Evaluation of umbilical cord blood unit processing efficiency in routine laboratory conditions
Introduction: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an alternative stem cell source increasingly used for patients lacking an HLA matched sibling or unrelated donor. For UCB transplantation the total nucleated cells (TNC) and CD34+ cells greatly influence transplant outcome. UCB banks perform a white cell e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) 2009-03, Vol.43 (S1), p.S110 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | S110 |
container_title | Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Kindler, V Troeger, C de Faveri, G. Nicoloso Gratwohl, A Tichelli, A Passweg, J Meyer-Monard, S |
description | Introduction: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an alternative stem cell source increasingly used for patients lacking an HLA matched sibling or unrelated donor. For UCB transplantation the total nucleated cells (TNC) and CD34+ cells greatly influence transplant outcome. UCB banks perform a white cell enrichment and red cell depletion prior to cryopreservation in order to decrease the stored product volumes. Various techniques have been evaluated in a restricted number of products; however the efficacy of volume reduction under routine laboratory conditions is lacking. We report on the results of 1280 UCB processed in two banks using the same device and compare them with the manufacturer's qualification reports. Materials and methods: 1280 units were processed between 1994 and 2008, 456 in centre 1 and 856 in centre 2 using a Sepax (r) S-100 device (Biosafe, Eysins, Switzerland) piloted by proprietary software (version 1.17 to 264), according to the manufacturer's instructions. UCB were collected in 5 different maternity wards and processed within 36 hours after collection. TNC and CD34+ counts were performed before and after volume reduction using standardized counting methods. Results: Median volume obtained immediately after processing was 21% of the initial volume (10th/90th percentile 15/29%). Median TNC and CD34+ cell recoveries were 76% (10th/90th percentile 63/86%) and 81% (10th/90th percentile 64/95%) respectively in both sites, whereas the device qualification report proposes 88% and 96% for TNC and CD34+ cell recovery respectively (p |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A198170294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A198170294</galeid><sourcerecordid>A198170294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g984-bbca44fd98060dac0dcbe69c8f2fca1c4b860c2df5d2c94bb814744b806e2df43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj01LAzEQhvegYK3-h4DgbSW7m6bJsZT6AQUvPVuSSbIdySayyQr996bqoYLMYeDhfV5mLqoZbbmou47Lq-o6pXdKG8boYla9bT6Vn1TGGEh0ZBo0egTlCcTREO1jNGQKmMnHGMGmhKEn1jkEtAGOBAMZ45QxWOKVjqPKcTwWNxg8Vaab6tIpn-zt755Xu8fNbv1cb1-fXtarbd1LwWqtQTHmjBSUU6OAGtCWSxCudaAaYFpwCq1xC9OCZFqLhi1ZoZTbQlk3r-5-anvl7R6Di3lUMGCC_aqRolnSVp5SD_-kyhg7YLnZOiz8j3B_Jhys8vmQop--XzsPfgHY623D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of umbilical cord blood unit processing efficiency in routine laboratory conditions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kindler, V ; Troeger, C ; de Faveri, G. Nicoloso ; Gratwohl, A ; Tichelli, A ; Passweg, J ; Meyer-Monard, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Kindler, V ; Troeger, C ; de Faveri, G. Nicoloso ; Gratwohl, A ; Tichelli, A ; Passweg, J ; Meyer-Monard, S</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an alternative stem cell source increasingly used for patients lacking an HLA matched sibling or unrelated donor. For UCB transplantation the total nucleated cells (TNC) and CD34+ cells greatly influence transplant outcome. UCB banks perform a white cell enrichment and red cell depletion prior to cryopreservation in order to decrease the stored product volumes. Various techniques have been evaluated in a restricted number of products; however the efficacy of volume reduction under routine laboratory conditions is lacking. We report on the results of 1280 UCB processed in two banks using the same device and compare them with the manufacturer's qualification reports. Materials and methods: 1280 units were processed between 1994 and 2008, 456 in centre 1 and 856 in centre 2 using a Sepax (r) S-100 device (Biosafe, Eysins, Switzerland) piloted by proprietary software (version 1.17 to 264), according to the manufacturer's instructions. UCB were collected in 5 different maternity wards and processed within 36 hours after collection. TNC and CD34+ counts were performed before and after volume reduction using standardized counting methods. Results: Median volume obtained immediately after processing was 21% of the initial volume (10th/90th percentile 15/29%). Median TNC and CD34+ cell recoveries were 76% (10th/90th percentile 63/86%) and 81% (10th/90th percentile 64/95%) respectively in both sites, whereas the device qualification report proposes 88% and 96% for TNC and CD34+ cell recovery respectively (p<0.0001 for each value according to one sample T-test). The recovery rates were stable over time in both laboratories. Red cell depletion data were only available from centre 1 and corresponded to a median of 25% (10th/90th percentile 10/44%) retained RBC. Conclusions: Volume reduction of UCB with the Sepax(r) device provides a satisfactory TNC and CD34+ cell recovery in a routine setting. The TNC and CD34+ cell counts after volume reduction are however inferior than these expected by the manufacturer. The stability of the cell recovery over time in both UBC banks excludes the contribution of a learning effect. Preprocessing factors including the delay between collection and processing could be involved and have to be evaluated in the future. These data demonstrate that stem cell processing within a routine setting may provide relevant differences compared to data obtained within study conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nature Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Blood collection and preservation ; Fetal blood ; Methods ; Physiological aspects ; T cells</subject><ispartof>Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke), 2009-03, Vol.43 (S1), p.S110</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Nature Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kindler, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troeger, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faveri, G. Nicoloso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gratwohl, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tichelli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passweg, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer-Monard, S</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of umbilical cord blood unit processing efficiency in routine laboratory conditions</title><title>Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke)</title><description>Introduction: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an alternative stem cell source increasingly used for patients lacking an HLA matched sibling or unrelated donor. For UCB transplantation the total nucleated cells (TNC) and CD34+ cells greatly influence transplant outcome. UCB banks perform a white cell enrichment and red cell depletion prior to cryopreservation in order to decrease the stored product volumes. Various techniques have been evaluated in a restricted number of products; however the efficacy of volume reduction under routine laboratory conditions is lacking. We report on the results of 1280 UCB processed in two banks using the same device and compare them with the manufacturer's qualification reports. Materials and methods: 1280 units were processed between 1994 and 2008, 456 in centre 1 and 856 in centre 2 using a Sepax (r) S-100 device (Biosafe, Eysins, Switzerland) piloted by proprietary software (version 1.17 to 264), according to the manufacturer's instructions. UCB were collected in 5 different maternity wards and processed within 36 hours after collection. TNC and CD34+ counts were performed before and after volume reduction using standardized counting methods. Results: Median volume obtained immediately after processing was 21% of the initial volume (10th/90th percentile 15/29%). Median TNC and CD34+ cell recoveries were 76% (10th/90th percentile 63/86%) and 81% (10th/90th percentile 64/95%) respectively in both sites, whereas the device qualification report proposes 88% and 96% for TNC and CD34+ cell recovery respectively (p<0.0001 for each value according to one sample T-test). The recovery rates were stable over time in both laboratories. Red cell depletion data were only available from centre 1 and corresponded to a median of 25% (10th/90th percentile 10/44%) retained RBC. Conclusions: Volume reduction of UCB with the Sepax(r) device provides a satisfactory TNC and CD34+ cell recovery in a routine setting. The TNC and CD34+ cell counts after volume reduction are however inferior than these expected by the manufacturer. The stability of the cell recovery over time in both UBC banks excludes the contribution of a learning effect. Preprocessing factors including the delay between collection and processing could be involved and have to be evaluated in the future. These data demonstrate that stem cell processing within a routine setting may provide relevant differences compared to data obtained within study conditions.</description><subject>Blood collection and preservation</subject><subject>Fetal blood</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>T cells</subject><issn>0268-3369</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptj01LAzEQhvegYK3-h4DgbSW7m6bJsZT6AQUvPVuSSbIdySayyQr996bqoYLMYeDhfV5mLqoZbbmou47Lq-o6pXdKG8boYla9bT6Vn1TGGEh0ZBo0egTlCcTREO1jNGQKmMnHGMGmhKEn1jkEtAGOBAMZ45QxWOKVjqPKcTwWNxg8Vaab6tIpn-zt755Xu8fNbv1cb1-fXtarbd1LwWqtQTHmjBSUU6OAGtCWSxCudaAaYFpwCq1xC9OCZFqLhi1ZoZTbQlk3r-5-anvl7R6Di3lUMGCC_aqRolnSVp5SD_-kyhg7YLnZOiz8j3B_Jhys8vmQop--XzsPfgHY623D</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Kindler, V</creator><creator>Troeger, C</creator><creator>de Faveri, G. Nicoloso</creator><creator>Gratwohl, A</creator><creator>Tichelli, A</creator><creator>Passweg, J</creator><creator>Meyer-Monard, S</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Evaluation of umbilical cord blood unit processing efficiency in routine laboratory conditions</title><author>Kindler, V ; Troeger, C ; de Faveri, G. Nicoloso ; Gratwohl, A ; Tichelli, A ; Passweg, J ; Meyer-Monard, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g984-bbca44fd98060dac0dcbe69c8f2fca1c4b860c2df5d2c94bb814744b806e2df43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Blood collection and preservation</topic><topic>Fetal blood</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>T cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kindler, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troeger, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faveri, G. Nicoloso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gratwohl, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tichelli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passweg, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer-Monard, S</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kindler, V</au><au>Troeger, C</au><au>de Faveri, G. Nicoloso</au><au>Gratwohl, A</au><au>Tichelli, A</au><au>Passweg, J</au><au>Meyer-Monard, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of umbilical cord blood unit processing efficiency in routine laboratory conditions</atitle><jtitle>Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke)</jtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S110</spage><pages>S110-</pages><issn>0268-3369</issn><abstract>Introduction: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an alternative stem cell source increasingly used for patients lacking an HLA matched sibling or unrelated donor. For UCB transplantation the total nucleated cells (TNC) and CD34+ cells greatly influence transplant outcome. UCB banks perform a white cell enrichment and red cell depletion prior to cryopreservation in order to decrease the stored product volumes. Various techniques have been evaluated in a restricted number of products; however the efficacy of volume reduction under routine laboratory conditions is lacking. We report on the results of 1280 UCB processed in two banks using the same device and compare them with the manufacturer's qualification reports. Materials and methods: 1280 units were processed between 1994 and 2008, 456 in centre 1 and 856 in centre 2 using a Sepax (r) S-100 device (Biosafe, Eysins, Switzerland) piloted by proprietary software (version 1.17 to 264), according to the manufacturer's instructions. UCB were collected in 5 different maternity wards and processed within 36 hours after collection. TNC and CD34+ counts were performed before and after volume reduction using standardized counting methods. Results: Median volume obtained immediately after processing was 21% of the initial volume (10th/90th percentile 15/29%). Median TNC and CD34+ cell recoveries were 76% (10th/90th percentile 63/86%) and 81% (10th/90th percentile 64/95%) respectively in both sites, whereas the device qualification report proposes 88% and 96% for TNC and CD34+ cell recovery respectively (p<0.0001 for each value according to one sample T-test). The recovery rates were stable over time in both laboratories. Red cell depletion data were only available from centre 1 and corresponded to a median of 25% (10th/90th percentile 10/44%) retained RBC. Conclusions: Volume reduction of UCB with the Sepax(r) device provides a satisfactory TNC and CD34+ cell recovery in a routine setting. The TNC and CD34+ cell counts after volume reduction are however inferior than these expected by the manufacturer. The stability of the cell recovery over time in both UBC banks excludes the contribution of a learning effect. Preprocessing factors including the delay between collection and processing could be involved and have to be evaluated in the future. These data demonstrate that stem cell processing within a routine setting may provide relevant differences compared to data obtained within study conditions.</abstract><pub>Nature Publishing Group</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-3369 |
ispartof | Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke), 2009-03, Vol.43 (S1), p.S110 |
issn | 0268-3369 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A198170294 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; Nature Journals Online; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Blood collection and preservation Fetal blood Methods Physiological aspects T cells |
title | Evaluation of umbilical cord blood unit processing efficiency in routine laboratory conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A13%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20umbilical%20cord%20blood%20unit%20processing%20efficiency%20in%20routine%20laboratory%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Bone%20marrow%20transplantation%20(Basingstoke)&rft.au=Kindler,%20V&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S110&rft.pages=S110-&rft.issn=0268-3369&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA198170294%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A198170294&rfr_iscdi=true |