Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules
How to replace the human element of generalization with computer algorithms or rules in knowledge bases has been frequently discussed, but we have not succeeded in formulating these rules very well. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the problem of knowledge acquisition for generalization...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cartography and geographic information science 2000-01, Vol.27 (1), p.41-50 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 50 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 41 |
container_title | Cartography and geographic information science |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Kilpelainen, Tiina |
description | How to replace the human element of generalization with computer algorithms or rules in knowledge bases has been frequently discussed, but we have not succeeded in formulating these rules very well. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the problem of knowledge acquisition for generalization of topographic maps. Three studies to derive rule-based knowledge for automatic map generalization are presented and analyzed. In the tests, cartographers were asked to interpret map objects to be generalized and to describe the basis of their decisions. The studies showed that by interviewing cartographers, much of the domain knowledge can be gathered, but the most time-consuming part of documenting this knowledge is to analyze the data and formalize the results. It was also found that there is important domain knowledge on generalization that has not previously been documented. The tests performed resulted in the discovery of four categories of declarative rules: geometric, topological, context-related, and culture-related rules. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1559/152304000783547993 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A63691836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A63691836</galeid><sourcerecordid>A63691836</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-9df8cfe830e5dc7d0c13ce180b5a99aed17352b777cc4f4bc7997f534f629db53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4KoP4NRk8jdZuChFq1gQRNchk58SSSeaTCn16Zs67ixyF_dw-M7lcAG4RnCKKBW3iNYYEgghbzAlXAh8AkaIElpBwujpQde4aMjOwUXOH4VkGPERmD53cRusWdnJTH9tfPa9j93ExTRZ2M4mFfy3-rFeN8HmS3DmVMj26nePwfvD_dv8sVq-LJ7ms2Wl60b0lTCu0c42GFpqNDdQI6wtamBLlRDKGsQxrVvOudbEkVaXxtxRTByrhWkpHoOb4e5KBSt952KflF4NjWJnnS_2jGEmUINZwasjeBlj114f4-uB1ynmnKyTn8mvVdpJBOXhofLvQ0vobggd7qe12sYUjOzVLsTkkuq0zxL_k98DOk57Aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules</title><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Kilpelainen, Tiina</creator><creatorcontrib>Kilpelainen, Tiina</creatorcontrib><description>How to replace the human element of generalization with computer algorithms or rules in knowledge bases has been frequently discussed, but we have not succeeded in formulating these rules very well. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the problem of knowledge acquisition for generalization of topographic maps. Three studies to derive rule-based knowledge for automatic map generalization are presented and analyzed. In the tests, cartographers were asked to interpret map objects to be generalized and to describe the basis of their decisions. The studies showed that by interviewing cartographers, much of the domain knowledge can be gathered, but the most time-consuming part of documenting this knowledge is to analyze the data and formalize the results. It was also found that there is important domain knowledge on generalization that has not previously been documented. The tests performed resulted in the discovery of four categories of declarative rules: geometric, topological, context-related, and culture-related rules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-0406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-0465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1559/152304000783547993</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>AUTOMATED CARTOGRAPHIC GENERALIZATION ; Cartography ; GENERALIZATION RULES ; Geographic information systems ; Information management ; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION ; Knowledge acquisition (Expert systems) ; Methods</subject><ispartof>Cartography and geographic information science, 2000-01, Vol.27 (1), p.41-50</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2000</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Taylor & Francis Group LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-9df8cfe830e5dc7d0c13ce180b5a99aed17352b777cc4f4bc7997f534f629db53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1559/152304000783547993$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1559/152304000783547993$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kilpelainen, Tiina</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules</title><title>Cartography and geographic information science</title><description>How to replace the human element of generalization with computer algorithms or rules in knowledge bases has been frequently discussed, but we have not succeeded in formulating these rules very well. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the problem of knowledge acquisition for generalization of topographic maps. Three studies to derive rule-based knowledge for automatic map generalization are presented and analyzed. In the tests, cartographers were asked to interpret map objects to be generalized and to describe the basis of their decisions. The studies showed that by interviewing cartographers, much of the domain knowledge can be gathered, but the most time-consuming part of documenting this knowledge is to analyze the data and formalize the results. It was also found that there is important domain knowledge on generalization that has not previously been documented. The tests performed resulted in the discovery of four categories of declarative rules: geometric, topological, context-related, and culture-related rules.</description><subject>AUTOMATED CARTOGRAPHIC GENERALIZATION</subject><subject>Cartography</subject><subject>GENERALIZATION RULES</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION</subject><subject>Knowledge acquisition (Expert systems)</subject><subject>Methods</subject><issn>1523-0406</issn><issn>1545-0465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4KoP4NRk8jdZuChFq1gQRNchk58SSSeaTCn16Zs67ixyF_dw-M7lcAG4RnCKKBW3iNYYEgghbzAlXAh8AkaIElpBwujpQde4aMjOwUXOH4VkGPERmD53cRusWdnJTH9tfPa9j93ExTRZ2M4mFfy3-rFeN8HmS3DmVMj26nePwfvD_dv8sVq-LJ7ms2Wl60b0lTCu0c42GFpqNDdQI6wtamBLlRDKGsQxrVvOudbEkVaXxtxRTByrhWkpHoOb4e5KBSt952KflF4NjWJnnS_2jGEmUINZwasjeBlj114f4-uB1ynmnKyTn8mvVdpJBOXhofLvQ0vobggd7qe12sYUjOzVLsTkkuq0zxL_k98DOk57Aw</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>Kilpelainen, Tiina</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules</title><author>Kilpelainen, Tiina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-9df8cfe830e5dc7d0c13ce180b5a99aed17352b777cc4f4bc7997f534f629db53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>AUTOMATED CARTOGRAPHIC GENERALIZATION</topic><topic>Cartography</topic><topic>GENERALIZATION RULES</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION</topic><topic>Knowledge acquisition (Expert systems)</topic><topic>Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kilpelainen, Tiina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cartography and geographic information science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kilpelainen, Tiina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules</atitle><jtitle>Cartography and geographic information science</jtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>41-50</pages><issn>1523-0406</issn><eissn>1545-0465</eissn><abstract>How to replace the human element of generalization with computer algorithms or rules in knowledge bases has been frequently discussed, but we have not succeeded in formulating these rules very well. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the problem of knowledge acquisition for generalization of topographic maps. Three studies to derive rule-based knowledge for automatic map generalization are presented and analyzed. In the tests, cartographers were asked to interpret map objects to be generalized and to describe the basis of their decisions. The studies showed that by interviewing cartographers, much of the domain knowledge can be gathered, but the most time-consuming part of documenting this knowledge is to analyze the data and formalize the results. It was also found that there is important domain knowledge on generalization that has not previously been documented. The tests performed resulted in the discovery of four categories of declarative rules: geometric, topological, context-related, and culture-related rules.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1559/152304000783547993</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1523-0406 |
ispartof | Cartography and geographic information science, 2000-01, Vol.27 (1), p.41-50 |
issn | 1523-0406 1545-0465 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A63691836 |
source | Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles) |
subjects | AUTOMATED CARTOGRAPHIC GENERALIZATION Cartography GENERALIZATION RULES Geographic information systems Information management KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION Knowledge acquisition (Expert systems) Methods |
title | Knowledge Acquisition for Generalization Rules |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A08%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge%20Acquisition%20for%20Generalization%20Rules&rft.jtitle=Cartography%20and%20geographic%20information%20science&rft.au=Kilpelainen,%20Tiina&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=41-50&rft.issn=1523-0406&rft.eissn=1545-0465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1559/152304000783547993&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA63691836%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A63691836&rfr_iscdi=true |