Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia

Purpose The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the language characteristics of people with latent aphasia using measures that examined temporal (i.e., real-time) and episodic organization of discourse production. Method Thirty AphasiaBank participants were included (10 people...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of speech-language pathology 2020-02, Vol.29 (1S), p.449-462
Hauptverfasser: DeDe, Gayle, Salis, Christos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 462
container_issue 1S
container_start_page 449
container_title American journal of speech-language pathology
container_volume 29
creator DeDe, Gayle
Salis, Christos
description Purpose The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the language characteristics of people with latent aphasia using measures that examined temporal (i.e., real-time) and episodic organization of discourse production. Method Thirty AphasiaBank participants were included (10 people with latent aphasia, 10 people with anomic aphasia, and 10 neurotypical control participants). Speech material of Cinderella narratives was analyzed with Praat software. We devised a protocol that coded the presence and duration of all speech segments, dysfluencies such as silent and filled pauses, and other speech behaviors. Using these durations, we generated a range of temporal measures such as speech, articulation, and pure word rates. Narratives were also coded into episodes, which provided information about the discourse macrostructure abilities of the participants. Results The latent aphasia group differed from controls in number of words produced, silent pause duration, and speech rate, but not articulation rate or pure word rate. Episodic organization of the narratives was similar in these 2 groups. The latent and anomic aphasia groups were similar in most measures, apart from articulation rate, which was lower in the anomic group. The anomic aphasia group also omitted more episodes than the latent aphasia group. Conclusions The differences between latent aphasia and neurotypical controls can be attributed to a processing speed deficit. We propose that this deficit results in an impaired ability to process information from multiple cognitive domains simultaneously.
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0210
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A624293858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A624293858</galeid><sourcerecordid>A624293858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-8e429b49937b104347281762c6ca71049c5e82fbbbd6f3583b1294a492a9bdf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkV9v1iAUxolxcfPVr2BITMxuOjlAW7hsmjn_vMlMNq8JpdSXpS0V6MX77aVu6mYMFxxOfs_Jc3gQwkAugHD-nhKQqvl8s_9atE3LRQGiIBTIM3QGZSkKCUCe55rkmrCKnKKXMd4RQgAofYFOGXCQUJEz9OXWTosPesR67vHl4qLvncHNrMdjtBH7AaeDxTfJh-P2aN3c22DHUWM3471Odk64WQ46Ov0KnQx6jPb1w71D3z5c3rYfi_311ae22ReGc0iFsJzKjkvJ6i5vw3hNBdQVNZXRdW5IU1pBh67r-mpgpWAdUMk1l1TLrh8Y26Hz-7lL8D9WG5OaXDSbp9n6NSpK65LWleR1Rt_-g975NeTlMsVk_kUqyCPqux6tcvPgU9BmG6qaima3TGQbO3TxHyqf3k7O-NkOLvefCN49EhysHtMh-nFNzs_xKSjuQRN8jMEOaglu0uGogKgtcPU3cPUrcAVCbYFn6ZuHBddusv0f4e-E2U-h8KJj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2390192807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>DeDe, Gayle ; Salis, Christos</creator><creatorcontrib>DeDe, Gayle ; Salis, Christos</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the language characteristics of people with latent aphasia using measures that examined temporal (i.e., real-time) and episodic organization of discourse production. Method Thirty AphasiaBank participants were included (10 people with latent aphasia, 10 people with anomic aphasia, and 10 neurotypical control participants). Speech material of Cinderella narratives was analyzed with Praat software. We devised a protocol that coded the presence and duration of all speech segments, dysfluencies such as silent and filled pauses, and other speech behaviors. Using these durations, we generated a range of temporal measures such as speech, articulation, and pure word rates. Narratives were also coded into episodes, which provided information about the discourse macrostructure abilities of the participants. Results The latent aphasia group differed from controls in number of words produced, silent pause duration, and speech rate, but not articulation rate or pure word rate. Episodic organization of the narratives was similar in these 2 groups. The latent and anomic aphasia groups were similar in most measures, apart from articulation rate, which was lower in the anomic group. The anomic aphasia group also omitted more episodes than the latent aphasia group. Conclusions The differences between latent aphasia and neurotypical controls can be attributed to a processing speed deficit. We propose that this deficit results in an impaired ability to process information from multiple cognitive domains simultaneously.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9110</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31419160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Analysis ; Anomia - physiopathology ; Aphasia ; Aphasia - physiopathology ; Articulation ; Case-Control Studies ; Control Groups ; Female ; Humans ; Individual Differences ; Language Aptitude ; Language Impairments ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Narration ; Narratives ; Outcome Measures ; Pauses ; Speech ; Speech duration ; Speech Production Measurement - methods ; Speech rate ; Standardized Tests ; Time ; Verbal Ability ; Verbal communication</subject><ispartof>American journal of speech-language pathology, 2020-02, Vol.29 (1S), p.449-462</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Feb 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-8e429b49937b104347281762c6ca71049c5e82fbbbd6f3583b1294a492a9bdf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-8e429b49937b104347281762c6ca71049c5e82fbbbd6f3583b1294a492a9bdf33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31419160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeDe, Gayle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salis, Christos</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia</title><title>American journal of speech-language pathology</title><addtitle>Am J Speech Lang Pathol</addtitle><description>Purpose The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the language characteristics of people with latent aphasia using measures that examined temporal (i.e., real-time) and episodic organization of discourse production. Method Thirty AphasiaBank participants were included (10 people with latent aphasia, 10 people with anomic aphasia, and 10 neurotypical control participants). Speech material of Cinderella narratives was analyzed with Praat software. We devised a protocol that coded the presence and duration of all speech segments, dysfluencies such as silent and filled pauses, and other speech behaviors. Using these durations, we generated a range of temporal measures such as speech, articulation, and pure word rates. Narratives were also coded into episodes, which provided information about the discourse macrostructure abilities of the participants. Results The latent aphasia group differed from controls in number of words produced, silent pause duration, and speech rate, but not articulation rate or pure word rate. Episodic organization of the narratives was similar in these 2 groups. The latent and anomic aphasia groups were similar in most measures, apart from articulation rate, which was lower in the anomic group. The anomic aphasia group also omitted more episodes than the latent aphasia group. Conclusions The differences between latent aphasia and neurotypical controls can be attributed to a processing speed deficit. We propose that this deficit results in an impaired ability to process information from multiple cognitive domains simultaneously.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anomia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aphasia</subject><subject>Aphasia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Articulation</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Language Aptitude</subject><subject>Language Impairments</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Narration</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Pauses</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech duration</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Speech rate</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Verbal Ability</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><issn>1058-0360</issn><issn>1558-9110</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkV9v1iAUxolxcfPVr2BITMxuOjlAW7hsmjn_vMlMNq8JpdSXpS0V6MX77aVu6mYMFxxOfs_Jc3gQwkAugHD-nhKQqvl8s_9atE3LRQGiIBTIM3QGZSkKCUCe55rkmrCKnKKXMd4RQgAofYFOGXCQUJEz9OXWTosPesR67vHl4qLvncHNrMdjtBH7AaeDxTfJh-P2aN3c22DHUWM3471Odk64WQ46Ov0KnQx6jPb1w71D3z5c3rYfi_311ae22ReGc0iFsJzKjkvJ6i5vw3hNBdQVNZXRdW5IU1pBh67r-mpgpWAdUMk1l1TLrh8Y26Hz-7lL8D9WG5OaXDSbp9n6NSpK65LWleR1Rt_-g975NeTlMsVk_kUqyCPqux6tcvPgU9BmG6qaima3TGQbO3TxHyqf3k7O-NkOLvefCN49EhysHtMh-nFNzs_xKSjuQRN8jMEOaglu0uGogKgtcPU3cPUrcAVCbYFn6ZuHBddusv0f4e-E2U-h8KJj</recordid><startdate>20200221</startdate><enddate>20200221</enddate><creator>DeDe, Gayle</creator><creator>Salis, Christos</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200221</creationdate><title>Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia</title><author>DeDe, Gayle ; Salis, Christos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-8e429b49937b104347281762c6ca71049c5e82fbbbd6f3583b1294a492a9bdf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anomia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aphasia</topic><topic>Aphasia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Articulation</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Language Aptitude</topic><topic>Language Impairments</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Narration</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Pauses</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech duration</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Speech rate</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Verbal Ability</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeDe, Gayle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salis, Christos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of speech-language pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeDe, Gayle</au><au>Salis, Christos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia</atitle><jtitle>American journal of speech-language pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Speech Lang Pathol</addtitle><date>2020-02-21</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1S</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>449-462</pages><issn>1058-0360</issn><eissn>1558-9110</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the language characteristics of people with latent aphasia using measures that examined temporal (i.e., real-time) and episodic organization of discourse production. Method Thirty AphasiaBank participants were included (10 people with latent aphasia, 10 people with anomic aphasia, and 10 neurotypical control participants). Speech material of Cinderella narratives was analyzed with Praat software. We devised a protocol that coded the presence and duration of all speech segments, dysfluencies such as silent and filled pauses, and other speech behaviors. Using these durations, we generated a range of temporal measures such as speech, articulation, and pure word rates. Narratives were also coded into episodes, which provided information about the discourse macrostructure abilities of the participants. Results The latent aphasia group differed from controls in number of words produced, silent pause duration, and speech rate, but not articulation rate or pure word rate. Episodic organization of the narratives was similar in these 2 groups. The latent and anomic aphasia groups were similar in most measures, apart from articulation rate, which was lower in the anomic group. The anomic aphasia group also omitted more episodes than the latent aphasia group. Conclusions The differences between latent aphasia and neurotypical controls can be attributed to a processing speed deficit. We propose that this deficit results in an impaired ability to process information from multiple cognitive domains simultaneously.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</pub><pmid>31419160</pmid><doi>10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0210</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0360
ispartof American journal of speech-language pathology, 2020-02, Vol.29 (1S), p.449-462
issn 1058-0360
1558-9110
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A624293858
source MEDLINE; Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accuracy
Analysis
Anomia - physiopathology
Aphasia
Aphasia - physiopathology
Articulation
Case-Control Studies
Control Groups
Female
Humans
Individual Differences
Language Aptitude
Language Impairments
Linguistics
Listening Comprehension
Male
Middle Aged
Narration
Narratives
Outcome Measures
Pauses
Speech
Speech duration
Speech Production Measurement - methods
Speech rate
Standardized Tests
Time
Verbal Ability
Verbal communication
title Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T23%3A50%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20and%20Episodic%20Analyses%20of%20the%20Story%20of%20Cinderella%20in%20Latent%20Aphasia&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20speech-language%20pathology&rft.au=DeDe,%20Gayle&rft.date=2020-02-21&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1S&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=449-462&rft.issn=1058-0360&rft.eissn=1558-9110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0210&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA624293858%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2390192807&rft_id=info:pmid/31419160&rft_galeid=A624293858&rfr_iscdi=true