UNDERSTANDING, INTERPRETING AND PRESENTING HERITAGE SITES THAT LACK INTEGRITY: THE CASE OF THE OLD ARIFIYE VILLAGE INSTITUTE CAMPUS/BUTUNLUGUNU KAYBETMIS MIRAS ALANLARINI ANLAMAK, YORUMLAMAK VE SUNMAK: ESKI ARIFIYE KOY ENSTITUSU YERLESKESI ORNEGI
One of UNESCO's evaluation criteria for cultural and natural World Heritage Sites is the concept of integrity, which measures the completeness of a natural or cultural heritage site's tangible architectural, urban, and environmental qualities. On the other hand, cultural significance is no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mimarlık Fakültesi dergisi 2023-06, Vol.40 (1), p.175 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | tur |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | Mimarlık Fakültesi dergisi |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Okumus, Hande Savas Corakbas, Figen Kivilcim |
description | One of UNESCO's evaluation criteria for cultural and natural World Heritage Sites is the concept of integrity, which measures the completeness of a natural or cultural heritage site's tangible architectural, urban, and environmental qualities. On the other hand, cultural significance is not only embodied in the tangible aspects of heritage but also inherent in the intangible aspects like associations, meetings, memory, and records. Considering that numerous sites that do have significant heritage values do not meet this integrity criterion, this paper argues that heritage sites that lack "integrity" can partially regain and revive their heritage values through an integrated evaluation and on-site presentation of their tangible and intangible cultural qualities. Similarly, the restoration of integrity by the in situ presentation techniques can promote the appreciation of the site's architectural, cultural and historical values. Through an integrated methodology, this study analyzes the tangible and intangible cultural qualities of the Arifiye Old Village Institute campus, a heritage site that lacks integrity. Additionally, this paper discusses the role of digital technologies in the interpretation and presentation of the values of this campus. Village Institute campuses were situated in twenty-one different locations in Turkey; they were created to carry out modernization efforts and facilitate the construction of modern Turkish identity in the rural areas of the new Turkish Republic. The architectural projects of fifteen of the twenty-one Village Institute campuses, including the Arifiye Village Institute, were obtained through national architectural competitions. The architectural program included ateliers, classrooms, administrative buildings, service buildings, dining halls, dormitories, sports halls and open-air sports areas, and, in some cases, music schools and facilities for fishing. The Arifiye Village Institute was founded in Kocaeli in 1940. The educational and spatial history of the Arifiye Village Institute began with building of the Arifiye instructor course buildings in 1937. In 1940, the architect Recai Akcay was awarded first prize in the national architectural competition for his design of the Arifiye Village Institute. The construction of the buildings was considered part of the training education, and students built many of the buildings at Arifiye, including those in the instructor course area, the competition project area, and at other |
doi_str_mv | 10.4305/METU.JFA.2023.1.8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A758745994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A758745994</galeid><sourcerecordid>A758745994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7587459943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjstuwkAMRWfRSqWPD-jOHwAhIUl57AZwgpvJBM14kLKqEA0VFQWp8O1dd0ir7isvfHzta1uIxygMkjhM-yWyC54zGQzCQRxEwehKdMJBOuqlcfR0I25Pp_cwTIbROOqIL6fnaCxLPSedd4E0o1kaZF-BF8GzRd2WCzTEMkewxGiBF5JByVnRmnLfqydeRJhJi1BlLVdqDtJQRjXCipS62ElbJnZ8mSyXzvanjp1WLnfaQSHrKXJJFkoy0oJUUiu_QRNcoJRFF-rKuLJlWPlvnPY0AbQF_d0qqhrw5451UKNRvo2WoDIac7oX19v1_tQ8_OY7EWTIs0Xvbb1vXnaH7fH8ud74eG0-dpvjodnuvC6H6WiYpONxEv_b8A0-aXKS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>UNDERSTANDING, INTERPRETING AND PRESENTING HERITAGE SITES THAT LACK INTEGRITY: THE CASE OF THE OLD ARIFIYE VILLAGE INSTITUTE CAMPUS/BUTUNLUGUNU KAYBETMIS MIRAS ALANLARINI ANLAMAK, YORUMLAMAK VE SUNMAK: ESKI ARIFIYE KOY ENSTITUSU YERLESKESI ORNEGI</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Okumus, Hande Savas ; Corakbas, Figen Kivilcim</creator><creatorcontrib>Okumus, Hande Savas ; Corakbas, Figen Kivilcim</creatorcontrib><description>One of UNESCO's evaluation criteria for cultural and natural World Heritage Sites is the concept of integrity, which measures the completeness of a natural or cultural heritage site's tangible architectural, urban, and environmental qualities. On the other hand, cultural significance is not only embodied in the tangible aspects of heritage but also inherent in the intangible aspects like associations, meetings, memory, and records. Considering that numerous sites that do have significant heritage values do not meet this integrity criterion, this paper argues that heritage sites that lack "integrity" can partially regain and revive their heritage values through an integrated evaluation and on-site presentation of their tangible and intangible cultural qualities. Similarly, the restoration of integrity by the in situ presentation techniques can promote the appreciation of the site's architectural, cultural and historical values. Through an integrated methodology, this study analyzes the tangible and intangible cultural qualities of the Arifiye Old Village Institute campus, a heritage site that lacks integrity. Additionally, this paper discusses the role of digital technologies in the interpretation and presentation of the values of this campus. Village Institute campuses were situated in twenty-one different locations in Turkey; they were created to carry out modernization efforts and facilitate the construction of modern Turkish identity in the rural areas of the new Turkish Republic. The architectural projects of fifteen of the twenty-one Village Institute campuses, including the Arifiye Village Institute, were obtained through national architectural competitions. The architectural program included ateliers, classrooms, administrative buildings, service buildings, dining halls, dormitories, sports halls and open-air sports areas, and, in some cases, music schools and facilities for fishing. The Arifiye Village Institute was founded in Kocaeli in 1940. The educational and spatial history of the Arifiye Village Institute began with building of the Arifiye instructor course buildings in 1937. In 1940, the architect Recai Akcay was awarded first prize in the national architectural competition for his design of the Arifiye Village Institute. The construction of the buildings was considered part of the training education, and students built many of the buildings at Arifiye, including those in the instructor course area, the competition project area, and at other locations, like on the shores of nearby Sapanca Lake. The Arifiye Village Institute differs from other institute campuses, which were mostly confined to just one location. Although the Arifiye Village Institute has been an educational campus since its establishment, most of its original buildings are now lost. As a result of a Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism decision in 2000, a single building on the campus was registered as cultural heritage; that is a first step but is insufficient for conserving the site as a whole. The physical changes, in parallel with the changing educational systems over time, transformed the spatial characteristics of the campus. Functional changes to the existing buildings, a non-holistic conservation approach, demolition decisions, and the addition of architectural buildings incompatible with the character of the campus damaged its integrity. The Arifiye Village Institute campus, which has architectural, historical, political, and educational values, needs to be handled with an integrated conservation approach that prioritizes its tangible remains and intangible cultural heritage values. This article explores the importance of interpretation and on-site digital presentation for this campus and for other heritage sites that have lost their integrity. Using on-site digital presentation techniques to explain, interpret, and present the cultural significance of the Arifiye Village Institute and its tangible and intangible heritage values is an efficient and beneficial way to approach the conservation of heritage sites that have limited architectural remains. Keywords: Arifiye Village Institute; early republican period; integrated conservation approach; on-site digital presentation techniques; heritage interpretation and presentation. Kulturel ve dogal miras alanlarinin butunluk niteligini tasimasi, ozellikle UNESCO Dunya Miras calismalari baglaminda onemli kabul edilmektedir. Butunluk, dogal veya kulturel mirasin fiziksel ozniteliklerinin eksiksizliginin bir olcutudur. Ote yandan, kulturel anlam ve onem sadece mirasin somut yonlerinde degil, ayni zamanda mirasin toplumsal hafiza, anlamlar, anilar gibi somut olmayan yonlerinde somutlasir. Onemli miras degerlerine sahip cok sayida miras alaninin butunluk kriterini karsilayamadigi goz onune alindiginda, bu makale, "butunlukten" yoksun miras alanlarinin, somut ve somut olmayan kulturel niteliklerinin entegre bir degerlendirmesi ve yerinde sunumu yoluyla miras degerlerinin kismen yeniden kazanabilecegini ve canlandirabilecegini savunmaktadir. Benzer sekilde, yerinde sunum teknikleriyle butunlugun restorasyonu saglanarak miras alanlarinin mimari, kulturel ve tarihi degerlerinin takdir edilmesi tesvik edilebilir. Bu calisma kapsaminda, butunlugunu kaybetmis bir miras alani olan eski Arifiye Koy Enstitusu yerleskesinin somut ve somut olmayan kulturel nitelikleri butunlesik olarak calisilmis ve bu yerleskenin degerlerinin dijital teknolojiler ile yorumu ve sunumu tartisilmistir. Koy Enstituleri, Cumhuriyet Donemi'nin modernlesme ve yeni bir kimlik insasini kirsal alanda gerceklestirmek amaciyla yurdun 21 farkli noktasinda konumlandirilmistir. Birbirleriyle baglantili bir ag sistemi olarak mekansal uretim gerceklestiren ve ulkede egitim birligi saglayan bu agin bir parcasi olarak Arifiye Koy Enstitusu, 1940 yilinda Kocaeli'nde kurulmustur. Arifiye Koy Enstitusunun egitim ve mekansal tarihi 1937 yilinda kurulan Arifiye Egitmen Kursuna dayanmaktadir. 1940 yilinda 12 adet Koy Enstitusu icin acilan Koy Enstituleri ulusal mimari proje yarismasinda Arifiye Koy Enstitusu yerleskesinin proje yarismasini yuksek mimar Recai Akcay kazanmistir. Arifiye Koy Enstitusunde Egitmen Kursuna ait mekanlar ve yarisma projesi sonucu uretilen mekanlarin disinda farkli alanlarda egitim amaciyla gerceklesen eylemler sonucunda mekansal uretimler gerceklesmistir. Bu durum, bircok farkli alanda yerlesim gosteren Arifiye Koy Enstitusunu diger enstitu yerleskelerinden ayiran ozgun bir ozelliktir. Arifiye Koy Enstitusu, kuruldugu gunden gunumuze dek egitim yerleskesi olma ozelligini surdurmesine ragmen ozgun yapilarinin buyuk bir cogunlugu kaybedilmistir. 2000 yilinda alinan tescil karari sonucunda yerleskede bulunan tek bir yapinin tescillenmesi koruma kararlarinin butuncul bir yaklasim ile ele alinmadiginin bir kaniti niteligindedir. Zaman icerisinde degisen egitim sistemlerine paralel olarak gecirdigi degisimler de yerleskenin mekansal ozeliklerini donusturmustur. Mevcut yapilarin islevsel degisiklikleri, butuncul olmayan koruma yaklasimi, yikim kararlari ve yerleske icerisine farkli karakterde mimari yapilarin eklenmesi yerleskenin butunlugunu zedelemistir. Mimari, tarihi, politik ve egitsel degerlere sahip olan Arifiye Koy Enstitusu yerleskesi sahip oldugu somut izler ve somut olmayan kulturel miras degerleri ile butuncul bir koruma yaklasimi ile ele alinmasi gerekmektedir. Bu calismada, enstitunun butunlugunu kaybetmis bir miras alani olarak korunmasinda miras alaninin sunumunun ve yorumunun onemi vurgulanmistir. Arifiye Koy Enstitusunun oneminin ve somut ve somut olmayan miras degerlerinin anlatilmasinda, yorumunda ve sunumunda yontem olarak dijital sunum tekniklerinin kullanilmasi, somut bir iz bulunmayan miras alanlarinin korunmasinda etkili bir yaklasim olarak ele alinmistir. Anahtar Sozcukler: Arifiye Koy Enstitusu; Erken Cumhuriyet Donemi; butunlesik koruma yaklasimi; yerinde dijital sunum teknikleri; kulturel mirasin sunumu ve yorumu.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0258-5316</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4305/METU.JFA.2023.1.8</identifier><language>tur</language><publisher>Middle East Technical University</publisher><subject>Protection and preservation ; World Heritage areas</subject><ispartof>Mimarlık Fakültesi dergisi, 2023-06, Vol.40 (1), p.175</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Middle East Technical University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okumus, Hande Savas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corakbas, Figen Kivilcim</creatorcontrib><title>UNDERSTANDING, INTERPRETING AND PRESENTING HERITAGE SITES THAT LACK INTEGRITY: THE CASE OF THE OLD ARIFIYE VILLAGE INSTITUTE CAMPUS/BUTUNLUGUNU KAYBETMIS MIRAS ALANLARINI ANLAMAK, YORUMLAMAK VE SUNMAK: ESKI ARIFIYE KOY ENSTITUSU YERLESKESI ORNEGI</title><title>Mimarlık Fakültesi dergisi</title><description>One of UNESCO's evaluation criteria for cultural and natural World Heritage Sites is the concept of integrity, which measures the completeness of a natural or cultural heritage site's tangible architectural, urban, and environmental qualities. On the other hand, cultural significance is not only embodied in the tangible aspects of heritage but also inherent in the intangible aspects like associations, meetings, memory, and records. Considering that numerous sites that do have significant heritage values do not meet this integrity criterion, this paper argues that heritage sites that lack "integrity" can partially regain and revive their heritage values through an integrated evaluation and on-site presentation of their tangible and intangible cultural qualities. Similarly, the restoration of integrity by the in situ presentation techniques can promote the appreciation of the site's architectural, cultural and historical values. Through an integrated methodology, this study analyzes the tangible and intangible cultural qualities of the Arifiye Old Village Institute campus, a heritage site that lacks integrity. Additionally, this paper discusses the role of digital technologies in the interpretation and presentation of the values of this campus. Village Institute campuses were situated in twenty-one different locations in Turkey; they were created to carry out modernization efforts and facilitate the construction of modern Turkish identity in the rural areas of the new Turkish Republic. The architectural projects of fifteen of the twenty-one Village Institute campuses, including the Arifiye Village Institute, were obtained through national architectural competitions. The architectural program included ateliers, classrooms, administrative buildings, service buildings, dining halls, dormitories, sports halls and open-air sports areas, and, in some cases, music schools and facilities for fishing. The Arifiye Village Institute was founded in Kocaeli in 1940. The educational and spatial history of the Arifiye Village Institute began with building of the Arifiye instructor course buildings in 1937. In 1940, the architect Recai Akcay was awarded first prize in the national architectural competition for his design of the Arifiye Village Institute. The construction of the buildings was considered part of the training education, and students built many of the buildings at Arifiye, including those in the instructor course area, the competition project area, and at other locations, like on the shores of nearby Sapanca Lake. The Arifiye Village Institute differs from other institute campuses, which were mostly confined to just one location. Although the Arifiye Village Institute has been an educational campus since its establishment, most of its original buildings are now lost. As a result of a Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism decision in 2000, a single building on the campus was registered as cultural heritage; that is a first step but is insufficient for conserving the site as a whole. The physical changes, in parallel with the changing educational systems over time, transformed the spatial characteristics of the campus. Functional changes to the existing buildings, a non-holistic conservation approach, demolition decisions, and the addition of architectural buildings incompatible with the character of the campus damaged its integrity. The Arifiye Village Institute campus, which has architectural, historical, political, and educational values, needs to be handled with an integrated conservation approach that prioritizes its tangible remains and intangible cultural heritage values. This article explores the importance of interpretation and on-site digital presentation for this campus and for other heritage sites that have lost their integrity. Using on-site digital presentation techniques to explain, interpret, and present the cultural significance of the Arifiye Village Institute and its tangible and intangible heritage values is an efficient and beneficial way to approach the conservation of heritage sites that have limited architectural remains. Keywords: Arifiye Village Institute; early republican period; integrated conservation approach; on-site digital presentation techniques; heritage interpretation and presentation. Kulturel ve dogal miras alanlarinin butunluk niteligini tasimasi, ozellikle UNESCO Dunya Miras calismalari baglaminda onemli kabul edilmektedir. Butunluk, dogal veya kulturel mirasin fiziksel ozniteliklerinin eksiksizliginin bir olcutudur. Ote yandan, kulturel anlam ve onem sadece mirasin somut yonlerinde degil, ayni zamanda mirasin toplumsal hafiza, anlamlar, anilar gibi somut olmayan yonlerinde somutlasir. Onemli miras degerlerine sahip cok sayida miras alaninin butunluk kriterini karsilayamadigi goz onune alindiginda, bu makale, "butunlukten" yoksun miras alanlarinin, somut ve somut olmayan kulturel niteliklerinin entegre bir degerlendirmesi ve yerinde sunumu yoluyla miras degerlerinin kismen yeniden kazanabilecegini ve canlandirabilecegini savunmaktadir. Benzer sekilde, yerinde sunum teknikleriyle butunlugun restorasyonu saglanarak miras alanlarinin mimari, kulturel ve tarihi degerlerinin takdir edilmesi tesvik edilebilir. Bu calisma kapsaminda, butunlugunu kaybetmis bir miras alani olan eski Arifiye Koy Enstitusu yerleskesinin somut ve somut olmayan kulturel nitelikleri butunlesik olarak calisilmis ve bu yerleskenin degerlerinin dijital teknolojiler ile yorumu ve sunumu tartisilmistir. Koy Enstituleri, Cumhuriyet Donemi'nin modernlesme ve yeni bir kimlik insasini kirsal alanda gerceklestirmek amaciyla yurdun 21 farkli noktasinda konumlandirilmistir. Birbirleriyle baglantili bir ag sistemi olarak mekansal uretim gerceklestiren ve ulkede egitim birligi saglayan bu agin bir parcasi olarak Arifiye Koy Enstitusu, 1940 yilinda Kocaeli'nde kurulmustur. Arifiye Koy Enstitusunun egitim ve mekansal tarihi 1937 yilinda kurulan Arifiye Egitmen Kursuna dayanmaktadir. 1940 yilinda 12 adet Koy Enstitusu icin acilan Koy Enstituleri ulusal mimari proje yarismasinda Arifiye Koy Enstitusu yerleskesinin proje yarismasini yuksek mimar Recai Akcay kazanmistir. Arifiye Koy Enstitusunde Egitmen Kursuna ait mekanlar ve yarisma projesi sonucu uretilen mekanlarin disinda farkli alanlarda egitim amaciyla gerceklesen eylemler sonucunda mekansal uretimler gerceklesmistir. Bu durum, bircok farkli alanda yerlesim gosteren Arifiye Koy Enstitusunu diger enstitu yerleskelerinden ayiran ozgun bir ozelliktir. Arifiye Koy Enstitusu, kuruldugu gunden gunumuze dek egitim yerleskesi olma ozelligini surdurmesine ragmen ozgun yapilarinin buyuk bir cogunlugu kaybedilmistir. 2000 yilinda alinan tescil karari sonucunda yerleskede bulunan tek bir yapinin tescillenmesi koruma kararlarinin butuncul bir yaklasim ile ele alinmadiginin bir kaniti niteligindedir. Zaman icerisinde degisen egitim sistemlerine paralel olarak gecirdigi degisimler de yerleskenin mekansal ozeliklerini donusturmustur. Mevcut yapilarin islevsel degisiklikleri, butuncul olmayan koruma yaklasimi, yikim kararlari ve yerleske icerisine farkli karakterde mimari yapilarin eklenmesi yerleskenin butunlugunu zedelemistir. Mimari, tarihi, politik ve egitsel degerlere sahip olan Arifiye Koy Enstitusu yerleskesi sahip oldugu somut izler ve somut olmayan kulturel miras degerleri ile butuncul bir koruma yaklasimi ile ele alinmasi gerekmektedir. Bu calismada, enstitunun butunlugunu kaybetmis bir miras alani olarak korunmasinda miras alaninin sunumunun ve yorumunun onemi vurgulanmistir. Arifiye Koy Enstitusunun oneminin ve somut ve somut olmayan miras degerlerinin anlatilmasinda, yorumunda ve sunumunda yontem olarak dijital sunum tekniklerinin kullanilmasi, somut bir iz bulunmayan miras alanlarinin korunmasinda etkili bir yaklasim olarak ele alinmistir. Anahtar Sozcukler: Arifiye Koy Enstitusu; Erken Cumhuriyet Donemi; butunlesik koruma yaklasimi; yerinde dijital sunum teknikleri; kulturel mirasin sunumu ve yorumu.</description><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>World Heritage areas</subject><issn>0258-5316</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjstuwkAMRWfRSqWPD-jOHwAhIUl57AZwgpvJBM14kLKqEA0VFQWp8O1dd0ir7isvfHzta1uIxygMkjhM-yWyC54zGQzCQRxEwehKdMJBOuqlcfR0I25Pp_cwTIbROOqIL6fnaCxLPSedd4E0o1kaZF-BF8GzRd2WCzTEMkewxGiBF5JByVnRmnLfqydeRJhJi1BlLVdqDtJQRjXCipS62ElbJnZ8mSyXzvanjp1WLnfaQSHrKXJJFkoy0oJUUiu_QRNcoJRFF-rKuLJlWPlvnPY0AbQF_d0qqhrw5451UKNRvo2WoDIac7oX19v1_tQ8_OY7EWTIs0Xvbb1vXnaH7fH8ud74eG0-dpvjodnuvC6H6WiYpONxEv_b8A0-aXKS</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Okumus, Hande Savas</creator><creator>Corakbas, Figen Kivilcim</creator><general>Middle East Technical University</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>UNDERSTANDING, INTERPRETING AND PRESENTING HERITAGE SITES THAT LACK INTEGRITY: THE CASE OF THE OLD ARIFIYE VILLAGE INSTITUTE CAMPUS/BUTUNLUGUNU KAYBETMIS MIRAS ALANLARINI ANLAMAK, YORUMLAMAK VE SUNMAK: ESKI ARIFIYE KOY ENSTITUSU YERLESKESI ORNEGI</title><author>Okumus, Hande Savas ; Corakbas, Figen Kivilcim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7587459943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>tur</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>World Heritage areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okumus, Hande Savas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corakbas, Figen Kivilcim</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Mimarlık Fakültesi dergisi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okumus, Hande Savas</au><au>Corakbas, Figen Kivilcim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UNDERSTANDING, INTERPRETING AND PRESENTING HERITAGE SITES THAT LACK INTEGRITY: THE CASE OF THE OLD ARIFIYE VILLAGE INSTITUTE CAMPUS/BUTUNLUGUNU KAYBETMIS MIRAS ALANLARINI ANLAMAK, YORUMLAMAK VE SUNMAK: ESKI ARIFIYE KOY ENSTITUSU YERLESKESI ORNEGI</atitle><jtitle>Mimarlık Fakültesi dergisi</jtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>175</spage><pages>175-</pages><issn>0258-5316</issn><abstract>One of UNESCO's evaluation criteria for cultural and natural World Heritage Sites is the concept of integrity, which measures the completeness of a natural or cultural heritage site's tangible architectural, urban, and environmental qualities. On the other hand, cultural significance is not only embodied in the tangible aspects of heritage but also inherent in the intangible aspects like associations, meetings, memory, and records. Considering that numerous sites that do have significant heritage values do not meet this integrity criterion, this paper argues that heritage sites that lack "integrity" can partially regain and revive their heritage values through an integrated evaluation and on-site presentation of their tangible and intangible cultural qualities. Similarly, the restoration of integrity by the in situ presentation techniques can promote the appreciation of the site's architectural, cultural and historical values. Through an integrated methodology, this study analyzes the tangible and intangible cultural qualities of the Arifiye Old Village Institute campus, a heritage site that lacks integrity. Additionally, this paper discusses the role of digital technologies in the interpretation and presentation of the values of this campus. Village Institute campuses were situated in twenty-one different locations in Turkey; they were created to carry out modernization efforts and facilitate the construction of modern Turkish identity in the rural areas of the new Turkish Republic. The architectural projects of fifteen of the twenty-one Village Institute campuses, including the Arifiye Village Institute, were obtained through national architectural competitions. The architectural program included ateliers, classrooms, administrative buildings, service buildings, dining halls, dormitories, sports halls and open-air sports areas, and, in some cases, music schools and facilities for fishing. The Arifiye Village Institute was founded in Kocaeli in 1940. The educational and spatial history of the Arifiye Village Institute began with building of the Arifiye instructor course buildings in 1937. In 1940, the architect Recai Akcay was awarded first prize in the national architectural competition for his design of the Arifiye Village Institute. The construction of the buildings was considered part of the training education, and students built many of the buildings at Arifiye, including those in the instructor course area, the competition project area, and at other locations, like on the shores of nearby Sapanca Lake. The Arifiye Village Institute differs from other institute campuses, which were mostly confined to just one location. Although the Arifiye Village Institute has been an educational campus since its establishment, most of its original buildings are now lost. As a result of a Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism decision in 2000, a single building on the campus was registered as cultural heritage; that is a first step but is insufficient for conserving the site as a whole. The physical changes, in parallel with the changing educational systems over time, transformed the spatial characteristics of the campus. Functional changes to the existing buildings, a non-holistic conservation approach, demolition decisions, and the addition of architectural buildings incompatible with the character of the campus damaged its integrity. The Arifiye Village Institute campus, which has architectural, historical, political, and educational values, needs to be handled with an integrated conservation approach that prioritizes its tangible remains and intangible cultural heritage values. This article explores the importance of interpretation and on-site digital presentation for this campus and for other heritage sites that have lost their integrity. Using on-site digital presentation techniques to explain, interpret, and present the cultural significance of the Arifiye Village Institute and its tangible and intangible heritage values is an efficient and beneficial way to approach the conservation of heritage sites that have limited architectural remains. Keywords: Arifiye Village Institute; early republican period; integrated conservation approach; on-site digital presentation techniques; heritage interpretation and presentation. Kulturel ve dogal miras alanlarinin butunluk niteligini tasimasi, ozellikle UNESCO Dunya Miras calismalari baglaminda onemli kabul edilmektedir. Butunluk, dogal veya kulturel mirasin fiziksel ozniteliklerinin eksiksizliginin bir olcutudur. Ote yandan, kulturel anlam ve onem sadece mirasin somut yonlerinde degil, ayni zamanda mirasin toplumsal hafiza, anlamlar, anilar gibi somut olmayan yonlerinde somutlasir. Onemli miras degerlerine sahip cok sayida miras alaninin butunluk kriterini karsilayamadigi goz onune alindiginda, bu makale, "butunlukten" yoksun miras alanlarinin, somut ve somut olmayan kulturel niteliklerinin entegre bir degerlendirmesi ve yerinde sunumu yoluyla miras degerlerinin kismen yeniden kazanabilecegini ve canlandirabilecegini savunmaktadir. Benzer sekilde, yerinde sunum teknikleriyle butunlugun restorasyonu saglanarak miras alanlarinin mimari, kulturel ve tarihi degerlerinin takdir edilmesi tesvik edilebilir. Bu calisma kapsaminda, butunlugunu kaybetmis bir miras alani olan eski Arifiye Koy Enstitusu yerleskesinin somut ve somut olmayan kulturel nitelikleri butunlesik olarak calisilmis ve bu yerleskenin degerlerinin dijital teknolojiler ile yorumu ve sunumu tartisilmistir. Koy Enstituleri, Cumhuriyet Donemi'nin modernlesme ve yeni bir kimlik insasini kirsal alanda gerceklestirmek amaciyla yurdun 21 farkli noktasinda konumlandirilmistir. Birbirleriyle baglantili bir ag sistemi olarak mekansal uretim gerceklestiren ve ulkede egitim birligi saglayan bu agin bir parcasi olarak Arifiye Koy Enstitusu, 1940 yilinda Kocaeli'nde kurulmustur. Arifiye Koy Enstitusunun egitim ve mekansal tarihi 1937 yilinda kurulan Arifiye Egitmen Kursuna dayanmaktadir. 1940 yilinda 12 adet Koy Enstitusu icin acilan Koy Enstituleri ulusal mimari proje yarismasinda Arifiye Koy Enstitusu yerleskesinin proje yarismasini yuksek mimar Recai Akcay kazanmistir. Arifiye Koy Enstitusunde Egitmen Kursuna ait mekanlar ve yarisma projesi sonucu uretilen mekanlarin disinda farkli alanlarda egitim amaciyla gerceklesen eylemler sonucunda mekansal uretimler gerceklesmistir. Bu durum, bircok farkli alanda yerlesim gosteren Arifiye Koy Enstitusunu diger enstitu yerleskelerinden ayiran ozgun bir ozelliktir. Arifiye Koy Enstitusu, kuruldugu gunden gunumuze dek egitim yerleskesi olma ozelligini surdurmesine ragmen ozgun yapilarinin buyuk bir cogunlugu kaybedilmistir. 2000 yilinda alinan tescil karari sonucunda yerleskede bulunan tek bir yapinin tescillenmesi koruma kararlarinin butuncul bir yaklasim ile ele alinmadiginin bir kaniti niteligindedir. Zaman icerisinde degisen egitim sistemlerine paralel olarak gecirdigi degisimler de yerleskenin mekansal ozeliklerini donusturmustur. Mevcut yapilarin islevsel degisiklikleri, butuncul olmayan koruma yaklasimi, yikim kararlari ve yerleske icerisine farkli karakterde mimari yapilarin eklenmesi yerleskenin butunlugunu zedelemistir. Mimari, tarihi, politik ve egitsel degerlere sahip olan Arifiye Koy Enstitusu yerleskesi sahip oldugu somut izler ve somut olmayan kulturel miras degerleri ile butuncul bir koruma yaklasimi ile ele alinmasi gerekmektedir. Bu calismada, enstitunun butunlugunu kaybetmis bir miras alani olarak korunmasinda miras alaninin sunumunun ve yorumunun onemi vurgulanmistir. Arifiye Koy Enstitusunun oneminin ve somut ve somut olmayan miras degerlerinin anlatilmasinda, yorumunda ve sunumunda yontem olarak dijital sunum tekniklerinin kullanilmasi, somut bir iz bulunmayan miras alanlarinin korunmasinda etkili bir yaklasim olarak ele alinmistir. Anahtar Sozcukler: Arifiye Koy Enstitusu; Erken Cumhuriyet Donemi; butunlesik koruma yaklasimi; yerinde dijital sunum teknikleri; kulturel mirasin sunumu ve yorumu.</abstract><pub>Middle East Technical University</pub><doi>10.4305/METU.JFA.2023.1.8</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0258-5316 |
ispartof | Mimarlık Fakültesi dergisi, 2023-06, Vol.40 (1), p.175 |
issn | 0258-5316 |
language | tur |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A758745994 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Protection and preservation World Heritage areas |
title | UNDERSTANDING, INTERPRETING AND PRESENTING HERITAGE SITES THAT LACK INTEGRITY: THE CASE OF THE OLD ARIFIYE VILLAGE INSTITUTE CAMPUS/BUTUNLUGUNU KAYBETMIS MIRAS ALANLARINI ANLAMAK, YORUMLAMAK VE SUNMAK: ESKI ARIFIYE KOY ENSTITUSU YERLESKESI ORNEGI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A37%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UNDERSTANDING,%20INTERPRETING%20AND%20PRESENTING%20HERITAGE%20SITES%20THAT%20LACK%20INTEGRITY:%20THE%20CASE%20OF%20THE%20OLD%20ARIFIYE%20VILLAGE%20INSTITUTE%20CAMPUS/BUTUNLUGUNU%20KAYBETMIS%20MIRAS%20ALANLARINI%20ANLAMAK,%20YORUMLAMAK%20VE%20SUNMAK:%20ESKI%20ARIFIYE%20KOY%20ENSTITUSU%20YERLESKESI%20ORNEGI&rft.jtitle=Mimarl%C4%B1k%20Faku%CC%88ltesi%20dergisi&rft.au=Okumus,%20Hande%20Savas&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=175&rft.pages=175-&rft.issn=0258-5316&rft_id=info:doi/10.4305/METU.JFA.2023.1.8&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA758745994%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A758745994&rfr_iscdi=true |