Diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Cancer Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation

Quantitative culture of protected samples of lower respiratory tract secretions obtained by a fiberoptic protected specimen brush (PSB) is widely accepted for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), but this diagnostic procedure is time consuming, expensive, and may give rise to iatr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 1999-06, Vol.115 (6), p.1641-1645
Hauptverfasser: Casetta, Michel, Blot, François, Antoun, Sami, Leclercq, Bernard, Tancrède, Cyrille, Doyon, Françoise, Nitenberg, Gérard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1645
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1641
container_title Chest
container_volume 115
creator Casetta, Michel
Blot, François
Antoun, Sami
Leclercq, Bernard
Tancrède, Cyrille
Doyon, Françoise
Nitenberg, Gérard
description Quantitative culture of protected samples of lower respiratory tract secretions obtained by a fiberoptic protected specimen brush (PSB) is widely accepted for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), but this diagnostic procedure is time consuming, expensive, and may give rise to iatrogenic complications, especially in cancer patients who often present with thrombocytopenia. The plugged telescoping catheter (PTC) could be a satisfactory alternative to the PSB in this setting. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the interest of the PTC to diagnose VAP in ventilated cancer patients. A prospective observational study. A 15-bed medical-surgical ICU in a comprehensive cancer center. Over a 9-month period, 42 patients suspected of having bacterial VAP during mechanical ventilation underwent 69 bronchial samplings: a blinded PTC and a fiberoptic PSB were performed successively in each case. A positive culture for both sampling procedures was defined as the recovery of≥ 103 cfu/mL of at least one potential pathogen. The PSB result was taken as the reference standard. The overall agreement between the techniques was 87% (60/69). PTC had a sensitivity of 67%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 71%, and a negative predictive value of 91%. We conclude that the accuracy of the blinded PTC compares well with that of the PSB for the diagnosis of VAP in cancer patients. The sensitivity of the PTC observed herein, which is slightly lower than that described in previous studies, may be due to the blinded nature of the method: the indications for initial or secondary coupling with a directed sampling method in patients with suspicion of localized pneumonia remain to be determined.
doi_str_mv 10.1378/chest.115.6.1641
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A55051813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A55051813</galeid><els_id>S0012369215383021</els_id><sourcerecordid>A55051813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2551-c1bfe25ba090d875e8841b28a7f5861918bdb48967ed08d41a9e732a9566292f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v3CAQhlGVqNmmvffoHxBvGTAYcos26YeUNjkkuSKMx14iGyLwpuq_L5utVFVKNQc08DyDNC8hH4Gugbfqk9tiXtYAYi3XIBt4Q1agOdRcNPyIrCgFVnOp2Ql5l_MjLT1o-ZacAC22kGxFHi69HUPMPldxqH7EHF2cvZ2q24C7OQZvKx-qjQ0OU3VrF49hydV96DGN0Yex-o5ua4N3RXkob34qTAzvyfFgp4wf_pyn5P7z1d3ma3198-Xb5uK6dkwIqB10AzLRWappr1qBSjXQMWXbQSgJGlTXd43SssWeqr4Bq7HlzGohJdNs4Kfk7DB3tBMaH4a4JOtGDJjsFAMOvlxfCEEFKOAFr1_BS_U4e_caTw-8SzHnhIN5Sn626ZcBavYJmJcETEnASLNP4K-y9eP2p09o8myn6WnX8QP8GHcp2Okf5fygYNnUs8dksit7dtgX3S2mj_7___0GhoKdWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Cancer Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Casetta, Michel ; Blot, François ; Antoun, Sami ; Leclercq, Bernard ; Tancrède, Cyrille ; Doyon, Françoise ; Nitenberg, Gérard</creator><creatorcontrib>Casetta, Michel ; Blot, François ; Antoun, Sami ; Leclercq, Bernard ; Tancrède, Cyrille ; Doyon, Françoise ; Nitenberg, Gérard</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative culture of protected samples of lower respiratory tract secretions obtained by a fiberoptic protected specimen brush (PSB) is widely accepted for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), but this diagnostic procedure is time consuming, expensive, and may give rise to iatrogenic complications, especially in cancer patients who often present with thrombocytopenia. The plugged telescoping catheter (PTC) could be a satisfactory alternative to the PSB in this setting. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the interest of the PTC to diagnose VAP in ventilated cancer patients. A prospective observational study. A 15-bed medical-surgical ICU in a comprehensive cancer center. Over a 9-month period, 42 patients suspected of having bacterial VAP during mechanical ventilation underwent 69 bronchial samplings: a blinded PTC and a fiberoptic PSB were performed successively in each case. A positive culture for both sampling procedures was defined as the recovery of≥ 103 cfu/mL of at least one potential pathogen. The PSB result was taken as the reference standard. The overall agreement between the techniques was 87% (60/69). PTC had a sensitivity of 67%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 71%, and a negative predictive value of 91%. We conclude that the accuracy of the blinded PTC compares well with that of the PSB for the diagnosis of VAP in cancer patients. The sensitivity of the PTC observed herein, which is slightly lower than that described in previous studies, may be due to the blinded nature of the method: the indications for initial or secondary coupling with a directed sampling method in patients with suspicion of localized pneumonia remain to be determined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1378/chest.115.6.1641</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10378562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Artificial respiration ; Bacterial pneumonia ; cancer ; Cancer patients ; Complications and side effects ; Cross infection ; Diagnosis ; Health aspects ; intensive care ; mechanical ventilation ; Nosocomial infections ; nosocomial pneumonia ; plugged telescoping catheter ; Pneumonia</subject><ispartof>Chest, 1999-06, Vol.115 (6), p.1641-1645</ispartof><rights>1999 The American College of Chest Physicians</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1999 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2551-c1bfe25ba090d875e8841b28a7f5861918bdb48967ed08d41a9e732a9566292f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2551-c1bfe25ba090d875e8841b28a7f5861918bdb48967ed08d41a9e732a9566292f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casetta, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blot, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoun, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclercq, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tancrède, Cyrille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyon, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitenberg, Gérard</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Cancer Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation</title><title>Chest</title><description>Quantitative culture of protected samples of lower respiratory tract secretions obtained by a fiberoptic protected specimen brush (PSB) is widely accepted for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), but this diagnostic procedure is time consuming, expensive, and may give rise to iatrogenic complications, especially in cancer patients who often present with thrombocytopenia. The plugged telescoping catheter (PTC) could be a satisfactory alternative to the PSB in this setting. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the interest of the PTC to diagnose VAP in ventilated cancer patients. A prospective observational study. A 15-bed medical-surgical ICU in a comprehensive cancer center. Over a 9-month period, 42 patients suspected of having bacterial VAP during mechanical ventilation underwent 69 bronchial samplings: a blinded PTC and a fiberoptic PSB were performed successively in each case. A positive culture for both sampling procedures was defined as the recovery of≥ 103 cfu/mL of at least one potential pathogen. The PSB result was taken as the reference standard. The overall agreement between the techniques was 87% (60/69). PTC had a sensitivity of 67%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 71%, and a negative predictive value of 91%. We conclude that the accuracy of the blinded PTC compares well with that of the PSB for the diagnosis of VAP in cancer patients. The sensitivity of the PTC observed herein, which is slightly lower than that described in previous studies, may be due to the blinded nature of the method: the indications for initial or secondary coupling with a directed sampling method in patients with suspicion of localized pneumonia remain to be determined.</description><subject>Artificial respiration</subject><subject>Bacterial pneumonia</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Cross infection</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>intensive care</subject><subject>mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>nosocomial pneumonia</subject><subject>plugged telescoping catheter</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1v3CAQhlGVqNmmvffoHxBvGTAYcos26YeUNjkkuSKMx14iGyLwpuq_L5utVFVKNQc08DyDNC8hH4Gugbfqk9tiXtYAYi3XIBt4Q1agOdRcNPyIrCgFVnOp2Ql5l_MjLT1o-ZacAC22kGxFHi69HUPMPldxqH7EHF2cvZ2q24C7OQZvKx-qjQ0OU3VrF49hydV96DGN0Yex-o5ua4N3RXkob34qTAzvyfFgp4wf_pyn5P7z1d3ma3198-Xb5uK6dkwIqB10AzLRWappr1qBSjXQMWXbQSgJGlTXd43SssWeqr4Bq7HlzGohJdNs4Kfk7DB3tBMaH4a4JOtGDJjsFAMOvlxfCEEFKOAFr1_BS_U4e_caTw-8SzHnhIN5Sn626ZcBavYJmJcETEnASLNP4K-y9eP2p09o8myn6WnX8QP8GHcp2Okf5fygYNnUs8dksit7dtgX3S2mj_7___0GhoKdWQ</recordid><startdate>199906</startdate><enddate>199906</enddate><creator>Casetta, Michel</creator><creator>Blot, François</creator><creator>Antoun, Sami</creator><creator>Leclercq, Bernard</creator><creator>Tancrède, Cyrille</creator><creator>Doyon, Françoise</creator><creator>Nitenberg, Gérard</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American College of Chest Physicians</general><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199906</creationdate><title>Diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Cancer Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation</title><author>Casetta, Michel ; Blot, François ; Antoun, Sami ; Leclercq, Bernard ; Tancrède, Cyrille ; Doyon, Françoise ; Nitenberg, Gérard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2551-c1bfe25ba090d875e8841b28a7f5861918bdb48967ed08d41a9e732a9566292f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Artificial respiration</topic><topic>Bacterial pneumonia</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Cross infection</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>intensive care</topic><topic>mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>nosocomial pneumonia</topic><topic>plugged telescoping catheter</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casetta, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blot, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoun, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclercq, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tancrède, Cyrille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyon, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitenberg, Gérard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casetta, Michel</au><au>Blot, François</au><au>Antoun, Sami</au><au>Leclercq, Bernard</au><au>Tancrède, Cyrille</au><au>Doyon, Françoise</au><au>Nitenberg, Gérard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Cancer Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><date>1999-06</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1641</spage><epage>1645</epage><pages>1641-1645</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><abstract>Quantitative culture of protected samples of lower respiratory tract secretions obtained by a fiberoptic protected specimen brush (PSB) is widely accepted for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), but this diagnostic procedure is time consuming, expensive, and may give rise to iatrogenic complications, especially in cancer patients who often present with thrombocytopenia. The plugged telescoping catheter (PTC) could be a satisfactory alternative to the PSB in this setting. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the interest of the PTC to diagnose VAP in ventilated cancer patients. A prospective observational study. A 15-bed medical-surgical ICU in a comprehensive cancer center. Over a 9-month period, 42 patients suspected of having bacterial VAP during mechanical ventilation underwent 69 bronchial samplings: a blinded PTC and a fiberoptic PSB were performed successively in each case. A positive culture for both sampling procedures was defined as the recovery of≥ 103 cfu/mL of at least one potential pathogen. The PSB result was taken as the reference standard. The overall agreement between the techniques was 87% (60/69). PTC had a sensitivity of 67%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 71%, and a negative predictive value of 91%. We conclude that the accuracy of the blinded PTC compares well with that of the PSB for the diagnosis of VAP in cancer patients. The sensitivity of the PTC observed herein, which is slightly lower than that described in previous studies, may be due to the blinded nature of the method: the indications for initial or secondary coupling with a directed sampling method in patients with suspicion of localized pneumonia remain to be determined.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10378562</pmid><doi>10.1378/chest.115.6.1641</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3692
ispartof Chest, 1999-06, Vol.115 (6), p.1641-1645
issn 0012-3692
1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A55051813
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Artificial respiration
Bacterial pneumonia
cancer
Cancer patients
Complications and side effects
Cross infection
Diagnosis
Health aspects
intensive care
mechanical ventilation
Nosocomial infections
nosocomial pneumonia
plugged telescoping catheter
Pneumonia
title Diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Cancer Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20of%20Nosocomial%20Pneumonia%20in%20Cancer%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Mechanical%20Ventilation&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Casetta,%20Michel&rft.date=1999-06&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1641&rft.epage=1645&rft.pages=1641-1645&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1378/chest.115.6.1641&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA55051813%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/10378562&rft_galeid=A55051813&rft_els_id=S0012369215383021&rfr_iscdi=true