EVIDENCE-ASSURANCE CLAIM AND ANTICIPATED PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE IN FACE OF URGENCY: A SERIOUS CONCEPTUAL CONFUSION MAINTAINED BY THE BRAZILIAN CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE/ PRETENSAO A SEGURANCA DA PROVA E PRODUCAO ANTECIPADA DA PROVA DIANTE DA URGENCIA: UMA GRAVE CONFUSAO CONCEITUAL MANTIDA PELO CODIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL

This essay seeks to investigate if there is still such a thing as an evidence-assurance procedure in the Brazilian legal system now that the provisional proceedings stage no longer exists. My main hypothesis is that the specific procedural stage dedicated to the assurance of evidence still exists, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista eletrônica de direito processual 2018-09, Vol.19 (3), p.380
1. Verfasser: Raatz, Igor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 380
container_title Revista eletrônica de direito processual
container_volume 19
creator Raatz, Igor
description This essay seeks to investigate if there is still such a thing as an evidence-assurance procedure in the Brazilian legal system now that the provisional proceedings stage no longer exists. My main hypothesis is that the specific procedural stage dedicated to the assurance of evidence still exists, and therefore it is crucial to distinguish it from the mere motion for the anticipated production of evidence, with or without the element of urgence. Basically, this work seeks to draw a historical description of different institutes in Brazilian law: the motion for evidence-assurance and the motion for anticipated production of evidence, both in its autonomous and its satisfactory characters. Then it seeks to analyse if the motion for evidence-assurance still exists n Brazilian law, followed by an analysis of the technical aspects of said institute after the abolishment of the procedural stage of provisional proceedings in Brazilian law. The research method is historical, comparative, in order to analyse the historical developments of the study object, allowing for a critique of the current Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. KEYWORDS: Anticipated production of evidence. Evidence-assurance. Provisional proceedings. Provisional proceedings. Evidence-assurance claim. O presente ensaio, diante do problema relativo a extincao do processo cautelar, visa a averiguar se, no atual sistema procedimental civil brasileiro, ainda e possivel e necessario falar de uma pretensao a asseguracao da prova. Como hipotese principal de trabalho, tem-se que a tutela cautelar de asseguracao da prova permanece viva, sendo ainda crucial distingui-la da pretensao a producao antecipada da prova--com ou sem o requisito da urgencia. Os objetivos que se pretende alcancar sao, basicamente, os seguintes: tracar um perfil historico-evolutivo da pretensao a seguranca da prova e da pretensao a constituicao antecipada da prova (em carater autonomo e satisfativo), verificar se subsiste no atual sistema processual a pretensao a seguranca da prova e, por fim, os aspectos procedimentais gerais para a deducao e tutela da referida pretensao diante da abolicao do "processo cautelar". Para tanto, sera utilizado o metodo historico e comparativo, realizando-se uma analise do desenvolvimento historico do tema, bem como uma critica do modo como foi tratado pelo atual Codigo de Processo Civil brasileiro. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Producao antecipada da prova. Pretensao a seguranca da prova. Tutela cautelar. Processo caut
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A582203448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A582203448</galeid><sourcerecordid>A582203448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A5822034483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj29LwzAQxqsoOHTf4b7AtOu6Pw58cUuu3UGbjCYpzDcyZieTuYHz-2PSTdhbCcddnrvn8st11Ok_T5LeeDQY3VzUd1H3ePyM47g_HKfDNOlcvVDNkpSgHhrjKvQViAK5BFTSh2XBC7QkYVFp6YRlrUBn8GcDVpChz15zVe6l5RQQDFWsnQGh_czCOixCmTkT7CWysj780tkS7JxgVuErF4zKT8l2l-Cai_CmIOkqevIlWVIGdbs9b1ERJIaZGoHOfKGvLAVoedGWHNRwP0EyTsGVCHmFNZ3RvLXF5Ra3DH8PfiqCLjnXIOlEZIw-AT5Et5vV7th0z_k-eszIinnvY7Vr3rb7zeHne7X257352q4P-2az9ToOJ0kSD9J0Mvi34Rf6kX-I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>EVIDENCE-ASSURANCE CLAIM AND ANTICIPATED PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE IN FACE OF URGENCY: A SERIOUS CONCEPTUAL CONFUSION MAINTAINED BY THE BRAZILIAN CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE/ PRETENSAO A SEGURANCA DA PROVA E PRODUCAO ANTECIPADA DA PROVA DIANTE DA URGENCIA: UMA GRAVE CONFUSAO CONCEITUAL MANTIDA PELO CODIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Raatz, Igor</creator><creatorcontrib>Raatz, Igor</creatorcontrib><description>This essay seeks to investigate if there is still such a thing as an evidence-assurance procedure in the Brazilian legal system now that the provisional proceedings stage no longer exists. My main hypothesis is that the specific procedural stage dedicated to the assurance of evidence still exists, and therefore it is crucial to distinguish it from the mere motion for the anticipated production of evidence, with or without the element of urgence. Basically, this work seeks to draw a historical description of different institutes in Brazilian law: the motion for evidence-assurance and the motion for anticipated production of evidence, both in its autonomous and its satisfactory characters. Then it seeks to analyse if the motion for evidence-assurance still exists n Brazilian law, followed by an analysis of the technical aspects of said institute after the abolishment of the procedural stage of provisional proceedings in Brazilian law. The research method is historical, comparative, in order to analyse the historical developments of the study object, allowing for a critique of the current Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. KEYWORDS: Anticipated production of evidence. Evidence-assurance. Provisional proceedings. Provisional proceedings. Evidence-assurance claim. O presente ensaio, diante do problema relativo a extincao do processo cautelar, visa a averiguar se, no atual sistema procedimental civil brasileiro, ainda e possivel e necessario falar de uma pretensao a asseguracao da prova. Como hipotese principal de trabalho, tem-se que a tutela cautelar de asseguracao da prova permanece viva, sendo ainda crucial distingui-la da pretensao a producao antecipada da prova--com ou sem o requisito da urgencia. Os objetivos que se pretende alcancar sao, basicamente, os seguintes: tracar um perfil historico-evolutivo da pretensao a seguranca da prova e da pretensao a constituicao antecipada da prova (em carater autonomo e satisfativo), verificar se subsiste no atual sistema processual a pretensao a seguranca da prova e, por fim, os aspectos procedimentais gerais para a deducao e tutela da referida pretensao diante da abolicao do "processo cautelar". Para tanto, sera utilizado o metodo historico e comparativo, realizando-se uma analise do desenvolvimento historico do tema, bem como uma critica do modo como foi tratado pelo atual Codigo de Processo Civil brasileiro. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Producao antecipada da prova. Pretensao a seguranca da prova. Tutela cautelar. Processo cautelar. Pretensao a seguranca da prova.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1982-7636</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1982-7636</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</publisher><subject>Administration of justice ; Civil procedure</subject><ispartof>Revista eletrônica de direito processual, 2018-09, Vol.19 (3), p.380</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raatz, Igor</creatorcontrib><title>EVIDENCE-ASSURANCE CLAIM AND ANTICIPATED PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE IN FACE OF URGENCY: A SERIOUS CONCEPTUAL CONFUSION MAINTAINED BY THE BRAZILIAN CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE/ PRETENSAO A SEGURANCA DA PROVA E PRODUCAO ANTECIPADA DA PROVA DIANTE DA URGENCIA: UMA GRAVE CONFUSAO CONCEITUAL MANTIDA PELO CODIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL</title><title>Revista eletrônica de direito processual</title><description>This essay seeks to investigate if there is still such a thing as an evidence-assurance procedure in the Brazilian legal system now that the provisional proceedings stage no longer exists. My main hypothesis is that the specific procedural stage dedicated to the assurance of evidence still exists, and therefore it is crucial to distinguish it from the mere motion for the anticipated production of evidence, with or without the element of urgence. Basically, this work seeks to draw a historical description of different institutes in Brazilian law: the motion for evidence-assurance and the motion for anticipated production of evidence, both in its autonomous and its satisfactory characters. Then it seeks to analyse if the motion for evidence-assurance still exists n Brazilian law, followed by an analysis of the technical aspects of said institute after the abolishment of the procedural stage of provisional proceedings in Brazilian law. The research method is historical, comparative, in order to analyse the historical developments of the study object, allowing for a critique of the current Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. KEYWORDS: Anticipated production of evidence. Evidence-assurance. Provisional proceedings. Provisional proceedings. Evidence-assurance claim. O presente ensaio, diante do problema relativo a extincao do processo cautelar, visa a averiguar se, no atual sistema procedimental civil brasileiro, ainda e possivel e necessario falar de uma pretensao a asseguracao da prova. Como hipotese principal de trabalho, tem-se que a tutela cautelar de asseguracao da prova permanece viva, sendo ainda crucial distingui-la da pretensao a producao antecipada da prova--com ou sem o requisito da urgencia. Os objetivos que se pretende alcancar sao, basicamente, os seguintes: tracar um perfil historico-evolutivo da pretensao a seguranca da prova e da pretensao a constituicao antecipada da prova (em carater autonomo e satisfativo), verificar se subsiste no atual sistema processual a pretensao a seguranca da prova e, por fim, os aspectos procedimentais gerais para a deducao e tutela da referida pretensao diante da abolicao do "processo cautelar". Para tanto, sera utilizado o metodo historico e comparativo, realizando-se uma analise do desenvolvimento historico do tema, bem como uma critica do modo como foi tratado pelo atual Codigo de Processo Civil brasileiro. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Producao antecipada da prova. Pretensao a seguranca da prova. Tutela cautelar. Processo cautelar. Pretensao a seguranca da prova.</description><subject>Administration of justice</subject><subject>Civil procedure</subject><issn>1982-7636</issn><issn>1982-7636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVj29LwzAQxqsoOHTf4b7AtOu6Pw58cUuu3UGbjCYpzDcyZieTuYHz-2PSTdhbCcddnrvn8st11Ok_T5LeeDQY3VzUd1H3ePyM47g_HKfDNOlcvVDNkpSgHhrjKvQViAK5BFTSh2XBC7QkYVFp6YRlrUBn8GcDVpChz15zVe6l5RQQDFWsnQGh_czCOixCmTkT7CWysj780tkS7JxgVuErF4zKT8l2l-Cai_CmIOkqevIlWVIGdbs9b1ERJIaZGoHOfKGvLAVoedGWHNRwP0EyTsGVCHmFNZ3RvLXF5Ra3DH8PfiqCLjnXIOlEZIw-AT5Et5vV7th0z_k-eszIinnvY7Vr3rb7zeHne7X257352q4P-2az9ToOJ0kSD9J0Mvi34Rf6kX-I</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Raatz, Igor</creator><general>Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>EVIDENCE-ASSURANCE CLAIM AND ANTICIPATED PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE IN FACE OF URGENCY: A SERIOUS CONCEPTUAL CONFUSION MAINTAINED BY THE BRAZILIAN CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE/ PRETENSAO A SEGURANCA DA PROVA E PRODUCAO ANTECIPADA DA PROVA DIANTE DA URGENCIA: UMA GRAVE CONFUSAO CONCEITUAL MANTIDA PELO CODIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL</title><author>Raatz, Igor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A5822034483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Administration of justice</topic><topic>Civil procedure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raatz, Igor</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Revista eletrônica de direito processual</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raatz, Igor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EVIDENCE-ASSURANCE CLAIM AND ANTICIPATED PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE IN FACE OF URGENCY: A SERIOUS CONCEPTUAL CONFUSION MAINTAINED BY THE BRAZILIAN CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE/ PRETENSAO A SEGURANCA DA PROVA E PRODUCAO ANTECIPADA DA PROVA DIANTE DA URGENCIA: UMA GRAVE CONFUSAO CONCEITUAL MANTIDA PELO CODIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL</atitle><jtitle>Revista eletrônica de direito processual</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>380</spage><pages>380-</pages><issn>1982-7636</issn><eissn>1982-7636</eissn><abstract>This essay seeks to investigate if there is still such a thing as an evidence-assurance procedure in the Brazilian legal system now that the provisional proceedings stage no longer exists. My main hypothesis is that the specific procedural stage dedicated to the assurance of evidence still exists, and therefore it is crucial to distinguish it from the mere motion for the anticipated production of evidence, with or without the element of urgence. Basically, this work seeks to draw a historical description of different institutes in Brazilian law: the motion for evidence-assurance and the motion for anticipated production of evidence, both in its autonomous and its satisfactory characters. Then it seeks to analyse if the motion for evidence-assurance still exists n Brazilian law, followed by an analysis of the technical aspects of said institute after the abolishment of the procedural stage of provisional proceedings in Brazilian law. The research method is historical, comparative, in order to analyse the historical developments of the study object, allowing for a critique of the current Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. KEYWORDS: Anticipated production of evidence. Evidence-assurance. Provisional proceedings. Provisional proceedings. Evidence-assurance claim. O presente ensaio, diante do problema relativo a extincao do processo cautelar, visa a averiguar se, no atual sistema procedimental civil brasileiro, ainda e possivel e necessario falar de uma pretensao a asseguracao da prova. Como hipotese principal de trabalho, tem-se que a tutela cautelar de asseguracao da prova permanece viva, sendo ainda crucial distingui-la da pretensao a producao antecipada da prova--com ou sem o requisito da urgencia. Os objetivos que se pretende alcancar sao, basicamente, os seguintes: tracar um perfil historico-evolutivo da pretensao a seguranca da prova e da pretensao a constituicao antecipada da prova (em carater autonomo e satisfativo), verificar se subsiste no atual sistema processual a pretensao a seguranca da prova e, por fim, os aspectos procedimentais gerais para a deducao e tutela da referida pretensao diante da abolicao do "processo cautelar". Para tanto, sera utilizado o metodo historico e comparativo, realizando-se uma analise do desenvolvimento historico do tema, bem como uma critica do modo como foi tratado pelo atual Codigo de Processo Civil brasileiro. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Producao antecipada da prova. Pretensao a seguranca da prova. Tutela cautelar. Processo cautelar. Pretensao a seguranca da prova.</abstract><pub>Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1982-7636
ispartof Revista eletrônica de direito processual, 2018-09, Vol.19 (3), p.380
issn 1982-7636
1982-7636
language spa
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A582203448
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Administration of justice
Civil procedure
title EVIDENCE-ASSURANCE CLAIM AND ANTICIPATED PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE IN FACE OF URGENCY: A SERIOUS CONCEPTUAL CONFUSION MAINTAINED BY THE BRAZILIAN CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE/ PRETENSAO A SEGURANCA DA PROVA E PRODUCAO ANTECIPADA DA PROVA DIANTE DA URGENCIA: UMA GRAVE CONFUSAO CONCEITUAL MANTIDA PELO CODIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A44%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EVIDENCE-ASSURANCE%20CLAIM%20AND%20ANTICIPATED%20PRODUCTION%20OF%20EVIDENCE%20IN%20FACE%20OF%20URGENCY:%20A%20SERIOUS%20CONCEPTUAL%20CONFUSION%20MAINTAINED%20BY%20THE%20BRAZILIAN%20CODE%20OF%20CIVIL%20PROCEDURE/%20PRETENSAO%20A%20SEGURANCA%20DA%20PROVA%20E%20PRODUCAO%20ANTECIPADA%20DA%20PROVA%20DIANTE%20DA%20URGENCIA:%20UMA%20GRAVE%20CONFUSAO%20CONCEITUAL%20MANTIDA%20PELO%20CODIGO%20DE%20PROCESSO%20CIVIL&rft.jtitle=Revista%20eletr%C3%B4nica%20de%20direito%20processual&rft.au=Raatz,%20Igor&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=380&rft.pages=380-&rft.issn=1982-7636&rft.eissn=1982-7636&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA582203448%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A582203448&rfr_iscdi=true