An Empirical Investigation of Two Group Idea Generation Techniques: Manual vs. Electronic Gallery Writing
Gallery writing is a widely used variant of brain writing and the technique is available in electronic and manual forms. This study posits a model based on the input-process-output framework to empirically test the relative efficacy of electronic and manual gallery writing. An experiment using a stu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of e-collaboration 2013-04, Vol.9 (2), p.61-77 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 77 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 61 |
| container_title | International journal of e-collaboration |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | GHOSH, Kaushik AIKEN, Milam |
| description | Gallery writing is a widely used variant of brain writing and the technique is available in electronic and manual forms. This study posits a model based on the input-process-output framework to empirically test the relative efficacy of electronic and manual gallery writing. An experiment using a student sample was conducted and data were collected to test the proposed model. Path analysis shows that while either technique can be used successfully, groups using the electronic version generated more text. Also, free riders were dissatisfied with the meeting process. Some implications of this study are that when a large number of ideas are desired in group meetings, electronic gallery writing might be the preferred technique, while manual gallery writing might be better when meeting participants want to keep the discussion focused on succinct ideas. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4018/jec.2013040103 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A339733793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A339733793</galeid><sourcerecordid>A339733793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g289t-ce44980682ebcb2c45e527be99baf23f6e988c8fba41cbd4353aa0fdc667df6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkN9LwzAQx4soOKevPgfEN1vTJm1T38aYdTDxZeJjSdNLd6NLa9JO9t9bmIgDObifn-_BnefdhjTgNBSPW1BBRENGx4qyM28Sxlz4LBHh-W-eskvvyrktpSxmEZ94ODNksevQopINWZo9uB5r2WNrSKvJ-qsluW2HjiwrkCQHA_Y4XIPaGPwcwD2RV2mGUb13AVk0oHrbGlQkl00D9kA-LPZo6mvvQsvGwc1PnHrvz4v1_MVfveXL-Wzl15HIel8B55mgiYigVGWkeAxxlJaQZaXUEdMJZEIooUvJQ1VWfLxDSqorlSRppRPFpt7dcW8tGyjQ6La3Uu3QqWLGWJYylmZspIJ_qNEq2KFqDWgc-yeChz-CcnBowI3OYb3pXS0H507x-yPeSTd-VltpFLqis7iT9lBEacypSBP2DQIxhqo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Empirical Investigation of Two Group Idea Generation Techniques: Manual vs. Electronic Gallery Writing</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>GHOSH, Kaushik ; AIKEN, Milam</creator><creatorcontrib>GHOSH, Kaushik ; AIKEN, Milam</creatorcontrib><description>Gallery writing is a widely used variant of brain writing and the technique is available in electronic and manual forms. This study posits a model based on the input-process-output framework to empirically test the relative efficacy of electronic and manual gallery writing. An experiment using a student sample was conducted and data were collected to test the proposed model. Path analysis shows that while either technique can be used successfully, groups using the electronic version generated more text. Also, free riders were dissatisfied with the meeting process. Some implications of this study are that when a large number of ideas are desired in group meetings, electronic gallery writing might be the preferred technique, while manual gallery writing might be better when meeting participants want to keep the discussion focused on succinct ideas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1548-3673</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-3681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4018/jec.2013040103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hershey, PA: Idea Group Pub</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Applied sciences ; Behavior. Attitude ; Biological and medical sciences ; Business writing ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Meetings ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology ; Software</subject><ispartof>International journal of e-collaboration, 2013-04, Vol.9 (2), p.61-77</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 IGI Global</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27540876$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GHOSH, Kaushik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AIKEN, Milam</creatorcontrib><title>An Empirical Investigation of Two Group Idea Generation Techniques: Manual vs. Electronic Gallery Writing</title><title>International journal of e-collaboration</title><description>Gallery writing is a widely used variant of brain writing and the technique is available in electronic and manual forms. This study posits a model based on the input-process-output framework to empirically test the relative efficacy of electronic and manual gallery writing. An experiment using a student sample was conducted and data were collected to test the proposed model. Path analysis shows that while either technique can be used successfully, groups using the electronic version generated more text. Also, free riders were dissatisfied with the meeting process. Some implications of this study are that when a large number of ideas are desired in group meetings, electronic gallery writing might be the preferred technique, while manual gallery writing might be better when meeting participants want to keep the discussion focused on succinct ideas.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Behavior. Attitude</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Business writing</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1548-3673</issn><issn>1548-3681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNptkN9LwzAQx4soOKevPgfEN1vTJm1T38aYdTDxZeJjSdNLd6NLa9JO9t9bmIgDObifn-_BnefdhjTgNBSPW1BBRENGx4qyM28Sxlz4LBHh-W-eskvvyrktpSxmEZ94ODNksevQopINWZo9uB5r2WNrSKvJ-qsluW2HjiwrkCQHA_Y4XIPaGPwcwD2RV2mGUb13AVk0oHrbGlQkl00D9kA-LPZo6mvvQsvGwc1PnHrvz4v1_MVfveXL-Wzl15HIel8B55mgiYigVGWkeAxxlJaQZaXUEdMJZEIooUvJQ1VWfLxDSqorlSRppRPFpt7dcW8tGyjQ6La3Uu3QqWLGWJYylmZspIJ_qNEq2KFqDWgc-yeChz-CcnBowI3OYb3pXS0H507x-yPeSTd-VltpFLqis7iT9lBEacypSBP2DQIxhqo</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>GHOSH, Kaushik</creator><creator>AIKEN, Milam</creator><general>Idea Group Pub</general><general>IGI Global</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>An Empirical Investigation of Two Group Idea Generation Techniques: Manual vs. Electronic Gallery Writing</title><author>GHOSH, Kaushik ; AIKEN, Milam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g289t-ce44980682ebcb2c45e527be99baf23f6e988c8fba41cbd4353aa0fdc667df6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Behavior. Attitude</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Business writing</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GHOSH, Kaushik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AIKEN, Milam</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><jtitle>International journal of e-collaboration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GHOSH, Kaushik</au><au>AIKEN, Milam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Empirical Investigation of Two Group Idea Generation Techniques: Manual vs. Electronic Gallery Writing</atitle><jtitle>International journal of e-collaboration</jtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>61-77</pages><issn>1548-3673</issn><eissn>1548-3681</eissn><abstract>Gallery writing is a widely used variant of brain writing and the technique is available in electronic and manual forms. This study posits a model based on the input-process-output framework to empirically test the relative efficacy of electronic and manual gallery writing. An experiment using a student sample was conducted and data were collected to test the proposed model. Path analysis shows that while either technique can be used successfully, groups using the electronic version generated more text. Also, free riders were dissatisfied with the meeting process. Some implications of this study are that when a large number of ideas are desired in group meetings, electronic gallery writing might be the preferred technique, while manual gallery writing might be better when meeting participants want to keep the discussion focused on succinct ideas.</abstract><cop>Hershey, PA</cop><pub>Idea Group Pub</pub><doi>10.4018/jec.2013040103</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1548-3673 |
| ispartof | International journal of e-collaboration, 2013-04, Vol.9 (2), p.61-77 |
| issn | 1548-3673 1548-3681 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A339733793 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Analysis Applied sciences Behavior. Attitude Biological and medical sciences Business writing Computer science control theory systems Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Meetings Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social psychology Software |
| title | An Empirical Investigation of Two Group Idea Generation Techniques: Manual vs. Electronic Gallery Writing |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A46%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Empirical%20Investigation%20of%20Two%20Group%20Idea%20Generation%20Techniques:%20Manual%20vs.%20Electronic%20Gallery%20Writing&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20e-collaboration&rft.au=GHOSH,%20Kaushik&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=61-77&rft.issn=1548-3673&rft.eissn=1548-3681&rft_id=info:doi/10.4018/jec.2013040103&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pasca%3EA339733793%3C/gale_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A339733793&rfr_iscdi=true |