Policies and practices to sustain soil productivity: perspectives from the public and private sectors
The USDA Forest Service, the Canadian Forest Service, and US and Canadian forest products industries are committed to the principles of sustainable forestry with a major focus on protecting soil productivity. The USDA Forest Service has developed and adopted soil quality standards to evaluate the ef...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of forest research 2006-03, Vol.36 (3), p.615-625 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 625 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 615 |
container_title | Canadian journal of forest research |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Cline, Richard G Ragus, Jerry Hogan, Gary D Maynard, Doug G Foster, Neil W Terry, Thomas A Heninger, Ronald L Campbell, Robert G Carter, Mason C |
description | The USDA Forest Service, the Canadian Forest Service, and US and Canadian forest products industries are committed to the principles of sustainable forestry with a major focus on protecting soil productivity. The USDA Forest Service has developed and adopted soil quality standards to evaluate the effects of forest use and management activities on forest soils and, if necessary, prescribe remedial or preventive actions to avoid adverse impacts on soil productivity. Similarly, the Canadian Forest Service has adopted a series of criteria and indicators with which to monitor the impacts of management on soil resources. The policies of both public agencies reflect the recommendations of the Montréal Process Working Group (1999). Many forest industries have adopted the Sustainable Forestry Initiative developed by the American Forest and Paper Association (2000). Standards of the Sustainable Forestry Initiative clearly state the vision and direction for achieving sustainable forest management, goals, and objectives to be attained and performance measures for judging whether a goal or objective has been achieved. However, both public and private entities recognize that current standards, criteria, and indicators represent first approximations. Continuing revision and adjustment based on information from long-term research studies are vital to protecting soil productivity while deriving optimum public benefits from our forest-based resources. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/x05-266 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A148278107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A148278107</galeid><sourcerecordid>A148278107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-43f6c4116a598ce501cb7c604edf32fd5fec1859f988d1529ca4e63a82e285e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0ltrFTEQB_BFFKxV_AqLYEVha7LZXLZvpXgpFBUvzyHNTk4jezbbTLa0396p54AWjorkIST55U_ITFU95eyQc9G_vmayaZW6V-3xlplGMaHvV3uMdbKRTOmH1SPE74wxoQTbq-BTGqOPgLWbhnrOzpfoaVVSjQsWF6caUxzpJA0LnV3FcnNUz5Bxhtsl0ZDTui4XUM_LOWVtg-KVK1AjoZTxcfUguBHhyXber769ffP15H1z9vHd6cnxWeOllKXpRFC-41w52RsPknF_rr1iHQxBtGGQATw3sg-9MQOXbe9dB0o400JrJBixXx1scum5lwtgseuIHsbRTZAWtFxz3Ssp_g07rTvBNMFmA1duBBunkAr90QomyG5ME4RI28e8M602_Kd_tsP7OV7a39HhDkRjgHX0O1Nf3rlApsB1WbkF0Z5--fwf9sNd-2JjfU6IGYKlwq1dvrGc2dtustRNlrqJ5PPthzn0bgzZTT7iL651T93WkXu1cVP2GRBc9hd_CT34M94iO1PtfwAFSeKR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14774307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policies and practices to sustain soil productivity: perspectives from the public and private sectors</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cline, Richard G ; Ragus, Jerry ; Hogan, Gary D ; Maynard, Doug G ; Foster, Neil W ; Terry, Thomas A ; Heninger, Ronald L ; Campbell, Robert G ; Carter, Mason C</creator><creatorcontrib>Cline, Richard G ; Ragus, Jerry ; Hogan, Gary D ; Maynard, Doug G ; Foster, Neil W ; Terry, Thomas A ; Heninger, Ronald L ; Campbell, Robert G ; Carter, Mason C</creatorcontrib><description>The USDA Forest Service, the Canadian Forest Service, and US and Canadian forest products industries are committed to the principles of sustainable forestry with a major focus on protecting soil productivity. The USDA Forest Service has developed and adopted soil quality standards to evaluate the effects of forest use and management activities on forest soils and, if necessary, prescribe remedial or preventive actions to avoid adverse impacts on soil productivity. Similarly, the Canadian Forest Service has adopted a series of criteria and indicators with which to monitor the impacts of management on soil resources. The policies of both public agencies reflect the recommendations of the Montréal Process Working Group (1999). Many forest industries have adopted the Sustainable Forestry Initiative developed by the American Forest and Paper Association (2000). Standards of the Sustainable Forestry Initiative clearly state the vision and direction for achieving sustainable forest management, goals, and objectives to be attained and performance measures for judging whether a goal or objective has been achieved. However, both public and private entities recognize that current standards, criteria, and indicators represent first approximations. Continuing revision and adjustment based on information from long-term research studies are vital to protecting soil productivity while deriving optimum public benefits from our forest-based resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/x05-266</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Canada ; Forestry ; Forests and forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology ; Production. Biomass ; Protection and preservation ; Soil erosion, conservation, land management and development ; Soil science ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; Soils ; United States</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2006-03, Vol.36 (3), p.615-625</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2006 NRC Research Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-43f6c4116a598ce501cb7c604edf32fd5fec1859f988d1529ca4e63a82e285e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-43f6c4116a598ce501cb7c604edf32fd5fec1859f988d1529ca4e63a82e285e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17792084$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cline, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragus, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Gary D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maynard, Doug G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Neil W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heninger, Ronald L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Mason C</creatorcontrib><title>Policies and practices to sustain soil productivity: perspectives from the public and private sectors</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><description>The USDA Forest Service, the Canadian Forest Service, and US and Canadian forest products industries are committed to the principles of sustainable forestry with a major focus on protecting soil productivity. The USDA Forest Service has developed and adopted soil quality standards to evaluate the effects of forest use and management activities on forest soils and, if necessary, prescribe remedial or preventive actions to avoid adverse impacts on soil productivity. Similarly, the Canadian Forest Service has adopted a series of criteria and indicators with which to monitor the impacts of management on soil resources. The policies of both public agencies reflect the recommendations of the Montréal Process Working Group (1999). Many forest industries have adopted the Sustainable Forestry Initiative developed by the American Forest and Paper Association (2000). Standards of the Sustainable Forestry Initiative clearly state the vision and direction for achieving sustainable forest management, goals, and objectives to be attained and performance measures for judging whether a goal or objective has been achieved. However, both public and private entities recognize that current standards, criteria, and indicators represent first approximations. Continuing revision and adjustment based on information from long-term research studies are vital to protecting soil productivity while deriving optimum public benefits from our forest-based resources.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests and forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</subject><subject>Production. Biomass</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Soil erosion, conservation, land management and development</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqV0ltrFTEQB_BFFKxV_AqLYEVha7LZXLZvpXgpFBUvzyHNTk4jezbbTLa0396p54AWjorkIST55U_ITFU95eyQc9G_vmayaZW6V-3xlplGMaHvV3uMdbKRTOmH1SPE74wxoQTbq-BTGqOPgLWbhnrOzpfoaVVSjQsWF6caUxzpJA0LnV3FcnNUz5Bxhtsl0ZDTui4XUM_LOWVtg-KVK1AjoZTxcfUguBHhyXber769ffP15H1z9vHd6cnxWeOllKXpRFC-41w52RsPknF_rr1iHQxBtGGQATw3sg-9MQOXbe9dB0o400JrJBixXx1scum5lwtgseuIHsbRTZAWtFxz3Ssp_g07rTvBNMFmA1duBBunkAr90QomyG5ME4RI28e8M602_Kd_tsP7OV7a39HhDkRjgHX0O1Nf3rlApsB1WbkF0Z5--fwf9sNd-2JjfU6IGYKlwq1dvrGc2dtustRNlrqJ5PPthzn0bgzZTT7iL651T93WkXu1cVP2GRBc9hd_CT34M94iO1PtfwAFSeKR</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Cline, Richard G</creator><creator>Ragus, Jerry</creator><creator>Hogan, Gary D</creator><creator>Maynard, Doug G</creator><creator>Foster, Neil W</creator><creator>Terry, Thomas A</creator><creator>Heninger, Ronald L</creator><creator>Campbell, Robert G</creator><creator>Carter, Mason C</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>National Research Council of Canada</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Policies and practices to sustain soil productivity: perspectives from the public and private sectors</title><author>Cline, Richard G ; Ragus, Jerry ; Hogan, Gary D ; Maynard, Doug G ; Foster, Neil W ; Terry, Thomas A ; Heninger, Ronald L ; Campbell, Robert G ; Carter, Mason C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-43f6c4116a598ce501cb7c604edf32fd5fec1859f988d1529ca4e63a82e285e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests and forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</topic><topic>Production. Biomass</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Soil erosion, conservation, land management and development</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cline, Richard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragus, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Gary D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maynard, Doug G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Neil W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terry, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heninger, Ronald L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Mason C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cline, Richard G</au><au>Ragus, Jerry</au><au>Hogan, Gary D</au><au>Maynard, Doug G</au><au>Foster, Neil W</au><au>Terry, Thomas A</au><au>Heninger, Ronald L</au><au>Campbell, Robert G</au><au>Carter, Mason C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policies and practices to sustain soil productivity: perspectives from the public and private sectors</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>615</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>615-625</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>The USDA Forest Service, the Canadian Forest Service, and US and Canadian forest products industries are committed to the principles of sustainable forestry with a major focus on protecting soil productivity. The USDA Forest Service has developed and adopted soil quality standards to evaluate the effects of forest use and management activities on forest soils and, if necessary, prescribe remedial or preventive actions to avoid adverse impacts on soil productivity. Similarly, the Canadian Forest Service has adopted a series of criteria and indicators with which to monitor the impacts of management on soil resources. The policies of both public agencies reflect the recommendations of the Montréal Process Working Group (1999). Many forest industries have adopted the Sustainable Forestry Initiative developed by the American Forest and Paper Association (2000). Standards of the Sustainable Forestry Initiative clearly state the vision and direction for achieving sustainable forest management, goals, and objectives to be attained and performance measures for judging whether a goal or objective has been achieved. However, both public and private entities recognize that current standards, criteria, and indicators represent first approximations. Continuing revision and adjustment based on information from long-term research studies are vital to protecting soil productivity while deriving optimum public benefits from our forest-based resources.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, Canada</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/x05-266</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-5067 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of forest research, 2006-03, Vol.36 (3), p.615-625 |
issn | 0045-5067 1208-6037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A148278107 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Canada Forestry Forests and forestry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology Production. Biomass Protection and preservation Soil erosion, conservation, land management and development Soil science Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments Soils United States |
title | Policies and practices to sustain soil productivity: perspectives from the public and private sectors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A06%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policies%20and%20practices%20to%20sustain%20soil%20productivity:%20perspectives%20from%20the%20public%20and%20private%20sectors&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Cline,%20Richard%20G&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=615&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=615-625&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/x05-266&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA148278107%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14774307&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A148278107&rfr_iscdi=true |