Power output from 12 brands of contemporary LED light-curing units measured using 2 brands of radiometers

Background Given the increasing use of photo-activated resins in dentistry, dentists and researchers need a user-friendly dental radiometer to measure the power output from dental light-curing units (LCUs). Objective Our goal was to measure the accuracy of two brands of dental radiometers in reporti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS ONE 2022, Vol.17 (7), p.e0267359
Hauptverfasser: Maucoski, Cristiane, Price, Richard B, Arrais, Cesar A, Sullivan, Braden
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0267359
container_title PLoS ONE
container_volume 17
creator Maucoski, Cristiane
Price, Richard B
Arrais, Cesar A
Sullivan, Braden
description Background Given the increasing use of photo-activated resins in dentistry, dentists and researchers need a user-friendly dental radiometer to measure the power output from dental light-curing units (LCUs). Objective Our goal was to measure the accuracy of two brands of dental radiometers in reporting the power (mW) from twelve brands of contemporary LCUs compared to a 'gold standard' (GS) reference value obtained from an integrating sphere attached to a fiberoptic spectroradiometer. Methods The power output was measured from two units of 12 brands of LCUs, five times on the ''GS" system, five times on two Bluephase Meter II dental radiometers, and five times on two Mini Gig hand-held spectroradiometers. The emission spectrum was also recorded using the 'GS' integrating sphere. The power values reported by each meter were subjected to t-tests to compare the two examples of each LCU, and 3-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc tests. Regression analyses were also performed to determine the relationship between the data from the hand-held radiometers and the 'GS' integrating sphere. Results There was a large difference in the power values (mW) and the emission spectra from the 12 brands of LCUs on their standard-settings (p 98%). Conclusion We concluded that the power values reported from both brands of dental radiometers we tested were accurate, provided that the light source did not emit wavelengths of light that were beyond the radiometer's detection limit.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0267359
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A709596835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A709596835</galeid><sourcerecordid>A709596835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7095968353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjcFKxDAURYM44Oj4By7eD7QmDU2nS9ERFy5m4V5i-1IzNHnlJUH8eyu4mK3cxb0cOFwh7pSsle7U_YkKRzvXC0WsZWM63fYXYqt63VSmkfrybF-J65ROUrZ6b8xW-CN9IQOVvJQMjimAauCDbRwTkIOBYsawEFv-htfDE8x--szVUNjHCUr0OUFAmwrjCCX9wnOd7egpYEZOO7Fxdk54-9c3on4-vD2-VJOd8d1HR5ntsGbE4NdbdH7lD53s297sdav_LfwAGARZkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Power output from 12 brands of contemporary LED light-curing units measured using 2 brands of radiometers</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Maucoski, Cristiane ; Price, Richard B ; Arrais, Cesar A ; Sullivan, Braden</creator><creatorcontrib>Maucoski, Cristiane ; Price, Richard B ; Arrais, Cesar A ; Sullivan, Braden</creatorcontrib><description>Background Given the increasing use of photo-activated resins in dentistry, dentists and researchers need a user-friendly dental radiometer to measure the power output from dental light-curing units (LCUs). Objective Our goal was to measure the accuracy of two brands of dental radiometers in reporting the power (mW) from twelve brands of contemporary LCUs compared to a 'gold standard' (GS) reference value obtained from an integrating sphere attached to a fiberoptic spectroradiometer. Methods The power output was measured from two units of 12 brands of LCUs, five times on the ''GS" system, five times on two Bluephase Meter II dental radiometers, and five times on two Mini Gig hand-held spectroradiometers. The emission spectrum was also recorded using the 'GS' integrating sphere. The power values reported by each meter were subjected to t-tests to compare the two examples of each LCU, and 3-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc tests. Regression analyses were also performed to determine the relationship between the data from the hand-held radiometers and the 'GS' integrating sphere. Results There was a large difference in the power values (mW) and the emission spectra from the 12 brands of LCUs on their standard-settings (p 98%). Conclusion We concluded that the power values reported from both brands of dental radiometers we tested were accurate, provided that the light source did not emit wavelengths of light that were beyond the radiometer's detection limit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Emission spectra ; Light-emitting diodes ; Radiometers</subject><ispartof>PLoS ONE, 2022, Vol.17 (7), p.e0267359</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,860,4476,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maucoski, Cristiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Richard B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrais, Cesar A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Braden</creatorcontrib><title>Power output from 12 brands of contemporary LED light-curing units measured using 2 brands of radiometers</title><title>PLoS ONE</title><description>Background Given the increasing use of photo-activated resins in dentistry, dentists and researchers need a user-friendly dental radiometer to measure the power output from dental light-curing units (LCUs). Objective Our goal was to measure the accuracy of two brands of dental radiometers in reporting the power (mW) from twelve brands of contemporary LCUs compared to a 'gold standard' (GS) reference value obtained from an integrating sphere attached to a fiberoptic spectroradiometer. Methods The power output was measured from two units of 12 brands of LCUs, five times on the ''GS" system, five times on two Bluephase Meter II dental radiometers, and five times on two Mini Gig hand-held spectroradiometers. The emission spectrum was also recorded using the 'GS' integrating sphere. The power values reported by each meter were subjected to t-tests to compare the two examples of each LCU, and 3-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc tests. Regression analyses were also performed to determine the relationship between the data from the hand-held radiometers and the 'GS' integrating sphere. Results There was a large difference in the power values (mW) and the emission spectra from the 12 brands of LCUs on their standard-settings (p 98%). Conclusion We concluded that the power values reported from both brands of dental radiometers we tested were accurate, provided that the light source did not emit wavelengths of light that were beyond the radiometer's detection limit.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Emission spectra</subject><subject>Light-emitting diodes</subject><subject>Radiometers</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjcFKxDAURYM44Oj4By7eD7QmDU2nS9ERFy5m4V5i-1IzNHnlJUH8eyu4mK3cxb0cOFwh7pSsle7U_YkKRzvXC0WsZWM63fYXYqt63VSmkfrybF-J65ROUrZ6b8xW-CN9IQOVvJQMjimAauCDbRwTkIOBYsawEFv-htfDE8x--szVUNjHCUr0OUFAmwrjCCX9wnOd7egpYEZOO7Fxdk54-9c3on4-vD2-VJOd8d1HR5ntsGbE4NdbdH7lD53s297sdav_LfwAGARZkw</recordid><startdate>20220708</startdate><enddate>20220708</enddate><creator>Maucoski, Cristiane</creator><creator>Price, Richard B</creator><creator>Arrais, Cesar A</creator><creator>Sullivan, Braden</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20220708</creationdate><title>Power output from 12 brands of contemporary LED light-curing units measured using 2 brands of radiometers</title><author>Maucoski, Cristiane ; Price, Richard B ; Arrais, Cesar A ; Sullivan, Braden</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7095968353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Emission spectra</topic><topic>Light-emitting diodes</topic><topic>Radiometers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maucoski, Cristiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Richard B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrais, Cesar A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Braden</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maucoski, Cristiane</au><au>Price, Richard B</au><au>Arrais, Cesar A</au><au>Sullivan, Braden</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Power output from 12 brands of contemporary LED light-curing units measured using 2 brands of radiometers</atitle><jtitle>PLoS ONE</jtitle><date>2022-07-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0267359</spage><pages>e0267359-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Background Given the increasing use of photo-activated resins in dentistry, dentists and researchers need a user-friendly dental radiometer to measure the power output from dental light-curing units (LCUs). Objective Our goal was to measure the accuracy of two brands of dental radiometers in reporting the power (mW) from twelve brands of contemporary LCUs compared to a 'gold standard' (GS) reference value obtained from an integrating sphere attached to a fiberoptic spectroradiometer. Methods The power output was measured from two units of 12 brands of LCUs, five times on the ''GS" system, five times on two Bluephase Meter II dental radiometers, and five times on two Mini Gig hand-held spectroradiometers. The emission spectrum was also recorded using the 'GS' integrating sphere. The power values reported by each meter were subjected to t-tests to compare the two examples of each LCU, and 3-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc tests. Regression analyses were also performed to determine the relationship between the data from the hand-held radiometers and the 'GS' integrating sphere. Results There was a large difference in the power values (mW) and the emission spectra from the 12 brands of LCUs on their standard-settings (p 98%). Conclusion We concluded that the power values reported from both brands of dental radiometers we tested were accurate, provided that the light source did not emit wavelengths of light that were beyond the radiometer's detection limit.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0267359</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PLoS ONE, 2022, Vol.17 (7), p.e0267359
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A709596835
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Analysis
Emission spectra
Light-emitting diodes
Radiometers
title Power output from 12 brands of contemporary LED light-curing units measured using 2 brands of radiometers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T15%3A16%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Power%20output%20from%2012%20brands%20of%20contemporary%20LED%20light-curing%20units%20measured%20using%202%20brands%20of%20radiometers&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20ONE&rft.au=Maucoski,%20Cristiane&rft.date=2022-07-08&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0267359&rft.pages=e0267359-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0267359&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA709596835%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A709596835&rfr_iscdi=true