Modeling and Simulation of Extended-Range Electric Vehicle with Control Strategy to Assess Fuel Consumption and CO[sub.2] Emission for the Expected Driving Range
Extended-Range Electric Vehicles (EREVs) are intended to improve the range of battery electric vehicles and thus eliminate drivers' concerns about running out of energy before reaching the desired destination. This paper gives an insight into EREV's performance operating according to the p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energies (Basel) 2022-06, Vol.15 (12) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Energies (Basel) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Krawczyk, Paweł Kopczyński, Artur Lasocki, Jakub |
description | Extended-Range Electric Vehicles (EREVs) are intended to improve the range of battery electric vehicles and thus eliminate drivers' concerns about running out of energy before reaching the desired destination. This paper gives an insight into EREV's performance operating according to the proposed control strategy over various driving cycles, including the Worldwide Harmonized Light-duty Test Cycle Class 3b (WLTC 3b), Federal Test Procedure (FTP-75), and China Light-Duty Vehicle Test Cycle (CLTC-P). Simulation runs were performed in Matlab-Simulink[sup.®] for different cases of drive range, electricity mix, and vehicle mass. The control strategy goal was to aim at a specified value of battery state of charge at the targeted range value. The obtained test results included: pure electric drive range, acceleration times, EREV range tests, control strategy range errors, Range Extender (REX) utilization metric and distribution of its engagement instances, fuel consumption, total equivalent CO[sub.2] emission, powertrain efficiency, and specific energy consumption. The control strategy operated on average with a range error of −1.04% and a range mean square error of 2.13%. Fuel consumption (in range extension mode) varied between 1.37 dm[sup.3]/100 km (FTP-75) and 6.85 dm[sup.3]/100 km (WLTC 3b Extra-High 3). CO[sub.2]eq emission was 95.3-244.2 g/km for Poland, 31.0-160.5 g/km for EU-27, and 1.2-147.6 g/km for Sweden. This paper is a valuable source of information for scientists and engineers seeking to learn the advantages and shortcomings of EREV drives with a proposed control strategy, based on various sets of results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/en15124187 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A729091261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A729091261</galeid><sourcerecordid>A729091261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7290912613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjsFOwzAMhiMEEhPswhP4BTqaBlZ6nEonLmgSQ1wQQqFxW6M0meoUxuPwpqQTB674P9j6Lf-fhbiQ6UKpIr1EJ69ldiVv8iMxk0WxTGSaq-M_86mYM7-nsZSSSqmZ-L73Bi25FrQzsKV-tDqQd-AbqPYBnUGTPGjXIlQW6zBQDU_YUW0RPil0UHoXBm9hGwYdsP2C4GHFjMywHtFOex773SFzQpSbZx7fFtkLVD0xT3bjBwhdBOx3kYAGbgf6mF46cM_FSaMt4_y3n4nFunos75JWW3wl1_hIrqMM9lR7hw1Ff5VnRVrIbCnVvw9-AKaaaio</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling and Simulation of Extended-Range Electric Vehicle with Control Strategy to Assess Fuel Consumption and CO[sub.2] Emission for the Expected Driving Range</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Krawczyk, Paweł ; Kopczyński, Artur ; Lasocki, Jakub</creator><creatorcontrib>Krawczyk, Paweł ; Kopczyński, Artur ; Lasocki, Jakub</creatorcontrib><description>Extended-Range Electric Vehicles (EREVs) are intended to improve the range of battery electric vehicles and thus eliminate drivers' concerns about running out of energy before reaching the desired destination. This paper gives an insight into EREV's performance operating according to the proposed control strategy over various driving cycles, including the Worldwide Harmonized Light-duty Test Cycle Class 3b (WLTC 3b), Federal Test Procedure (FTP-75), and China Light-Duty Vehicle Test Cycle (CLTC-P). Simulation runs were performed in Matlab-Simulink[sup.®] for different cases of drive range, electricity mix, and vehicle mass. The control strategy goal was to aim at a specified value of battery state of charge at the targeted range value. The obtained test results included: pure electric drive range, acceleration times, EREV range tests, control strategy range errors, Range Extender (REX) utilization metric and distribution of its engagement instances, fuel consumption, total equivalent CO[sub.2] emission, powertrain efficiency, and specific energy consumption. The control strategy operated on average with a range error of −1.04% and a range mean square error of 2.13%. Fuel consumption (in range extension mode) varied between 1.37 dm[sup.3]/100 km (FTP-75) and 6.85 dm[sup.3]/100 km (WLTC 3b Extra-High 3). CO[sub.2]eq emission was 95.3-244.2 g/km for Poland, 31.0-160.5 g/km for EU-27, and 1.2-147.6 g/km for Sweden. This paper is a valuable source of information for scientists and engineers seeking to learn the advantages and shortcomings of EREV drives with a proposed control strategy, based on various sets of results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en15124187</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Air quality management ; Electric vehicles ; Energy use ; Fuel</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2022-06, Vol.15 (12)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krawczyk, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopczyński, Artur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasocki, Jakub</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling and Simulation of Extended-Range Electric Vehicle with Control Strategy to Assess Fuel Consumption and CO[sub.2] Emission for the Expected Driving Range</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>Extended-Range Electric Vehicles (EREVs) are intended to improve the range of battery electric vehicles and thus eliminate drivers' concerns about running out of energy before reaching the desired destination. This paper gives an insight into EREV's performance operating according to the proposed control strategy over various driving cycles, including the Worldwide Harmonized Light-duty Test Cycle Class 3b (WLTC 3b), Federal Test Procedure (FTP-75), and China Light-Duty Vehicle Test Cycle (CLTC-P). Simulation runs were performed in Matlab-Simulink[sup.®] for different cases of drive range, electricity mix, and vehicle mass. The control strategy goal was to aim at a specified value of battery state of charge at the targeted range value. The obtained test results included: pure electric drive range, acceleration times, EREV range tests, control strategy range errors, Range Extender (REX) utilization metric and distribution of its engagement instances, fuel consumption, total equivalent CO[sub.2] emission, powertrain efficiency, and specific energy consumption. The control strategy operated on average with a range error of −1.04% and a range mean square error of 2.13%. Fuel consumption (in range extension mode) varied between 1.37 dm[sup.3]/100 km (FTP-75) and 6.85 dm[sup.3]/100 km (WLTC 3b Extra-High 3). CO[sub.2]eq emission was 95.3-244.2 g/km for Poland, 31.0-160.5 g/km for EU-27, and 1.2-147.6 g/km for Sweden. This paper is a valuable source of information for scientists and engineers seeking to learn the advantages and shortcomings of EREV drives with a proposed control strategy, based on various sets of results.</description><subject>Air quality management</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Energy use</subject><subject>Fuel</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjsFOwzAMhiMEEhPswhP4BTqaBlZ6nEonLmgSQ1wQQqFxW6M0meoUxuPwpqQTB674P9j6Lf-fhbiQ6UKpIr1EJ69ldiVv8iMxk0WxTGSaq-M_86mYM7-nsZSSSqmZ-L73Bi25FrQzsKV-tDqQd-AbqPYBnUGTPGjXIlQW6zBQDU_YUW0RPil0UHoXBm9hGwYdsP2C4GHFjMywHtFOex773SFzQpSbZx7fFtkLVD0xT3bjBwhdBOx3kYAGbgf6mF46cM_FSaMt4_y3n4nFunos75JWW3wl1_hIrqMM9lR7hw1Ff5VnRVrIbCnVvw9-AKaaaio</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Krawczyk, Paweł</creator><creator>Kopczyński, Artur</creator><creator>Lasocki, Jakub</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Modeling and Simulation of Extended-Range Electric Vehicle with Control Strategy to Assess Fuel Consumption and CO[sub.2] Emission for the Expected Driving Range</title><author>Krawczyk, Paweł ; Kopczyński, Artur ; Lasocki, Jakub</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7290912613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Air quality management</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Energy use</topic><topic>Fuel</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krawczyk, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopczyński, Artur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasocki, Jakub</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krawczyk, Paweł</au><au>Kopczyński, Artur</au><au>Lasocki, Jakub</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling and Simulation of Extended-Range Electric Vehicle with Control Strategy to Assess Fuel Consumption and CO[sub.2] Emission for the Expected Driving Range</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>12</issue><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>Extended-Range Electric Vehicles (EREVs) are intended to improve the range of battery electric vehicles and thus eliminate drivers' concerns about running out of energy before reaching the desired destination. This paper gives an insight into EREV's performance operating according to the proposed control strategy over various driving cycles, including the Worldwide Harmonized Light-duty Test Cycle Class 3b (WLTC 3b), Federal Test Procedure (FTP-75), and China Light-Duty Vehicle Test Cycle (CLTC-P). Simulation runs were performed in Matlab-Simulink[sup.®] for different cases of drive range, electricity mix, and vehicle mass. The control strategy goal was to aim at a specified value of battery state of charge at the targeted range value. The obtained test results included: pure electric drive range, acceleration times, EREV range tests, control strategy range errors, Range Extender (REX) utilization metric and distribution of its engagement instances, fuel consumption, total equivalent CO[sub.2] emission, powertrain efficiency, and specific energy consumption. The control strategy operated on average with a range error of −1.04% and a range mean square error of 2.13%. Fuel consumption (in range extension mode) varied between 1.37 dm[sup.3]/100 km (FTP-75) and 6.85 dm[sup.3]/100 km (WLTC 3b Extra-High 3). CO[sub.2]eq emission was 95.3-244.2 g/km for Poland, 31.0-160.5 g/km for EU-27, and 1.2-147.6 g/km for Sweden. This paper is a valuable source of information for scientists and engineers seeking to learn the advantages and shortcomings of EREV drives with a proposed control strategy, based on various sets of results.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en15124187</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1073 |
ispartof | Energies (Basel), 2022-06, Vol.15 (12) |
issn | 1996-1073 1996-1073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A729091261 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Air quality management Electric vehicles Energy use Fuel |
title | Modeling and Simulation of Extended-Range Electric Vehicle with Control Strategy to Assess Fuel Consumption and CO[sub.2] Emission for the Expected Driving Range |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A49%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20and%20Simulation%20of%20Extended-Range%20Electric%20Vehicle%20with%20Control%20Strategy%20to%20Assess%20Fuel%20Consumption%20and%20CO%5Bsub.2%5D%20Emission%20for%20the%20Expected%20Driving%20Range&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Krawczyk,%20Pawe%C5%82&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=12&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en15124187&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA729091261%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A729091261&rfr_iscdi=true |