Disparities in Chronic Kidney Disease Progression by Medicare Advantage Enrollees

Introduction: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Medicare beneficiaries has quadrupled in the past 2 decades, but little is known about risk factors affecting the progression of CKD. This study aims to understand the progression in Medicare Advantage enrollees and whether it differs b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of nephrology 2022-01, Vol.52 (12), p.949-957
Hauptverfasser: Diamantidis, Clarissa Jonas, Zepel, Lindsay, Wang, Virginia, Smith, Valerie A., Hudson Scholle, Sarah, Tamayo, Loida, Maciejewski, Matthew L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 957
container_issue 12
container_start_page 949
container_title American journal of nephrology
container_volume 52
creator Diamantidis, Clarissa Jonas
Zepel, Lindsay
Wang, Virginia
Smith, Valerie A.
Hudson Scholle, Sarah
Tamayo, Loida
Maciejewski, Matthew L.
description Introduction: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Medicare beneficiaries has quadrupled in the past 2 decades, but little is known about risk factors affecting the progression of CKD. This study aims to understand the progression in Medicare Advantage enrollees and whether it differs by provider recognition of CKD, race and ethnicity, or geographic location. In a large cohort of Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees, we examined whether CKD progression, up to 5 years after study entry, differed by demographic and clinical factors and identified additional risk factors of CKD progression. Methods: In a cohort of 1,002,388 MA enrollees with CKD stages 1–4 based on 2013–2018 labs, progression was estimated using a mixed-effects model that adjusted for demographics, geographic location, comorbidity, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, clinical recognition via diagnosed CKD, and time-fixed effects. Race and ethnicity, geographic location, and clinical recognition of CKD were interacted with time in 3 separate regression models. Results: Mean (median) follow-up was 3.1 (3.0) years. Black and Hispanic MA enrollees had greater kidney function at study entry than other beneficiaries, but their kidney function declined faster. MA enrollees with clinically recognized CKD had estimated glomerular filtration rate levels that were 18.6 units (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.5–18.7) lower than levels of unrecognized patients, but kidney function declined more slowly in enrollees with clinical recognition. There were no differences in CKD progression by geography. After removal of the race coefficient from the eGFR equation in a sensitivity analysis, kidney function was much lower in all years among Black MA enrollees, but patterns of progression remained the same. Discussion/Conclusions: These results suggest that patients with clinically recognized CKD and racial and ethnic minorities merit closer surveillance and management to reduce their risk of faster progression.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000519758
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A709900519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A709900519</galeid><sourcerecordid>A709900519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-1349074eb5f2c419cffec6d3d7595a7393bf81dc532f91a427b69f76878a9fcd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0d1vFCEQAHBiauy1-uC7MSQmpn3YCsuywOPlbK1av5L2mbAw3GH34IS9Jvffu_XO0yYNDyTwm5nMDEIvKTmjlKt3hBBOleDyCZrQpqaVagU5QBNSc1JJovghOirlJyG0lkQ8Q4eskYK3rZygH-9DWZkchgAFh4hni5xisPhzcBE2ePwFUwB_z2meoZSQIu42-Au4YE0GPHV3Jg5mDvg85tT3AOU5eupNX-DF7j5GNxfn17PL6urbh4-z6VVlm1YMFWWNIqKBjvvaNlRZ78G2jjnBFTeCKdZ5SZ3lrPaKmqYWXau8aKWQRnnr2DE62eZd5fRrDWXQy1As9L2JkNZF1y2RlNWUsZG-2dK56UGH6NOQjb3neiqIUn_GN6qzR9R4HCyDTRF8GN8fBLz9L2ABph8WJfXrYZxSeQhPt9DmVEoGr1c5LE3eaEr0_Qb1foOjfb1ra90twe3l35X9a-bW5DnkPZh--rpNoVfOj-rVo2pX5TfVjKff</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2608132133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disparities in Chronic Kidney Disease Progression by Medicare Advantage Enrollees</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals Complete</source><creator>Diamantidis, Clarissa Jonas ; Zepel, Lindsay ; Wang, Virginia ; Smith, Valerie A. ; Hudson Scholle, Sarah ; Tamayo, Loida ; Maciejewski, Matthew L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Diamantidis, Clarissa Jonas ; Zepel, Lindsay ; Wang, Virginia ; Smith, Valerie A. ; Hudson Scholle, Sarah ; Tamayo, Loida ; Maciejewski, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Medicare beneficiaries has quadrupled in the past 2 decades, but little is known about risk factors affecting the progression of CKD. This study aims to understand the progression in Medicare Advantage enrollees and whether it differs by provider recognition of CKD, race and ethnicity, or geographic location. In a large cohort of Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees, we examined whether CKD progression, up to 5 years after study entry, differed by demographic and clinical factors and identified additional risk factors of CKD progression. Methods: In a cohort of 1,002,388 MA enrollees with CKD stages 1–4 based on 2013–2018 labs, progression was estimated using a mixed-effects model that adjusted for demographics, geographic location, comorbidity, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, clinical recognition via diagnosed CKD, and time-fixed effects. Race and ethnicity, geographic location, and clinical recognition of CKD were interacted with time in 3 separate regression models. Results: Mean (median) follow-up was 3.1 (3.0) years. Black and Hispanic MA enrollees had greater kidney function at study entry than other beneficiaries, but their kidney function declined faster. MA enrollees with clinically recognized CKD had estimated glomerular filtration rate levels that were 18.6 units (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.5–18.7) lower than levels of unrecognized patients, but kidney function declined more slowly in enrollees with clinical recognition. There were no differences in CKD progression by geography. After removal of the race coefficient from the eGFR equation in a sensitivity analysis, kidney function was much lower in all years among Black MA enrollees, but patterns of progression remained the same. Discussion/Conclusions: These results suggest that patients with clinically recognized CKD and racial and ethnic minorities merit closer surveillance and management to reduce their risk of faster progression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0250-8095</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000519758</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34875668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Care and treatment ; Chronic kidney failure ; Cohort Studies ; Complications and side effects ; Demographic aspects ; Development and progression ; Disease Progression ; Economic aspects ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Health care disparities ; Health Status Disparities ; Humans ; Male ; Medicare ; Medicare Part C ; Middle Aged ; Patient-Oriented, Translational Research: Research Article ; Racial Groups ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - epidemiology ; Services ; Social aspects ; United States - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of nephrology, 2022-01, Vol.52 (12), p.949-957</ispartof><rights>2021 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 S. Karger AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-1349074eb5f2c419cffec6d3d7595a7393bf81dc532f91a427b69f76878a9fcd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-1349074eb5f2c419cffec6d3d7595a7393bf81dc532f91a427b69f76878a9fcd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8212-6288</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2429,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34875668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diamantidis, Clarissa Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zepel, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Valerie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson Scholle, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamayo, Loida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><title>Disparities in Chronic Kidney Disease Progression by Medicare Advantage Enrollees</title><title>American journal of nephrology</title><addtitle>Am J Nephrol</addtitle><description>Introduction: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Medicare beneficiaries has quadrupled in the past 2 decades, but little is known about risk factors affecting the progression of CKD. This study aims to understand the progression in Medicare Advantage enrollees and whether it differs by provider recognition of CKD, race and ethnicity, or geographic location. In a large cohort of Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees, we examined whether CKD progression, up to 5 years after study entry, differed by demographic and clinical factors and identified additional risk factors of CKD progression. Methods: In a cohort of 1,002,388 MA enrollees with CKD stages 1–4 based on 2013–2018 labs, progression was estimated using a mixed-effects model that adjusted for demographics, geographic location, comorbidity, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, clinical recognition via diagnosed CKD, and time-fixed effects. Race and ethnicity, geographic location, and clinical recognition of CKD were interacted with time in 3 separate regression models. Results: Mean (median) follow-up was 3.1 (3.0) years. Black and Hispanic MA enrollees had greater kidney function at study entry than other beneficiaries, but their kidney function declined faster. MA enrollees with clinically recognized CKD had estimated glomerular filtration rate levels that were 18.6 units (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.5–18.7) lower than levels of unrecognized patients, but kidney function declined more slowly in enrollees with clinical recognition. There were no differences in CKD progression by geography. After removal of the race coefficient from the eGFR equation in a sensitivity analysis, kidney function was much lower in all years among Black MA enrollees, but patterns of progression remained the same. Discussion/Conclusions: These results suggest that patients with clinically recognized CKD and racial and ethnic minorities merit closer surveillance and management to reduce their risk of faster progression.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chronic kidney failure</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care disparities</subject><subject>Health Status Disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicare Part C</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient-Oriented, Translational Research: Research Article</subject><subject>Racial Groups</subject><subject>Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0250-8095</issn><issn>1421-9670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0d1vFCEQAHBiauy1-uC7MSQmpn3YCsuywOPlbK1av5L2mbAw3GH34IS9Jvffu_XO0yYNDyTwm5nMDEIvKTmjlKt3hBBOleDyCZrQpqaVagU5QBNSc1JJovghOirlJyG0lkQ8Q4eskYK3rZygH-9DWZkchgAFh4hni5xisPhzcBE2ePwFUwB_z2meoZSQIu42-Au4YE0GPHV3Jg5mDvg85tT3AOU5eupNX-DF7j5GNxfn17PL6urbh4-z6VVlm1YMFWWNIqKBjvvaNlRZ78G2jjnBFTeCKdZ5SZ3lrPaKmqYWXau8aKWQRnnr2DE62eZd5fRrDWXQy1As9L2JkNZF1y2RlNWUsZG-2dK56UGH6NOQjb3neiqIUn_GN6qzR9R4HCyDTRF8GN8fBLz9L2ABph8WJfXrYZxSeQhPt9DmVEoGr1c5LE3eaEr0_Qb1foOjfb1ra90twe3l35X9a-bW5DnkPZh--rpNoVfOj-rVo2pX5TfVjKff</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Diamantidis, Clarissa Jonas</creator><creator>Zepel, Lindsay</creator><creator>Wang, Virginia</creator><creator>Smith, Valerie A.</creator><creator>Hudson Scholle, Sarah</creator><creator>Tamayo, Loida</creator><creator>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8212-6288</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Disparities in Chronic Kidney Disease Progression by Medicare Advantage Enrollees</title><author>Diamantidis, Clarissa Jonas ; Zepel, Lindsay ; Wang, Virginia ; Smith, Valerie A. ; Hudson Scholle, Sarah ; Tamayo, Loida ; Maciejewski, Matthew L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-1349074eb5f2c419cffec6d3d7595a7393bf81dc532f91a427b69f76878a9fcd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chronic kidney failure</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care disparities</topic><topic>Health Status Disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicare Part C</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient-Oriented, Translational Research: Research Article</topic><topic>Racial Groups</topic><topic>Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diamantidis, Clarissa Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zepel, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Valerie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson Scholle, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamayo, Loida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diamantidis, Clarissa Jonas</au><au>Zepel, Lindsay</au><au>Wang, Virginia</au><au>Smith, Valerie A.</au><au>Hudson Scholle, Sarah</au><au>Tamayo, Loida</au><au>Maciejewski, Matthew L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disparities in Chronic Kidney Disease Progression by Medicare Advantage Enrollees</atitle><jtitle>American journal of nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Nephrol</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>949</spage><epage>957</epage><pages>949-957</pages><issn>0250-8095</issn><eissn>1421-9670</eissn><abstract>Introduction: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Medicare beneficiaries has quadrupled in the past 2 decades, but little is known about risk factors affecting the progression of CKD. This study aims to understand the progression in Medicare Advantage enrollees and whether it differs by provider recognition of CKD, race and ethnicity, or geographic location. In a large cohort of Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees, we examined whether CKD progression, up to 5 years after study entry, differed by demographic and clinical factors and identified additional risk factors of CKD progression. Methods: In a cohort of 1,002,388 MA enrollees with CKD stages 1–4 based on 2013–2018 labs, progression was estimated using a mixed-effects model that adjusted for demographics, geographic location, comorbidity, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, clinical recognition via diagnosed CKD, and time-fixed effects. Race and ethnicity, geographic location, and clinical recognition of CKD were interacted with time in 3 separate regression models. Results: Mean (median) follow-up was 3.1 (3.0) years. Black and Hispanic MA enrollees had greater kidney function at study entry than other beneficiaries, but their kidney function declined faster. MA enrollees with clinically recognized CKD had estimated glomerular filtration rate levels that were 18.6 units (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.5–18.7) lower than levels of unrecognized patients, but kidney function declined more slowly in enrollees with clinical recognition. There were no differences in CKD progression by geography. After removal of the race coefficient from the eGFR equation in a sensitivity analysis, kidney function was much lower in all years among Black MA enrollees, but patterns of progression remained the same. Discussion/Conclusions: These results suggest that patients with clinically recognized CKD and racial and ethnic minorities merit closer surveillance and management to reduce their risk of faster progression.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>34875668</pmid><doi>10.1159/000519758</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8212-6288</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0250-8095
ispartof American journal of nephrology, 2022-01, Vol.52 (12), p.949-957
issn 0250-8095
1421-9670
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A709900519
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Care and treatment
Chronic kidney failure
Cohort Studies
Complications and side effects
Demographic aspects
Development and progression
Disease Progression
Economic aspects
Ethnicity
Female
Health care disparities
Health Status Disparities
Humans
Male
Medicare
Medicare Part C
Middle Aged
Patient-Oriented, Translational Research: Research Article
Racial Groups
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic - epidemiology
Services
Social aspects
United States - epidemiology
Young Adult
title Disparities in Chronic Kidney Disease Progression by Medicare Advantage Enrollees
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A02%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disparities%20in%20Chronic%20Kidney%20Disease%20Progression%20by%20Medicare%20Advantage%20Enrollees&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20nephrology&rft.au=Diamantidis,%20Clarissa%20Jonas&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=949&rft.epage=957&rft.pages=949-957&rft.issn=0250-8095&rft.eissn=1421-9670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000519758&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA709900519%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2608132133&rft_id=info:pmid/34875668&rft_galeid=A709900519&rfr_iscdi=true