PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER?
While many companies are engaging in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives, little attention has been given to assess whether the disclosure of evidence used to support ESG programs impacts public perceptions of corporate trust. For instance, does the provision of evidence to the i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global journal of management and marketing 2024-06, Vol.8 (1), p.41 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 41 |
container_title | Global journal of management and marketing |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Kinard, Brian R |
description | While many companies are engaging in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives, little attention has been given to assess whether the disclosure of evidence used to support ESG programs impacts public perceptions of corporate trust. For instance, does the provision of evidence to the impact of an initiative matter to individuals or is the mere act of developing and communicating an ESG program sufficient? Does providing evidence of more than one ESG initiative amplify the effects? Using a between-subjects experimental design, the results suggest there is a positive impact on public perceptions of trust when a company provides evidence of the impact of at least one ESG initiative. However, there were no enhanced effects on perceptions when evidence of the impact of more than one initiative was provided. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A810296181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A810296181</galeid><sourcerecordid>A810296181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A8102961813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVi8EKgkAURWdRkJT_MD9gzKiVtolpfNaD1EEnaRdiGoYpZP9PBv1AnMWBw70TYtirjWsx173MiDkMD8aYzbjj-I5BlDrvTyipglSC0pjEGU1CCtmBYowahcYcsi0NEsioSpMcA4wPFEZDLOG7xUgJqWkktIZ0tyDTumiHyvx5TpYhaHm07kVbXZuu7t-vohy5Vc-m7LuqbsYuPM5sf8097vx9-ACr2z9G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER?</title><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Kinard, Brian R</creator><creatorcontrib>Kinard, Brian R</creatorcontrib><description>While many companies are engaging in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives, little attention has been given to assess whether the disclosure of evidence used to support ESG programs impacts public perceptions of corporate trust. For instance, does the provision of evidence to the impact of an initiative matter to individuals or is the mere act of developing and communicating an ESG program sufficient? Does providing evidence of more than one ESG initiative amplify the effects? Using a between-subjects experimental design, the results suggest there is a positive impact on public perceptions of trust when a company provides evidence of the impact of at least one ESG initiative. However, there were no enhanced effects on perceptions when evidence of the impact of more than one initiative was provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-044X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Institute for Global Business Research</publisher><subject>Brand equity ; Business ; Marketing research ; Soft drink industry</subject><ispartof>Global journal of management and marketing, 2024-06, Vol.8 (1), p.41</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Institute for Global Business Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kinard, Brian R</creatorcontrib><title>PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER?</title><title>Global journal of management and marketing</title><description>While many companies are engaging in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives, little attention has been given to assess whether the disclosure of evidence used to support ESG programs impacts public perceptions of corporate trust. For instance, does the provision of evidence to the impact of an initiative matter to individuals or is the mere act of developing and communicating an ESG program sufficient? Does providing evidence of more than one ESG initiative amplify the effects? Using a between-subjects experimental design, the results suggest there is a positive impact on public perceptions of trust when a company provides evidence of the impact of at least one ESG initiative. However, there were no enhanced effects on perceptions when evidence of the impact of more than one initiative was provided.</description><subject>Brand equity</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Marketing research</subject><subject>Soft drink industry</subject><issn>2574-044X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVi8EKgkAURWdRkJT_MD9gzKiVtolpfNaD1EEnaRdiGoYpZP9PBv1AnMWBw70TYtirjWsx173MiDkMD8aYzbjj-I5BlDrvTyipglSC0pjEGU1CCtmBYowahcYcsi0NEsioSpMcA4wPFEZDLOG7xUgJqWkktIZ0tyDTumiHyvx5TpYhaHm07kVbXZuu7t-vohy5Vc-m7LuqbsYuPM5sf8097vx9-ACr2z9G</recordid><startdate>20240622</startdate><enddate>20240622</enddate><creator>Kinard, Brian R</creator><general>Institute for Global Business Research</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20240622</creationdate><title>PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER?</title><author>Kinard, Brian R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A8102961813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Brand equity</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Marketing research</topic><topic>Soft drink industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kinard, Brian R</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Global journal of management and marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kinard, Brian R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER?</atitle><jtitle>Global journal of management and marketing</jtitle><date>2024-06-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><pages>41-</pages><issn>2574-044X</issn><abstract>While many companies are engaging in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives, little attention has been given to assess whether the disclosure of evidence used to support ESG programs impacts public perceptions of corporate trust. For instance, does the provision of evidence to the impact of an initiative matter to individuals or is the mere act of developing and communicating an ESG program sufficient? Does providing evidence of more than one ESG initiative amplify the effects? Using a between-subjects experimental design, the results suggest there is a positive impact on public perceptions of trust when a company provides evidence of the impact of at least one ESG initiative. However, there were no enhanced effects on perceptions when evidence of the impact of more than one initiative was provided.</abstract><pub>Institute for Global Business Research</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2574-044X |
ispartof | Global journal of management and marketing, 2024-06, Vol.8 (1), p.41 |
issn | 2574-044X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A810296181 |
source | ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Brand equity Business Marketing research Soft drink industry |
title | PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A42%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PUBLIC%20PERCEPTIONS%20OF%20ESG%20INITIATIVES:%20DOES%20PROVIDING%20EVIDENCE%20OF%20IMPACT%20MATTER?&rft.jtitle=Global%20journal%20of%20management%20and%20marketing&rft.au=Kinard,%20Brian%20R&rft.date=2024-06-22&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.pages=41-&rft.issn=2574-044X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA810296181%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A810296181&rfr_iscdi=true |