Short-term clinical and microbiologic effects of pocket debridement with an Er:YAG laser during periodontal maintenance

Background. The erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser is considered a useful tool for subgingival debridement because the laser treatment creates minimal damage to the root surface and has potential antimicrobial effects. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dental hygiene 2008-06, Vol.82 (3-4)
Hauptverfasser: Tomasi, C, Schander, K, Dahlen, G, Wennstrom, J.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page
container_title Journal of dental hygiene
container_volume 82
creator Tomasi, C
Schander, K
Dahlen, G
Wennstrom, J.L
description Background. The erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser is considered a useful tool for subgingival debridement because the laser treatment creates minimal damage to the root surface and has potential antimicrobial effects. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate clinical and microbiologic effects of pocket debridement using an Er:YAG laser in patients during periodontal maintenance. Methods. Twenty patients at a recall visit for maintenance were consecutively recruited if presenting at least four teeth with residual probing depth (PD) > or = 5 mm. Two pockets in each of two jaw quadrants were randomly assigned to subgingival debridement using 1) an Er:YAG laser (test) or 2) an ultrasonic scaler (control). The laser beam was set at 160 mJ with a pulse frequency of 10 Hz. Clinical variables were recorded at baseline, 1 month, and 4 months after treatment. Primary clinical outcome variables were changes in PD and clinical attachment level (CAL). Microbiologic analysis of subgingival samples was performed at baseline, 2 days, and 30 days after treatment using a checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique against 12 periodontal disease-associated species. Results. The mean initial PD was 6.0 mm (SD: 1.2) in the test group and 5.8 mm (SD: 0.9) in the control group. At 1 month post-treatment, the PD reduction was significantly greater for test than control sites (0.9 versus 0.5 mm; P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A199854125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A199854125</galeid><sourcerecordid>A199854125</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1085-c2e9210971c37502385367d8aa222133d37d0e8d636d6b19e7d92cc5d377b32f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj01LAzEURWehYK3-h6zcjeRjMplxV0qtQsGFCrqSTPIyE80kJUnp3zegiy7KW1y4nHPhXVQLghtWU958XFXXKX1jjIkQfFEdX6cQc50hzkg5662SDkmv0WxVDIMNLoxWITAGVE4oGLQP6gcy0jBEq2EGn9HR5qlIaBMfPldb5GSCiPQhWj-iPUQbdPC57M7S-gxeegU31aWRLsHtfy6r98fN2_qp3r1sn9erXT0S3PFaUegpwb0gigmOKes4a4XupKSUEsY0ExpDp1vW6nYgPQjdU6V46cXAqGHLqv7bHaWDL-tNyFGqETxE6YIHY0u9In3f8YZQXvj7M3y58qpVZ4W7E2EC6fKUgjtkG3w6BX8BveZ4Xg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short-term clinical and microbiologic effects of pocket debridement with an Er:YAG laser during periodontal maintenance</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tomasi, C ; Schander, K ; Dahlen, G ; Wennstrom, J.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Tomasi, C ; Schander, K ; Dahlen, G ; Wennstrom, J.L</creatorcontrib><description>Background. The erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser is considered a useful tool for subgingival debridement because the laser treatment creates minimal damage to the root surface and has potential antimicrobial effects. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate clinical and microbiologic effects of pocket debridement using an Er:YAG laser in patients during periodontal maintenance. Methods. Twenty patients at a recall visit for maintenance were consecutively recruited if presenting at least four teeth with residual probing depth (PD) &gt; or = 5 mm. Two pockets in each of two jaw quadrants were randomly assigned to subgingival debridement using 1) an Er:YAG laser (test) or 2) an ultrasonic scaler (control). The laser beam was set at 160 mJ with a pulse frequency of 10 Hz. Clinical variables were recorded at baseline, 1 month, and 4 months after treatment. Primary clinical outcome variables were changes in PD and clinical attachment level (CAL). Microbiologic analysis of subgingival samples was performed at baseline, 2 days, and 30 days after treatment using a checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique against 12 periodontal disease-associated species. Results. The mean initial PD was 6.0 mm (SD: 1.2) in the test group and 5.8 mm (SD: 0.9) in the control group. At 1 month post-treatment, the PD reduction was significantly greater for test than control sites (0.9 versus 0.5 mm; P &lt;0.05). The CAL gain also was significantly greater (0.5 versus 0.06 mm; P &lt;0.01). At the 4-month examination, no significant differences were detected in PD reduction (1.1 versus 1.0 mm) or CAL gain (0.6 versus 0.4 mm). Both treatments resulted in reduction of the subgingival microflora. No significant differences in microbiologic composition were identified between the treatment groups at various time intervals. Degree of treatment discomfort scored significantly lower for the test than the control treatment modality. Conclusion. The results of the trial failed to demonstrate any apparent advantage of using an Er:YAG laser for subgingival debridement, except less treatment discomfort perceived by the patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-254X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Dental Hygienists' Association</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Debridement ; Lasers in dentistry ; Methods ; Periodontal disease</subject><ispartof>Journal of dental hygiene, 2008-06, Vol.82 (3-4)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 American Dental Hygienists' Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tomasi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schander, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wennstrom, J.L</creatorcontrib><title>Short-term clinical and microbiologic effects of pocket debridement with an Er:YAG laser during periodontal maintenance</title><title>Journal of dental hygiene</title><description>Background. The erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser is considered a useful tool for subgingival debridement because the laser treatment creates minimal damage to the root surface and has potential antimicrobial effects. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate clinical and microbiologic effects of pocket debridement using an Er:YAG laser in patients during periodontal maintenance. Methods. Twenty patients at a recall visit for maintenance were consecutively recruited if presenting at least four teeth with residual probing depth (PD) &gt; or = 5 mm. Two pockets in each of two jaw quadrants were randomly assigned to subgingival debridement using 1) an Er:YAG laser (test) or 2) an ultrasonic scaler (control). The laser beam was set at 160 mJ with a pulse frequency of 10 Hz. Clinical variables were recorded at baseline, 1 month, and 4 months after treatment. Primary clinical outcome variables were changes in PD and clinical attachment level (CAL). Microbiologic analysis of subgingival samples was performed at baseline, 2 days, and 30 days after treatment using a checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique against 12 periodontal disease-associated species. Results. The mean initial PD was 6.0 mm (SD: 1.2) in the test group and 5.8 mm (SD: 0.9) in the control group. At 1 month post-treatment, the PD reduction was significantly greater for test than control sites (0.9 versus 0.5 mm; P &lt;0.05). The CAL gain also was significantly greater (0.5 versus 0.06 mm; P &lt;0.01). At the 4-month examination, no significant differences were detected in PD reduction (1.1 versus 1.0 mm) or CAL gain (0.6 versus 0.4 mm). Both treatments resulted in reduction of the subgingival microflora. No significant differences in microbiologic composition were identified between the treatment groups at various time intervals. Degree of treatment discomfort scored significantly lower for the test than the control treatment modality. Conclusion. The results of the trial failed to demonstrate any apparent advantage of using an Er:YAG laser for subgingival debridement, except less treatment discomfort perceived by the patients.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Lasers in dentistry</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Periodontal disease</subject><issn>1043-254X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptj01LAzEURWehYK3-h6zcjeRjMplxV0qtQsGFCrqSTPIyE80kJUnp3zegiy7KW1y4nHPhXVQLghtWU958XFXXKX1jjIkQfFEdX6cQc50hzkg5662SDkmv0WxVDIMNLoxWITAGVE4oGLQP6gcy0jBEq2EGn9HR5qlIaBMfPldb5GSCiPQhWj-iPUQbdPC57M7S-gxeegU31aWRLsHtfy6r98fN2_qp3r1sn9erXT0S3PFaUegpwb0gigmOKes4a4XupKSUEsY0ExpDp1vW6nYgPQjdU6V46cXAqGHLqv7bHaWDL-tNyFGqETxE6YIHY0u9In3f8YZQXvj7M3y58qpVZ4W7E2EC6fKUgjtkG3w6BX8BveZ4Xg</recordid><startdate>20080622</startdate><enddate>20080622</enddate><creator>Tomasi, C</creator><creator>Schander, K</creator><creator>Dahlen, G</creator><creator>Wennstrom, J.L</creator><general>American Dental Hygienists' Association</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20080622</creationdate><title>Short-term clinical and microbiologic effects of pocket debridement with an Er:YAG laser during periodontal maintenance</title><author>Tomasi, C ; Schander, K ; Dahlen, G ; Wennstrom, J.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1085-c2e9210971c37502385367d8aa222133d37d0e8d636d6b19e7d92cc5d377b32f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Lasers in dentistry</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Periodontal disease</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tomasi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schander, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wennstrom, J.L</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of dental hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tomasi, C</au><au>Schander, K</au><au>Dahlen, G</au><au>Wennstrom, J.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short-term clinical and microbiologic effects of pocket debridement with an Er:YAG laser during periodontal maintenance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dental hygiene</jtitle><date>2008-06-22</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>3-4</issue><issn>1043-254X</issn><abstract>Background. The erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser is considered a useful tool for subgingival debridement because the laser treatment creates minimal damage to the root surface and has potential antimicrobial effects. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate clinical and microbiologic effects of pocket debridement using an Er:YAG laser in patients during periodontal maintenance. Methods. Twenty patients at a recall visit for maintenance were consecutively recruited if presenting at least four teeth with residual probing depth (PD) &gt; or = 5 mm. Two pockets in each of two jaw quadrants were randomly assigned to subgingival debridement using 1) an Er:YAG laser (test) or 2) an ultrasonic scaler (control). The laser beam was set at 160 mJ with a pulse frequency of 10 Hz. Clinical variables were recorded at baseline, 1 month, and 4 months after treatment. Primary clinical outcome variables were changes in PD and clinical attachment level (CAL). Microbiologic analysis of subgingival samples was performed at baseline, 2 days, and 30 days after treatment using a checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique against 12 periodontal disease-associated species. Results. The mean initial PD was 6.0 mm (SD: 1.2) in the test group and 5.8 mm (SD: 0.9) in the control group. At 1 month post-treatment, the PD reduction was significantly greater for test than control sites (0.9 versus 0.5 mm; P &lt;0.05). The CAL gain also was significantly greater (0.5 versus 0.06 mm; P &lt;0.01). At the 4-month examination, no significant differences were detected in PD reduction (1.1 versus 1.0 mm) or CAL gain (0.6 versus 0.4 mm). Both treatments resulted in reduction of the subgingival microflora. No significant differences in microbiologic composition were identified between the treatment groups at various time intervals. Degree of treatment discomfort scored significantly lower for the test than the control treatment modality. Conclusion. The results of the trial failed to demonstrate any apparent advantage of using an Er:YAG laser for subgingival debridement, except less treatment discomfort perceived by the patients.</abstract><pub>American Dental Hygienists' Association</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1043-254X
ispartof Journal of dental hygiene, 2008-06, Vol.82 (3-4)
issn 1043-254X
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A199854125
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Care and treatment
Debridement
Lasers in dentistry
Methods
Periodontal disease
title Short-term clinical and microbiologic effects of pocket debridement with an Er:YAG laser during periodontal maintenance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A54%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-term%20clinical%20and%20microbiologic%20effects%20of%20pocket%20debridement%20with%20an%20Er:YAG%20laser%20during%20periodontal%20maintenance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dental%20hygiene&rft.au=Tomasi,%20C&rft.date=2008-06-22&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3-4&rft.issn=1043-254X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA199854125%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A199854125&rfr_iscdi=true