Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009)
In 2004, the accession of ten new member states to the European Union has a significant impact on the continuing debate about the European narrative. The Western European view on the Second World War and the Holocaust is contested by other claims focusing on the Stalinist crimes and other Cold War e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European review of international studies 2015-12, Vol.2 (2), p.19-39 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 39 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | European review of international studies |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Perchoc, Philippe |
description | In 2004, the accession of ten new member states to the European Union has a significant impact on the continuing debate about the European narrative. The Western European view on the Second World War and the Holocaust is contested by other claims focusing on the Stalinist crimes and other Cold War events. The European Parliament becomes a forum for this symbolic struggle about European memory. An in-depth analysis shows that the enlargement conducts the Parliament to include new historical events in the European narrative and leads to news debates about the hierarchy of events. In these debates, a coalition of Baltic-Polish member states and nationalist eurosceptics is particularly dominating the European scene. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3224/eris.v2i2.20678 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A533566421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A533566421</galeid><jstor_id>26593450</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A533566421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b255t-71c471484b573613a8e37a6473c4d95c31b7d2306e2f6951f23f05803f65b6593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBUnv2JOSoh6T7vcmxlFqF-gX1vGzS3bglyZbNVujN_-A_9JeYNMWbzOEN8-bN8B4A1wgmBGM61d62ySe2OMGQi_QMjDDKeCwoYuennmeYXIJJ224hhAgjQjkcgbdnXbpgVbBNGT3p2vlDpEK0_tDRYu_dTqsmelW-sqrWTYhmJmgfhZ5tKuVLfZzeYgjpz9d3B9ndFbgwqmr15IRj8H6_WM8f4tXL8nE-W8U5ZizEAhVUIJrSnAnCEVGpJkJxKkhBNxkrCMrFBhPINTY8Y8hgYiBLITGc5ZxlZAyS4W6pKi1tY1zwquhqo2tbuEYb281njBDGOe38jsF0EBTeta3XRu68rZU_SARln6LsU5R9ivKYYqe4GRTbNjj_t47795TBjo8HPve2quTW7X3TWf733i8wRXx_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009)</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Perchoc, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Perchoc, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>In 2004, the accession of ten new member states to the European Union has a significant impact on the continuing debate about the European narrative. The Western European view on the Second World War and the Holocaust is contested by other claims focusing on the Stalinist crimes and other Cold War events. The European Parliament becomes a forum for this symbolic struggle about European memory. An in-depth analysis shows that the enlargement conducts the Parliament to include new historical events in the European narrative and leads to news debates about the hierarchy of events. In these debates, a coalition of Baltic-Polish member states and nationalist eurosceptics is particularly dominating the European scene.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2196-6923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2196-7415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3224/eris.v2i2.20678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Barbara Budrich Verlag</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Memory</subject><ispartof>European review of international studies, 2015-12, Vol.2 (2), p.19-39</ispartof><rights>Barbara Budrich Verlag, 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Barbara Budrich Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b255t-71c471484b573613a8e37a6473c4d95c31b7d2306e2f6951f23f05803f65b6593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26593450$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26593450$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perchoc, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009)</title><title>European review of international studies</title><description>In 2004, the accession of ten new member states to the European Union has a significant impact on the continuing debate about the European narrative. The Western European view on the Second World War and the Holocaust is contested by other claims focusing on the Stalinist crimes and other Cold War events. The European Parliament becomes a forum for this symbolic struggle about European memory. An in-depth analysis shows that the enlargement conducts the Parliament to include new historical events in the European narrative and leads to news debates about the hierarchy of events. In these debates, a coalition of Baltic-Polish member states and nationalist eurosceptics is particularly dominating the European scene.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Memory</subject><issn>2196-6923</issn><issn>2196-7415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBUnv2JOSoh6T7vcmxlFqF-gX1vGzS3bglyZbNVujN_-A_9JeYNMWbzOEN8-bN8B4A1wgmBGM61d62ySe2OMGQi_QMjDDKeCwoYuennmeYXIJJ224hhAgjQjkcgbdnXbpgVbBNGT3p2vlDpEK0_tDRYu_dTqsmelW-sqrWTYhmJmgfhZ5tKuVLfZzeYgjpz9d3B9ndFbgwqmr15IRj8H6_WM8f4tXL8nE-W8U5ZizEAhVUIJrSnAnCEVGpJkJxKkhBNxkrCMrFBhPINTY8Y8hgYiBLITGc5ZxlZAyS4W6pKi1tY1zwquhqo2tbuEYb281njBDGOe38jsF0EBTeta3XRu68rZU_SARln6LsU5R9ivKYYqe4GRTbNjj_t47795TBjo8HPve2quTW7X3TWf733i8wRXx_</recordid><startdate>20151217</startdate><enddate>20151217</enddate><creator>Perchoc, Philippe</creator><general>Barbara Budrich Verlag</general><general>Canterbury Christ Church University</general><general>Barbara Budrich Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151217</creationdate><title>Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009)</title><author>Perchoc, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b255t-71c471484b573613a8e37a6473c4d95c31b7d2306e2f6951f23f05803f65b6593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perchoc, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European review of international studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perchoc, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009)</atitle><jtitle>European review of international studies</jtitle><date>2015-12-17</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>19-39</pages><issn>2196-6923</issn><eissn>2196-7415</eissn><abstract>In 2004, the accession of ten new member states to the European Union has a significant impact on the continuing debate about the European narrative. The Western European view on the Second World War and the Holocaust is contested by other claims focusing on the Stalinist crimes and other Cold War events. The European Parliament becomes a forum for this symbolic struggle about European memory. An in-depth analysis shows that the enlargement conducts the Parliament to include new historical events in the European narrative and leads to news debates about the hierarchy of events. In these debates, a coalition of Baltic-Polish member states and nationalist eurosceptics is particularly dominating the European scene.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Barbara Budrich Verlag</pub><doi>10.3224/eris.v2i2.20678</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2196-6923 |
ispartof | European review of international studies, 2015-12, Vol.2 (2), p.19-39 |
issn | 2196-6923 2196-7415 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A533566421 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Analysis Memory |
title | Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A34%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Negotiating%20Memory%20at%20The%20European%20Parliament%20After%20the%20Enlargement%20(2004%E2%80%932009)&rft.jtitle=European%20review%20of%20international%20studies&rft.au=Perchoc,%20Philippe&rft.date=2015-12-17&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=19-39&rft.issn=2196-6923&rft.eissn=2196-7415&rft_id=info:doi/10.3224/eris.v2i2.20678&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA533566421%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A533566421&rft_jstor_id=26593450&rfr_iscdi=true |