IWaldsteinia/I within IGeum/I s.l. : Main Aspects of Phylogeny and Speciation History
Waldsteinia is a small plant genus inhabiting the temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere. According to the latest revisions, Waldsteinia is included in Geum. We have obtained a phylogenetic reconstruction based on the nuclear (ITS) and plastid (trnL-trnF) DNA to understand the phylogenetic str...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diversity (Basel) 2023-03, Vol.15 (4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Diversity (Basel) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Protopopova, Marina Pavlichenko, Vasiliy Chepinoga, Victor Gnutikov, Alexander Adelshin, Renat |
description | Waldsteinia is a small plant genus inhabiting the temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere. According to the latest revisions, Waldsteinia is included in Geum. We have obtained a phylogenetic reconstruction based on the nuclear (ITS) and plastid (trnL-trnF) DNA to understand the phylogenetic structure of Waldsteinia and its relationships with other taxa of Geum s.l. Phylogenetic analysis based on the joint ITS + trnL-trnF dataset demonstrated Waldsteinia monophyly. The phylogenetic relationships of Waldsteinia species were better explained by their geographical distribution than their morphology. Hence, Euro-Siberian, Northeast Asian, and North American phylogeographic groups were distinguished, with East Asia having been suggested as the place of Waldsteinia origin. Considering the incongruence in W. geoides (a type species) position on the plastid and nuclear DNA trees, together with the discrepancy between the species morphology and its location on the plastid DNA tree, a hybrid origin was suggested for this species. Despite the fact that the position of W. maximowicziana is still not fully resolved, we support the point of view that claims it should be separated from the W. ternata aggregate (traditionally including W. trifolia, W. ternata s.str., and W. maximowicziana) and considered a separate species. The American W. doniana, W. fragarioides, and W. lobata belong to a single maternal lineage, but the observed genetic differences are too small to serve as a convincing argument for species segregation, so their relationships still remain unresolved. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/d15040479 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A747443451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747443451</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747443451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g731-de7995b114b9c8f2ce3dcb48d63e5e2f3cd8a09cee75ef87ebb814aa9b9f9cec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVjEFLAzEUhIMoWKsH_0GuHnabbLLNxlsp2i5UFFvxWLLJyzayzUqTovvvDeihMof35mNmELqlJGdMkomhJeGEC3mGRpQXPCsqWp2f_JfoKoQPQqayFGKE3up31ZkQwXmnJjX-cnHnPK4XcNwnG_Iux_f4SSU2C5-gY8C9xS-7oetb8ANW3uB14k5F13u8dCH2h-EaXVjVBbj5u2O0eXzYzJfZ6nlRz2errBWMZgaElGVDKW-krmyhgRnd8MpMGZRQWKZNpYjUAKIEWwlomopypWQjbaKajVH-O9uqDrbO2z4elE4ysHe692Bd4jPBBeeMlzQV7v4VUibCd2zVMYRtvX49zf4AVZdjJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>IWaldsteinia/I within IGeum/I s.l. : Main Aspects of Phylogeny and Speciation History</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Protopopova, Marina ; Pavlichenko, Vasiliy ; Chepinoga, Victor ; Gnutikov, Alexander ; Adelshin, Renat</creator><creatorcontrib>Protopopova, Marina ; Pavlichenko, Vasiliy ; Chepinoga, Victor ; Gnutikov, Alexander ; Adelshin, Renat</creatorcontrib><description>Waldsteinia is a small plant genus inhabiting the temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere. According to the latest revisions, Waldsteinia is included in Geum. We have obtained a phylogenetic reconstruction based on the nuclear (ITS) and plastid (trnL-trnF) DNA to understand the phylogenetic structure of Waldsteinia and its relationships with other taxa of Geum s.l. Phylogenetic analysis based on the joint ITS + trnL-trnF dataset demonstrated Waldsteinia monophyly. The phylogenetic relationships of Waldsteinia species were better explained by their geographical distribution than their morphology. Hence, Euro-Siberian, Northeast Asian, and North American phylogeographic groups were distinguished, with East Asia having been suggested as the place of Waldsteinia origin. Considering the incongruence in W. geoides (a type species) position on the plastid and nuclear DNA trees, together with the discrepancy between the species morphology and its location on the plastid DNA tree, a hybrid origin was suggested for this species. Despite the fact that the position of W. maximowicziana is still not fully resolved, we support the point of view that claims it should be separated from the W. ternata aggregate (traditionally including W. trifolia, W. ternata s.str., and W. maximowicziana) and considered a separate species. The American W. doniana, W. fragarioides, and W. lobata belong to a single maternal lineage, but the observed genetic differences are too small to serve as a convincing argument for species segregation, so their relationships still remain unresolved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-2818</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-2818</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/d15040479</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Distribution ; Genetic aspects ; Identification and classification ; Phylogeny ; Rosaceae</subject><ispartof>Diversity (Basel), 2023-03, Vol.15 (4)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,862,27913,27914</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Protopopova, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlichenko, Vasiliy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chepinoga, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnutikov, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelshin, Renat</creatorcontrib><title>IWaldsteinia/I within IGeum/I s.l. : Main Aspects of Phylogeny and Speciation History</title><title>Diversity (Basel)</title><description>Waldsteinia is a small plant genus inhabiting the temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere. According to the latest revisions, Waldsteinia is included in Geum. We have obtained a phylogenetic reconstruction based on the nuclear (ITS) and plastid (trnL-trnF) DNA to understand the phylogenetic structure of Waldsteinia and its relationships with other taxa of Geum s.l. Phylogenetic analysis based on the joint ITS + trnL-trnF dataset demonstrated Waldsteinia monophyly. The phylogenetic relationships of Waldsteinia species were better explained by their geographical distribution than their morphology. Hence, Euro-Siberian, Northeast Asian, and North American phylogeographic groups were distinguished, with East Asia having been suggested as the place of Waldsteinia origin. Considering the incongruence in W. geoides (a type species) position on the plastid and nuclear DNA trees, together with the discrepancy between the species morphology and its location on the plastid DNA tree, a hybrid origin was suggested for this species. Despite the fact that the position of W. maximowicziana is still not fully resolved, we support the point of view that claims it should be separated from the W. ternata aggregate (traditionally including W. trifolia, W. ternata s.str., and W. maximowicziana) and considered a separate species. The American W. doniana, W. fragarioides, and W. lobata belong to a single maternal lineage, but the observed genetic differences are too small to serve as a convincing argument for species segregation, so their relationships still remain unresolved.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Rosaceae</subject><issn>1424-2818</issn><issn>1424-2818</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVjEFLAzEUhIMoWKsH_0GuHnabbLLNxlsp2i5UFFvxWLLJyzayzUqTovvvDeihMof35mNmELqlJGdMkomhJeGEC3mGRpQXPCsqWp2f_JfoKoQPQqayFGKE3up31ZkQwXmnJjX-cnHnPK4XcNwnG_Iux_f4SSU2C5-gY8C9xS-7oetb8ANW3uB14k5F13u8dCH2h-EaXVjVBbj5u2O0eXzYzJfZ6nlRz2errBWMZgaElGVDKW-krmyhgRnd8MpMGZRQWKZNpYjUAKIEWwlomopypWQjbaKajVH-O9uqDrbO2z4elE4ysHe692Bd4jPBBeeMlzQV7v4VUibCd2zVMYRtvX49zf4AVZdjJw</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Protopopova, Marina</creator><creator>Pavlichenko, Vasiliy</creator><creator>Chepinoga, Victor</creator><creator>Gnutikov, Alexander</creator><creator>Adelshin, Renat</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>IWaldsteinia/I within IGeum/I s.l. : Main Aspects of Phylogeny and Speciation History</title><author>Protopopova, Marina ; Pavlichenko, Vasiliy ; Chepinoga, Victor ; Gnutikov, Alexander ; Adelshin, Renat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g731-de7995b114b9c8f2ce3dcb48d63e5e2f3cd8a09cee75ef87ebb814aa9b9f9cec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Rosaceae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Protopopova, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlichenko, Vasiliy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chepinoga, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnutikov, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelshin, Renat</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>Diversity (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Protopopova, Marina</au><au>Pavlichenko, Vasiliy</au><au>Chepinoga, Victor</au><au>Gnutikov, Alexander</au><au>Adelshin, Renat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IWaldsteinia/I within IGeum/I s.l. : Main Aspects of Phylogeny and Speciation History</atitle><jtitle>Diversity (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>1424-2818</issn><eissn>1424-2818</eissn><abstract>Waldsteinia is a small plant genus inhabiting the temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere. According to the latest revisions, Waldsteinia is included in Geum. We have obtained a phylogenetic reconstruction based on the nuclear (ITS) and plastid (trnL-trnF) DNA to understand the phylogenetic structure of Waldsteinia and its relationships with other taxa of Geum s.l. Phylogenetic analysis based on the joint ITS + trnL-trnF dataset demonstrated Waldsteinia monophyly. The phylogenetic relationships of Waldsteinia species were better explained by their geographical distribution than their morphology. Hence, Euro-Siberian, Northeast Asian, and North American phylogeographic groups were distinguished, with East Asia having been suggested as the place of Waldsteinia origin. Considering the incongruence in W. geoides (a type species) position on the plastid and nuclear DNA trees, together with the discrepancy between the species morphology and its location on the plastid DNA tree, a hybrid origin was suggested for this species. Despite the fact that the position of W. maximowicziana is still not fully resolved, we support the point of view that claims it should be separated from the W. ternata aggregate (traditionally including W. trifolia, W. ternata s.str., and W. maximowicziana) and considered a separate species. The American W. doniana, W. fragarioides, and W. lobata belong to a single maternal lineage, but the observed genetic differences are too small to serve as a convincing argument for species segregation, so their relationships still remain unresolved.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/d15040479</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1424-2818 |
ispartof | Diversity (Basel), 2023-03, Vol.15 (4) |
issn | 1424-2818 1424-2818 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A747443451 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Analysis Distribution Genetic aspects Identification and classification Phylogeny Rosaceae |
title | IWaldsteinia/I within IGeum/I s.l. : Main Aspects of Phylogeny and Speciation History |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A58%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IWaldsteinia/I%20within%20IGeum/I%20s.l.%20:%20Main%20Aspects%20of%20Phylogeny%20and%20Speciation%20History&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20(Basel)&rft.au=Protopopova,%20Marina&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=1424-2818&rft.eissn=1424-2818&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/d15040479&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA747443451%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747443451&rfr_iscdi=true |