HOW MANY DETAINEES? THE RELATION BETWEEN PRE-TRIAL DETENTION AND JUDICIARY CONGESTION/QUANTOS PRESOS PROVISORIOS? A RELACAO ENTRE PRISAO PROCESSUAL E CONGESTIONAMENTO JUDICIARIO

HOW MANY DETAINEES? THE RELATION BETWEEN PRE-TRIAL DETENTION AND JUDICIARY CONGESTION/QUANTOS PRESOS PROVISORIOS? A RELACAO ENTRE PRISAO PROCESSUAL E CONGESTIONAMENTO JUDICIARIO

Why Brazil presents high rates of pre-trial detention? The analysis of the numbers of pre-trial detention denotes the explication is not solely legal. The paper problematizes the relation between pre-trial detention and the length of criminal cases on first degree criminal courts until the judgment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista eletrônica de direito processual 2021-05, Vol.22 (2), p.120
1. Verfasser: Suxberger, Antonio Henrique Graciano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:por
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 120
container_title Revista eletrônica de direito processual
container_volume 22
creator Suxberger, Antonio Henrique Graciano
description Why Brazil presents high rates of pre-trial detention? The analysis of the numbers of pre-trial detention denotes the explication is not solely legal. The paper problematizes the relation between pre-trial detention and the length of criminal cases on first degree criminal courts until the judgment promoting comparison on imprisonment rates and judicial congestion in first instance. It asserts judicial congestion as a relevant factor to estimate pre-trial detention. Methodologically, the paper promotes legal- exploratory research and documental analysis--this, considering data available on imprisonment in Brazil. KEYWORDS: Prison Arrests National Data. Judiciary congestion. Reasonable length of trial. Infopen. Pre-trial detention. Por que o Brasil ostenta elevado percentual de presos provisorios? A analise dos numeros de prisao processual indica que a explicacao nao e estritamente juridica. O artigo problematiza a relacao entre o uso da prisao processual e os tempos de tramitacao do processo criminal ate a prolacao da sentenca por meio do cotejo entre taxa de aprisionamento e congestionamento judicial em primeira instancia. Sustenta que o congestionamento judiciario e fator relevante no dimensionamento da prisao processual. Metodologicamente, o artigo se vale de pesquisa juridico-exploratoria e analise documental--esta ultima a partir dos dados disponiveis de uso da prisao no Brasil. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Banco Nacional de Mandados de Prisao. Congestionamento judiciario. Duracao razoavel do processo. Infopen. Prisao provisoria.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A661840421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A661840421</galeid><sourcerecordid>A661840421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A6618404213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVTc1OwkAQ3hhNJMI7zAtU21IKnMy4He0a2NHdLYSTabA1NQiJ9cV4Q7eNIVzNHL6Z-f4uxCCaz-Jgmo7Ty7P9Woza9jMMw2gyTSZJPBDHnNewRL2BjBwqTWTvweUEhhboFGt4ILcm0vBiKHBG4aJTku451Bk8F5mSCs0GJOsnsh1x91qgdmw7k-2BV8qyUezTsc-WyOBTDHlSWX94jSRrC19AZ1G49Co-tSgeiqu63LXV6A9vxO0jOZkHH-Wuemv29eHnu9z6ea--mu1hX9WN_2OaRrMkTOJo_G_DL_IKXGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>HOW MANY DETAINEES? THE RELATION BETWEEN PRE-TRIAL DETENTION AND JUDICIARY CONGESTION/QUANTOS PRESOS PROVISORIOS? A RELACAO ENTRE PRISAO PROCESSUAL E CONGESTIONAMENTO JUDICIARIO</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Suxberger, Antonio Henrique Graciano</creator><creatorcontrib>Suxberger, Antonio Henrique Graciano</creatorcontrib><description>Why Brazil presents high rates of pre-trial detention? The analysis of the numbers of pre-trial detention denotes the explication is not solely legal. The paper problematizes the relation between pre-trial detention and the length of criminal cases on first degree criminal courts until the judgment promoting comparison on imprisonment rates and judicial congestion in first instance. It asserts judicial congestion as a relevant factor to estimate pre-trial detention. Methodologically, the paper promotes legal- exploratory research and documental analysis--this, considering data available on imprisonment in Brazil. KEYWORDS: Prison Arrests National Data. Judiciary congestion. Reasonable length of trial. Infopen. Pre-trial detention. Por que o Brasil ostenta elevado percentual de presos provisorios? A analise dos numeros de prisao processual indica que a explicacao nao e estritamente juridica. O artigo problematiza a relacao entre o uso da prisao processual e os tempos de tramitacao do processo criminal ate a prolacao da sentenca por meio do cotejo entre taxa de aprisionamento e congestionamento judicial em primeira instancia. Sustenta que o congestionamento judiciario e fator relevante no dimensionamento da prisao processual. Metodologicamente, o artigo se vale de pesquisa juridico-exploratoria e analise documental--esta ultima a partir dos dados disponiveis de uso da prisao no Brasil. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Banco Nacional de Mandados de Prisao. Congestionamento judiciario. Duracao razoavel do processo. Infopen. Prisao provisoria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1982-7636</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1982-7636</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</publisher><ispartof>Revista eletrônica de direito processual, 2021-05, Vol.22 (2), p.120</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suxberger, Antonio Henrique Graciano</creatorcontrib><title>HOW MANY DETAINEES? THE RELATION BETWEEN PRE-TRIAL DETENTION AND JUDICIARY CONGESTION/QUANTOS PRESOS PROVISORIOS? A RELACAO ENTRE PRISAO PROCESSUAL E CONGESTIONAMENTO JUDICIARIO</title><title>Revista eletrônica de direito processual</title><description>Why Brazil presents high rates of pre-trial detention? The analysis of the numbers of pre-trial detention denotes the explication is not solely legal. The paper problematizes the relation between pre-trial detention and the length of criminal cases on first degree criminal courts until the judgment promoting comparison on imprisonment rates and judicial congestion in first instance. It asserts judicial congestion as a relevant factor to estimate pre-trial detention. Methodologically, the paper promotes legal- exploratory research and documental analysis--this, considering data available on imprisonment in Brazil. KEYWORDS: Prison Arrests National Data. Judiciary congestion. Reasonable length of trial. Infopen. Pre-trial detention. Por que o Brasil ostenta elevado percentual de presos provisorios? A analise dos numeros de prisao processual indica que a explicacao nao e estritamente juridica. O artigo problematiza a relacao entre o uso da prisao processual e os tempos de tramitacao do processo criminal ate a prolacao da sentenca por meio do cotejo entre taxa de aprisionamento e congestionamento judicial em primeira instancia. Sustenta que o congestionamento judiciario e fator relevante no dimensionamento da prisao processual. Metodologicamente, o artigo se vale de pesquisa juridico-exploratoria e analise documental--esta ultima a partir dos dados disponiveis de uso da prisao no Brasil. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Banco Nacional de Mandados de Prisao. Congestionamento judiciario. Duracao razoavel do processo. Infopen. Prisao provisoria.</description><issn>1982-7636</issn><issn>1982-7636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVTc1OwkAQ3hhNJMI7zAtU21IKnMy4He0a2NHdLYSTabA1NQiJ9cV4Q7eNIVzNHL6Z-f4uxCCaz-Jgmo7Ty7P9Woza9jMMw2gyTSZJPBDHnNewRL2BjBwqTWTvweUEhhboFGt4ILcm0vBiKHBG4aJTku451Bk8F5mSCs0GJOsnsh1x91qgdmw7k-2BV8qyUezTsc-WyOBTDHlSWX94jSRrC19AZ1G49Co-tSgeiqu63LXV6A9vxO0jOZkHH-Wuemv29eHnu9z6ea--mu1hX9WN_2OaRrMkTOJo_G_DL_IKXGQ</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Suxberger, Antonio Henrique Graciano</creator><general>Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>HOW MANY DETAINEES? THE RELATION BETWEEN PRE-TRIAL DETENTION AND JUDICIARY CONGESTION/QUANTOS PRESOS PROVISORIOS? A RELACAO ENTRE PRISAO PROCESSUAL E CONGESTIONAMENTO JUDICIARIO</title><author>Suxberger, Antonio Henrique Graciano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A6618404213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suxberger, Antonio Henrique Graciano</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Revista eletrônica de direito processual</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suxberger, Antonio Henrique Graciano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HOW MANY DETAINEES? THE RELATION BETWEEN PRE-TRIAL DETENTION AND JUDICIARY CONGESTION/QUANTOS PRESOS PROVISORIOS? A RELACAO ENTRE PRISAO PROCESSUAL E CONGESTIONAMENTO JUDICIARIO</atitle><jtitle>Revista eletrônica de direito processual</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>120</spage><pages>120-</pages><issn>1982-7636</issn><eissn>1982-7636</eissn><abstract>Why Brazil presents high rates of pre-trial detention? The analysis of the numbers of pre-trial detention denotes the explication is not solely legal. The paper problematizes the relation between pre-trial detention and the length of criminal cases on first degree criminal courts until the judgment promoting comparison on imprisonment rates and judicial congestion in first instance. It asserts judicial congestion as a relevant factor to estimate pre-trial detention. Methodologically, the paper promotes legal- exploratory research and documental analysis--this, considering data available on imprisonment in Brazil. KEYWORDS: Prison Arrests National Data. Judiciary congestion. Reasonable length of trial. Infopen. Pre-trial detention. Por que o Brasil ostenta elevado percentual de presos provisorios? A analise dos numeros de prisao processual indica que a explicacao nao e estritamente juridica. O artigo problematiza a relacao entre o uso da prisao processual e os tempos de tramitacao do processo criminal ate a prolacao da sentenca por meio do cotejo entre taxa de aprisionamento e congestionamento judicial em primeira instancia. Sustenta que o congestionamento judiciario e fator relevante no dimensionamento da prisao processual. Metodologicamente, o artigo se vale de pesquisa juridico-exploratoria e analise documental--esta ultima a partir dos dados disponiveis de uso da prisao no Brasil. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Banco Nacional de Mandados de Prisao. Congestionamento judiciario. Duracao razoavel do processo. Infopen. Prisao provisoria.</abstract><pub>Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1982-7636
ispartof Revista eletrônica de direito processual, 2021-05, Vol.22 (2), p.120
issn 1982-7636
1982-7636
language por
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A661840421
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title HOW MANY DETAINEES? THE RELATION BETWEEN PRE-TRIAL DETENTION AND JUDICIARY CONGESTION/QUANTOS PRESOS PROVISORIOS? A RELACAO ENTRE PRISAO PROCESSUAL E CONGESTIONAMENTO JUDICIARIO
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T16%3A47%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HOW%20MANY%20DETAINEES?%20THE%20RELATION%20BETWEEN%20PRE-TRIAL%20DETENTION%20AND%20JUDICIARY%20CONGESTION/QUANTOS%20PRESOS%20PROVISORIOS?%20A%20RELACAO%20ENTRE%20PRISAO%20PROCESSUAL%20E%20CONGESTIONAMENTO%20JUDICIARIO&rft.jtitle=Revista%20eletr%C3%B4nica%20de%20direito%20processual&rft.au=Suxberger,%20Antonio%20Henrique%20Graciano&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=120&rft.pages=120-&rft.issn=1982-7636&rft.eissn=1982-7636&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA661840421%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A661840421&rfr_iscdi=true