DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MODEL FOR LOGISTIC STAFF PERSONNEL WITH THE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Nowadays, the performance appraisal system that exists within the TNI is still general and not specific, meaning that the performance appraisal of TNI officers does not represent in detail the specific criteria of the performance appraisal of TNI staff officers, so the assessment system still requir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of defense resources management 2020-10, Vol.11 (2), p.127
Hauptverfasser: Madhakomala, R, Gunawan, K, Marsiningsih, Susilo, A.K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 127
container_title Journal of defense resources management
container_volume 11
creator Madhakomala, R
Gunawan, K
Marsiningsih
Susilo, A.K
description Nowadays, the performance appraisal system that exists within the TNI is still general and not specific, meaning that the performance appraisal of TNI officers does not represent in detail the specific criteria of the performance appraisal of TNI staff officers, so the assessment system still requires development criteria. This study aims to develop a model of performance appraisal evaluation instruments for logistics staff officers in the TNI environment. This study uses the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach. Based on the results of the research, it was found that the development of the TNI logistics staff performance appraisal model consists of 3 (three) criteria, namely logistical activities (A), logistics function (F), and logistical principles (L). Furthermore, logistics activities (A) consist of 5 KPIs (A1-A5), the logistics function criteria (F) consist of 5 KPIs (F1-F5), the logistics principle criteria (L) consist of 7 KPIs (L1-L7). Based on the calculation of the criteria values that have been carried out by referring to the Key performance indicators, it is found that the criteria that have the largest total are the logistic principle criteria with a weight value of 0.413; logistic function criteria is in the second position with a weight value of 0.327; Logistic activity criteria is in the third position with a weight value of 0.260. Furthermore, based on the total result value, the highest score is obtained, namely the Responsive sub-criteria with a weight value of 0.113; while the lowest value is the Survive Ability sub-criteria with a weight value of 0.028. This research is expected to be a model of performance appraisal evaluation and to make an important contribution to TNI organizations in particular and to function for unit organizations in general. Key words: Performance Appraisal; Key Performance Indicator (KPI); Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP); Logistics.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A647536018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A647536018</galeid><sourcerecordid>A647536018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A6475360183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVTMsKgkAUnUVBUv7D_QFD85EuB73mkM6IDkWrENNQTCH7fxqiTcvOWRw4rwXRdqbnG4Fj2iuiz3NvKniutQscjfQRnjAVeYZcgoghxyIWRUZ5iEDzvKCspClkIsIUVACpOLBSshBKSeNPvRScq_DMZAIyQTji5eeF8YiFVIpiQ5ZtNcyN_tU12cYow8S4V0Nz7cZ2ej2rWvHWPLp6Gpu2Uz71nL1re6bl238P3hBoRoc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MODEL FOR LOGISTIC STAFF PERSONNEL WITH THE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Madhakomala, R ; Gunawan, K ; Marsiningsih ; Susilo, A.K</creator><creatorcontrib>Madhakomala, R ; Gunawan, K ; Marsiningsih ; Susilo, A.K</creatorcontrib><description>Nowadays, the performance appraisal system that exists within the TNI is still general and not specific, meaning that the performance appraisal of TNI officers does not represent in detail the specific criteria of the performance appraisal of TNI staff officers, so the assessment system still requires development criteria. This study aims to develop a model of performance appraisal evaluation instruments for logistics staff officers in the TNI environment. This study uses the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach. Based on the results of the research, it was found that the development of the TNI logistics staff performance appraisal model consists of 3 (three) criteria, namely logistical activities (A), logistics function (F), and logistical principles (L). Furthermore, logistics activities (A) consist of 5 KPIs (A1-A5), the logistics function criteria (F) consist of 5 KPIs (F1-F5), the logistics principle criteria (L) consist of 7 KPIs (L1-L7). Based on the calculation of the criteria values that have been carried out by referring to the Key performance indicators, it is found that the criteria that have the largest total are the logistic principle criteria with a weight value of 0.413; logistic function criteria is in the second position with a weight value of 0.327; Logistic activity criteria is in the third position with a weight value of 0.260. Furthermore, based on the total result value, the highest score is obtained, namely the Responsive sub-criteria with a weight value of 0.113; while the lowest value is the Survive Ability sub-criteria with a weight value of 0.028. This research is expected to be a model of performance appraisal evaluation and to make an important contribution to TNI organizations in particular and to function for unit organizations in general. Key words: Performance Appraisal; Key Performance Indicator (KPI); Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP); Logistics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2068-9403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Regional Department of Defense Resources Management Studies</publisher><subject>Business performance management ; Employee performance</subject><ispartof>Journal of defense resources management, 2020-10, Vol.11 (2), p.127</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Regional Department of Defense Resources Management Studies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madhakomala, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunawan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsiningsih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susilo, A.K</creatorcontrib><title>DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MODEL FOR LOGISTIC STAFF PERSONNEL WITH THE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR</title><title>Journal of defense resources management</title><description>Nowadays, the performance appraisal system that exists within the TNI is still general and not specific, meaning that the performance appraisal of TNI officers does not represent in detail the specific criteria of the performance appraisal of TNI staff officers, so the assessment system still requires development criteria. This study aims to develop a model of performance appraisal evaluation instruments for logistics staff officers in the TNI environment. This study uses the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach. Based on the results of the research, it was found that the development of the TNI logistics staff performance appraisal model consists of 3 (three) criteria, namely logistical activities (A), logistics function (F), and logistical principles (L). Furthermore, logistics activities (A) consist of 5 KPIs (A1-A5), the logistics function criteria (F) consist of 5 KPIs (F1-F5), the logistics principle criteria (L) consist of 7 KPIs (L1-L7). Based on the calculation of the criteria values that have been carried out by referring to the Key performance indicators, it is found that the criteria that have the largest total are the logistic principle criteria with a weight value of 0.413; logistic function criteria is in the second position with a weight value of 0.327; Logistic activity criteria is in the third position with a weight value of 0.260. Furthermore, based on the total result value, the highest score is obtained, namely the Responsive sub-criteria with a weight value of 0.113; while the lowest value is the Survive Ability sub-criteria with a weight value of 0.028. This research is expected to be a model of performance appraisal evaluation and to make an important contribution to TNI organizations in particular and to function for unit organizations in general. Key words: Performance Appraisal; Key Performance Indicator (KPI); Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP); Logistics.</description><subject>Business performance management</subject><subject>Employee performance</subject><issn>2068-9403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVTMsKgkAUnUVBUv7D_QFD85EuB73mkM6IDkWrENNQTCH7fxqiTcvOWRw4rwXRdqbnG4Fj2iuiz3NvKniutQscjfQRnjAVeYZcgoghxyIWRUZ5iEDzvKCspClkIsIUVACpOLBSshBKSeNPvRScq_DMZAIyQTji5eeF8YiFVIpiQ5ZtNcyN_tU12cYow8S4V0Nz7cZ2ej2rWvHWPLp6Gpu2Uz71nL1re6bl238P3hBoRoc</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Madhakomala, R</creator><creator>Gunawan, K</creator><creator>Marsiningsih</creator><creator>Susilo, A.K</creator><general>Regional Department of Defense Resources Management Studies</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MODEL FOR LOGISTIC STAFF PERSONNEL WITH THE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR</title><author>Madhakomala, R ; Gunawan, K ; Marsiningsih ; Susilo, A.K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A6475360183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business performance management</topic><topic>Employee performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madhakomala, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunawan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsiningsih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susilo, A.K</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of defense resources management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madhakomala, R</au><au>Gunawan, K</au><au>Marsiningsih</au><au>Susilo, A.K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MODEL FOR LOGISTIC STAFF PERSONNEL WITH THE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR</atitle><jtitle>Journal of defense resources management</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>127</spage><pages>127-</pages><issn>2068-9403</issn><abstract>Nowadays, the performance appraisal system that exists within the TNI is still general and not specific, meaning that the performance appraisal of TNI officers does not represent in detail the specific criteria of the performance appraisal of TNI staff officers, so the assessment system still requires development criteria. This study aims to develop a model of performance appraisal evaluation instruments for logistics staff officers in the TNI environment. This study uses the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach. Based on the results of the research, it was found that the development of the TNI logistics staff performance appraisal model consists of 3 (three) criteria, namely logistical activities (A), logistics function (F), and logistical principles (L). Furthermore, logistics activities (A) consist of 5 KPIs (A1-A5), the logistics function criteria (F) consist of 5 KPIs (F1-F5), the logistics principle criteria (L) consist of 7 KPIs (L1-L7). Based on the calculation of the criteria values that have been carried out by referring to the Key performance indicators, it is found that the criteria that have the largest total are the logistic principle criteria with a weight value of 0.413; logistic function criteria is in the second position with a weight value of 0.327; Logistic activity criteria is in the third position with a weight value of 0.260. Furthermore, based on the total result value, the highest score is obtained, namely the Responsive sub-criteria with a weight value of 0.113; while the lowest value is the Survive Ability sub-criteria with a weight value of 0.028. This research is expected to be a model of performance appraisal evaluation and to make an important contribution to TNI organizations in particular and to function for unit organizations in general. Key words: Performance Appraisal; Key Performance Indicator (KPI); Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP); Logistics.</abstract><pub>Regional Department of Defense Resources Management Studies</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2068-9403
ispartof Journal of defense resources management, 2020-10, Vol.11 (2), p.127
issn 2068-9403
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A647536018
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Business performance management
Employee performance
title DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MODEL FOR LOGISTIC STAFF PERSONNEL WITH THE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A21%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DEVELOPMENT%20OF%20PERFORMANCE%20APPRAISAL%20MODEL%20FOR%20LOGISTIC%20STAFF%20PERSONNEL%20WITH%20THE%20KEY%20PERFORMANCE%20INDICATOR&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20defense%20resources%20management&rft.au=Madhakomala,%20R&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.pages=127-&rft.issn=2068-9403&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA647536018%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A647536018&rfr_iscdi=true