Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia
Purpose The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the language characteristics of people with latent aphasia using measures that examined temporal (i.e., real-time) and episodic organization of discourse production. Method Thirty AphasiaBank participants were included (10 people...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of speech-language pathology 2020-02, Vol.29 (1S), p.449-462 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 462 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1S |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | American journal of speech-language pathology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | DeDe, Gayle Salis, Christos |
description | Purpose The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the language characteristics of people with latent aphasia using measures that examined temporal (i.e., real-time) and episodic organization of discourse production. Method Thirty AphasiaBank participants were included (10 people with latent aphasia, 10 people with anomic aphasia, and 10 neurotypical control participants). Speech material of Cinderella narratives was analyzed with Praat software. We devised a protocol that coded the presence and duration of all speech segments, dysfluencies such as silent and filled pauses, and other speech behaviors. Using these durations, we generated a range of temporal measures such as speech, articulation, and pure word rates. Narratives were also coded into episodes, which provided information about the discourse macrostructure abilities of the participants. Results The latent aphasia group differed from controls in number of words produced, silent pause duration, and speech rate, but not articulation rate or pure word rate. Episodic organization of the narratives was similar in these 2 groups. The latent and anomic aphasia groups were similar in most measures, apart from articulation rate, which was lower in the anomic group. The anomic aphasia group also omitted more episodes than the latent aphasia group. Conclusions The differences between latent aphasia and neurotypical controls can be attributed to a processing speed deficit. We propose that this deficit results in an impaired ability to process information from multiple cognitive domains simultaneously. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0210 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A624293858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A624293858</galeid><sourcerecordid>A624293858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-8e429b49937b104347281762c6ca71049c5e82fbbbd6f3583b1294a492a9bdf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkV9v1iAUxolxcfPVr2BITMxuOjlAW7hsmjn_vMlMNq8JpdSXpS0V6MX77aVu6mYMFxxOfs_Jc3gQwkAugHD-nhKQqvl8s_9atE3LRQGiIBTIM3QGZSkKCUCe55rkmrCKnKKXMd4RQgAofYFOGXCQUJEz9OXWTosPesR67vHl4qLvncHNrMdjtBH7AaeDxTfJh-P2aN3c22DHUWM3471Odk64WQ46Ov0KnQx6jPb1w71D3z5c3rYfi_311ae22ReGc0iFsJzKjkvJ6i5vw3hNBdQVNZXRdW5IU1pBh67r-mpgpWAdUMk1l1TLrh8Y26Hz-7lL8D9WG5OaXDSbp9n6NSpK65LWleR1Rt_-g975NeTlMsVk_kUqyCPqux6tcvPgU9BmG6qaima3TGQbO3TxHyqf3k7O-NkOLvefCN49EhysHtMh-nFNzs_xKSjuQRN8jMEOaglu0uGogKgtcPU3cPUrcAVCbYFn6ZuHBddusv0f4e-E2U-h8KJj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2390192807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>DeDe, Gayle ; Salis, Christos</creator><creatorcontrib>DeDe, Gayle ; Salis, Christos</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the language characteristics of people with latent aphasia using measures that examined temporal (i.e., real-time) and episodic organization of discourse production. Method Thirty AphasiaBank participants were included (10 people with latent aphasia, 10 people with anomic aphasia, and 10 neurotypical control participants). Speech material of Cinderella narratives was analyzed with Praat software. We devised a protocol that coded the presence and duration of all speech segments, dysfluencies such as silent and filled pauses, and other speech behaviors. Using these durations, we generated a range of temporal measures such as speech, articulation, and pure word rates. Narratives were also coded into episodes, which provided information about the discourse macrostructure abilities of the participants. Results The latent aphasia group differed from controls in number of words produced, silent pause duration, and speech rate, but not articulation rate or pure word rate. Episodic organization of the narratives was similar in these 2 groups. The latent and anomic aphasia groups were similar in most measures, apart from articulation rate, which was lower in the anomic group. The anomic aphasia group also omitted more episodes than the latent aphasia group. Conclusions The differences between latent aphasia and neurotypical controls can be attributed to a processing speed deficit. We propose that this deficit results in an impaired ability to process information from multiple cognitive domains simultaneously.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9110</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31419160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Analysis ; Anomia - physiopathology ; Aphasia ; Aphasia - physiopathology ; Articulation ; Case-Control Studies ; Control Groups ; Female ; Humans ; Individual Differences ; Language Aptitude ; Language Impairments ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Narration ; Narratives ; Outcome Measures ; Pauses ; Speech ; Speech duration ; Speech Production Measurement - methods ; Speech rate ; Standardized Tests ; Time ; Verbal Ability ; Verbal communication</subject><ispartof>American journal of speech-language pathology, 2020-02, Vol.29 (1S), p.449-462</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Feb 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-8e429b49937b104347281762c6ca71049c5e82fbbbd6f3583b1294a492a9bdf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-8e429b49937b104347281762c6ca71049c5e82fbbbd6f3583b1294a492a9bdf33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31419160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeDe, Gayle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salis, Christos</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia</title><title>American journal of speech-language pathology</title><addtitle>Am J Speech Lang Pathol</addtitle><description>Purpose The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the language characteristics of people with latent aphasia using measures that examined temporal (i.e., real-time) and episodic organization of discourse production. Method Thirty AphasiaBank participants were included (10 people with latent aphasia, 10 people with anomic aphasia, and 10 neurotypical control participants). Speech material of Cinderella narratives was analyzed with Praat software. We devised a protocol that coded the presence and duration of all speech segments, dysfluencies such as silent and filled pauses, and other speech behaviors. Using these durations, we generated a range of temporal measures such as speech, articulation, and pure word rates. Narratives were also coded into episodes, which provided information about the discourse macrostructure abilities of the participants. Results The latent aphasia group differed from controls in number of words produced, silent pause duration, and speech rate, but not articulation rate or pure word rate. Episodic organization of the narratives was similar in these 2 groups. The latent and anomic aphasia groups were similar in most measures, apart from articulation rate, which was lower in the anomic group. The anomic aphasia group also omitted more episodes than the latent aphasia group. Conclusions The differences between latent aphasia and neurotypical controls can be attributed to a processing speed deficit. We propose that this deficit results in an impaired ability to process information from multiple cognitive domains simultaneously.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anomia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aphasia</subject><subject>Aphasia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Articulation</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Language Aptitude</subject><subject>Language Impairments</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Narration</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Pauses</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech duration</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Speech rate</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Verbal Ability</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><issn>1058-0360</issn><issn>1558-9110</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkV9v1iAUxolxcfPVr2BITMxuOjlAW7hsmjn_vMlMNq8JpdSXpS0V6MX77aVu6mYMFxxOfs_Jc3gQwkAugHD-nhKQqvl8s_9atE3LRQGiIBTIM3QGZSkKCUCe55rkmrCKnKKXMd4RQgAofYFOGXCQUJEz9OXWTosPesR67vHl4qLvncHNrMdjtBH7AaeDxTfJh-P2aN3c22DHUWM3471Odk64WQ46Ov0KnQx6jPb1w71D3z5c3rYfi_311ae22ReGc0iFsJzKjkvJ6i5vw3hNBdQVNZXRdW5IU1pBh67r-mpgpWAdUMk1l1TLrh8Y26Hz-7lL8D9WG5OaXDSbp9n6NSpK65LWleR1Rt_-g975NeTlMsVk_kUqyCPqux6tcvPgU9BmG6qaima3TGQbO3TxHyqf3k7O-NkOLvefCN49EhysHtMh-nFNzs_xKSjuQRN8jMEOaglu0uGogKgtcPU3cPUrcAVCbYFn6ZuHBddusv0f4e-E2U-h8KJj</recordid><startdate>20200221</startdate><enddate>20200221</enddate><creator>DeDe, Gayle</creator><creator>Salis, Christos</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200221</creationdate><title>Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia</title><author>DeDe, Gayle ; Salis, Christos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-8e429b49937b104347281762c6ca71049c5e82fbbbd6f3583b1294a492a9bdf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anomia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aphasia</topic><topic>Aphasia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Articulation</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Language Aptitude</topic><topic>Language Impairments</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Narration</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Pauses</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech duration</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Speech rate</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Verbal Ability</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeDe, Gayle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salis, Christos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of speech-language pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeDe, Gayle</au><au>Salis, Christos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia</atitle><jtitle>American journal of speech-language pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Speech Lang Pathol</addtitle><date>2020-02-21</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1S</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>449-462</pages><issn>1058-0360</issn><eissn>1558-9110</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of the language characteristics of people with latent aphasia using measures that examined temporal (i.e., real-time) and episodic organization of discourse production. Method Thirty AphasiaBank participants were included (10 people with latent aphasia, 10 people with anomic aphasia, and 10 neurotypical control participants). Speech material of Cinderella narratives was analyzed with Praat software. We devised a protocol that coded the presence and duration of all speech segments, dysfluencies such as silent and filled pauses, and other speech behaviors. Using these durations, we generated a range of temporal measures such as speech, articulation, and pure word rates. Narratives were also coded into episodes, which provided information about the discourse macrostructure abilities of the participants. Results The latent aphasia group differed from controls in number of words produced, silent pause duration, and speech rate, but not articulation rate or pure word rate. Episodic organization of the narratives was similar in these 2 groups. The latent and anomic aphasia groups were similar in most measures, apart from articulation rate, which was lower in the anomic group. The anomic aphasia group also omitted more episodes than the latent aphasia group. Conclusions The differences between latent aphasia and neurotypical controls can be attributed to a processing speed deficit. We propose that this deficit results in an impaired ability to process information from multiple cognitive domains simultaneously.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</pub><pmid>31419160</pmid><doi>10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0210</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-0360 |
ispartof | American journal of speech-language pathology, 2020-02, Vol.29 (1S), p.449-462 |
issn | 1058-0360 1558-9110 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A624293858 |
source | MEDLINE; Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accuracy Analysis Anomia - physiopathology Aphasia Aphasia - physiopathology Articulation Case-Control Studies Control Groups Female Humans Individual Differences Language Aptitude Language Impairments Linguistics Listening Comprehension Male Middle Aged Narration Narratives Outcome Measures Pauses Speech Speech duration Speech Production Measurement - methods Speech rate Standardized Tests Time Verbal Ability Verbal communication |
title | Temporal and Episodic Analyses of the Story of Cinderella in Latent Aphasia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T23%3A50%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20and%20Episodic%20Analyses%20of%20the%20Story%20of%20Cinderella%20in%20Latent%20Aphasia&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20speech-language%20pathology&rft.au=DeDe,%20Gayle&rft.date=2020-02-21&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1S&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=449-462&rft.issn=1058-0360&rft.eissn=1558-9110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0210&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA624293858%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2390192807&rft_id=info:pmid/31419160&rft_galeid=A624293858&rfr_iscdi=true |