Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District

This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample includes information on students enrolled in third through eighth grades nested in 121 elementary and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of education finance 2014-03, Vol.39 (4), p.370-403
Hauptverfasser: Springer, Matthew G., Pepper, Matthew J., Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 403
container_issue 4
container_start_page 370
container_title Journal of education finance
container_volume 39
creator Springer, Matthew G.
Pepper, Matthew J.
Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie
description This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample includes information on students enrolled in third through eighth grades nested in 121 elementary and middle schools over a five-year period comprising the 2003–04 to 2007–08 school years. A total of 17 elementary and middle schools were required to offer SES at some point during the period under study, and 9,861 student-year pairings in the sample were eligible to receive SES. Although our preferred analytic approach takes advantage of panel data to implement an analysis strategy with student fixed effect regression methods, we also test the robustness of these estimates to a number of alternative approaches, including a comparison of student test score gains between current and future SES participants. We find consistently significant and positive average effects of SES on test score gains in mathematics. Results in reading tend to be insignificant. SES tutoring does not appear to disproportionately benefit a particular racial/ethnic group or ability level. Female students and students with disabilities appear to benefit more from participating in SES. SES has a significant, cumulative effect on students in both mathematics and reading. We also demonstrate that not accounting for content area of tutoring can cause downward bias in estimates of the SES treatment effect. Our findings are qualified on a couple of dimensions.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/jef.2014.a546720
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A367966219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A367966219</galeid><ericid>EJ1082317</ericid><jstor_id>24459268</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A367966219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-58a4dc9cf24388f9deb71cbeb6f9d4141c6cdf8f7412453a52c65b20e422fe2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1r3DAUxEVoIdu091wCgl7rrSQ_f_UW0m2SstCDk7OQ5aetjG0tkhzof18tDimFlQ56aH4zIA0h15xteV7kXwc0W8E4bFUBZSXYBdnwBiAroWLvyIaxps4aaIpL8iGEgTEuWCU2ZGyX43HECeeoRrrrF62idXOaW_QvVmOgau5pG5c-IfQJQ6Stdh7pvbJz-EZ3LzYpGqnxbqKK7pU_4Bf67Ds1J_K3cyP9bkP0VseP5L1RY8BPr-cVef6xe7p7yPa_7h_vbveZTi-JWVEr6HWjjYC8rk3TY1dx3WFXphk4cF3q3tSmAi6gyFUhdFl0giEIYVCo_Ip8XnMPakRpZ-OiV3qyQcvbvKyashS8SVR2hjrgjF6NbkZj0_V__PYMn3aPk9VnDWw1aO9C8Gjk0dtJ-T-SM3kqTabS5Kk0-VpastysFkz_9YbvfnJWi5xXSYdVP3o3oI7TElAObvGpsSDXENmeij_1zgFYWvAvdgjR-bdcAVA0oqzzv0xXrS0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Springer, Matthew G. ; Pepper, Matthew J. ; Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</creator><creatorcontrib>Springer, Matthew G. ; Pepper, Matthew J. ; Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample includes information on students enrolled in third through eighth grades nested in 121 elementary and middle schools over a five-year period comprising the 2003–04 to 2007–08 school years. A total of 17 elementary and middle schools were required to offer SES at some point during the period under study, and 9,861 student-year pairings in the sample were eligible to receive SES. Although our preferred analytic approach takes advantage of panel data to implement an analysis strategy with student fixed effect regression methods, we also test the robustness of these estimates to a number of alternative approaches, including a comparison of student test score gains between current and future SES participants. We find consistently significant and positive average effects of SES on test score gains in mathematics. Results in reading tend to be insignificant. SES tutoring does not appear to disproportionately benefit a particular racial/ethnic group or ability level. Female students and students with disabilities appear to benefit more from participating in SES. SES has a significant, cumulative effect on students in both mathematics and reading. We also demonstrate that not accounting for content area of tutoring can cause downward bias in estimates of the SES treatment effect. Our findings are qualified on a couple of dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-9495</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-6470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-6470</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/jef.2014.a546720</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Illinois Press</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Achievement Gains ; After school programs ; Arithmetic mean ; Comparative Analysis ; Disabilities ; Educational Legislation ; Educational services ; Elementary School Students ; Federal Legislation ; Gender Differences ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Longitudinal Studies ; Mathematical models ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Achievement ; Mathematics education ; Middle School Students ; Racial Differences ; Reading Achievement ; Regression (Statistics) ; Robustness (Statistics) ; School year ; Scores ; Socioeconomic status ; Standard deviation ; Statistical Analysis ; Supplementary Education ; Test scores ; Tutoring ; Tutors and tutoring</subject><ispartof>Journal of education finance, 2014-03, Vol.39 (4), p.370-403</ispartof><rights>2014 Board of Directors of the Journal of Education Finance, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 University of Illinois Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24459268$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24459268$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1082317$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Springer, Matthew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepper, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><title>Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District</title><title>Journal of education finance</title><description>This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample includes information on students enrolled in third through eighth grades nested in 121 elementary and middle schools over a five-year period comprising the 2003–04 to 2007–08 school years. A total of 17 elementary and middle schools were required to offer SES at some point during the period under study, and 9,861 student-year pairings in the sample were eligible to receive SES. Although our preferred analytic approach takes advantage of panel data to implement an analysis strategy with student fixed effect regression methods, we also test the robustness of these estimates to a number of alternative approaches, including a comparison of student test score gains between current and future SES participants. We find consistently significant and positive average effects of SES on test score gains in mathematics. Results in reading tend to be insignificant. SES tutoring does not appear to disproportionately benefit a particular racial/ethnic group or ability level. Female students and students with disabilities appear to benefit more from participating in SES. SES has a significant, cumulative effect on students in both mathematics and reading. We also demonstrate that not accounting for content area of tutoring can cause downward bias in estimates of the SES treatment effect. Our findings are qualified on a couple of dimensions.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>After school programs</subject><subject>Arithmetic mean</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Educational Legislation</subject><subject>Educational services</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Achievement</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Racial Differences</subject><subject>Reading Achievement</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Robustness (Statistics)</subject><subject>School year</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Supplementary Education</subject><subject>Test scores</subject><subject>Tutoring</subject><subject>Tutors and tutoring</subject><issn>0098-9495</issn><issn>1944-6470</issn><issn>1944-6470</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkc1r3DAUxEVoIdu091wCgl7rrSQ_f_UW0m2SstCDk7OQ5aetjG0tkhzof18tDimFlQ56aH4zIA0h15xteV7kXwc0W8E4bFUBZSXYBdnwBiAroWLvyIaxps4aaIpL8iGEgTEuWCU2ZGyX43HECeeoRrrrF62idXOaW_QvVmOgau5pG5c-IfQJQ6Stdh7pvbJz-EZ3LzYpGqnxbqKK7pU_4Bf67Ds1J_K3cyP9bkP0VseP5L1RY8BPr-cVef6xe7p7yPa_7h_vbveZTi-JWVEr6HWjjYC8rk3TY1dx3WFXphk4cF3q3tSmAi6gyFUhdFl0giEIYVCo_Ip8XnMPakRpZ-OiV3qyQcvbvKyashS8SVR2hjrgjF6NbkZj0_V__PYMn3aPk9VnDWw1aO9C8Gjk0dtJ-T-SM3kqTabS5Kk0-VpastysFkz_9YbvfnJWi5xXSYdVP3o3oI7TElAObvGpsSDXENmeij_1zgFYWvAvdgjR-bdcAVA0oqzzv0xXrS0</recordid><startdate>20140322</startdate><enddate>20140322</enddate><creator>Springer, Matthew G.</creator><creator>Pepper, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</creator><general>University of Illinois Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140322</creationdate><title>Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District</title><author>Springer, Matthew G. ; Pepper, Matthew J. ; Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-58a4dc9cf24388f9deb71cbeb6f9d4141c6cdf8f7412453a52c65b20e422fe2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>After school programs</topic><topic>Arithmetic mean</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Educational Legislation</topic><topic>Educational services</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Achievement</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Racial Differences</topic><topic>Reading Achievement</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Robustness (Statistics)</topic><topic>School year</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Supplementary Education</topic><topic>Test scores</topic><topic>Tutoring</topic><topic>Tutors and tutoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Springer, Matthew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepper, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>Journal of education finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Springer, Matthew G.</au><au>Pepper, Matthew J.</au><au>Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1082317</ericid><atitle>Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District</atitle><jtitle>Journal of education finance</jtitle><date>2014-03-22</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>370</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>370-403</pages><issn>0098-9495</issn><issn>1944-6470</issn><eissn>1944-6470</eissn><abstract>This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample includes information on students enrolled in third through eighth grades nested in 121 elementary and middle schools over a five-year period comprising the 2003–04 to 2007–08 school years. A total of 17 elementary and middle schools were required to offer SES at some point during the period under study, and 9,861 student-year pairings in the sample were eligible to receive SES. Although our preferred analytic approach takes advantage of panel data to implement an analysis strategy with student fixed effect regression methods, we also test the robustness of these estimates to a number of alternative approaches, including a comparison of student test score gains between current and future SES participants. We find consistently significant and positive average effects of SES on test score gains in mathematics. Results in reading tend to be insignificant. SES tutoring does not appear to disproportionately benefit a particular racial/ethnic group or ability level. Female students and students with disabilities appear to benefit more from participating in SES. SES has a significant, cumulative effect on students in both mathematics and reading. We also demonstrate that not accounting for content area of tutoring can cause downward bias in estimates of the SES treatment effect. Our findings are qualified on a couple of dimensions.</abstract><pub>University of Illinois Press</pub><doi>10.1353/jef.2014.a546720</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-9495
ispartof Journal of education finance, 2014-03, Vol.39 (4), p.370-403
issn 0098-9495
1944-6470
1944-6470
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A367966219
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Academic achievement
Achievement Gains
After school programs
Arithmetic mean
Comparative Analysis
Disabilities
Educational Legislation
Educational services
Elementary School Students
Federal Legislation
Gender Differences
Instructional Effectiveness
Longitudinal Studies
Mathematical models
Mathematics
Mathematics Achievement
Mathematics education
Middle School Students
Racial Differences
Reading Achievement
Regression (Statistics)
Robustness (Statistics)
School year
Scores
Socioeconomic status
Standard deviation
Statistical Analysis
Supplementary Education
Test scores
Tutoring
Tutors and tutoring
title Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A59%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supplemental%20Educational%20Services%20and%20Student%20Test%20Score%20Gains:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20Large,%20Urban%20School%20District&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20education%20finance&rft.au=Springer,%20Matthew%20G.&rft.date=2014-03-22&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=370-403&rft.issn=0098-9495&rft.eissn=1944-6470&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/jef.2014.a546720&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA367966219%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A367966219&rft_ericid=EJ1082317&rft_jstor_id=24459268&rfr_iscdi=true