PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER?

While many companies are engaging in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives, little attention has been given to assess whether the disclosure of evidence used to support ESG programs impacts public perceptions of corporate trust. For instance, does the provision of evidence to the i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global journal of management and marketing 2024-06, Vol.8 (1), p.41
1. Verfasser: Kinard, Brian R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Global journal of management and marketing
container_volume 8
creator Kinard, Brian R
description While many companies are engaging in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives, little attention has been given to assess whether the disclosure of evidence used to support ESG programs impacts public perceptions of corporate trust. For instance, does the provision of evidence to the impact of an initiative matter to individuals or is the mere act of developing and communicating an ESG program sufficient? Does providing evidence of more than one ESG initiative amplify the effects? Using a between-subjects experimental design, the results suggest there is a positive impact on public perceptions of trust when a company provides evidence of the impact of at least one ESG initiative. However, there were no enhanced effects on perceptions when evidence of the impact of more than one initiative was provided.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A810296181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A810296181</galeid><sourcerecordid>A810296181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A8102961813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVi8EKgkAURWdRkJT_MD9gzKiVtolpfNaD1EEnaRdiGoYpZP9PBv1AnMWBw70TYtirjWsx173MiDkMD8aYzbjj-I5BlDrvTyipglSC0pjEGU1CCtmBYowahcYcsi0NEsioSpMcA4wPFEZDLOG7xUgJqWkktIZ0tyDTumiHyvx5TpYhaHm07kVbXZuu7t-vohy5Vc-m7LuqbsYuPM5sf8097vx9-ACr2z9G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER?</title><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Kinard, Brian R</creator><creatorcontrib>Kinard, Brian R</creatorcontrib><description>While many companies are engaging in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives, little attention has been given to assess whether the disclosure of evidence used to support ESG programs impacts public perceptions of corporate trust. For instance, does the provision of evidence to the impact of an initiative matter to individuals or is the mere act of developing and communicating an ESG program sufficient? Does providing evidence of more than one ESG initiative amplify the effects? Using a between-subjects experimental design, the results suggest there is a positive impact on public perceptions of trust when a company provides evidence of the impact of at least one ESG initiative. However, there were no enhanced effects on perceptions when evidence of the impact of more than one initiative was provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-044X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Institute for Global Business Research</publisher><subject>Brand equity ; Business ; Marketing research ; Soft drink industry</subject><ispartof>Global journal of management and marketing, 2024-06, Vol.8 (1), p.41</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Institute for Global Business Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kinard, Brian R</creatorcontrib><title>PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER?</title><title>Global journal of management and marketing</title><description>While many companies are engaging in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives, little attention has been given to assess whether the disclosure of evidence used to support ESG programs impacts public perceptions of corporate trust. For instance, does the provision of evidence to the impact of an initiative matter to individuals or is the mere act of developing and communicating an ESG program sufficient? Does providing evidence of more than one ESG initiative amplify the effects? Using a between-subjects experimental design, the results suggest there is a positive impact on public perceptions of trust when a company provides evidence of the impact of at least one ESG initiative. However, there were no enhanced effects on perceptions when evidence of the impact of more than one initiative was provided.</description><subject>Brand equity</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Marketing research</subject><subject>Soft drink industry</subject><issn>2574-044X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVi8EKgkAURWdRkJT_MD9gzKiVtolpfNaD1EEnaRdiGoYpZP9PBv1AnMWBw70TYtirjWsx173MiDkMD8aYzbjj-I5BlDrvTyipglSC0pjEGU1CCtmBYowahcYcsi0NEsioSpMcA4wPFEZDLOG7xUgJqWkktIZ0tyDTumiHyvx5TpYhaHm07kVbXZuu7t-vohy5Vc-m7LuqbsYuPM5sf8097vx9-ACr2z9G</recordid><startdate>20240622</startdate><enddate>20240622</enddate><creator>Kinard, Brian R</creator><general>Institute for Global Business Research</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20240622</creationdate><title>PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER?</title><author>Kinard, Brian R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A8102961813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Brand equity</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Marketing research</topic><topic>Soft drink industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kinard, Brian R</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Global journal of management and marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kinard, Brian R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER?</atitle><jtitle>Global journal of management and marketing</jtitle><date>2024-06-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><pages>41-</pages><issn>2574-044X</issn><abstract>While many companies are engaging in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives, little attention has been given to assess whether the disclosure of evidence used to support ESG programs impacts public perceptions of corporate trust. For instance, does the provision of evidence to the impact of an initiative matter to individuals or is the mere act of developing and communicating an ESG program sufficient? Does providing evidence of more than one ESG initiative amplify the effects? Using a between-subjects experimental design, the results suggest there is a positive impact on public perceptions of trust when a company provides evidence of the impact of at least one ESG initiative. However, there were no enhanced effects on perceptions when evidence of the impact of more than one initiative was provided.</abstract><pub>Institute for Global Business Research</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2574-044X
ispartof Global journal of management and marketing, 2024-06, Vol.8 (1), p.41
issn 2574-044X
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A810296181
source ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Brand equity
Business
Marketing research
Soft drink industry
title PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF ESG INITIATIVES: DOES PROVIDING EVIDENCE OF IMPACT MATTER?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A42%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PUBLIC%20PERCEPTIONS%20OF%20ESG%20INITIATIVES:%20DOES%20PROVIDING%20EVIDENCE%20OF%20IMPACT%20MATTER?&rft.jtitle=Global%20journal%20of%20management%20and%20marketing&rft.au=Kinard,%20Brian%20R&rft.date=2024-06-22&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.pages=41-&rft.issn=2574-044X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA810296181%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A810296181&rfr_iscdi=true