Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District
This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample includes information on students enrolled in third through eighth grades nested in 121 elementary and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of education finance 2014-03, Vol.39 (4), p.370-403 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 403 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 370 |
container_title | Journal of education finance |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Springer, Matthew G. Pepper, Matthew J. Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie |
description | This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample includes information on students enrolled in third through eighth grades nested in 121 elementary and middle schools over a five-year period comprising the 2003–04 to 2007–08 school years. A total of 17 elementary and middle schools were required to offer SES at some point during the period under study, and 9,861 student-year pairings in the sample were eligible to receive SES. Although our preferred analytic approach takes advantage of panel data to implement an analysis strategy with student fixed effect regression methods, we also test the robustness of these estimates to a number of alternative approaches, including a comparison of student test score gains between current and future SES participants. We find consistently significant and positive average effects of SES on test score gains in mathematics. Results in reading tend to be insignificant. SES tutoring does not appear to disproportionately benefit a particular racial/ethnic group or ability level. Female students and students with disabilities appear to benefit more from participating in SES. SES has a significant, cumulative effect on students in both mathematics and reading. We also demonstrate that not accounting for content area of tutoring can cause downward bias in estimates of the SES treatment effect. Our findings are qualified on a couple of dimensions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/jef.2014.a546720 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A367966219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A367966219</galeid><ericid>EJ1082317</ericid><jstor_id>24459268</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A367966219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-58a4dc9cf24388f9deb71cbeb6f9d4141c6cdf8f7412453a52c65b20e422fe2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1r3DAUxEVoIdu091wCgl7rrSQ_f_UW0m2SstCDk7OQ5aetjG0tkhzof18tDimFlQ56aH4zIA0h15xteV7kXwc0W8E4bFUBZSXYBdnwBiAroWLvyIaxps4aaIpL8iGEgTEuWCU2ZGyX43HECeeoRrrrF62idXOaW_QvVmOgau5pG5c-IfQJQ6Stdh7pvbJz-EZ3LzYpGqnxbqKK7pU_4Bf67Ds1J_K3cyP9bkP0VseP5L1RY8BPr-cVef6xe7p7yPa_7h_vbveZTi-JWVEr6HWjjYC8rk3TY1dx3WFXphk4cF3q3tSmAi6gyFUhdFl0giEIYVCo_Ip8XnMPakRpZ-OiV3qyQcvbvKyashS8SVR2hjrgjF6NbkZj0_V__PYMn3aPk9VnDWw1aO9C8Gjk0dtJ-T-SM3kqTabS5Kk0-VpastysFkz_9YbvfnJWi5xXSYdVP3o3oI7TElAObvGpsSDXENmeij_1zgFYWvAvdgjR-bdcAVA0oqzzv0xXrS0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Springer, Matthew G. ; Pepper, Matthew J. ; Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</creator><creatorcontrib>Springer, Matthew G. ; Pepper, Matthew J. ; Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample includes information on students enrolled in third through eighth grades nested in 121 elementary and middle schools over a five-year period comprising the 2003–04 to 2007–08 school years. A total of 17 elementary and middle schools were required to offer SES at some point during the period under study, and 9,861 student-year pairings in the sample were eligible to receive SES. Although our preferred analytic approach takes advantage of panel data to implement an analysis strategy with student fixed effect regression methods, we also test the robustness of these estimates to a number of alternative approaches, including a comparison of student test score gains between current and future SES participants. We find consistently significant and positive average effects of SES on test score gains in mathematics. Results in reading tend to be insignificant. SES tutoring does not appear to disproportionately benefit a particular racial/ethnic group or ability level. Female students and students with disabilities appear to benefit more from participating in SES. SES has a significant, cumulative effect on students in both mathematics and reading. We also demonstrate that not accounting for content area of tutoring can cause downward bias in estimates of the SES treatment effect. Our findings are qualified on a couple of dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-9495</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-6470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-6470</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/jef.2014.a546720</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Illinois Press</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Achievement Gains ; After school programs ; Arithmetic mean ; Comparative Analysis ; Disabilities ; Educational Legislation ; Educational services ; Elementary School Students ; Federal Legislation ; Gender Differences ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Longitudinal Studies ; Mathematical models ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Achievement ; Mathematics education ; Middle School Students ; Racial Differences ; Reading Achievement ; Regression (Statistics) ; Robustness (Statistics) ; School year ; Scores ; Socioeconomic status ; Standard deviation ; Statistical Analysis ; Supplementary Education ; Test scores ; Tutoring ; Tutors and tutoring</subject><ispartof>Journal of education finance, 2014-03, Vol.39 (4), p.370-403</ispartof><rights>2014 Board of Directors of the Journal of Education Finance, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 University of Illinois Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24459268$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24459268$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1082317$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Springer, Matthew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepper, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><title>Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District</title><title>Journal of education finance</title><description>This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample includes information on students enrolled in third through eighth grades nested in 121 elementary and middle schools over a five-year period comprising the 2003–04 to 2007–08 school years. A total of 17 elementary and middle schools were required to offer SES at some point during the period under study, and 9,861 student-year pairings in the sample were eligible to receive SES. Although our preferred analytic approach takes advantage of panel data to implement an analysis strategy with student fixed effect regression methods, we also test the robustness of these estimates to a number of alternative approaches, including a comparison of student test score gains between current and future SES participants. We find consistently significant and positive average effects of SES on test score gains in mathematics. Results in reading tend to be insignificant. SES tutoring does not appear to disproportionately benefit a particular racial/ethnic group or ability level. Female students and students with disabilities appear to benefit more from participating in SES. SES has a significant, cumulative effect on students in both mathematics and reading. We also demonstrate that not accounting for content area of tutoring can cause downward bias in estimates of the SES treatment effect. Our findings are qualified on a couple of dimensions.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>After school programs</subject><subject>Arithmetic mean</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Educational Legislation</subject><subject>Educational services</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Achievement</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Racial Differences</subject><subject>Reading Achievement</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Robustness (Statistics)</subject><subject>School year</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Supplementary Education</subject><subject>Test scores</subject><subject>Tutoring</subject><subject>Tutors and tutoring</subject><issn>0098-9495</issn><issn>1944-6470</issn><issn>1944-6470</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkc1r3DAUxEVoIdu091wCgl7rrSQ_f_UW0m2SstCDk7OQ5aetjG0tkhzof18tDimFlQ56aH4zIA0h15xteV7kXwc0W8E4bFUBZSXYBdnwBiAroWLvyIaxps4aaIpL8iGEgTEuWCU2ZGyX43HECeeoRrrrF62idXOaW_QvVmOgau5pG5c-IfQJQ6Stdh7pvbJz-EZ3LzYpGqnxbqKK7pU_4Bf67Ds1J_K3cyP9bkP0VseP5L1RY8BPr-cVef6xe7p7yPa_7h_vbveZTi-JWVEr6HWjjYC8rk3TY1dx3WFXphk4cF3q3tSmAi6gyFUhdFl0giEIYVCo_Ip8XnMPakRpZ-OiV3qyQcvbvKyashS8SVR2hjrgjF6NbkZj0_V__PYMn3aPk9VnDWw1aO9C8Gjk0dtJ-T-SM3kqTabS5Kk0-VpastysFkz_9YbvfnJWi5xXSYdVP3o3oI7TElAObvGpsSDXENmeij_1zgFYWvAvdgjR-bdcAVA0oqzzv0xXrS0</recordid><startdate>20140322</startdate><enddate>20140322</enddate><creator>Springer, Matthew G.</creator><creator>Pepper, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</creator><general>University of Illinois Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140322</creationdate><title>Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District</title><author>Springer, Matthew G. ; Pepper, Matthew J. ; Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-58a4dc9cf24388f9deb71cbeb6f9d4141c6cdf8f7412453a52c65b20e422fe2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>After school programs</topic><topic>Arithmetic mean</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Educational Legislation</topic><topic>Educational services</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Achievement</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Racial Differences</topic><topic>Reading Achievement</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Robustness (Statistics)</topic><topic>School year</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Supplementary Education</topic><topic>Test scores</topic><topic>Tutoring</topic><topic>Tutors and tutoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Springer, Matthew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepper, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>Journal of education finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Springer, Matthew G.</au><au>Pepper, Matthew J.</au><au>Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1082317</ericid><atitle>Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District</atitle><jtitle>Journal of education finance</jtitle><date>2014-03-22</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>370</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>370-403</pages><issn>0098-9495</issn><issn>1944-6470</issn><eissn>1944-6470</eissn><abstract>This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample includes information on students enrolled in third through eighth grades nested in 121 elementary and middle schools over a five-year period comprising the 2003–04 to 2007–08 school years. A total of 17 elementary and middle schools were required to offer SES at some point during the period under study, and 9,861 student-year pairings in the sample were eligible to receive SES. Although our preferred analytic approach takes advantage of panel data to implement an analysis strategy with student fixed effect regression methods, we also test the robustness of these estimates to a number of alternative approaches, including a comparison of student test score gains between current and future SES participants. We find consistently significant and positive average effects of SES on test score gains in mathematics. Results in reading tend to be insignificant. SES tutoring does not appear to disproportionately benefit a particular racial/ethnic group or ability level. Female students and students with disabilities appear to benefit more from participating in SES. SES has a significant, cumulative effect on students in both mathematics and reading. We also demonstrate that not accounting for content area of tutoring can cause downward bias in estimates of the SES treatment effect. Our findings are qualified on a couple of dimensions.</abstract><pub>University of Illinois Press</pub><doi>10.1353/jef.2014.a546720</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-9495 |
ispartof | Journal of education finance, 2014-03, Vol.39 (4), p.370-403 |
issn | 0098-9495 1944-6470 1944-6470 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A367966219 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Academic achievement Achievement Gains After school programs Arithmetic mean Comparative Analysis Disabilities Educational Legislation Educational services Elementary School Students Federal Legislation Gender Differences Instructional Effectiveness Longitudinal Studies Mathematical models Mathematics Mathematics Achievement Mathematics education Middle School Students Racial Differences Reading Achievement Regression (Statistics) Robustness (Statistics) School year Scores Socioeconomic status Standard deviation Statistical Analysis Supplementary Education Test scores Tutoring Tutors and tutoring |
title | Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A59%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supplemental%20Educational%20Services%20and%20Student%20Test%20Score%20Gains:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20Large,%20Urban%20School%20District&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20education%20finance&rft.au=Springer,%20Matthew%20G.&rft.date=2014-03-22&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=370-403&rft.issn=0098-9495&rft.eissn=1944-6470&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/jef.2014.a546720&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA367966219%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A367966219&rft_ericid=EJ1082317&rft_jstor_id=24459268&rfr_iscdi=true |