Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study

Background Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC public health 2011-05, Vol.11, p.386
Hauptverfasser: Howard, Kirsten, Jan, Stephen, Rose, John, Chadban, Steven, Allen, Richard DM, Irving, Michelle, Tong, Allison, Wong, Germaine, Craig, Jonathan C, Cass, Alan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 386
container_title BMC public health
container_volume 11
creator Howard, Kirsten
Jan, Stephen
Rose, John
Chadban, Steven
Allen, Richard DM
Irving, Michelle
Tong, Allison
Wong, Germaine
Craig, Jonathan C
Cass, Alan
description Background Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; there appears to be no lack of 'in principle' public support for organ donation. Methods/Design The PAraDOx Study examines community preferences for organ donation policy in Australia. The aims are to 1) determine which factors influence decisions by individuals to offer their organs for donation and 2) determine the criteria by which the community deems the allocation of donor organs to be fair and equitable. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. Focus group participants from the general community, aged between 18-80, will be purposively sampled to ensure a variety of cultural backgrounds and views on organ donation. Each focus group will include a ranking exercise using a modified nominal group technique. Focus groups of organ recipients, their families, and individuals on a transplant waiting list will also be conducted. Using the qualitative work, a discrete choice study will be designed to quantitatively assess community preferences. Discrete choice methods are based on the premise that goods and services can be described in terms of a number of separate attributes. Respondents are presented with a series of choices where levels of attributes are varied, and a mathematical function is estimated to describe numerically the value respondents attach to different options. Two community surveys will be conducted in approximately 1000 respondents each to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. A mixed logit model will be used; model results will be expressed as parameter estimates ([beta]) and the odds of choosing one option over an alternative. Trade-offs between attributes will also be calculated. Discussion By providing a better understanding of current community preferences in relation to organ donation and allocation, the PAraDOx study will highlight options for firstly, increasing the rate of organ donation and secondly, allow for more transparent and equitable policies in relation to organ allocation.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2458-11-386
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A260001799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A260001799</galeid><sourcerecordid>A260001799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-858ecd79f754e55d9d3c9e0b38d2c21174bda8f35c7a1f39ab37d6dd5073d8503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj89LwzAcxYMoOKd3j1_wnJk0TZMcS6dTGHSw3keaH7XSJtB24P57KxPZQd7h-3h8vg8eQo-UrCiV2TNNBcVJyiWmFDOZXaHFX3R94W_R3Th-EkKF5MkC7YvY98fQTifYweC8G1wwbgQfB5g-HOTQddHoqY0B1hDD2UUPJQyNDiNgqGZslw96XX7Bfjra0z268bob3cPvXaLq9aUq3vC23LwX-RY3mVBYcumMFcoLnjrOrbLMKEdqJm1iEkpFWlstPeNGaOqZ0jUTNrOWE8Gs5IQt0dO5ttGdO7TBx2nQpm9Hc8iTjPxMVGqmVv9Qs6zrWxOD8-2cXzx8A8FnX1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study</title><source>SpringerOpen</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Howard, Kirsten ; Jan, Stephen ; Rose, John ; Chadban, Steven ; Allen, Richard DM ; Irving, Michelle ; Tong, Allison ; Wong, Germaine ; Craig, Jonathan C ; Cass, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Howard, Kirsten ; Jan, Stephen ; Rose, John ; Chadban, Steven ; Allen, Richard DM ; Irving, Michelle ; Tong, Allison ; Wong, Germaine ; Craig, Jonathan C ; Cass, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>Background Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; there appears to be no lack of 'in principle' public support for organ donation. Methods/Design The PAraDOx Study examines community preferences for organ donation policy in Australia. The aims are to 1) determine which factors influence decisions by individuals to offer their organs for donation and 2) determine the criteria by which the community deems the allocation of donor organs to be fair and equitable. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. Focus group participants from the general community, aged between 18-80, will be purposively sampled to ensure a variety of cultural backgrounds and views on organ donation. Each focus group will include a ranking exercise using a modified nominal group technique. Focus groups of organ recipients, their families, and individuals on a transplant waiting list will also be conducted. Using the qualitative work, a discrete choice study will be designed to quantitatively assess community preferences. Discrete choice methods are based on the premise that goods and services can be described in terms of a number of separate attributes. Respondents are presented with a series of choices where levels of attributes are varied, and a mathematical function is estimated to describe numerically the value respondents attach to different options. Two community surveys will be conducted in approximately 1000 respondents each to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. A mixed logit model will be used; model results will be expressed as parameter estimates ([beta]) and the odds of choosing one option over an alternative. Trade-offs between attributes will also be calculated. Discussion By providing a better understanding of current community preferences in relation to organ donation and allocation, the PAraDOx study will highlight options for firstly, increasing the rate of organ donation and secondly, allow for more transparent and equitable policies in relation to organ allocation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Donation of organs, tissues, etc ; Interpretation and construction ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Medical policy ; Public health ; Social aspects ; Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2011-05, Vol.11, p.386</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howard, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jan, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadban, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Richard DM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Germaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cass, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study</title><title>BMC public health</title><description>Background Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; there appears to be no lack of 'in principle' public support for organ donation. Methods/Design The PAraDOx Study examines community preferences for organ donation policy in Australia. The aims are to 1) determine which factors influence decisions by individuals to offer their organs for donation and 2) determine the criteria by which the community deems the allocation of donor organs to be fair and equitable. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. Focus group participants from the general community, aged between 18-80, will be purposively sampled to ensure a variety of cultural backgrounds and views on organ donation. Each focus group will include a ranking exercise using a modified nominal group technique. Focus groups of organ recipients, their families, and individuals on a transplant waiting list will also be conducted. Using the qualitative work, a discrete choice study will be designed to quantitatively assess community preferences. Discrete choice methods are based on the premise that goods and services can be described in terms of a number of separate attributes. Respondents are presented with a series of choices where levels of attributes are varied, and a mathematical function is estimated to describe numerically the value respondents attach to different options. Two community surveys will be conducted in approximately 1000 respondents each to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. A mixed logit model will be used; model results will be expressed as parameter estimates ([beta]) and the odds of choosing one option over an alternative. Trade-offs between attributes will also be calculated. Discussion By providing a better understanding of current community preferences in relation to organ donation and allocation, the PAraDOx study will highlight options for firstly, increasing the rate of organ donation and secondly, allow for more transparent and equitable policies in relation to organ allocation.</description><subject>Donation of organs, tissues, etc</subject><subject>Interpretation and construction</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Medical policy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptj89LwzAcxYMoOKd3j1_wnJk0TZMcS6dTGHSw3keaH7XSJtB24P57KxPZQd7h-3h8vg8eQo-UrCiV2TNNBcVJyiWmFDOZXaHFX3R94W_R3Th-EkKF5MkC7YvY98fQTifYweC8G1wwbgQfB5g-HOTQddHoqY0B1hDD2UUPJQyNDiNgqGZslw96XX7Bfjra0z268bob3cPvXaLq9aUq3vC23LwX-RY3mVBYcumMFcoLnjrOrbLMKEdqJm1iEkpFWlstPeNGaOqZ0jUTNrOWE8Gs5IQt0dO5ttGdO7TBx2nQpm9Hc8iTjPxMVGqmVv9Qs6zrWxOD8-2cXzx8A8FnX1w</recordid><startdate>20110525</startdate><enddate>20110525</enddate><creator>Howard, Kirsten</creator><creator>Jan, Stephen</creator><creator>Rose, John</creator><creator>Chadban, Steven</creator><creator>Allen, Richard DM</creator><creator>Irving, Michelle</creator><creator>Tong, Allison</creator><creator>Wong, Germaine</creator><creator>Craig, Jonathan C</creator><creator>Cass, Alan</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20110525</creationdate><title>Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study</title><author>Howard, Kirsten ; Jan, Stephen ; Rose, John ; Chadban, Steven ; Allen, Richard DM ; Irving, Michelle ; Tong, Allison ; Wong, Germaine ; Craig, Jonathan C ; Cass, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-858ecd79f754e55d9d3c9e0b38d2c21174bda8f35c7a1f39ab37d6dd5073d8503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Donation of organs, tissues, etc</topic><topic>Interpretation and construction</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Medical policy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howard, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jan, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadban, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Richard DM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Germaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Jonathan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cass, Alan</creatorcontrib><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howard, Kirsten</au><au>Jan, Stephen</au><au>Rose, John</au><au>Chadban, Steven</au><au>Allen, Richard DM</au><au>Irving, Michelle</au><au>Tong, Allison</au><au>Wong, Germaine</au><au>Craig, Jonathan C</au><au>Cass, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><date>2011-05-25</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>386</spage><pages>386-</pages><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>Background Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; there appears to be no lack of 'in principle' public support for organ donation. Methods/Design The PAraDOx Study examines community preferences for organ donation policy in Australia. The aims are to 1) determine which factors influence decisions by individuals to offer their organs for donation and 2) determine the criteria by which the community deems the allocation of donor organs to be fair and equitable. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. Focus group participants from the general community, aged between 18-80, will be purposively sampled to ensure a variety of cultural backgrounds and views on organ donation. Each focus group will include a ranking exercise using a modified nominal group technique. Focus groups of organ recipients, their families, and individuals on a transplant waiting list will also be conducted. Using the qualitative work, a discrete choice study will be designed to quantitatively assess community preferences. Discrete choice methods are based on the premise that goods and services can be described in terms of a number of separate attributes. Respondents are presented with a series of choices where levels of attributes are varied, and a mathematical function is estimated to describe numerically the value respondents attach to different options. Two community surveys will be conducted in approximately 1000 respondents each to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. A mixed logit model will be used; model results will be expressed as parameter estimates ([beta]) and the odds of choosing one option over an alternative. Trade-offs between attributes will also be calculated. Discussion By providing a better understanding of current community preferences in relation to organ donation and allocation, the PAraDOx study will highlight options for firstly, increasing the rate of organ donation and secondly, allow for more transparent and equitable policies in relation to organ allocation.</abstract><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/1471-2458-11-386</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2458
ispartof BMC public health, 2011-05, Vol.11, p.386
issn 1471-2458
1471-2458
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A260001799
source SpringerOpen; PubMed Central; Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Donation of organs, tissues, etc
Interpretation and construction
Laws, regulations and rules
Medical policy
Public health
Social aspects
Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc
title Community P references for the A llocation D onation of O rgans - The PAraDOx Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community%20P%20references%20for%20the%20A%20llocation%20D%20onation%20of%20O%20rgans%20-%20The%20PAraDOx%20Study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=Howard,%20Kirsten&rft.date=2011-05-25&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=386&rft.pages=386-&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2458-11-386&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA260001799%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A260001799&rfr_iscdi=true