Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping

The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), has now become a pest of global concern. Originally known to be endemic to the Western Hemisphere, its first detection in Africa was followed by spectacular outbreaks and spread to almost all sub-Saharan countries. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Florida entomologist 2022-03, Vol.105 (1), p.71-78
Hauptverfasser: Tepa-Yotto, Ghislain T, Meagher, Robert L, Winsou, Jeannette K, Dahoueto, Borghero T. A, Tamò, Manuele, Sæthre, May-Guri, Nagoshi, Rodney N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 78
container_issue 1
container_start_page 71
container_title The Florida entomologist
container_volume 105
creator Tepa-Yotto, Ghislain T
Meagher, Robert L
Winsou, Jeannette K
Dahoueto, Borghero T. A
Tamò, Manuele
Sæthre, May-Guri
Nagoshi, Rodney N
description The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), has now become a pest of global concern. Originally known to be endemic to the Western Hemisphere, its first detection in Africa was followed by spectacular outbreaks and spread to almost all sub-Saharan countries. The rapid incursion of S. frugiperda on maize (Zea mays L.; Poaceae) fields in Africa highlighted a crucial need for a comprehensive assessment of integrated pest management strategies in most smallholder farms. However, these strategies cannot successfully function without efficient monitoring and surveillance efforts. These trapping studies were designed to provide an indication as to whether pheromone trap-lure combinations and simple changes in landscape and agricultural practices might mitigate fall armyworm infestations. Our data show that the commercially available Unitrap was the most effective design for fall armyworm captures among the traps tested. The inexpensive home-made 2 L jar trap was capable of consistently collecting fall armyworm during the first season of relatively moderate fall armyworm density. However, the number of fall armyworm captured by home-made trap were several fold lower than by the Unitrap under all conditions, and almost no fall armyworm was captured during the second season by home-made 2 L jar when fall armyworm density was low. Substantial differences were observed among the pheromone blends with respect to numbers of fall armyworm and non-targets captured. The 4-component blend attracted the most fall armyworm under all conditions. The 2-component blend was the most selective, with no non-target species found during the second season experiments.
doi_str_mv 10.1653/024.105.0111
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A701514205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A701514205</galeid><jstor_id>48674013</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A701514205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b333t-1e888348ace4bfc7d604c1b8ed4773c3b30d98457fc53fdac8af04f6752412f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFLXDEQxoNUcKu9eS3k2rJvnbwk-7K9WbGtoAhaz4-8ZLIb2U0eSRbq3T_cLCtSL5JDwsxvPr7MR8gpgxmbS34GrZgxkDNgjB2QCVtw1UgG7ScyAWCyESDgiHzO-REAFq2UE_J8E4MvMfmwpPdjtHEsmDR1abv0IyarqQ_0JwYfflCdM-a8I8sKa92ttxgM0uhoSXqk5WnEKR1XmOImBqTDGoPNU6qDpSs9-KILjeE_YDc1Vr0Tcuj0OuOX1_uYPPy6_Hvxp7m-_X11cX7dDJzz0jBUSnGhtEExONPZOQjDBoVWdB03fOBgF0rIzhnJndVGaQfCzTvZCtY6xo_JbK-71Gvs6wdidWDqsbjxpjpyvtbPu7orJlqQdeDbu4HKFPxXlnqbc391f_eene5Zk2LOCV0_Jr_R6aln0O_i6Ws89S37XTwV_7rHH3Nd_xsr1LwTwHjtf9_3Bx-rs4_FXgBPepm4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Tepa-Yotto, Ghislain T ; Meagher, Robert L ; Winsou, Jeannette K ; Dahoueto, Borghero T. A ; Tamò, Manuele ; Sæthre, May-Guri ; Nagoshi, Rodney N</creator><creatorcontrib>Tepa-Yotto, Ghislain T ; Meagher, Robert L ; Winsou, Jeannette K ; Dahoueto, Borghero T. A ; Tamò, Manuele ; Sæthre, May-Guri ; Nagoshi, Rodney N</creatorcontrib><description>The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), has now become a pest of global concern. Originally known to be endemic to the Western Hemisphere, its first detection in Africa was followed by spectacular outbreaks and spread to almost all sub-Saharan countries. The rapid incursion of S. frugiperda on maize (Zea mays L.; Poaceae) fields in Africa highlighted a crucial need for a comprehensive assessment of integrated pest management strategies in most smallholder farms. However, these strategies cannot successfully function without efficient monitoring and surveillance efforts. These trapping studies were designed to provide an indication as to whether pheromone trap-lure combinations and simple changes in landscape and agricultural practices might mitigate fall armyworm infestations. Our data show that the commercially available Unitrap was the most effective design for fall armyworm captures among the traps tested. The inexpensive home-made 2 L jar trap was capable of consistently collecting fall armyworm during the first season of relatively moderate fall armyworm density. However, the number of fall armyworm captured by home-made trap were several fold lower than by the Unitrap under all conditions, and almost no fall armyworm was captured during the second season by home-made 2 L jar when fall armyworm density was low. Substantial differences were observed among the pheromone blends with respect to numbers of fall armyworm and non-targets captured. The 4-component blend attracted the most fall armyworm under all conditions. The 2-component blend was the most selective, with no non-target species found during the second season experiments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-4040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1653/024.105.0111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Florida Entomological Society</publisher><subject>Army-worms ; Behavior ; Control ; cropping system ; Cropping systems ; Distribution ; Environmental aspects ; fall armyworm ; gusano cogollero ; Insect traps ; monitoreo ; monitoring ; Pests ; pheromone lures ; pheromone traps ; RESEARCH PAPERS ; señuelos de feromonas ; sistema de cultivo ; trampas de feromonas</subject><ispartof>The Florida entomologist, 2022-03, Vol.105 (1), p.71-78</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Florida Entomological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b333t-1e888348ace4bfc7d604c1b8ed4773c3b30d98457fc53fdac8af04f6752412f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b333t-1e888348ace4bfc7d604c1b8ed4773c3b30d98457fc53fdac8af04f6752412f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1653/024.105.0111$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48674013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>109,314,780,784,864,25353,27923,27924,52718,54523,54529</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48674013$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tepa-Yotto, Ghislain T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meagher, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsou, Jeannette K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahoueto, Borghero T. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamò, Manuele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sæthre, May-Guri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagoshi, Rodney N</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping</title><title>The Florida entomologist</title><description>The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), has now become a pest of global concern. Originally known to be endemic to the Western Hemisphere, its first detection in Africa was followed by spectacular outbreaks and spread to almost all sub-Saharan countries. The rapid incursion of S. frugiperda on maize (Zea mays L.; Poaceae) fields in Africa highlighted a crucial need for a comprehensive assessment of integrated pest management strategies in most smallholder farms. However, these strategies cannot successfully function without efficient monitoring and surveillance efforts. These trapping studies were designed to provide an indication as to whether pheromone trap-lure combinations and simple changes in landscape and agricultural practices might mitigate fall armyworm infestations. Our data show that the commercially available Unitrap was the most effective design for fall armyworm captures among the traps tested. The inexpensive home-made 2 L jar trap was capable of consistently collecting fall armyworm during the first season of relatively moderate fall armyworm density. However, the number of fall armyworm captured by home-made trap were several fold lower than by the Unitrap under all conditions, and almost no fall armyworm was captured during the second season by home-made 2 L jar when fall armyworm density was low. Substantial differences were observed among the pheromone blends with respect to numbers of fall armyworm and non-targets captured. The 4-component blend attracted the most fall armyworm under all conditions. The 2-component blend was the most selective, with no non-target species found during the second season experiments.</description><subject>Army-worms</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>cropping system</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>fall armyworm</subject><subject>gusano cogollero</subject><subject>Insect traps</subject><subject>monitoreo</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>pheromone lures</subject><subject>pheromone traps</subject><subject>RESEARCH PAPERS</subject><subject>señuelos de feromonas</subject><subject>sistema de cultivo</subject><subject>trampas de feromonas</subject><issn>0015-4040</issn><issn>1938-5102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFLXDEQxoNUcKu9eS3k2rJvnbwk-7K9WbGtoAhaz4-8ZLIb2U0eSRbq3T_cLCtSL5JDwsxvPr7MR8gpgxmbS34GrZgxkDNgjB2QCVtw1UgG7ScyAWCyESDgiHzO-REAFq2UE_J8E4MvMfmwpPdjtHEsmDR1abv0IyarqQ_0JwYfflCdM-a8I8sKa92ttxgM0uhoSXqk5WnEKR1XmOImBqTDGoPNU6qDpSs9-KILjeE_YDc1Vr0Tcuj0OuOX1_uYPPy6_Hvxp7m-_X11cX7dDJzz0jBUSnGhtEExONPZOQjDBoVWdB03fOBgF0rIzhnJndVGaQfCzTvZCtY6xo_JbK-71Gvs6wdidWDqsbjxpjpyvtbPu7orJlqQdeDbu4HKFPxXlnqbc391f_eene5Zk2LOCV0_Jr_R6aln0O_i6Ws89S37XTwV_7rHH3Nd_xsr1LwTwHjtf9_3Bx-rs4_FXgBPepm4</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Tepa-Yotto, Ghislain T</creator><creator>Meagher, Robert L</creator><creator>Winsou, Jeannette K</creator><creator>Dahoueto, Borghero T. A</creator><creator>Tamò, Manuele</creator><creator>Sæthre, May-Guri</creator><creator>Nagoshi, Rodney N</creator><general>Florida Entomological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping</title><author>Tepa-Yotto, Ghislain T ; Meagher, Robert L ; Winsou, Jeannette K ; Dahoueto, Borghero T. A ; Tamò, Manuele ; Sæthre, May-Guri ; Nagoshi, Rodney N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b333t-1e888348ace4bfc7d604c1b8ed4773c3b30d98457fc53fdac8af04f6752412f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Army-worms</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>cropping system</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>fall armyworm</topic><topic>gusano cogollero</topic><topic>Insect traps</topic><topic>monitoreo</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>pheromone lures</topic><topic>pheromone traps</topic><topic>RESEARCH PAPERS</topic><topic>señuelos de feromonas</topic><topic>sistema de cultivo</topic><topic>trampas de feromonas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tepa-Yotto, Ghislain T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meagher, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsou, Jeannette K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahoueto, Borghero T. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamò, Manuele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sæthre, May-Guri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagoshi, Rodney N</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tepa-Yotto, Ghislain T</au><au>Meagher, Robert L</au><au>Winsou, Jeannette K</au><au>Dahoueto, Borghero T. A</au><au>Tamò, Manuele</au><au>Sæthre, May-Guri</au><au>Nagoshi, Rodney N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping</atitle><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>71-78</pages><issn>0015-4040</issn><eissn>1938-5102</eissn><abstract>The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), has now become a pest of global concern. Originally known to be endemic to the Western Hemisphere, its first detection in Africa was followed by spectacular outbreaks and spread to almost all sub-Saharan countries. The rapid incursion of S. frugiperda on maize (Zea mays L.; Poaceae) fields in Africa highlighted a crucial need for a comprehensive assessment of integrated pest management strategies in most smallholder farms. However, these strategies cannot successfully function without efficient monitoring and surveillance efforts. These trapping studies were designed to provide an indication as to whether pheromone trap-lure combinations and simple changes in landscape and agricultural practices might mitigate fall armyworm infestations. Our data show that the commercially available Unitrap was the most effective design for fall armyworm captures among the traps tested. The inexpensive home-made 2 L jar trap was capable of consistently collecting fall armyworm during the first season of relatively moderate fall armyworm density. However, the number of fall armyworm captured by home-made trap were several fold lower than by the Unitrap under all conditions, and almost no fall armyworm was captured during the second season by home-made 2 L jar when fall armyworm density was low. Substantial differences were observed among the pheromone blends with respect to numbers of fall armyworm and non-targets captured. The 4-component blend attracted the most fall armyworm under all conditions. The 2-component blend was the most selective, with no non-target species found during the second season experiments.</abstract><pub>Florida Entomological Society</pub><doi>10.1653/024.105.0111</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0015-4040
ispartof The Florida entomologist, 2022-03, Vol.105 (1), p.71-78
issn 0015-4040
1938-5102
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A701514205
source Jstor Journals Open Access
subjects Army-worms
Behavior
Control
cropping system
Cropping systems
Distribution
Environmental aspects
fall armyworm
gusano cogollero
Insect traps
monitoreo
monitoring
Pests
pheromone lures
pheromone traps
RESEARCH PAPERS
señuelos de feromonas
sistema de cultivo
trampas de feromonas
title Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T05%3A22%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20Spodoptera%20frugiperda%20in%20Benin:%20assessing%20the%20influence%20of%20trap%20type,%20pheromone%20blends,%20and%20habitat%20on%20pheromone%20trapping&rft.jtitle=The%20Florida%20entomologist&rft.au=Tepa-Yotto,%20Ghislain%20T&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=71-78&rft.issn=0015-4040&rft.eissn=1938-5102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1653/024.105.0111&rft_dat=%3Cgale_JFNAL%3EA701514205%3C/gale_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A701514205&rft_jstor_id=48674013&rfr_iscdi=true