Species richness, relative abundance and occupancy of ground-dwelling mammals denote the ineffectiveness of chimpanzee as flagship species

In conservation biology, flagship species are defined as species that can raise support for biodiversity conservation in a given place or social context. In the newly established Gishwati–Mukura National Park in Rwanda, the Eastern chimpanzee was considered such an ambassador. To test whether the fl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 2022-12, Vol.102 (5-6), p.1835-1850
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Ping, Umuntunundi, Prosper, Wronski, Torsten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1850
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 1835
container_title Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde
container_volume 102
creator Sun, Ping
Umuntunundi, Prosper
Wronski, Torsten
description In conservation biology, flagship species are defined as species that can raise support for biodiversity conservation in a given place or social context. In the newly established Gishwati–Mukura National Park in Rwanda, the Eastern chimpanzee was considered such an ambassador. To test whether the flagship species concept was effective in the park, we studied species richness, relative abundance, and species distribution (occupancy) of medium- to large-sized, ground-dwelling mammals using camera trapping technology. The impact of three environmental and three anthropogenic variables on species distribution was investigated and the ecological diversity of the fauna in the national park assessed. Over a period of 9 months, two 4 × 4 camera trapping grids were deployed in Gishwati and Mukura Forest. Sampling effort in each forest equated to 32 and 29 camera trapping locations, yielding 258 and 242 independent photographic events of eight and six species, respectively. In both forests, the Emin's giant poached rat was the most frequently encountered species, while all other species showed high relative abundance only in Gishwati Forest. The relative abundance of the endangered Eastern chimpanzee in Gishwati Forest was 0.54, the estimated occupancy was 0.31. Single-species, single-season occupancy models revealed that forest cover, altitude and distance to forest edge influenced the detectability of L'Hoest's monkey and squirrel species, while no effect was found on their occupancy. Notably, no larger herbivore or carnivore species were observed in the park, while the flagship species, i.e., the Eastern chimpanzee, was relatively abundant. Moreover, in both forests, all detected carnivores were small- to medium-sized, suggesting a meso-predator release phenomenon, i.e., populations of medium-sized predators increased after the removal of larger, top carnivores, due to relaxed competition. It appears that the prioritization of the flagship species resulted in the neglect of other mammalian species, leading eventually into the demise of entire functional guilds. Based on these results, the Gishwati–Mukura NP was categorized as a ‘depleted forest’. We, therefore, strongly object chimpanzees as a suitable flagship species—at least in the Gishwati–Mukura NP—and recommend collating more knowledge on the release of meso-predators and the loss of forest ungulates to improve their future conservation in Afro-montane forest habitats.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s42991-022-00289-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A743342201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A743342201</galeid><sourcerecordid>A743342201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f6cf64b5e0d53e2d6e911736bf3993516c1c99b998dbf2bcdbbcd84bfc6a76233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1OwyAYhhujiXN6Ax5xATL5aek4XBb_EhMP1GNC4aNjaekCnUYvwauWrR4bQviA73kCb1FcU7KghNS3qWRSUkwYw4SwpcTVSTGjgi4xLWtxeqwFrkhZnxcXKW1zE61INSt-XndgPCQUvdkESOkGRej06D8A6WYfrA4mV8GiwZj9Lu--0OBQG4d8h-0ndJ0PLep13-suIQthGAGNG0A-gHNgDqaD90CZje-z4huyMSHX6TZt_A6l6QmXxZnLDrj6W-fF-_3d2_oRP788PK1Xz9jwuhyxE8aJsqmA2IoDswIkpTUXjeNS8ooKQ42UjZRL2zjWGNvkuSwbZ4SuBeN8Xiwmb6s7UD64YYza5GGh92bIz_b5fFWXnJeMEZoBNgEmDilFcGoXfa_jl6JEHeJXU_wqx6-O8asqQ3yCUm4OLUS1HfYx5I_9R_0CCbCMSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Species richness, relative abundance and occupancy of ground-dwelling mammals denote the ineffectiveness of chimpanzee as flagship species</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sun, Ping ; Umuntunundi, Prosper ; Wronski, Torsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ping ; Umuntunundi, Prosper ; Wronski, Torsten</creatorcontrib><description>In conservation biology, flagship species are defined as species that can raise support for biodiversity conservation in a given place or social context. In the newly established Gishwati–Mukura National Park in Rwanda, the Eastern chimpanzee was considered such an ambassador. To test whether the flagship species concept was effective in the park, we studied species richness, relative abundance, and species distribution (occupancy) of medium- to large-sized, ground-dwelling mammals using camera trapping technology. The impact of three environmental and three anthropogenic variables on species distribution was investigated and the ecological diversity of the fauna in the national park assessed. Over a period of 9 months, two 4 × 4 camera trapping grids were deployed in Gishwati and Mukura Forest. Sampling effort in each forest equated to 32 and 29 camera trapping locations, yielding 258 and 242 independent photographic events of eight and six species, respectively. In both forests, the Emin's giant poached rat was the most frequently encountered species, while all other species showed high relative abundance only in Gishwati Forest. The relative abundance of the endangered Eastern chimpanzee in Gishwati Forest was 0.54, the estimated occupancy was 0.31. Single-species, single-season occupancy models revealed that forest cover, altitude and distance to forest edge influenced the detectability of L'Hoest's monkey and squirrel species, while no effect was found on their occupancy. Notably, no larger herbivore or carnivore species were observed in the park, while the flagship species, i.e., the Eastern chimpanzee, was relatively abundant. Moreover, in both forests, all detected carnivores were small- to medium-sized, suggesting a meso-predator release phenomenon, i.e., populations of medium-sized predators increased after the removal of larger, top carnivores, due to relaxed competition. It appears that the prioritization of the flagship species resulted in the neglect of other mammalian species, leading eventually into the demise of entire functional guilds. Based on these results, the Gishwati–Mukura NP was categorized as a ‘depleted forest’. We, therefore, strongly object chimpanzees as a suitable flagship species—at least in the Gishwati–Mukura NP—and recommend collating more knowledge on the release of meso-predators and the loss of forest ungulates to improve their future conservation in Afro-montane forest habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1616-5047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42991-022-00289-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal Anatomy ; Animal Ecology ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Biological diversity ; Biological diversity conservation ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Evolutionary Biology ; Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management ; Histology ; Life Sciences ; Monkeys ; Morphology ; National parks and reserves ; Original Article ; Wildlife conservation ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 2022-12, Vol.102 (5-6), p.1835-1850</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f6cf64b5e0d53e2d6e911736bf3993516c1c99b998dbf2bcdbbcd84bfc6a76233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f6cf64b5e0d53e2d6e911736bf3993516c1c99b998dbf2bcdbbcd84bfc6a76233</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0853-6008</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42991-022-00289-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42991-022-00289-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umuntunundi, Prosper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wronski, Torsten</creatorcontrib><title>Species richness, relative abundance and occupancy of ground-dwelling mammals denote the ineffectiveness of chimpanzee as flagship species</title><title>Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde</title><addtitle>Mamm Biol</addtitle><description>In conservation biology, flagship species are defined as species that can raise support for biodiversity conservation in a given place or social context. In the newly established Gishwati–Mukura National Park in Rwanda, the Eastern chimpanzee was considered such an ambassador. To test whether the flagship species concept was effective in the park, we studied species richness, relative abundance, and species distribution (occupancy) of medium- to large-sized, ground-dwelling mammals using camera trapping technology. The impact of three environmental and three anthropogenic variables on species distribution was investigated and the ecological diversity of the fauna in the national park assessed. Over a period of 9 months, two 4 × 4 camera trapping grids were deployed in Gishwati and Mukura Forest. Sampling effort in each forest equated to 32 and 29 camera trapping locations, yielding 258 and 242 independent photographic events of eight and six species, respectively. In both forests, the Emin's giant poached rat was the most frequently encountered species, while all other species showed high relative abundance only in Gishwati Forest. The relative abundance of the endangered Eastern chimpanzee in Gishwati Forest was 0.54, the estimated occupancy was 0.31. Single-species, single-season occupancy models revealed that forest cover, altitude and distance to forest edge influenced the detectability of L'Hoest's monkey and squirrel species, while no effect was found on their occupancy. Notably, no larger herbivore or carnivore species were observed in the park, while the flagship species, i.e., the Eastern chimpanzee, was relatively abundant. Moreover, in both forests, all detected carnivores were small- to medium-sized, suggesting a meso-predator release phenomenon, i.e., populations of medium-sized predators increased after the removal of larger, top carnivores, due to relaxed competition. It appears that the prioritization of the flagship species resulted in the neglect of other mammalian species, leading eventually into the demise of entire functional guilds. Based on these results, the Gishwati–Mukura NP was categorized as a ‘depleted forest’. We, therefore, strongly object chimpanzees as a suitable flagship species—at least in the Gishwati–Mukura NP—and recommend collating more knowledge on the release of meso-predators and the loss of forest ungulates to improve their future conservation in Afro-montane forest habitats.</description><subject>Animal Anatomy</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Biological diversity conservation</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Monkeys</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>National parks and reserves</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1616-5047</issn><issn>1618-1476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN1OwyAYhhujiXN6Ax5xATL5aek4XBb_EhMP1GNC4aNjaekCnUYvwauWrR4bQviA73kCb1FcU7KghNS3qWRSUkwYw4SwpcTVSTGjgi4xLWtxeqwFrkhZnxcXKW1zE61INSt-XndgPCQUvdkESOkGRej06D8A6WYfrA4mV8GiwZj9Lu--0OBQG4d8h-0ndJ0PLep13-suIQthGAGNG0A-gHNgDqaD90CZje-z4huyMSHX6TZt_A6l6QmXxZnLDrj6W-fF-_3d2_oRP788PK1Xz9jwuhyxE8aJsqmA2IoDswIkpTUXjeNS8ooKQ42UjZRL2zjWGNvkuSwbZ4SuBeN8Xiwmb6s7UD64YYza5GGh92bIz_b5fFWXnJeMEZoBNgEmDilFcGoXfa_jl6JEHeJXU_wqx6-O8asqQ3yCUm4OLUS1HfYx5I_9R_0CCbCMSQ</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Sun, Ping</creator><creator>Umuntunundi, Prosper</creator><creator>Wronski, Torsten</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0853-6008</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Species richness, relative abundance and occupancy of ground-dwelling mammals denote the ineffectiveness of chimpanzee as flagship species</title><author>Sun, Ping ; Umuntunundi, Prosper ; Wronski, Torsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f6cf64b5e0d53e2d6e911736bf3993516c1c99b998dbf2bcdbbcd84bfc6a76233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal Anatomy</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Biological diversity conservation</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Monkeys</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>National parks and reserves</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umuntunundi, Prosper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wronski, Torsten</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Ping</au><au>Umuntunundi, Prosper</au><au>Wronski, Torsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Species richness, relative abundance and occupancy of ground-dwelling mammals denote the ineffectiveness of chimpanzee as flagship species</atitle><jtitle>Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde</jtitle><stitle>Mamm Biol</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>1835</spage><epage>1850</epage><pages>1835-1850</pages><issn>1616-5047</issn><eissn>1618-1476</eissn><abstract>In conservation biology, flagship species are defined as species that can raise support for biodiversity conservation in a given place or social context. In the newly established Gishwati–Mukura National Park in Rwanda, the Eastern chimpanzee was considered such an ambassador. To test whether the flagship species concept was effective in the park, we studied species richness, relative abundance, and species distribution (occupancy) of medium- to large-sized, ground-dwelling mammals using camera trapping technology. The impact of three environmental and three anthropogenic variables on species distribution was investigated and the ecological diversity of the fauna in the national park assessed. Over a period of 9 months, two 4 × 4 camera trapping grids were deployed in Gishwati and Mukura Forest. Sampling effort in each forest equated to 32 and 29 camera trapping locations, yielding 258 and 242 independent photographic events of eight and six species, respectively. In both forests, the Emin's giant poached rat was the most frequently encountered species, while all other species showed high relative abundance only in Gishwati Forest. The relative abundance of the endangered Eastern chimpanzee in Gishwati Forest was 0.54, the estimated occupancy was 0.31. Single-species, single-season occupancy models revealed that forest cover, altitude and distance to forest edge influenced the detectability of L'Hoest's monkey and squirrel species, while no effect was found on their occupancy. Notably, no larger herbivore or carnivore species were observed in the park, while the flagship species, i.e., the Eastern chimpanzee, was relatively abundant. Moreover, in both forests, all detected carnivores were small- to medium-sized, suggesting a meso-predator release phenomenon, i.e., populations of medium-sized predators increased after the removal of larger, top carnivores, due to relaxed competition. It appears that the prioritization of the flagship species resulted in the neglect of other mammalian species, leading eventually into the demise of entire functional guilds. Based on these results, the Gishwati–Mukura NP was categorized as a ‘depleted forest’. We, therefore, strongly object chimpanzees as a suitable flagship species—at least in the Gishwati–Mukura NP—and recommend collating more knowledge on the release of meso-predators and the loss of forest ungulates to improve their future conservation in Afro-montane forest habitats.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s42991-022-00289-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0853-6008</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1616-5047
ispartof Mammalian biology : Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 2022-12, Vol.102 (5-6), p.1835-1850
issn 1616-5047
1618-1476
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A743342201
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal Anatomy
Animal Ecology
Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography
Biological diversity
Biological diversity conservation
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Evolutionary Biology
Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management
Histology
Life Sciences
Monkeys
Morphology
National parks and reserves
Original Article
Wildlife conservation
Zoology
title Species richness, relative abundance and occupancy of ground-dwelling mammals denote the ineffectiveness of chimpanzee as flagship species
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A41%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Species%20richness,%20relative%20abundance%20and%20occupancy%20of%20ground-dwelling%20mammals%20denote%20the%20ineffectiveness%20of%20chimpanzee%20as%20flagship%20species&rft.jtitle=Mammalian%20biology%20:%20Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20S%C3%A4ugetierkunde&rft.au=Sun,%20Ping&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=1835&rft.epage=1850&rft.pages=1835-1850&rft.issn=1616-5047&rft.eissn=1618-1476&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42991-022-00289-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA743342201%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A743342201&rfr_iscdi=true