INFORMATION, INNOVATION, AND COMPETITION POLICY FOR THE INTERNET
Antitrust agencies around the world are increasingly focusing on digital industries. Critics have justifiably questioned the ability of competition agencies to make beneficial enforcement decisions given the complexity and rapid pace of change in online markets. This Article discusses those criticis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | University of Pennsylvania law review 2013-05, Vol.161 (6), p.1663-1705 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1705 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1663 |
container_title | University of Pennsylvania law review |
container_volume | 161 |
creator | Shelanski, Howard A. |
description | Antitrust agencies around the world are increasingly focusing on digital industries. Critics have justifiably questioned the ability of competition agencies to make beneficial enforcement decisions given the complexity and rapid pace of change in online markets. This Article discusses those criticisms and addresses the argument that, because the error costs of overenforcement of antitrust laws in digital markets would be much higher than the error costs of underenforcement, courts and antitrust agencies should presume against antitrust intervention in digital industries. While acknowledging that there is often good reason for such modesty in enforcement, this Article discusses several ways in which competition policy can adjust to better account for potential costs and benefits of enforcement in digital platform markets. It argues that nonprice effects related to information and innovation are particularly important to the performance of online platforms, and may hold the key to a better understanding of the costs of antitrust underenforcement and the assessment of the competitive effects of conduct and transactions in digital industries. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A334709565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A334709565</galeid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20201202040630</informt_id><jstor_id>23527815</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A334709565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g481t-1315805e3a5d3a0bd5722984b14fe396f322189e2fa518f7cbbb0b691236ca63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjVFr2zAQx81YYVm7j1Aw7LUeJ51lS28LqbsYUrsUM-iTkG3ZUUjsVFIe-u3nNh1baV7Kwd3x53e_-xTMiIhpxBmmn4MZQEwiISD9Enx1bgMACSNiFvzMi5vy_nZe5WVxFeZFUf5-3efFdbgob--yKn8OwrtylS8ewokOq2U2oVV2X2TVRXDWqa3T317neVDdZNViGa3KX_livor6mBMfESSMA9OoWIsK6pallAoe1yTuNIqkQ0oJF5p2ihHepU1d11AnglBMGpXgefD9qN3b8fGgnZeb8WCH6aMkKBgDBM7_Ub3aammGbvRWNTvjGjlHjFMQLGETFZ2gej1oq7bjoDszxW_4Hyf4qVq9M83Jg6v_DuqDM4N2U3OmX3vXq4Nzb_HlEbc746Xqjdt76bSyzfrl20s82l62o5EEJCJJ_mIUKJDnFkOCMKlW71Vr7_dOtsqrj-suj7qN86OVe2t2yj5JioymnDD8A0I7tYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1395503088</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>INFORMATION, INNOVATION, AND COMPETITION POLICY FOR THE INTERNET</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Shelanski, Howard A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shelanski, Howard A.</creatorcontrib><description>Antitrust agencies around the world are increasingly focusing on digital industries. Critics have justifiably questioned the ability of competition agencies to make beneficial enforcement decisions given the complexity and rapid pace of change in online markets. This Article discusses those criticisms and addresses the argument that, because the error costs of overenforcement of antitrust laws in digital markets would be much higher than the error costs of underenforcement, courts and antitrust agencies should presume against antitrust intervention in digital industries. While acknowledging that there is often good reason for such modesty in enforcement, this Article discusses several ways in which competition policy can adjust to better account for potential costs and benefits of enforcement in digital platform markets. It argues that nonprice effects related to information and innovation are particularly important to the performance of online platforms, and may hold the key to a better understanding of the costs of antitrust underenforcement and the assessment of the competitive effects of conduct and transactions in digital industries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-9907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-8537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Law School</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Antitrust ; Antitrust law ; Antitrust laws ; Competition ; Compliance costs ; Consumer protection ; Customers ; Data protection ; Economic competition ; Electronic commerce ; Evaluation ; INNOVATION ; INTERNET ; Internet service providers ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legal studies ; Legislation ; Market competition ; Market prices ; Product innovation ; Regulatory competition ; Search engines ; Technological innovation ; TRADE PRACTICES</subject><ispartof>University of Pennsylvania law review, 2013-05, Vol.161 (6), p.1663-1705</ispartof><rights>2013 University of Pennsylvania Law Review</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 University of Pennsylvania, Law School</rights><rights>Copyright University of Pennsylvania Law School May 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23527815$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23527815$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shelanski, Howard A.</creatorcontrib><title>INFORMATION, INNOVATION, AND COMPETITION POLICY FOR THE INTERNET</title><title>University of Pennsylvania law review</title><description>Antitrust agencies around the world are increasingly focusing on digital industries. Critics have justifiably questioned the ability of competition agencies to make beneficial enforcement decisions given the complexity and rapid pace of change in online markets. This Article discusses those criticisms and addresses the argument that, because the error costs of overenforcement of antitrust laws in digital markets would be much higher than the error costs of underenforcement, courts and antitrust agencies should presume against antitrust intervention in digital industries. While acknowledging that there is often good reason for such modesty in enforcement, this Article discusses several ways in which competition policy can adjust to better account for potential costs and benefits of enforcement in digital platform markets. It argues that nonprice effects related to information and innovation are particularly important to the performance of online platforms, and may hold the key to a better understanding of the costs of antitrust underenforcement and the assessment of the competitive effects of conduct and transactions in digital industries.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antitrust</subject><subject>Antitrust law</subject><subject>Antitrust laws</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Compliance costs</subject><subject>Consumer protection</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Data protection</subject><subject>Economic competition</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>INNOVATION</subject><subject>INTERNET</subject><subject>Internet service providers</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legal studies</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Market competition</subject><subject>Market prices</subject><subject>Product innovation</subject><subject>Regulatory competition</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Technological innovation</subject><subject>TRADE PRACTICES</subject><issn>0041-9907</issn><issn>1942-8537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjVFr2zAQx81YYVm7j1Aw7LUeJ51lS28LqbsYUrsUM-iTkG3ZUUjsVFIe-u3nNh1baV7Kwd3x53e_-xTMiIhpxBmmn4MZQEwiISD9Enx1bgMACSNiFvzMi5vy_nZe5WVxFeZFUf5-3efFdbgob--yKn8OwrtylS8ewokOq2U2oVV2X2TVRXDWqa3T317neVDdZNViGa3KX_livor6mBMfESSMA9OoWIsK6pallAoe1yTuNIqkQ0oJF5p2ihHepU1d11AnglBMGpXgefD9qN3b8fGgnZeb8WCH6aMkKBgDBM7_Ub3aammGbvRWNTvjGjlHjFMQLGETFZ2gej1oq7bjoDszxW_4Hyf4qVq9M83Jg6v_DuqDM4N2U3OmX3vXq4Nzb_HlEbc746Xqjdt76bSyzfrl20s82l62o5EEJCJJ_mIUKJDnFkOCMKlW71Vr7_dOtsqrj-suj7qN86OVe2t2yj5JioymnDD8A0I7tYA</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Shelanski, Howard A.</creator><general>University of Pennsylvania Law School</general><general>University of Pennsylvania, Law School</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>INFORMATION, INNOVATION, AND COMPETITION POLICY FOR THE INTERNET</title><author>Shelanski, Howard A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g481t-1315805e3a5d3a0bd5722984b14fe396f322189e2fa518f7cbbb0b691236ca63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antitrust</topic><topic>Antitrust law</topic><topic>Antitrust laws</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Compliance costs</topic><topic>Consumer protection</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Data protection</topic><topic>Economic competition</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>INNOVATION</topic><topic>INTERNET</topic><topic>Internet service providers</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legal studies</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Market competition</topic><topic>Market prices</topic><topic>Product innovation</topic><topic>Regulatory competition</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Technological innovation</topic><topic>TRADE PRACTICES</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shelanski, Howard A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shelanski, Howard A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INFORMATION, INNOVATION, AND COMPETITION POLICY FOR THE INTERNET</atitle><jtitle>University of Pennsylvania law review</jtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1663</spage><epage>1705</epage><pages>1663-1705</pages><issn>0041-9907</issn><eissn>1942-8537</eissn><abstract>Antitrust agencies around the world are increasingly focusing on digital industries. Critics have justifiably questioned the ability of competition agencies to make beneficial enforcement decisions given the complexity and rapid pace of change in online markets. This Article discusses those criticisms and addresses the argument that, because the error costs of overenforcement of antitrust laws in digital markets would be much higher than the error costs of underenforcement, courts and antitrust agencies should presume against antitrust intervention in digital industries. While acknowledging that there is often good reason for such modesty in enforcement, this Article discusses several ways in which competition policy can adjust to better account for potential costs and benefits of enforcement in digital platform markets. It argues that nonprice effects related to information and innovation are particularly important to the performance of online platforms, and may hold the key to a better understanding of the costs of antitrust underenforcement and the assessment of the competitive effects of conduct and transactions in digital industries.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>University of Pennsylvania Law School</pub><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-9907 |
ispartof | University of Pennsylvania law review, 2013-05, Vol.161 (6), p.1663-1705 |
issn | 0041-9907 1942-8537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A334709565 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Analysis Antitrust Antitrust law Antitrust laws Competition Compliance costs Consumer protection Customers Data protection Economic competition Electronic commerce Evaluation INNOVATION INTERNET Internet service providers Laws, regulations and rules Legal studies Legislation Market competition Market prices Product innovation Regulatory competition Search engines Technological innovation TRADE PRACTICES |
title | INFORMATION, INNOVATION, AND COMPETITION POLICY FOR THE INTERNET |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T12%3A57%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INFORMATION,%20INNOVATION,%20AND%20COMPETITION%20POLICY%20FOR%20THE%20INTERNET&rft.jtitle=University%20of%20Pennsylvania%20law%20review&rft.au=Shelanski,%20Howard%20A.&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1663&rft.epage=1705&rft.pages=1663-1705&rft.issn=0041-9907&rft.eissn=1942-8537&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_rmit_%3EA334709565%3C/gale_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1395503088&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A334709565&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20201202040630&rft_jstor_id=23527815&rfr_iscdi=true |