Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Replacement in Patients With Pure Aortic Insufficiency

To compare the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with pure aortic insufficiency (PAI). The treatment of choice for patients with severe symptomatic PAI is SAVR. However, not all patients are candidates for surgery beca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mayo Clinic proceedings 2020-12, Vol.95 (12), p.2655-2664
Hauptverfasser: Alharbi, Anas A., Khan, Muhammad Z., Osman, Mohammed, Khan, Muhammad U., Munir, Muhammad B., Syed, Moinuddin, Khan, Safi U., Balla, Sudarshan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2664
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2655
container_title Mayo Clinic proceedings
container_volume 95
creator Alharbi, Anas A.
Khan, Muhammad Z.
Osman, Mohammed
Khan, Muhammad U.
Munir, Muhammad B.
Syed, Moinuddin
Khan, Safi U.
Balla, Sudarshan
description To compare the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with pure aortic insufficiency (PAI). The treatment of choice for patients with severe symptomatic PAI is SAVR. However, not all patients are candidates for surgery because of comorbidities or are deemed high risk for surgery. As a result, TAVR is being used as an off-label procedure in some patients with PAI. We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Inclusion criteria were patients with aortic valve insufficiency undergoing either TAVR or SAVR. Patients with concomitant aortic stenosis, or history of infective endocarditis, and those below the age of 18 years were excluded. A total of 14,720 patients with PAI underwent valve replacement. Of those, 6.2% underwent TAVR. The TAVR group was significantly older (median age 78 years vs 64 years; P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A648001529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A648001529</galeid><els_id>S0025619620308533</els_id><sourcerecordid>A648001529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-df63526e9d6b1e647eea4cb52fdefdbec977e52c99846f7dfefa64f382da969c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl-LEzEUxQdR3Lr6DUQGBBFkxkySyUxehFL8s7Dgoqs-hjRz06bMJN0kU-23N912qxUUyUPCze-c5CYny55WqKxQxV6vykFunVqXGGFUoqZEBN3LJhWnuKhryu5nE4RwXbCKs7PsUQgrhFDDOX2YnRGCG9aSdpKZay9tUDIuIYLPp85Ho_Kvst9A_gnWvVQwgI35JuSfR78wSvYndWPzKxlNWob8m4nL_Gr0cGdzYcOotVFpW20fZw-07AM8Oczn2Zd3b69nH4rLj-8vZtPLQtUcx6LTjNSYAe_YvAJGGwBJ1bzGugPdzUHxpoEaK85bynTTadCSUU1a3EnOuCLn2Zu973qcD9CpdDUve7H2ZpB-K5w04nTHmqVYuI1oKaJVjZLBy4OBdzcjhCgGExT0vbTgxiAwZQ3DqEU79Pkf6MqN3qb2bqnUCCUkUeWeWsgehLHapXNVGh0MRjkL2qT6lNFkWdWYJ8GLE0FiIvyICzmGIP4OLkH2cRlcP0bjbDgF6R5U3oXgQR_fo0JiFyexEvs4iV2cBGpEilOSPfv9LY-iu_wk4NUe-A5zp8PtT8MRS4GrOSOMkbSqmkS3_0_PTJS7PmZutPHXr0KKzsaAFwd5ZzyoKDpn_t3KT86H_zg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2467352433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Replacement in Patients With Pure Aortic Insufficiency</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Alharbi, Anas A. ; Khan, Muhammad Z. ; Osman, Mohammed ; Khan, Muhammad U. ; Munir, Muhammad B. ; Syed, Moinuddin ; Khan, Safi U. ; Balla, Sudarshan</creator><creatorcontrib>Alharbi, Anas A. ; Khan, Muhammad Z. ; Osman, Mohammed ; Khan, Muhammad U. ; Munir, Muhammad B. ; Syed, Moinuddin ; Khan, Safi U. ; Balla, Sudarshan</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with pure aortic insufficiency (PAI). The treatment of choice for patients with severe symptomatic PAI is SAVR. However, not all patients are candidates for surgery because of comorbidities or are deemed high risk for surgery. As a result, TAVR is being used as an off-label procedure in some patients with PAI. We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Inclusion criteria were patients with aortic valve insufficiency undergoing either TAVR or SAVR. Patients with concomitant aortic stenosis, or history of infective endocarditis, and those below the age of 18 years were excluded. A total of 14,720 patients with PAI underwent valve replacement. Of those, 6.2% underwent TAVR. The TAVR group was significantly older (median age 78 years vs 64 years; P &lt;.001). There was no evidence of a difference in in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups. However, after adjustment, patients in the TAVR group were associated with favorable outcomes in terms of acute kidney injury, cardiogenic shock, postoperative respiratory complications, and length of stay. On the other hand, those in the SAVR group were less likely to need permanent pacemakers. There was no evidence of a significant statistical difference in in-hospital mortality between patients with PAI treated by either SAVR or TAVR, both in unmatched and propensity-matched cohorts. TAVR could be considered for patients with PAI who are not candidates for surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-6196</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-5546</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33276838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NEW YORK: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Age ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aortic stenosis ; Aortic valve ; Aortic valve insufficiency ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - epidemiology ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery ; Cardiovascular disease ; Care and treatment ; Comparative analysis ; Data analysis ; Endocarditis ; FDA approval ; Female ; Forecasts and trends ; General & Internal Medicine ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Heart valve replacement ; Hospital Costs - statistics & numerical data ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Kidneys ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Male ; Medicine, General & Internal ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care ; Pacemakers ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - classification ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Risk Assessment ; Science & Technology ; Statistical analysis ; Stenosis ; Surgery ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - adverse effects ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods ; Type 2 diabetes ; United States ; United States - epidemiology]]></subject><ispartof>Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2020-12, Vol.95 (12), p.2655-2664</ispartof><rights>2020 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Elsevier, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research Dec 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>18</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000596366300017</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-df63526e9d6b1e647eea4cb52fdefdbec977e52c99846f7dfefa64f382da969c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-df63526e9d6b1e647eea4cb52fdefdbec977e52c99846f7dfefa64f382da969c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4724-1912 ; 0000-0002-9804-898X ; 0000-0001-8473-8069 ; 0000-0002-7872-3757</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2467352433?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932,28255,64392,64394,64396,72476</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33276838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alharbi, Anas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munir, Muhammad B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syed, Moinuddin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Safi U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balla, Sudarshan</creatorcontrib><title>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Replacement in Patients With Pure Aortic Insufficiency</title><title>Mayo Clinic proceedings</title><addtitle>MAYO CLIN PROC</addtitle><addtitle>Mayo Clin Proc</addtitle><description>To compare the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with pure aortic insufficiency (PAI). The treatment of choice for patients with severe symptomatic PAI is SAVR. However, not all patients are candidates for surgery because of comorbidities or are deemed high risk for surgery. As a result, TAVR is being used as an off-label procedure in some patients with PAI. We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Inclusion criteria were patients with aortic valve insufficiency undergoing either TAVR or SAVR. Patients with concomitant aortic stenosis, or history of infective endocarditis, and those below the age of 18 years were excluded. A total of 14,720 patients with PAI underwent valve replacement. Of those, 6.2% underwent TAVR. The TAVR group was significantly older (median age 78 years vs 64 years; P &lt;.001). There was no evidence of a difference in in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups. However, after adjustment, patients in the TAVR group were associated with favorable outcomes in terms of acute kidney injury, cardiogenic shock, postoperative respiratory complications, and length of stay. On the other hand, those in the SAVR group were less likely to need permanent pacemakers. There was no evidence of a significant statistical difference in in-hospital mortality between patients with PAI treated by either SAVR or TAVR, both in unmatched and propensity-matched cohorts. TAVR could be considered for patients with PAI who are not candidates for surgery.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aortic stenosis</subject><subject>Aortic valve</subject><subject>Aortic valve insufficiency</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - epidemiology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Endocarditis</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>General &amp; Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Heart valve replacement</subject><subject>Hospital Costs - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine, General &amp; Internal</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Pacemakers</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - classification</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stenosis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - adverse effects</subject><subject>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0025-6196</issn><issn>1942-5546</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl-LEzEUxQdR3Lr6DUQGBBFkxkySyUxehFL8s7Dgoqs-hjRz06bMJN0kU-23N912qxUUyUPCze-c5CYny55WqKxQxV6vykFunVqXGGFUoqZEBN3LJhWnuKhryu5nE4RwXbCKs7PsUQgrhFDDOX2YnRGCG9aSdpKZay9tUDIuIYLPp85Ho_Kvst9A_gnWvVQwgI35JuSfR78wSvYndWPzKxlNWob8m4nL_Gr0cGdzYcOotVFpW20fZw-07AM8Oczn2Zd3b69nH4rLj-8vZtPLQtUcx6LTjNSYAe_YvAJGGwBJ1bzGugPdzUHxpoEaK85bynTTadCSUU1a3EnOuCLn2Zu973qcD9CpdDUve7H2ZpB-K5w04nTHmqVYuI1oKaJVjZLBy4OBdzcjhCgGExT0vbTgxiAwZQ3DqEU79Pkf6MqN3qb2bqnUCCUkUeWeWsgehLHapXNVGh0MRjkL2qT6lNFkWdWYJ8GLE0FiIvyICzmGIP4OLkH2cRlcP0bjbDgF6R5U3oXgQR_fo0JiFyexEvs4iV2cBGpEilOSPfv9LY-iu_wk4NUe-A5zp8PtT8MRS4GrOSOMkbSqmkS3_0_PTJS7PmZutPHXr0KKzsaAFwd5ZzyoKDpn_t3KT86H_zg</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Alharbi, Anas A.</creator><creator>Khan, Muhammad Z.</creator><creator>Osman, Mohammed</creator><creator>Khan, Muhammad U.</creator><creator>Munir, Muhammad B.</creator><creator>Syed, Moinuddin</creator><creator>Khan, Safi U.</creator><creator>Balla, Sudarshan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier, Inc</general><general>Frontline Medical Communications Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-1912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9804-898X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8473-8069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-3757</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Replacement in Patients With Pure Aortic Insufficiency</title><author>Alharbi, Anas A. ; Khan, Muhammad Z. ; Osman, Mohammed ; Khan, Muhammad U. ; Munir, Muhammad B. ; Syed, Moinuddin ; Khan, Safi U. ; Balla, Sudarshan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c592t-df63526e9d6b1e647eea4cb52fdefdbec977e52c99846f7dfefa64f382da969c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aortic stenosis</topic><topic>Aortic valve</topic><topic>Aortic valve insufficiency</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - epidemiology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Endocarditis</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>General &amp; Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Heart valve replacement</topic><topic>Hospital Costs - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine, General &amp; Internal</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Pacemakers</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - classification</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stenosis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - adverse effects</topic><topic>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alharbi, Anas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munir, Muhammad B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syed, Moinuddin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Safi U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balla, Sudarshan</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Mayo Clinic proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alharbi, Anas A.</au><au>Khan, Muhammad Z.</au><au>Osman, Mohammed</au><au>Khan, Muhammad U.</au><au>Munir, Muhammad B.</au><au>Syed, Moinuddin</au><au>Khan, Safi U.</au><au>Balla, Sudarshan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Replacement in Patients With Pure Aortic Insufficiency</atitle><jtitle>Mayo Clinic proceedings</jtitle><stitle>MAYO CLIN PROC</stitle><addtitle>Mayo Clin Proc</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2655</spage><epage>2664</epage><pages>2655-2664</pages><issn>0025-6196</issn><eissn>1942-5546</eissn><abstract>To compare the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with pure aortic insufficiency (PAI). The treatment of choice for patients with severe symptomatic PAI is SAVR. However, not all patients are candidates for surgery because of comorbidities or are deemed high risk for surgery. As a result, TAVR is being used as an off-label procedure in some patients with PAI. We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Inclusion criteria were patients with aortic valve insufficiency undergoing either TAVR or SAVR. Patients with concomitant aortic stenosis, or history of infective endocarditis, and those below the age of 18 years were excluded. A total of 14,720 patients with PAI underwent valve replacement. Of those, 6.2% underwent TAVR. The TAVR group was significantly older (median age 78 years vs 64 years; P &lt;.001). There was no evidence of a difference in in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups. However, after adjustment, patients in the TAVR group were associated with favorable outcomes in terms of acute kidney injury, cardiogenic shock, postoperative respiratory complications, and length of stay. On the other hand, those in the SAVR group were less likely to need permanent pacemakers. There was no evidence of a significant statistical difference in in-hospital mortality between patients with PAI treated by either SAVR or TAVR, both in unmatched and propensity-matched cohorts. TAVR could be considered for patients with PAI who are not candidates for surgery.</abstract><cop>NEW YORK</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33276838</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.030</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-1912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9804-898X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8473-8069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-3757</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-6196
ispartof Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2020-12, Vol.95 (12), p.2655-2664
issn 0025-6196
1942-5546
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A648001529
source MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Age
Age Factors
Aged
Aortic stenosis
Aortic valve
Aortic valve insufficiency
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - epidemiology
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery
Cardiovascular disease
Care and treatment
Comparative analysis
Data analysis
Endocarditis
FDA approval
Female
Forecasts and trends
General & Internal Medicine
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods
Heart valve replacement
Hospital Costs - statistics & numerical data
Hospital Mortality
Hospitals
Humans
Kidneys
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Male
Medicine, General & Internal
Middle Aged
Mortality
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Pacemakers
Patients
Postoperative Complications - classification
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - mortality
Risk Assessment
Science & Technology
Statistical analysis
Stenosis
Surgery
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - adverse effects
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods
Type 2 diabetes
United States
United States - epidemiology
title Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Replacement in Patients With Pure Aortic Insufficiency
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T17%3A29%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcatheter%20Aortic%20Valve%20Replacement%20vs%20Surgical%20Replacement%20in%20Patients%20With%20Pure%20Aortic%20Insufficiency&rft.jtitle=Mayo%20Clinic%20proceedings&rft.au=Alharbi,%20Anas%20A.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2655&rft.epage=2664&rft.pages=2655-2664&rft.issn=0025-6196&rft.eissn=1942-5546&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.030&rft_dat=%3Cgale_webof%3EA648001529%3C/gale_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2467352433&rft_id=info:pmid/33276838&rft_galeid=A648001529&rft_els_id=S0025619620308533&rfr_iscdi=true