Business Case Analysis and the Confounds of Innovation Driven by Performance-Based Postproduction Support Strategies

The postproduction support cost of complex systems such as rail, power, and defense often exceed the cost of research, design and production. As such systems age and degrade the traditional maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) approach does little to reduce their cost or improve performance. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation journal 2012-01, Vol.51 (1), p.33-58
Hauptverfasser: Randall, Wesley S, Brady, Stephan P, Nowicki, David R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 58
container_issue 1
container_start_page 33
container_title Transportation journal
container_volume 51
creator Randall, Wesley S
Brady, Stephan P
Nowicki, David R
description The postproduction support cost of complex systems such as rail, power, and defense often exceed the cost of research, design and production. As such systems age and degrade the traditional maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) approach does little to reduce their cost or improve performance. The failure of traditional MRO has given rise to a number of multi-year, performance-based, postproduction support strategies. These strategies drive investment to reduce cost, infuse innovation, and increase system performance. The dynamism and innovation associated with these strategies makes it difficult to conduct a business case analysis (BCA) that compares the return on sales model of traditional MRO to the return on investment model of performance based strategies. To address this gap in practice and theory we provide a framework for rationalizing performance-based and traditional strategies within the same BCA. We develop questions to guide the creation of BCAs that include performance- based options. Finally, we offer analytical guidance to support direct economic comparison between these two fundamentally different postproduction support strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.5325/transportationj.51.1.0033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A313344970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A313344970</galeid><jstor_id>10.5325/transportationj.51.1.0033</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A313344970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6350-4f8662a25f46da7925ad08d24b5ce21888a495a8e98844c37454319a6512f86d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkl-LEzEUxQdRsK5-h4j45oz538xjW11dWdiFruBbSDOZbkqbDLkzK_32ZnaKuNIHJQ-B8Dv3nptzi-ItwZVgVHzskwnQxdSb3sewqwSpSIUxY8-KGSViXjKqfjwvZhhzUhJJ6MviFcAOYzznnM2KfjmADw4ArQw4tAhmfwQPyIQG9fcOrWJo4xAaQLFFVyHEh8dG6FPyDy6gzRHdutTGdDDBunKZazToNkLfpdgM9hFdD91oEK2z195tvYPXxYvW7MG9Od0XxffLz3err-X1zZer1eK6tJIJXPJWSUkNFS2XjZnXVJgGq4byjbCOEqWU4bUwytVKcW7ZnAvOSG2kIDRLG3ZRvJvqbs3eaZ8nyRbswYPVC0YY47ye40yVZ6itCy6ZfQyu9fn5CV-d4fNp3MHbs4IPfwg2pw_3Afz2voetGQCe4vWE2xQBkmt1l_zBpKMmWI-h679C14JoosfQs_b9pO0MWLNvM2g9_C5ARS1rRkTmlhP3M3s9_nsDfffthi0vMSZqNMpPzVLcOdsfBnB6F4eUlwg0lwJzodcYUyrVmAnJW8fqLJOTbAd9TP8x3C8BaOqi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Business Case Analysis and the Confounds of Innovation Driven by Performance-Based Postproduction Support Strategies</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Randall, Wesley S ; Brady, Stephan P ; Nowicki, David R</creator><creatorcontrib>Randall, Wesley S ; Brady, Stephan P ; Nowicki, David R</creatorcontrib><description>The postproduction support cost of complex systems such as rail, power, and defense often exceed the cost of research, design and production. As such systems age and degrade the traditional maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) approach does little to reduce their cost or improve performance. The failure of traditional MRO has given rise to a number of multi-year, performance-based, postproduction support strategies. These strategies drive investment to reduce cost, infuse innovation, and increase system performance. The dynamism and innovation associated with these strategies makes it difficult to conduct a business case analysis (BCA) that compares the return on sales model of traditional MRO to the return on investment model of performance based strategies. To address this gap in practice and theory we provide a framework for rationalizing performance-based and traditional strategies within the same BCA. We develop questions to guide the creation of BCAs that include performance- based options. Finally, we offer analytical guidance to support direct economic comparison between these two fundamentally different postproduction support strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1612</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2157-328X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.51.1.0033</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRNJAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Warrenton, VA: Pennsylvania State University Press</publisher><subject>after market sales ; Air forces ; Applied sciences ; business case analysis ; Business innovation ; Contracts ; Cost incentives ; Cost structure ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fixed base operators industry ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction ; Knowledge management ; Life cycle costs ; Long term investments ; performance‐based contracting ; Performance‐based logistics ; performance‐based outcomes ; Return on investment ; Supply chain management ; Technological innovation ; Transportation planning, management and economics ; Video post production</subject><ispartof>Transportation journal, 2012-01, Vol.51 (1), p.33-58</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University</rights><rights>2012 Association for Supply Chain Management, Inc.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 American Society of Transportation and Logistics, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6350-4f8662a25f46da7925ad08d24b5ce21888a495a8e98844c37454319a6512f86d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6350-4f8662a25f46da7925ad08d24b5ce21888a495a8e98844c37454319a6512f86d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.5325%2Ftransportationj.51.1.0033$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.5325%2Ftransportationj.51.1.0033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25969315$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Randall, Wesley S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, Stephan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowicki, David R</creatorcontrib><title>Business Case Analysis and the Confounds of Innovation Driven by Performance-Based Postproduction Support Strategies</title><title>Transportation journal</title><description>The postproduction support cost of complex systems such as rail, power, and defense often exceed the cost of research, design and production. As such systems age and degrade the traditional maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) approach does little to reduce their cost or improve performance. The failure of traditional MRO has given rise to a number of multi-year, performance-based, postproduction support strategies. These strategies drive investment to reduce cost, infuse innovation, and increase system performance. The dynamism and innovation associated with these strategies makes it difficult to conduct a business case analysis (BCA) that compares the return on sales model of traditional MRO to the return on investment model of performance based strategies. To address this gap in practice and theory we provide a framework for rationalizing performance-based and traditional strategies within the same BCA. We develop questions to guide the creation of BCAs that include performance- based options. Finally, we offer analytical guidance to support direct economic comparison between these two fundamentally different postproduction support strategies.</description><subject>after market sales</subject><subject>Air forces</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>business case analysis</subject><subject>Business innovation</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Cost incentives</subject><subject>Cost structure</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fixed base operators industry</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Life cycle costs</subject><subject>Long term investments</subject><subject>performance‐based contracting</subject><subject>Performance‐based logistics</subject><subject>performance‐based outcomes</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><subject>Technological innovation</subject><subject>Transportation planning, management and economics</subject><subject>Video post production</subject><issn>0041-1612</issn><issn>2157-328X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkl-LEzEUxQdRsK5-h4j45oz538xjW11dWdiFruBbSDOZbkqbDLkzK_32ZnaKuNIHJQ-B8Dv3nptzi-ItwZVgVHzskwnQxdSb3sewqwSpSIUxY8-KGSViXjKqfjwvZhhzUhJJ6MviFcAOYzznnM2KfjmADw4ArQw4tAhmfwQPyIQG9fcOrWJo4xAaQLFFVyHEh8dG6FPyDy6gzRHdutTGdDDBunKZazToNkLfpdgM9hFdD91oEK2z195tvYPXxYvW7MG9Od0XxffLz3err-X1zZer1eK6tJIJXPJWSUkNFS2XjZnXVJgGq4byjbCOEqWU4bUwytVKcW7ZnAvOSG2kIDRLG3ZRvJvqbs3eaZ8nyRbswYPVC0YY47ye40yVZ6itCy6ZfQyu9fn5CV-d4fNp3MHbs4IPfwg2pw_3Afz2voetGQCe4vWE2xQBkmt1l_zBpKMmWI-h679C14JoosfQs_b9pO0MWLNvM2g9_C5ARS1rRkTmlhP3M3s9_nsDfffthi0vMSZqNMpPzVLcOdsfBnB6F4eUlwg0lwJzodcYUyrVmAnJW8fqLJOTbAd9TP8x3C8BaOqi</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Randall, Wesley S</creator><creator>Brady, Stephan P</creator><creator>Nowicki, David R</creator><general>Pennsylvania State University Press</general><general>Penn State University Press</general><general>American Society of Transportation and Logistics</general><general>American Society of Transportation and Logistics, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Business Case Analysis and the Confounds of Innovation Driven by Performance-Based Postproduction Support Strategies</title><author>Randall, Wesley S ; Brady, Stephan P ; Nowicki, David R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6350-4f8662a25f46da7925ad08d24b5ce21888a495a8e98844c37454319a6512f86d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>after market sales</topic><topic>Air forces</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>business case analysis</topic><topic>Business innovation</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Cost incentives</topic><topic>Cost structure</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fixed base operators industry</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Life cycle costs</topic><topic>Long term investments</topic><topic>performance‐based contracting</topic><topic>Performance‐based logistics</topic><topic>performance‐based outcomes</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><topic>Technological innovation</topic><topic>Transportation planning, management and economics</topic><topic>Video post production</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Randall, Wesley S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, Stephan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowicki, David R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><jtitle>Transportation journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Randall, Wesley S</au><au>Brady, Stephan P</au><au>Nowicki, David R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Business Case Analysis and the Confounds of Innovation Driven by Performance-Based Postproduction Support Strategies</atitle><jtitle>Transportation journal</jtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>33-58</pages><issn>0041-1612</issn><eissn>2157-328X</eissn><coden>TRNJAE</coden><abstract>The postproduction support cost of complex systems such as rail, power, and defense often exceed the cost of research, design and production. As such systems age and degrade the traditional maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) approach does little to reduce their cost or improve performance. The failure of traditional MRO has given rise to a number of multi-year, performance-based, postproduction support strategies. These strategies drive investment to reduce cost, infuse innovation, and increase system performance. The dynamism and innovation associated with these strategies makes it difficult to conduct a business case analysis (BCA) that compares the return on sales model of traditional MRO to the return on investment model of performance based strategies. To address this gap in practice and theory we provide a framework for rationalizing performance-based and traditional strategies within the same BCA. We develop questions to guide the creation of BCAs that include performance- based options. Finally, we offer analytical guidance to support direct economic comparison between these two fundamentally different postproduction support strategies.</abstract><cop>Warrenton, VA</cop><pub>Pennsylvania State University Press</pub><doi>10.5325/transportationj.51.1.0033</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1612
ispartof Transportation journal, 2012-01, Vol.51 (1), p.33-58
issn 0041-1612
2157-328X
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A313344970
source Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects after market sales
Air forces
Applied sciences
business case analysis
Business innovation
Contracts
Cost incentives
Cost structure
Exact sciences and technology
Fixed base operators industry
Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction
Knowledge management
Life cycle costs
Long term investments
performance‐based contracting
Performance‐based logistics
performance‐based outcomes
Return on investment
Supply chain management
Technological innovation
Transportation planning, management and economics
Video post production
title Business Case Analysis and the Confounds of Innovation Driven by Performance-Based Postproduction Support Strategies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A42%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Business%20Case%20Analysis%20and%20the%20Confounds%20of%20Innovation%20Driven%20by%20Performance-Based%20Postproduction%20Support%20Strategies&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20journal&rft.au=Randall,%20Wesley%20S&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=33-58&rft.issn=0041-1612&rft.eissn=2157-328X&rft.coden=TRNJAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.5325/transportationj.51.1.0033&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA313344970%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A313344970&rft_jstor_id=10.5325/transportationj.51.1.0033&rfr_iscdi=true