Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study
Background Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC public health 2011-05, Vol.11, p.386 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 386 |
container_title | BMC public health |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Howard, Kirsten Jan, Stephen Rose, John Chadban, Steven Allen, Richard DM Irving, Michelle Tong, Allison Wong, Germaine Craig, Jonathan C Cass, Alan |
description | Background Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; there appears to be no lack of 'in principle' public support for organ donation. Methods/Design The PAraDOx Study examines community preferences for organ donation policy in Australia. The aims are to 1) determine which factors influence decisions by individuals to offer their organs for donation and 2) determine the criteria by which the community deems the allocation of donor organs to be fair and equitable. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. Focus group participants from the general community, aged between 18-80, will be purposively sampled to ensure a variety of cultural backgrounds and views on organ donation. Each focus group will include a ranking exercise using a modified nominal group technique. Focus groups of organ recipients, their families, and individuals on a transplant waiting list will also be conducted. Using the qualitative work, a discrete choice study will be designed to quantitatively assess community preferences. Discrete choice methods are based on the premise that goods and services can be described in terms of a number of separate attributes. Respondents are presented with a series of choices where levels of attributes are varied, and a mathematical function is estimated to describe numerically the value respondents attach to different options. Two community surveys will be conducted in approximately 1000 respondents each to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. A mixed logit model will be used; model results will be expressed as parameter estimates ([beta]) and the odds of choosing one option over an alternative. Trade-offs between attributes will also be calculated. Discussion By providing a better understanding of current community preferences in relation to organ donation and allocation, the PAraDOx study will highlight options for firstly, increasing the rate of organ donation and secondly, allow for more transparent and equitable policies in relation to organ allocation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-386 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A260001799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A260001799</galeid><sourcerecordid>A260001799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-858ecd79f754e55d9d3c9e0b38d2c21174bda8f35c7a1f39ab37d6dd5073d8503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj89LwzAcxYMoOKd3j1_wnJk0TZMcS6dTGHSw3keaH7XSJtB24P57KxPZQd7h-3h8vg8eQo-UrCiV2TNNBcVJyiWmFDOZXaHFX3R94W_R3Th-EkKF5MkC7YvY98fQTifYweC8G1wwbgQfB5g-HOTQddHoqY0B1hDD2UUPJQyNDiNgqGZslw96XX7Bfjra0z268bob3cPvXaLq9aUq3vC23LwX-RY3mVBYcumMFcoLnjrOrbLMKEdqJm1iEkpFWlstPeNGaOqZ0jUTNrOWE8Gs5IQt0dO5ttGdO7TBx2nQpm9Hc8iTjPxMVGqmVv9Qs6zrWxOD8-2cXzx8A8FnX1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study</title><source>SpringerOpen</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Howard, Kirsten ; Jan, Stephen ; Rose, John ; Chadban, Steven ; Allen, Richard DM ; Irving, Michelle ; Tong, Allison ; Wong, Germaine ; Craig, Jonathan C ; Cass, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Howard, Kirsten ; Jan, Stephen ; Rose, John ; Chadban, Steven ; Allen, Richard DM ; Irving, Michelle ; Tong, Allison ; Wong, Germaine ; Craig, Jonathan C ; Cass, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>Background Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; there appears to be no lack of 'in principle' public support for organ donation. Methods/Design The PAraDOx Study examines community preferences for organ donation policy in Australia. The aims are to 1) determine which factors influence decisions by individuals to offer their organs for donation and 2) determine the criteria by which the community deems the allocation of donor organs to be fair and equitable. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. Focus group participants from the general community, aged between 18-80, will be purposively sampled to ensure a variety of cultural backgrounds and views on organ donation. Each focus group will include a ranking exercise using a modified nominal group technique. Focus groups of organ recipients, their families, and individuals on a transplant waiting list will also be conducted. Using the qualitative work, a discrete choice study will be designed to quantitatively assess community preferences. Discrete choice methods are based on the premise that goods and services can be described in terms of a number of separate attributes. Respondents are presented with a series of choices where levels of attributes are varied, and a mathematical function is estimated to describe numerically the value respondents attach to different options. Two community surveys will be conducted in approximately 1000 respondents each to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. A mixed logit model will be used; model results will be expressed as parameter estimates ([beta]) and the odds of choosing one option over an alternative. Trade-offs between attributes will also be calculated. Discussion By providing a better understanding of current community preferences in relation to organ donation and allocation, the PAraDOx study will highlight options for firstly, increasing the rate of organ donation and secondly, allow for more transparent and equitable policies in relation to organ allocation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Donation of organs, tissues, etc ; Interpretation and construction ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Medical policy ; Public health ; Social aspects ; Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2011-05, Vol.11, p.386</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howard, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jan, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadban, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Richard DM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Germaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cass, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study</title><title>BMC public health</title><description>Background Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; there appears to be no lack of 'in principle' public support for organ donation. Methods/Design The PAraDOx Study examines community preferences for organ donation policy in Australia. The aims are to 1) determine which factors influence decisions by individuals to offer their organs for donation and 2) determine the criteria by which the community deems the allocation of donor organs to be fair and equitable. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. Focus group participants from the general community, aged between 18-80, will be purposively sampled to ensure a variety of cultural backgrounds and views on organ donation. Each focus group will include a ranking exercise using a modified nominal group technique. Focus groups of organ recipients, their families, and individuals on a transplant waiting list will also be conducted. Using the qualitative work, a discrete choice study will be designed to quantitatively assess community preferences. Discrete choice methods are based on the premise that goods and services can be described in terms of a number of separate attributes. Respondents are presented with a series of choices where levels of attributes are varied, and a mathematical function is estimated to describe numerically the value respondents attach to different options. Two community surveys will be conducted in approximately 1000 respondents each to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. A mixed logit model will be used; model results will be expressed as parameter estimates ([beta]) and the odds of choosing one option over an alternative. Trade-offs between attributes will also be calculated. Discussion By providing a better understanding of current community preferences in relation to organ donation and allocation, the PAraDOx study will highlight options for firstly, increasing the rate of organ donation and secondly, allow for more transparent and equitable policies in relation to organ allocation.</description><subject>Donation of organs, tissues, etc</subject><subject>Interpretation and construction</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Medical policy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptj89LwzAcxYMoOKd3j1_wnJk0TZMcS6dTGHSw3keaH7XSJtB24P57KxPZQd7h-3h8vg8eQo-UrCiV2TNNBcVJyiWmFDOZXaHFX3R94W_R3Th-EkKF5MkC7YvY98fQTifYweC8G1wwbgQfB5g-HOTQddHoqY0B1hDD2UUPJQyNDiNgqGZslw96XX7Bfjra0z268bob3cPvXaLq9aUq3vC23LwX-RY3mVBYcumMFcoLnjrOrbLMKEdqJm1iEkpFWlstPeNGaOqZ0jUTNrOWE8Gs5IQt0dO5ttGdO7TBx2nQpm9Hc8iTjPxMVGqmVv9Qs6zrWxOD8-2cXzx8A8FnX1w</recordid><startdate>20110525</startdate><enddate>20110525</enddate><creator>Howard, Kirsten</creator><creator>Jan, Stephen</creator><creator>Rose, John</creator><creator>Chadban, Steven</creator><creator>Allen, Richard DM</creator><creator>Irving, Michelle</creator><creator>Tong, Allison</creator><creator>Wong, Germaine</creator><creator>Craig, Jonathan C</creator><creator>Cass, Alan</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20110525</creationdate><title>Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study</title><author>Howard, Kirsten ; Jan, Stephen ; Rose, John ; Chadban, Steven ; Allen, Richard DM ; Irving, Michelle ; Tong, Allison ; Wong, Germaine ; Craig, Jonathan C ; Cass, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-858ecd79f754e55d9d3c9e0b38d2c21174bda8f35c7a1f39ab37d6dd5073d8503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Donation of organs, tissues, etc</topic><topic>Interpretation and construction</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Medical policy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howard, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jan, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadban, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Richard DM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Germaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cass, Alan</creatorcontrib><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howard, Kirsten</au><au>Jan, Stephen</au><au>Rose, John</au><au>Chadban, Steven</au><au>Allen, Richard DM</au><au>Irving, Michelle</au><au>Tong, Allison</au><au>Wong, Germaine</au><au>Craig, Jonathan C</au><au>Cass, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><date>2011-05-25</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>386</spage><pages>386-</pages><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>Background Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; there appears to be no lack of 'in principle' public support for organ donation. Methods/Design The PAraDOx Study examines community preferences for organ donation policy in Australia. The aims are to 1) determine which factors influence decisions by individuals to offer their organs for donation and 2) determine the criteria by which the community deems the allocation of donor organs to be fair and equitable. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. Focus group participants from the general community, aged between 18-80, will be purposively sampled to ensure a variety of cultural backgrounds and views on organ donation. Each focus group will include a ranking exercise using a modified nominal group technique. Focus groups of organ recipients, their families, and individuals on a transplant waiting list will also be conducted. Using the qualitative work, a discrete choice study will be designed to quantitatively assess community preferences. Discrete choice methods are based on the premise that goods and services can be described in terms of a number of separate attributes. Respondents are presented with a series of choices where levels of attributes are varied, and a mathematical function is estimated to describe numerically the value respondents attach to different options. Two community surveys will be conducted in approximately 1000 respondents each to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. A mixed logit model will be used; model results will be expressed as parameter estimates ([beta]) and the odds of choosing one option over an alternative. Trade-offs between attributes will also be calculated. Discussion By providing a better understanding of current community preferences in relation to organ donation and allocation, the PAraDOx study will highlight options for firstly, increasing the rate of organ donation and secondly, allow for more transparent and equitable policies in relation to organ allocation.</abstract><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/1471-2458-11-386</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2458 |
ispartof | BMC public health, 2011-05, Vol.11, p.386 |
issn | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A260001799 |
source | SpringerOpen; PubMed Central; Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Donation of organs, tissues, etc Interpretation and construction Laws, regulations and rules Medical policy Public health Social aspects Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc |
title | Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community%20P%20references%20for%20the%20A%20llocation%20D%20onation%20of%20O%20rgans%20-%20The%20PAraDOx%20Study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=Howard,%20Kirsten&rft.date=2011-05-25&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=386&rft.pages=386-&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2458-11-386&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA260001799%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A260001799&rfr_iscdi=true |