Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules

How to replace the human element of generalization with computer algorithms or rules in knowledge bases has been frequently discussed, but we have not succeeded in formulating these rules very well. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the problem of knowledge acquisition for generalization...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cartography and geographic information science 2000-01, Vol.27 (1), p.41-50
1. Verfasser: Kilpelainen, Tiina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Cartography and geographic information science
container_volume 27
creator Kilpelainen, Tiina
description How to replace the human element of generalization with computer algorithms or rules in knowledge bases has been frequently discussed, but we have not succeeded in formulating these rules very well. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the problem of knowledge acquisition for generalization of topographic maps. Three studies to derive rule-based knowledge for automatic map generalization are presented and analyzed. In the tests, cartographers were asked to interpret map objects to be generalized and to describe the basis of their decisions. The studies showed that by interviewing cartographers, much of the domain knowledge can be gathered, but the most time-consuming part of documenting this knowledge is to analyze the data and formalize the results. It was also found that there is important domain knowledge on generalization that has not previously been documented. The tests performed resulted in the discovery of four categories of declarative rules: geometric, topological, context-related, and culture-related rules.
doi_str_mv 10.1559/152304000783547993
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A63691836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A63691836</galeid><sourcerecordid>A63691836</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-9df8cfe830e5dc7d0c13ce180b5a99aed17352b777cc4f4bc7997f534f629db53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4KoP4NRk8jdZuChFq1gQRNchk58SSSeaTCn16Zs67ixyF_dw-M7lcAG4RnCKKBW3iNYYEgghbzAlXAh8AkaIElpBwujpQde4aMjOwUXOH4VkGPERmD53cRusWdnJTH9tfPa9j93ExTRZ2M4mFfy3-rFeN8HmS3DmVMj26nePwfvD_dv8sVq-LJ7ms2Wl60b0lTCu0c42GFpqNDdQI6wtamBLlRDKGsQxrVvOudbEkVaXxtxRTByrhWkpHoOb4e5KBSt952KflF4NjWJnnS_2jGEmUINZwasjeBlj114f4-uB1ynmnKyTn8mvVdpJBOXhofLvQ0vobggd7qe12sYUjOzVLsTkkuq0zxL_k98DOk57Aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Kilpelainen, Tiina</creator><creatorcontrib>Kilpelainen, Tiina</creatorcontrib><description>How to replace the human element of generalization with computer algorithms or rules in knowledge bases has been frequently discussed, but we have not succeeded in formulating these rules very well. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the problem of knowledge acquisition for generalization of topographic maps. Three studies to derive rule-based knowledge for automatic map generalization are presented and analyzed. In the tests, cartographers were asked to interpret map objects to be generalized and to describe the basis of their decisions. The studies showed that by interviewing cartographers, much of the domain knowledge can be gathered, but the most time-consuming part of documenting this knowledge is to analyze the data and formalize the results. It was also found that there is important domain knowledge on generalization that has not previously been documented. The tests performed resulted in the discovery of four categories of declarative rules: geometric, topological, context-related, and culture-related rules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-0406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-0465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1559/152304000783547993</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>AUTOMATED CARTOGRAPHIC GENERALIZATION ; Cartography ; GENERALIZATION RULES ; Geographic information systems ; Information management ; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION ; Knowledge acquisition (Expert systems) ; Methods</subject><ispartof>Cartography and geographic information science, 2000-01, Vol.27 (1), p.41-50</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2000</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Taylor &amp; Francis Group LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-9df8cfe830e5dc7d0c13ce180b5a99aed17352b777cc4f4bc7997f534f629db53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1559/152304000783547993$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1559/152304000783547993$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kilpelainen, Tiina</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules</title><title>Cartography and geographic information science</title><description>How to replace the human element of generalization with computer algorithms or rules in knowledge bases has been frequently discussed, but we have not succeeded in formulating these rules very well. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the problem of knowledge acquisition for generalization of topographic maps. Three studies to derive rule-based knowledge for automatic map generalization are presented and analyzed. In the tests, cartographers were asked to interpret map objects to be generalized and to describe the basis of their decisions. The studies showed that by interviewing cartographers, much of the domain knowledge can be gathered, but the most time-consuming part of documenting this knowledge is to analyze the data and formalize the results. It was also found that there is important domain knowledge on generalization that has not previously been documented. The tests performed resulted in the discovery of four categories of declarative rules: geometric, topological, context-related, and culture-related rules.</description><subject>AUTOMATED CARTOGRAPHIC GENERALIZATION</subject><subject>Cartography</subject><subject>GENERALIZATION RULES</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION</subject><subject>Knowledge acquisition (Expert systems)</subject><subject>Methods</subject><issn>1523-0406</issn><issn>1545-0465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4KoP4NRk8jdZuChFq1gQRNchk58SSSeaTCn16Zs67ixyF_dw-M7lcAG4RnCKKBW3iNYYEgghbzAlXAh8AkaIElpBwujpQde4aMjOwUXOH4VkGPERmD53cRusWdnJTH9tfPa9j93ExTRZ2M4mFfy3-rFeN8HmS3DmVMj26nePwfvD_dv8sVq-LJ7ms2Wl60b0lTCu0c42GFpqNDdQI6wtamBLlRDKGsQxrVvOudbEkVaXxtxRTByrhWkpHoOb4e5KBSt952KflF4NjWJnnS_2jGEmUINZwasjeBlj114f4-uB1ynmnKyTn8mvVdpJBOXhofLvQ0vobggd7qe12sYUjOzVLsTkkuq0zxL_k98DOk57Aw</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>Kilpelainen, Tiina</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules</title><author>Kilpelainen, Tiina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-9df8cfe830e5dc7d0c13ce180b5a99aed17352b777cc4f4bc7997f534f629db53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>AUTOMATED CARTOGRAPHIC GENERALIZATION</topic><topic>Cartography</topic><topic>GENERALIZATION RULES</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION</topic><topic>Knowledge acquisition (Expert systems)</topic><topic>Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kilpelainen, Tiina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cartography and geographic information science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kilpelainen, Tiina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules</atitle><jtitle>Cartography and geographic information science</jtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>41-50</pages><issn>1523-0406</issn><eissn>1545-0465</eissn><abstract>How to replace the human element of generalization with computer algorithms or rules in knowledge bases has been frequently discussed, but we have not succeeded in formulating these rules very well. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the problem of knowledge acquisition for generalization of topographic maps. Three studies to derive rule-based knowledge for automatic map generalization are presented and analyzed. In the tests, cartographers were asked to interpret map objects to be generalized and to describe the basis of their decisions. The studies showed that by interviewing cartographers, much of the domain knowledge can be gathered, but the most time-consuming part of documenting this knowledge is to analyze the data and formalize the results. It was also found that there is important domain knowledge on generalization that has not previously been documented. The tests performed resulted in the discovery of four categories of declarative rules: geometric, topological, context-related, and culture-related rules.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1559/152304000783547993</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1523-0406
ispartof Cartography and geographic information science, 2000-01, Vol.27 (1), p.41-50
issn 1523-0406
1545-0465
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A63691836
source Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)
subjects AUTOMATED CARTOGRAPHIC GENERALIZATION
Cartography
GENERALIZATION RULES
Geographic information systems
Information management
KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION
Knowledge acquisition (Expert systems)
Methods
title Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A08%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge%20Acquisition%20for%20Generalization%20Rules&rft.jtitle=Cartography%20and%20geographic%20information%20science&rft.au=Kilpelainen,%20Tiina&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=41-50&rft.issn=1523-0406&rft.eissn=1545-0465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1559/152304000783547993&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA63691836%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A63691836&rfr_iscdi=true