Balancing views on community monitoring: the case of REDD

Balancing views on community monitoring: the case of REDD

In response to the commentary by Jens Friis Lund we suggest that the problem lies not in community monitoring but in the way the reward systems are designed. For the case of REDD+ we propose that if payments are made for inputs rather than for outputs, the problem can largely be resolved.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biodiversity and conservation 2014-01, Vol.23 (1), p.233
Hauptverfasser: Skutsch, Margaret M, McCall, Michael K, Larrazabal, Alejandra P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Environmental monitoring
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 233
container_title Biodiversity and conservation
container_volume 23
creator Skutsch, Margaret M
McCall, Michael K
Larrazabal, Alejandra P
description In response to the commentary by Jens Friis Lund we suggest that the problem lies not in community monitoring but in the way the reward systems are designed. For the case of REDD+ we propose that if payments are made for inputs rather than for outputs, the problem can largely be resolved.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10531-013-0594-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A727629370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A727629370</galeid><sourcerecordid>A727629370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-21827638816f7aaa3f6ed11a069d6b6cd125b54a3714277fc10402096ba164983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotTs1KAzEYzEHBWn0Ab3mB1O9LNsnGW23rDxQE0bN8m03qym4Czar49gaUOQzMDDPD2BXCCgHsdUHQCgWgEqBdI_CELcAZEApRn7HzUj6g5rTBBXO3NFLyQzrwryF8F54T93maPtMw__ApV8rH6t7w-T1wTyXwHPnzbru9YKeRxhIu_3nJXu92L5sHsX-6f9ys98JL1LOQ2EprVNuiiZaIVDShRyQwrjed8T1K3emGlMVGWhs9QgOy3u0ITeNatWSrv94DjeFtSDHPR_IVfZgGn1OIQ9XXtq5IpyyoXzn3SRk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Balancing views on community monitoring: the case of REDD</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Skutsch, Margaret M ; McCall, Michael K ; Larrazabal, Alejandra P</creator><creatorcontrib>Skutsch, Margaret M ; McCall, Michael K ; Larrazabal, Alejandra P</creatorcontrib><description>In response to the commentary by Jens Friis Lund we suggest that the problem lies not in community monitoring but in the way the reward systems are designed. For the case of REDD+ we propose that if payments are made for inputs rather than for outputs, the problem can largely be resolved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10531-013-0594-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer</publisher><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2014-01, Vol.23 (1), p.233</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-21827638816f7aaa3f6ed11a069d6b6cd125b54a3714277fc10402096ba164983</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skutsch, Margaret M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCall, Michael K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larrazabal, Alejandra P</creatorcontrib><title>Balancing views on community monitoring: the case of REDD</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><description>In response to the commentary by Jens Friis Lund we suggest that the problem lies not in community monitoring but in the way the reward systems are designed. For the case of REDD+ we propose that if payments are made for inputs rather than for outputs, the problem can largely be resolved.</description><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotTs1KAzEYzEHBWn0Ab3mB1O9LNsnGW23rDxQE0bN8m03qym4Czar49gaUOQzMDDPD2BXCCgHsdUHQCgWgEqBdI_CELcAZEApRn7HzUj6g5rTBBXO3NFLyQzrwryF8F54T93maPtMw__ApV8rH6t7w-T1wTyXwHPnzbru9YKeRxhIu_3nJXu92L5sHsX-6f9ys98JL1LOQ2EprVNuiiZaIVDShRyQwrjed8T1K3emGlMVGWhs9QgOy3u0ITeNatWSrv94DjeFtSDHPR_IVfZgGn1OIQ9XXtq5IpyyoXzn3SRk</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Skutsch, Margaret M</creator><creator>McCall, Michael K</creator><creator>Larrazabal, Alejandra P</creator><general>Springer</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Balancing views on community monitoring: the case of REDD</title><author>Skutsch, Margaret M ; McCall, Michael K ; Larrazabal, Alejandra P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-21827638816f7aaa3f6ed11a069d6b6cd125b54a3714277fc10402096ba164983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skutsch, Margaret M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCall, Michael K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larrazabal, Alejandra P</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skutsch, Margaret M</au><au>McCall, Michael K</au><au>Larrazabal, Alejandra P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Balancing views on community monitoring: the case of REDD</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>233</spage><pages>233-</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><abstract>In response to the commentary by Jens Friis Lund we suggest that the problem lies not in community monitoring but in the way the reward systems are designed. For the case of REDD+ we propose that if payments are made for inputs rather than for outputs, the problem can largely be resolved.</abstract><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10531-013-0594-1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-3115
ispartof Biodiversity and conservation, 2014-01, Vol.23 (1), p.233
issn 0960-3115
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A727629370
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Environmental monitoring
title Balancing views on community monitoring: the case of REDD
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A53%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Balancing%20views%20on%20community%20monitoring:%20the%20case%20of%20REDD&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Skutsch,%20Margaret%20M&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=233&rft.pages=233-&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-013-0594-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA727629370%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A727629370&rfr_iscdi=true