Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?
Background Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition. M...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Thrombosis journal 2009-05, Vol.7 (4), p.4 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 4 |
container_title | Thrombosis journal |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Godino, Cosmo Mendolicchio, Loredana Figini, Filippo Latib, Azeem Sharp, Andrew SP Cosgrave, John Calori, Giliola Cera, Michela Chieffo, Alaide Castelli, Alfredo Maseri, Attilio Ruggeri, Zaverio M Colombo, Antonio |
description | Background Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition. Methods We studied LR in patients with stable angina undergoing elective PCI, all on DAT for at least 7 days, by comparing: 1) Flow cytometry (FC) to measure platelet membrane expression of P-selectin (CD62P) and PAC-1 binding following double stimulation with ADP and collagen type I either in the presence of prostaglandin (PG) E.sub.1 ; 2) VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test, in which results are reported as absolute P2Y.sub.12 -Reaction-Units (PRU) or % of inhibition (% inhibition). Results Thirty controls and 52 patients were analyzed. The median percentage of platelets exhibiting CD62P expression and PAC-1 binding by FC evaluation after stimulation in the presence of PG E.sub.1 was 25.4% (IQR: 21.4-33.1%) and 3.5% (1.7-9.4%), respectively. Only 6 patients receiving DAT (11.5%) had both values above the 1.sup.st .sup.quartile of controls, and were defined as LR. Evaluation of the same patients with the VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test revealed that the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84-0.98, p [less than] 0.0001) for % inhibition and 0.85 (0.72-0.93, p [less than] 0.005) for PRU. Cut-off values of [less than or equal to] 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU gave the maximum accuracy for the detection of patients defined as having LR by FC. Conclusion In conclusion our findings show that a cut-off value of [less than or equal to] 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU in the VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test may provide the best accuracy for the identification of patients with LR. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1477-9560-7-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A200104913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A200104913</galeid><sourcerecordid>A200104913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g673-d63c8f4c1524af0e59ee549d823385515b6529fc9d1ca395cef977f5cbf2d1d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjkFrGzEQhZfSQFOnx94Hct7tSrvatU4lmCQtmDSHkJCTkaWRraLVLJIc43_an5N1U0oIYQ4zb3jv4xXFV1ZXjM27b6zt-1KKri77sv1QnP7XH1_dn4rPKf2ua84lF6fFnwUNo4ouUQCycI_R2cMN7ctb_lil3bpiHDKmDCoYuPK0h8Uh04A5HsBShIGCyxRd2IALxj05s1MeRq8yeswQMY0UEkIm0J5GZ2gT0VfwsFUZXIK8RdC7XJK18KT8Dv9SncGQpyJH7Kiym1SC_ZZARYRjiReuwZjekI_AqMbD97PixCqf8Mu_PSvuri7vFj_K5a_rn4uLZbnp-qY0XaPnttVM8FbZGoVEFK00c940cyGYWHeCS6ulYVo1Umi0su-t0GvLDZvSs-L8BbtRHlcuWMpR6cElvbrgdc3qVrJmclXvuKYxODhNAa2b_q8Cz3J8ko4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Godino, Cosmo ; Mendolicchio, Loredana ; Figini, Filippo ; Latib, Azeem ; Sharp, Andrew SP ; Cosgrave, John ; Calori, Giliola ; Cera, Michela ; Chieffo, Alaide ; Castelli, Alfredo ; Maseri, Attilio ; Ruggeri, Zaverio M ; Colombo, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Godino, Cosmo ; Mendolicchio, Loredana ; Figini, Filippo ; Latib, Azeem ; Sharp, Andrew SP ; Cosgrave, John ; Calori, Giliola ; Cera, Michela ; Chieffo, Alaide ; Castelli, Alfredo ; Maseri, Attilio ; Ruggeri, Zaverio M ; Colombo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>Background Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition. Methods We studied LR in patients with stable angina undergoing elective PCI, all on DAT for at least 7 days, by comparing: 1) Flow cytometry (FC) to measure platelet membrane expression of P-selectin (CD62P) and PAC-1 binding following double stimulation with ADP and collagen type I either in the presence of prostaglandin (PG) E.sub.1 ; 2) VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test, in which results are reported as absolute P2Y.sub.12 -Reaction-Units (PRU) or % of inhibition (% inhibition). Results Thirty controls and 52 patients were analyzed. The median percentage of platelets exhibiting CD62P expression and PAC-1 binding by FC evaluation after stimulation in the presence of PG E.sub.1 was 25.4% (IQR: 21.4-33.1%) and 3.5% (1.7-9.4%), respectively. Only 6 patients receiving DAT (11.5%) had both values above the 1.sup.st .sup.quartile of controls, and were defined as LR. Evaluation of the same patients with the VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test revealed that the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84-0.98, p [less than] 0.0001) for % inhibition and 0.85 (0.72-0.93, p [less than] 0.005) for PRU. Cut-off values of [less than or equal to] 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU gave the maximum accuracy for the detection of patients defined as having LR by FC. Conclusion In conclusion our findings show that a cut-off value of [less than or equal to] 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU in the VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test may provide the best accuracy for the identification of patients with LR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-9560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1477-9560-7-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Blood clot ; Clopidogrel ; Complications and side effects ; Dosage and administration ; Drug therapy ; Risk factors ; Thrombosis ; Transluminal angioplasty</subject><ispartof>Thrombosis journal, 2009-05, Vol.7 (4), p.4</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Godino, Cosmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendolicchio, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figini, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latib, Azeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Andrew SP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosgrave, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calori, Giliola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cera, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chieffo, Alaide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelli, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maseri, Attilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruggeri, Zaverio M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?</title><title>Thrombosis journal</title><description>Background Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition. Methods We studied LR in patients with stable angina undergoing elective PCI, all on DAT for at least 7 days, by comparing: 1) Flow cytometry (FC) to measure platelet membrane expression of P-selectin (CD62P) and PAC-1 binding following double stimulation with ADP and collagen type I either in the presence of prostaglandin (PG) E.sub.1 ; 2) VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test, in which results are reported as absolute P2Y.sub.12 -Reaction-Units (PRU) or % of inhibition (% inhibition). Results Thirty controls and 52 patients were analyzed. The median percentage of platelets exhibiting CD62P expression and PAC-1 binding by FC evaluation after stimulation in the presence of PG E.sub.1 was 25.4% (IQR: 21.4-33.1%) and 3.5% (1.7-9.4%), respectively. Only 6 patients receiving DAT (11.5%) had both values above the 1.sup.st .sup.quartile of controls, and were defined as LR. Evaluation of the same patients with the VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test revealed that the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84-0.98, p [less than] 0.0001) for % inhibition and 0.85 (0.72-0.93, p [less than] 0.005) for PRU. Cut-off values of [less than or equal to] 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU gave the maximum accuracy for the detection of patients defined as having LR by FC. Conclusion In conclusion our findings show that a cut-off value of [less than or equal to] 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU in the VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test may provide the best accuracy for the identification of patients with LR.</description><subject>Blood clot</subject><subject>Clopidogrel</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Transluminal angioplasty</subject><issn>1477-9560</issn><issn>1477-9560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptjkFrGzEQhZfSQFOnx94Hct7tSrvatU4lmCQtmDSHkJCTkaWRraLVLJIc43_an5N1U0oIYQ4zb3jv4xXFV1ZXjM27b6zt-1KKri77sv1QnP7XH1_dn4rPKf2ua84lF6fFnwUNo4ouUQCycI_R2cMN7ctb_lil3bpiHDKmDCoYuPK0h8Uh04A5HsBShIGCyxRd2IALxj05s1MeRq8yeswQMY0UEkIm0J5GZ2gT0VfwsFUZXIK8RdC7XJK18KT8Dv9SncGQpyJH7Kiym1SC_ZZARYRjiReuwZjekI_AqMbD97PixCqf8Mu_PSvuri7vFj_K5a_rn4uLZbnp-qY0XaPnttVM8FbZGoVEFK00c940cyGYWHeCS6ulYVo1Umi0su-t0GvLDZvSs-L8BbtRHlcuWMpR6cElvbrgdc3qVrJmclXvuKYxODhNAa2b_q8Cz3J8ko4</recordid><startdate>20090506</startdate><enddate>20090506</enddate><creator>Godino, Cosmo</creator><creator>Mendolicchio, Loredana</creator><creator>Figini, Filippo</creator><creator>Latib, Azeem</creator><creator>Sharp, Andrew SP</creator><creator>Cosgrave, John</creator><creator>Calori, Giliola</creator><creator>Cera, Michela</creator><creator>Chieffo, Alaide</creator><creator>Castelli, Alfredo</creator><creator>Maseri, Attilio</creator><creator>Ruggeri, Zaverio M</creator><creator>Colombo, Antonio</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20090506</creationdate><title>Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?</title><author>Godino, Cosmo ; Mendolicchio, Loredana ; Figini, Filippo ; Latib, Azeem ; Sharp, Andrew SP ; Cosgrave, John ; Calori, Giliola ; Cera, Michela ; Chieffo, Alaide ; Castelli, Alfredo ; Maseri, Attilio ; Ruggeri, Zaverio M ; Colombo, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g673-d63c8f4c1524af0e59ee549d823385515b6529fc9d1ca395cef977f5cbf2d1d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Blood clot</topic><topic>Clopidogrel</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Transluminal angioplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Godino, Cosmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendolicchio, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figini, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latib, Azeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Andrew SP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosgrave, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calori, Giliola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cera, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chieffo, Alaide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelli, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maseri, Attilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruggeri, Zaverio M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Thrombosis journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Godino, Cosmo</au><au>Mendolicchio, Loredana</au><au>Figini, Filippo</au><au>Latib, Azeem</au><au>Sharp, Andrew SP</au><au>Cosgrave, John</au><au>Calori, Giliola</au><au>Cera, Michela</au><au>Chieffo, Alaide</au><au>Castelli, Alfredo</au><au>Maseri, Attilio</au><au>Ruggeri, Zaverio M</au><au>Colombo, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?</atitle><jtitle>Thrombosis journal</jtitle><date>2009-05-06</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>4</spage><pages>4-</pages><issn>1477-9560</issn><eissn>1477-9560</eissn><abstract>Background Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition. Methods We studied LR in patients with stable angina undergoing elective PCI, all on DAT for at least 7 days, by comparing: 1) Flow cytometry (FC) to measure platelet membrane expression of P-selectin (CD62P) and PAC-1 binding following double stimulation with ADP and collagen type I either in the presence of prostaglandin (PG) E.sub.1 ; 2) VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test, in which results are reported as absolute P2Y.sub.12 -Reaction-Units (PRU) or % of inhibition (% inhibition). Results Thirty controls and 52 patients were analyzed. The median percentage of platelets exhibiting CD62P expression and PAC-1 binding by FC evaluation after stimulation in the presence of PG E.sub.1 was 25.4% (IQR: 21.4-33.1%) and 3.5% (1.7-9.4%), respectively. Only 6 patients receiving DAT (11.5%) had both values above the 1.sup.st .sup.quartile of controls, and were defined as LR. Evaluation of the same patients with the VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test revealed that the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84-0.98, p [less than] 0.0001) for % inhibition and 0.85 (0.72-0.93, p [less than] 0.005) for PRU. Cut-off values of [less than or equal to] 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU gave the maximum accuracy for the detection of patients defined as having LR by FC. Conclusion In conclusion our findings show that a cut-off value of [less than or equal to] 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU in the VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test may provide the best accuracy for the identification of patients with LR.</abstract><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/1477-9560-7-4</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-9560 |
ispartof | Thrombosis journal, 2009-05, Vol.7 (4), p.4 |
issn | 1477-9560 1477-9560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A200104913 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Blood clot Clopidogrel Complications and side effects Dosage and administration Drug therapy Risk factors Thrombosis Transluminal angioplasty |
title | Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12 test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A35%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20VerifyNow-P2Y.sub.12%20test%20and%20Flow%20Cytometry%20for%20monitoring%20individual%20platelet%20response%20to%20clopidogrel.%20What%20is%20the%20cut-off%20value%20for%20identifying%20patients%20who%20are%20low%20responders%20to%20clopidogrel%20therapy?&rft.jtitle=Thrombosis%20journal&rft.au=Godino,%20Cosmo&rft.date=2009-05-06&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=4&rft.pages=4-&rft.issn=1477-9560&rft.eissn=1477-9560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1477-9560-7-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA200104913%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A200104913&rfr_iscdi=true |