft.pages=737-745&rft.issn=0950-0618&rft.eissn=1879-0526&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.152&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA427959700%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A427959700&rft_els_id=S0950061815301781&rfr_iscdi=true |