Water dependence structures predation risk for large herbivores in insular protected areas

Predator avoidance strategies vary across the ungulate guild. Population-level responses to the presence of large predators to a large extent depend on how well ecological conditions suit the particular predator avoidance strategies of a species. Predation risk from ambush predators, e.g. lions nega...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 2022-12, Vol.102 (5-6), p.1783-1792
Hauptverfasser: Louw, Cornelius J., Ferreira, Sam M., Marshal, Jason P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1792
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 1783
container_title Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde
container_volume 102
creator Louw, Cornelius J.
Ferreira, Sam M.
Marshal, Jason P.
description Predator avoidance strategies vary across the ungulate guild. Population-level responses to the presence of large predators to a large extent depend on how well ecological conditions suit the particular predator avoidance strategies of a species. Predation risk from ambush predators, e.g. lions negatively correlates with distance from surface water, but only at scales comparable to the foraging range of lions. Prey species with low surface water requirements spend less time close to surface water, and their predator avoidance revolves around selecting predator-free zones. Arguably, spatial segregation would be further encouraged by competition from water-dependent conspecifics. The scarcity of predator-free zones in confined spaces raises the expectation that they are exposed to a high predation risk relative to species more dependent on surface water. Based on this premise, we argue that lion introductions to insular conservation areas of limited size, compromise diverse ungulate communities. We do an across-species comparison of the long-run population growth of a selection of prey species across fourteen small conservation areas. Study areas are categorised according to those harbouring apex predators (lions) and those that do not. Our findings suggest species differentially respond to the presence of lions, with negative responses biased towards species with low surface water requirements. In smaller conservation areas harbouring lions, reducing surface water frequency might prove key to the successful conservation of water-independent large herbivores.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s42991-022-00278-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A743342216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A743342216</galeid><sourcerecordid>A743342216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-b61ea8ed99143cb578a2e3e8f86dff45ae9554f30721a47eb884cd393db97a343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtKAzEQhhdRsFZfwKu8wNacdpO9LMUTFLxRBG9CNpnU1DYpya7g25t2vZYZmGH4v2Hmr6pbghcEY3GXOe06UmNKa4ypkLU8q2akJbImXLTnp76tG8zFZXWV87aISIObWfXxrgdIyMIBgoVgAOUhjWYYE2R0SGD14GNAyecv5GJCO502gD4h9f47HjU-lMxjmRd5HMAMYJFOoPN1deH0LsPNX51Xbw_3r6unev3y-LxarmtDJRnqviWgJdhyP2emb4TUFBhIJ1vrHG80dE3DHcOCEs0F9FJyY1nHbN8JzTibV4tp70bvQPng4pC0KWFh700M4HyZLwVnjFNK2gLQCTAp5pzAqUPye51-FMHqaKea7FTFTnWyU8kCsQnKRRw2kNQ2jimUx_6jfgFIx3n7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Water dependence structures predation risk for large herbivores in insular protected areas</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Louw, Cornelius J. ; Ferreira, Sam M. ; Marshal, Jason P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Louw, Cornelius J. ; Ferreira, Sam M. ; Marshal, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><description>Predator avoidance strategies vary across the ungulate guild. Population-level responses to the presence of large predators to a large extent depend on how well ecological conditions suit the particular predator avoidance strategies of a species. Predation risk from ambush predators, e.g. lions negatively correlates with distance from surface water, but only at scales comparable to the foraging range of lions. Prey species with low surface water requirements spend less time close to surface water, and their predator avoidance revolves around selecting predator-free zones. Arguably, spatial segregation would be further encouraged by competition from water-dependent conspecifics. The scarcity of predator-free zones in confined spaces raises the expectation that they are exposed to a high predation risk relative to species more dependent on surface water. Based on this premise, we argue that lion introductions to insular conservation areas of limited size, compromise diverse ungulate communities. We do an across-species comparison of the long-run population growth of a selection of prey species across fourteen small conservation areas. Study areas are categorised according to those harbouring apex predators (lions) and those that do not. Our findings suggest species differentially respond to the presence of lions, with negative responses biased towards species with low surface water requirements. In smaller conservation areas harbouring lions, reducing surface water frequency might prove key to the successful conservation of water-independent large herbivores.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1616-5047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42991-022-00278-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal Anatomy ; Animal Ecology ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Aquatic resources ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Evolutionary Biology ; Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management ; Histology ; Life Sciences ; Morphology ; Original Article ; Predation (Biology) ; Wildlife conservation ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 2022-12, Vol.102 (5-6), p.1783-1792</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-b61ea8ed99143cb578a2e3e8f86dff45ae9554f30721a47eb884cd393db97a343</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2490-4584 ; 0000-0001-6664-5432 ; 0000-0001-6924-1150</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42991-022-00278-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42991-022-00278-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Louw, Cornelius J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Sam M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshal, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><title>Water dependence structures predation risk for large herbivores in insular protected areas</title><title>Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde</title><addtitle>Mamm Biol</addtitle><description>Predator avoidance strategies vary across the ungulate guild. Population-level responses to the presence of large predators to a large extent depend on how well ecological conditions suit the particular predator avoidance strategies of a species. Predation risk from ambush predators, e.g. lions negatively correlates with distance from surface water, but only at scales comparable to the foraging range of lions. Prey species with low surface water requirements spend less time close to surface water, and their predator avoidance revolves around selecting predator-free zones. Arguably, spatial segregation would be further encouraged by competition from water-dependent conspecifics. The scarcity of predator-free zones in confined spaces raises the expectation that they are exposed to a high predation risk relative to species more dependent on surface water. Based on this premise, we argue that lion introductions to insular conservation areas of limited size, compromise diverse ungulate communities. We do an across-species comparison of the long-run population growth of a selection of prey species across fourteen small conservation areas. Study areas are categorised according to those harbouring apex predators (lions) and those that do not. Our findings suggest species differentially respond to the presence of lions, with negative responses biased towards species with low surface water requirements. In smaller conservation areas harbouring lions, reducing surface water frequency might prove key to the successful conservation of water-independent large herbivores.</description><subject>Animal Anatomy</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Aquatic resources</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Predation (Biology)</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1616-5047</issn><issn>1618-1476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNtKAzEQhhdRsFZfwKu8wNacdpO9LMUTFLxRBG9CNpnU1DYpya7g25t2vZYZmGH4v2Hmr6pbghcEY3GXOe06UmNKa4ypkLU8q2akJbImXLTnp76tG8zFZXWV87aISIObWfXxrgdIyMIBgoVgAOUhjWYYE2R0SGD14GNAyecv5GJCO502gD4h9f47HjU-lMxjmRd5HMAMYJFOoPN1deH0LsPNX51Xbw_3r6unev3y-LxarmtDJRnqviWgJdhyP2emb4TUFBhIJ1vrHG80dE3DHcOCEs0F9FJyY1nHbN8JzTibV4tp70bvQPng4pC0KWFh700M4HyZLwVnjFNK2gLQCTAp5pzAqUPye51-FMHqaKea7FTFTnWyU8kCsQnKRRw2kNQ2jimUx_6jfgFIx3n7</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Louw, Cornelius J.</creator><creator>Ferreira, Sam M.</creator><creator>Marshal, Jason P.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2490-4584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6664-5432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6924-1150</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Water dependence structures predation risk for large herbivores in insular protected areas</title><author>Louw, Cornelius J. ; Ferreira, Sam M. ; Marshal, Jason P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-b61ea8ed99143cb578a2e3e8f86dff45ae9554f30721a47eb884cd393db97a343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal Anatomy</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Aquatic resources</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Predation (Biology)</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Louw, Cornelius J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Sam M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshal, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Louw, Cornelius J.</au><au>Ferreira, Sam M.</au><au>Marshal, Jason P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Water dependence structures predation risk for large herbivores in insular protected areas</atitle><jtitle>Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde</jtitle><stitle>Mamm Biol</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>1783</spage><epage>1792</epage><pages>1783-1792</pages><issn>1616-5047</issn><eissn>1618-1476</eissn><abstract>Predator avoidance strategies vary across the ungulate guild. Population-level responses to the presence of large predators to a large extent depend on how well ecological conditions suit the particular predator avoidance strategies of a species. Predation risk from ambush predators, e.g. lions negatively correlates with distance from surface water, but only at scales comparable to the foraging range of lions. Prey species with low surface water requirements spend less time close to surface water, and their predator avoidance revolves around selecting predator-free zones. Arguably, spatial segregation would be further encouraged by competition from water-dependent conspecifics. The scarcity of predator-free zones in confined spaces raises the expectation that they are exposed to a high predation risk relative to species more dependent on surface water. Based on this premise, we argue that lion introductions to insular conservation areas of limited size, compromise diverse ungulate communities. We do an across-species comparison of the long-run population growth of a selection of prey species across fourteen small conservation areas. Study areas are categorised according to those harbouring apex predators (lions) and those that do not. Our findings suggest species differentially respond to the presence of lions, with negative responses biased towards species with low surface water requirements. In smaller conservation areas harbouring lions, reducing surface water frequency might prove key to the successful conservation of water-independent large herbivores.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s42991-022-00278-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2490-4584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6664-5432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6924-1150</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1616-5047
ispartof Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 2022-12, Vol.102 (5-6), p.1783-1792
issn 1616-5047
1618-1476
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A743342216
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal Anatomy
Animal Ecology
Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography
Aquatic resources
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Evolutionary Biology
Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management
Histology
Life Sciences
Morphology
Original Article
Predation (Biology)
Wildlife conservation
Zoology
title Water dependence structures predation risk for large herbivores in insular protected areas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T13%3A35%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Water%20dependence%20structures%20predation%20risk%20for%20large%20herbivores%20in%20insular%20protected%20areas&rft.jtitle=Mammalian%20biology%20:%20Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20S%C3%A4ugetierkunde&rft.au=Louw,%20Cornelius%20J.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=1783&rft.epage=1792&rft.pages=1783-1792&rft.issn=1616-5047&rft.eissn=1618-1476&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42991-022-00278-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA743342216%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A743342216&rfr_iscdi=true