Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue?
► This paper questions the durability of alkali-activated binders. ► Special attention is given to the case of efflorescences. ► The durability of alkali-activated binders is conditioned by the use of calcium. The alkali activation of alumino-silicate materials is a complex chemical process evolving...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Construction & building materials 2012-05, Vol.30 (1), p.400-405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 405 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 400 |
container_title | Construction & building materials |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Pacheco-Torgal, F. Abdollahnejad, Z. Camões, A.F. Jamshidi, M. Ding, Y. |
description | ► This paper questions the durability of alkali-activated binders. ► Special attention is given to the case of efflorescences. ► The durability of alkali-activated binders is conditioned by the use of calcium.
The alkali activation of alumino-silicate materials is a complex chemical process evolving dissolution of raw materials, transportation or orientation and polycondensation of the reaction products. Publications on the field of alkali-activated binders, state that this new material is likely to have high potential to become an alternative to Portland cement. While some authors state that the durability of these materials constitutes the most important advantage over Portland cement others argue that it’s an unproven issue. This paper presents a review of the literature about the durability of alkali-activated binders. The subjects of this paper are resistance to acid attack, alkali–silica reaction, corrosion of steel reinforcement, resistance to high temperatures and to fire, resistance to freeze–thaw. Special attention is given to the case of efflorescences, an aspect that was received very little concern although it is a very important one. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A285320787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A285320787</galeid><els_id>S0950061811006945</els_id><sourcerecordid>A285320787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-28b97b707f4184343de22e042a026868d319372134ea9d179a18ac7e15c500f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-h4hXu03SH0l7kWH8hAU96DlUJ9VtxnSyJOmB_ff2MB52YQ5SUAVVz_se6iXkNWc1Z7x_d6xNDOPqvF2g1IJxXnNRMy6fkB1XcqhYJ_qnZMeGjlWs5-o5eZHzkTHWi17siP24Jhidd-WexomC_wPeVWCKO0FBS0cXLKb8nu6p8QiJgj1BKDAjjSdM9EdMxUOw1OCCodC4EYGu4S5t50Bdzit-eEmeTeAzvvo3b8ivz59-Hr5Wt9-_fDvsbyvTNUOphBoHOUomp5artmkbi0IgawUw0ate2YYPjRS8aREGy-UAXIGRyDvTMTbJ5oa8ufjO4FG7MMWSwCwuG70XqmsEk-pMVVeoGQMm8DHg5Lb1I76-wm9lcXHmquDtA8G4Zhcwby27-XfJM6w5P8aHC25SzDnhpO-SWyDda870OWR91A9C1ueQNRd6C3nTHi5a3N56cph0Ng6DQesSmqJtdP_h8hfNFbQx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pacheco-Torgal, F. ; Abdollahnejad, Z. ; Camões, A.F. ; Jamshidi, M. ; Ding, Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pacheco-Torgal, F. ; Abdollahnejad, Z. ; Camões, A.F. ; Jamshidi, M. ; Ding, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>► This paper questions the durability of alkali-activated binders. ► Special attention is given to the case of efflorescences. ► The durability of alkali-activated binders is conditioned by the use of calcium.
The alkali activation of alumino-silicate materials is a complex chemical process evolving dissolution of raw materials, transportation or orientation and polycondensation of the reaction products. Publications on the field of alkali-activated binders, state that this new material is likely to have high potential to become an alternative to Portland cement. While some authors state that the durability of these materials constitutes the most important advantage over Portland cement others argue that it’s an unproven issue. This paper presents a review of the literature about the durability of alkali-activated binders. The subjects of this paper are resistance to acid attack, alkali–silica reaction, corrosion of steel reinforcement, resistance to high temperatures and to fire, resistance to freeze–thaw. Special attention is given to the case of efflorescences, an aspect that was received very little concern although it is a very important one.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-0618</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0526</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Alkali-activated binders ; Aluminum compounds ; Aluminum oxide ; Atmospheric carbon dioxide ; Building materials industry ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbonates ; Cement ; Cement industry ; Chemical weapons ; Combustion ; Corrosion ; Corrosion and anti-corrosives ; Durability ; Eco-efficiency ; Efflorescences ; Emissions (Pollution) ; Global temperature changes ; Green market ; Hydrochloric acid ; Hydroxides ; Leaching ; Lignite ; Lime ; Mechanical properties ; Ordinary Portland cement ; Organic acids ; Permeability ; Porosity ; Sea-water ; Silicates ; Steel ; Sulfuric acid ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Construction & building materials, 2012-05, Vol.30 (1), p.400-405</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-28b97b707f4184343de22e042a026868d319372134ea9d179a18ac7e15c500f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-28b97b707f4184343de22e042a026868d319372134ea9d179a18ac7e15c500f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061811006945$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pacheco-Torgal, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdollahnejad, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camões, A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamshidi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue?</title><title>Construction & building materials</title><description>► This paper questions the durability of alkali-activated binders. ► Special attention is given to the case of efflorescences. ► The durability of alkali-activated binders is conditioned by the use of calcium.
The alkali activation of alumino-silicate materials is a complex chemical process evolving dissolution of raw materials, transportation or orientation and polycondensation of the reaction products. Publications on the field of alkali-activated binders, state that this new material is likely to have high potential to become an alternative to Portland cement. While some authors state that the durability of these materials constitutes the most important advantage over Portland cement others argue that it’s an unproven issue. This paper presents a review of the literature about the durability of alkali-activated binders. The subjects of this paper are resistance to acid attack, alkali–silica reaction, corrosion of steel reinforcement, resistance to high temperatures and to fire, resistance to freeze–thaw. Special attention is given to the case of efflorescences, an aspect that was received very little concern although it is a very important one.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Alkali-activated binders</subject><subject>Aluminum compounds</subject><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Atmospheric carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Building materials industry</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Cement industry</subject><subject>Chemical weapons</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Corrosion</subject><subject>Corrosion and anti-corrosives</subject><subject>Durability</subject><subject>Eco-efficiency</subject><subject>Efflorescences</subject><subject>Emissions (Pollution)</subject><subject>Global temperature changes</subject><subject>Green market</subject><subject>Hydrochloric acid</subject><subject>Hydroxides</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Lignite</subject><subject>Lime</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Ordinary Portland cement</subject><subject>Organic acids</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Sea-water</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Sulfuric acid</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>0950-0618</issn><issn>1879-0526</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-h4hXu03SH0l7kWH8hAU96DlUJ9VtxnSyJOmB_ff2MB52YQ5SUAVVz_se6iXkNWc1Z7x_d6xNDOPqvF2g1IJxXnNRMy6fkB1XcqhYJ_qnZMeGjlWs5-o5eZHzkTHWi17siP24Jhidd-WexomC_wPeVWCKO0FBS0cXLKb8nu6p8QiJgj1BKDAjjSdM9EdMxUOw1OCCodC4EYGu4S5t50Bdzit-eEmeTeAzvvo3b8ivz59-Hr5Wt9-_fDvsbyvTNUOphBoHOUomp5artmkbi0IgawUw0ate2YYPjRS8aREGy-UAXIGRyDvTMTbJ5oa8ufjO4FG7MMWSwCwuG70XqmsEk-pMVVeoGQMm8DHg5Lb1I76-wm9lcXHmquDtA8G4Zhcwby27-XfJM6w5P8aHC25SzDnhpO-SWyDda870OWR91A9C1ueQNRd6C3nTHi5a3N56cph0Ng6DQesSmqJtdP_h8hfNFbQx</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Pacheco-Torgal, F.</creator><creator>Abdollahnejad, Z.</creator><creator>Camões, A.F.</creator><creator>Jamshidi, M.</creator><creator>Ding, Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue?</title><author>Pacheco-Torgal, F. ; Abdollahnejad, Z. ; Camões, A.F. ; Jamshidi, M. ; Ding, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-28b97b707f4184343de22e042a026868d319372134ea9d179a18ac7e15c500f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Alkali-activated binders</topic><topic>Aluminum compounds</topic><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Atmospheric carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Building materials industry</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Cement industry</topic><topic>Chemical weapons</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Corrosion</topic><topic>Corrosion and anti-corrosives</topic><topic>Durability</topic><topic>Eco-efficiency</topic><topic>Efflorescences</topic><topic>Emissions (Pollution)</topic><topic>Global temperature changes</topic><topic>Green market</topic><topic>Hydrochloric acid</topic><topic>Hydroxides</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Lignite</topic><topic>Lime</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Ordinary Portland cement</topic><topic>Organic acids</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Sea-water</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Sulfuric acid</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pacheco-Torgal, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdollahnejad, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camões, A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamshidi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><jtitle>Construction & building materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pacheco-Torgal, F.</au><au>Abdollahnejad, Z.</au><au>Camões, A.F.</au><au>Jamshidi, M.</au><au>Ding, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue?</atitle><jtitle>Construction & building materials</jtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>400</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>400-405</pages><issn>0950-0618</issn><eissn>1879-0526</eissn><abstract>► This paper questions the durability of alkali-activated binders. ► Special attention is given to the case of efflorescences. ► The durability of alkali-activated binders is conditioned by the use of calcium.
The alkali activation of alumino-silicate materials is a complex chemical process evolving dissolution of raw materials, transportation or orientation and polycondensation of the reaction products. Publications on the field of alkali-activated binders, state that this new material is likely to have high potential to become an alternative to Portland cement. While some authors state that the durability of these materials constitutes the most important advantage over Portland cement others argue that it’s an unproven issue. This paper presents a review of the literature about the durability of alkali-activated binders. The subjects of this paper are resistance to acid attack, alkali–silica reaction, corrosion of steel reinforcement, resistance to high temperatures and to fire, resistance to freeze–thaw. Special attention is given to the case of efflorescences, an aspect that was received very little concern although it is a very important one.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.017</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-0618 |
ispartof | Construction & building materials, 2012-05, Vol.30 (1), p.400-405 |
issn | 0950-0618 1879-0526 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A285320787 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Air pollution Alkali-activated binders Aluminum compounds Aluminum oxide Atmospheric carbon dioxide Building materials industry Carbon dioxide Carbonates Cement Cement industry Chemical weapons Combustion Corrosion Corrosion and anti-corrosives Durability Eco-efficiency Efflorescences Emissions (Pollution) Global temperature changes Green market Hydrochloric acid Hydroxides Leaching Lignite Lime Mechanical properties Ordinary Portland cement Organic acids Permeability Porosity Sea-water Silicates Steel Sulfuric acid Sustainable development |
title | Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T22%3A45%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Durability%20of%20alkali-activated%20binders:%20A%20clear%20advantage%20over%20Portland%20cement%20or%20an%20unproven%20issue?&rft.jtitle=Construction%20&%20building%20materials&rft.au=Pacheco-Torgal,%20F.&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=400&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=400-405&rft.issn=0950-0618&rft.eissn=1879-0526&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.017&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA285320787%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A285320787&rft_els_id=S0950061811006945&rfr_iscdi=true |