PROTEIN QUALITY OF COMMONLY CONSUMED EDIBLE INSECTS IN ZIMBABWE

Consumption of edible insects as alternative animal protein-source is a potential long-term solution to curb protein deficiency in resource-limited communities where diets lacking in protein are predominant. Entomophagy has been expressed in both developed and developing countries, and previous stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:African journal of food, agriculture, nutrition, and development : AJFAND agriculture, nutrition, and development : AJFAND, 2019-06, Vol.19 (3), p.14674-14689
Hauptverfasser: Chagwena, DT, Matanhire, GT, Jombo, TZ, Maponga, CC
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14689
container_issue 3
container_start_page 14674
container_title African journal of food, agriculture, nutrition, and development : AJFAND
container_volume 19
creator Chagwena, DT
Matanhire, GT
Jombo, TZ
Maponga, CC
description Consumption of edible insects as alternative animal protein-source is a potential long-term solution to curb protein deficiency in resource-limited communities where diets lacking in protein are predominant. Entomophagy has been expressed in both developed and developing countries, and previous studies have proven that edible insects are high in protein. However, there is paucity of information on protein quality of edible insects to adequately guide populations on their utilization as good alternative protein sources. The aim of this study was to evaluate protein quality of three edible insects commonly consumed in most regions of Zimbabwe, namely Imbrasia belina (mopane worms), Locusta migratoria (locust) and Encosternum delegorguei (stinkbug). Kjeldahl method was used to evaluate crude protein of edible insects and a 20-day mice-feeding trial was conducted to evaluate protein efficiency ratio and protein digestibility in comparison to a control protein (casein). Crude protein was higher in Locusta migratoria (71.2%) compared to Imbrasia belina (57.7%) and Encosternum delegorguei (31.3%). Protein efficiency ratio was lower in insect samples L. migratoria (2.3), I Belina (1.96), E. delegorguei (2.0) compared to control casein (2.5). There was a significant difference (p0.05) in protein digestibility between the three insect protein sources and casein. The results showed high protein quality of three edible insects commonly consumed in Zimbabwe comparable to casein, a high quality animal protein. High protein digestibility of edible insects indicated ease in absorption and improved utilisation in the body. The lower PER values for I. Belina and E. delegorguei could possibly indicate that these edible insects may be limiting in the amino acids that support body tissue building and growth. Edible insects are a good source of quality protein that could meet protein requirements in resource-limited populations to curb protein deficiency. There is a strong need to further promote edible insects as a good alternative animal protein source.
doi_str_mv 10.18697/ajfand.86.17645
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A600161775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A600161775</galeid><sourcerecordid>A600161775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4215-3ccf52c85df37f5c995fc9e89ecf152919d635bb69251f2c80e4ed239776fdfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1LwzAUhosoOKf3XvZWsDNpm7S5kn10WuzHdBtj3oQ0TWbH1kqzgf57w6rTwS4kkHM4PM-Bw2sY1xB0oI-Jd8eWkpV5x8cd6GEXnRgtiH3XQo7nnu575J8bF0otAXARwm7LuB-9pJMgTMznaTcKJ3MzHZr9NI7TJJrrJhlP42BgBoOwFwVmmIyD_mSsq_kaxr1ubxZcGmeSrZS4-q5tYzoMJv1HK0ofwn43sjLXhshyOJfI5j7KpeNJxAlBkhPhE8ElRDaBJMcOyjJMbASlBoFwRW47xPOwzGXutA2r2btgK0GLUlabmvGFKEXNVlUpZKHHXQwAxNDzkOY7R3j9crEu-FHh5kDQzEZ8bBZsqxR9GoX_ZsN4dsje_mGzrSpKofSnisXbRjXKAQ4anNeVUrWQ9L0u1qz-pBDQXdC0CZr6mO6C_j01K6qV3r43eF0w-jPURplDAhBwvgCS_6Ug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROTEIN QUALITY OF COMMONLY CONSUMED EDIBLE INSECTS IN ZIMBABWE</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Bioline International</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chagwena, DT ; Matanhire, GT ; Jombo, TZ ; Maponga, CC</creator><creatorcontrib>Chagwena, DT ; Matanhire, GT ; Jombo, TZ ; Maponga, CC ; Nutri@ctive Zimbabwe, 96 Golden Stairs Rd, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe ; School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe ; Department of Food and Nutrition Sciences, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe</creatorcontrib><description>Consumption of edible insects as alternative animal protein-source is a potential long-term solution to curb protein deficiency in resource-limited communities where diets lacking in protein are predominant. Entomophagy has been expressed in both developed and developing countries, and previous studies have proven that edible insects are high in protein. However, there is paucity of information on protein quality of edible insects to adequately guide populations on their utilization as good alternative protein sources. The aim of this study was to evaluate protein quality of three edible insects commonly consumed in most regions of Zimbabwe, namely Imbrasia belina (mopane worms), Locusta migratoria (locust) and Encosternum delegorguei (stinkbug). Kjeldahl method was used to evaluate crude protein of edible insects and a 20-day mice-feeding trial was conducted to evaluate protein efficiency ratio and protein digestibility in comparison to a control protein (casein). Crude protein was higher in Locusta migratoria (71.2%) compared to Imbrasia belina (57.7%) and Encosternum delegorguei (31.3%). Protein efficiency ratio was lower in insect samples L. migratoria (2.3), I Belina (1.96), E. delegorguei (2.0) compared to control casein (2.5). There was a significant difference (p&lt;0.05) in protein efficiency ratio between the three edible insects and casein. Protein digestibility of the three insects (I. belina-92%, L. migratoria-90%, E. delegorguei-92%) was high and comparable to that of casein (96%). There was no significant difference (p&gt;0.05) in protein digestibility between the three insect protein sources and casein. The results showed high protein quality of three edible insects commonly consumed in Zimbabwe comparable to casein, a high quality animal protein. High protein digestibility of edible insects indicated ease in absorption and improved utilisation in the body. The lower PER values for I. Belina and E. delegorguei could possibly indicate that these edible insects may be limiting in the amino acids that support body tissue building and growth. Edible insects are a good source of quality protein that could meet protein requirements in resource-limited populations to curb protein deficiency. There is a strong need to further promote edible insects as a good alternative animal protein source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1684-5358</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1684-5374</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1684-5374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18697/ajfand.86.17645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rural Outreach Program</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Casein ; Developing countries ; Digestibility ; Edible Insects ; Insects ; Locusts (Insects) ; Milk proteins ; Protein Efficiency Ratio ; Protein quality ; Stink bugs</subject><ispartof>African journal of food, agriculture, nutrition, and development : AJFAND, 2019-06, Vol.19 (3), p.14674-14689</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2019 - African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Rural Outreach Program</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4215-3ccf52c85df37f5c995fc9e89ecf152919d635bb69251f2c80e4ed239776fdfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4215-3ccf52c85df37f5c995fc9e89ecf152919d635bb69251f2c80e4ed239776fdfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27922,27923,79196</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chagwena, DT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matanhire, GT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jombo, TZ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maponga, CC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nutri@ctive Zimbabwe, 96 Golden Stairs Rd, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Food and Nutrition Sciences, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe</creatorcontrib><title>PROTEIN QUALITY OF COMMONLY CONSUMED EDIBLE INSECTS IN ZIMBABWE</title><title>African journal of food, agriculture, nutrition, and development : AJFAND</title><description>Consumption of edible insects as alternative animal protein-source is a potential long-term solution to curb protein deficiency in resource-limited communities where diets lacking in protein are predominant. Entomophagy has been expressed in both developed and developing countries, and previous studies have proven that edible insects are high in protein. However, there is paucity of information on protein quality of edible insects to adequately guide populations on their utilization as good alternative protein sources. The aim of this study was to evaluate protein quality of three edible insects commonly consumed in most regions of Zimbabwe, namely Imbrasia belina (mopane worms), Locusta migratoria (locust) and Encosternum delegorguei (stinkbug). Kjeldahl method was used to evaluate crude protein of edible insects and a 20-day mice-feeding trial was conducted to evaluate protein efficiency ratio and protein digestibility in comparison to a control protein (casein). Crude protein was higher in Locusta migratoria (71.2%) compared to Imbrasia belina (57.7%) and Encosternum delegorguei (31.3%). Protein efficiency ratio was lower in insect samples L. migratoria (2.3), I Belina (1.96), E. delegorguei (2.0) compared to control casein (2.5). There was a significant difference (p&lt;0.05) in protein efficiency ratio between the three edible insects and casein. Protein digestibility of the three insects (I. belina-92%, L. migratoria-90%, E. delegorguei-92%) was high and comparable to that of casein (96%). There was no significant difference (p&gt;0.05) in protein digestibility between the three insect protein sources and casein. The results showed high protein quality of three edible insects commonly consumed in Zimbabwe comparable to casein, a high quality animal protein. High protein digestibility of edible insects indicated ease in absorption and improved utilisation in the body. The lower PER values for I. Belina and E. delegorguei could possibly indicate that these edible insects may be limiting in the amino acids that support body tissue building and growth. Edible insects are a good source of quality protein that could meet protein requirements in resource-limited populations to curb protein deficiency. There is a strong need to further promote edible insects as a good alternative animal protein source.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Casein</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Edible Insects</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Locusts (Insects)</subject><subject>Milk proteins</subject><subject>Protein Efficiency Ratio</subject><subject>Protein quality</subject><subject>Stink bugs</subject><issn>1684-5358</issn><issn>1684-5374</issn><issn>1684-5374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RBI</sourceid><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1LwzAUhosoOKf3XvZWsDNpm7S5kn10WuzHdBtj3oQ0TWbH1kqzgf57w6rTwS4kkHM4PM-Bw2sY1xB0oI-Jd8eWkpV5x8cd6GEXnRgtiH3XQo7nnu575J8bF0otAXARwm7LuB-9pJMgTMznaTcKJ3MzHZr9NI7TJJrrJhlP42BgBoOwFwVmmIyD_mSsq_kaxr1ubxZcGmeSrZS4-q5tYzoMJv1HK0ofwn43sjLXhshyOJfI5j7KpeNJxAlBkhPhE8ElRDaBJMcOyjJMbASlBoFwRW47xPOwzGXutA2r2btgK0GLUlabmvGFKEXNVlUpZKHHXQwAxNDzkOY7R3j9crEu-FHh5kDQzEZ8bBZsqxR9GoX_ZsN4dsje_mGzrSpKofSnisXbRjXKAQ4anNeVUrWQ9L0u1qz-pBDQXdC0CZr6mO6C_j01K6qV3r43eF0w-jPURplDAhBwvgCS_6Ug</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Chagwena, DT</creator><creator>Matanhire, GT</creator><creator>Jombo, TZ</creator><creator>Maponga, CC</creator><general>Rural Outreach Program</general><scope>RBI</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>IMW</scope><scope>KPI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>PROTEIN QUALITY OF COMMONLY CONSUMED EDIBLE INSECTS IN ZIMBABWE</title><author>Chagwena, DT ; Matanhire, GT ; Jombo, TZ ; Maponga, CC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4215-3ccf52c85df37f5c995fc9e89ecf152919d635bb69251f2c80e4ed239776fdfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Casein</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Edible Insects</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Locusts (Insects)</topic><topic>Milk proteins</topic><topic>Protein Efficiency Ratio</topic><topic>Protein quality</topic><topic>Stink bugs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chagwena, DT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matanhire, GT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jombo, TZ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maponga, CC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nutri@ctive Zimbabwe, 96 Golden Stairs Rd, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Food and Nutrition Sciences, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe</creatorcontrib><collection>Bioline International</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Gale In Context: World History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues</collection><jtitle>African journal of food, agriculture, nutrition, and development : AJFAND</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chagwena, DT</au><au>Matanhire, GT</au><au>Jombo, TZ</au><au>Maponga, CC</au><aucorp>Nutri@ctive Zimbabwe, 96 Golden Stairs Rd, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe</aucorp><aucorp>School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Food and Nutrition Sciences, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROTEIN QUALITY OF COMMONLY CONSUMED EDIBLE INSECTS IN ZIMBABWE</atitle><jtitle>African journal of food, agriculture, nutrition, and development : AJFAND</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>14674</spage><epage>14689</epage><pages>14674-14689</pages><issn>1684-5358</issn><issn>1684-5374</issn><eissn>1684-5374</eissn><abstract>Consumption of edible insects as alternative animal protein-source is a potential long-term solution to curb protein deficiency in resource-limited communities where diets lacking in protein are predominant. Entomophagy has been expressed in both developed and developing countries, and previous studies have proven that edible insects are high in protein. However, there is paucity of information on protein quality of edible insects to adequately guide populations on their utilization as good alternative protein sources. The aim of this study was to evaluate protein quality of three edible insects commonly consumed in most regions of Zimbabwe, namely Imbrasia belina (mopane worms), Locusta migratoria (locust) and Encosternum delegorguei (stinkbug). Kjeldahl method was used to evaluate crude protein of edible insects and a 20-day mice-feeding trial was conducted to evaluate protein efficiency ratio and protein digestibility in comparison to a control protein (casein). Crude protein was higher in Locusta migratoria (71.2%) compared to Imbrasia belina (57.7%) and Encosternum delegorguei (31.3%). Protein efficiency ratio was lower in insect samples L. migratoria (2.3), I Belina (1.96), E. delegorguei (2.0) compared to control casein (2.5). There was a significant difference (p&lt;0.05) in protein efficiency ratio between the three edible insects and casein. Protein digestibility of the three insects (I. belina-92%, L. migratoria-90%, E. delegorguei-92%) was high and comparable to that of casein (96%). There was no significant difference (p&gt;0.05) in protein digestibility between the three insect protein sources and casein. The results showed high protein quality of three edible insects commonly consumed in Zimbabwe comparable to casein, a high quality animal protein. High protein digestibility of edible insects indicated ease in absorption and improved utilisation in the body. The lower PER values for I. Belina and E. delegorguei could possibly indicate that these edible insects may be limiting in the amino acids that support body tissue building and growth. Edible insects are a good source of quality protein that could meet protein requirements in resource-limited populations to curb protein deficiency. There is a strong need to further promote edible insects as a good alternative animal protein source.</abstract><pub>Rural Outreach Program</pub><doi>10.18697/ajfand.86.17645</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1684-5358
ispartof African journal of food, agriculture, nutrition, and development : AJFAND, 2019-06, Vol.19 (3), p.14674-14689
issn 1684-5358
1684-5374
1684-5374
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A600161775
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Bioline International; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis
Casein
Developing countries
Digestibility
Edible Insects
Insects
Locusts (Insects)
Milk proteins
Protein Efficiency Ratio
Protein quality
Stink bugs
title PROTEIN QUALITY OF COMMONLY CONSUMED EDIBLE INSECTS IN ZIMBABWE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T06%3A51%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROTEIN%20QUALITY%20OF%20COMMONLY%20CONSUMED%20EDIBLE%20INSECTS%20IN%20ZIMBABWE&rft.jtitle=African%20journal%20of%20food,%20agriculture,%20nutrition,%20and%20development%20:%20AJFAND&rft.au=Chagwena,%20DT&rft.aucorp=Nutri@ctive%20Zimbabwe,%2096%20Golden%20Stairs%20Rd,%20Mt.%20Pleasant,%20Harare,%20Zimbabwe&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=14674&rft.epage=14689&rft.pages=14674-14689&rft.issn=1684-5358&rft.eissn=1684-5374&rft_id=info:doi/10.18697/ajfand.86.17645&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA600161775%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A600161775&rfr_iscdi=true