Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009)

In 2004, the accession of ten new member states to the European Union has a significant impact on the continuing debate about the European narrative. The Western European view on the Second World War and the Holocaust is contested by other claims focusing on the Stalinist crimes and other Cold War e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European review of international studies 2015-12, Vol.2 (2), p.19-39
1. Verfasser: Perchoc, Philippe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 39
container_issue 2
container_start_page 19
container_title European review of international studies
container_volume 2
creator Perchoc, Philippe
description In 2004, the accession of ten new member states to the European Union has a significant impact on the continuing debate about the European narrative. The Western European view on the Second World War and the Holocaust is contested by other claims focusing on the Stalinist crimes and other Cold War events. The European Parliament becomes a forum for this symbolic struggle about European memory. An in-depth analysis shows that the enlargement conducts the Parliament to include new historical events in the European narrative and leads to news debates about the hierarchy of events. In these debates, a coalition of Baltic-Polish member states and nationalist eurosceptics is particularly dominating the European scene.
doi_str_mv 10.3224/eris.v2i2.20678
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A533566421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A533566421</galeid><jstor_id>26593450</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A533566421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b255t-71c471484b573613a8e37a6473c4d95c31b7d2306e2f6951f23f05803f65b6593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBUnv2JOSoh6T7vcmxlFqF-gX1vGzS3bglyZbNVujN_-A_9JeYNMWbzOEN8-bN8B4A1wgmBGM61d62ySe2OMGQi_QMjDDKeCwoYuennmeYXIJJ224hhAgjQjkcgbdnXbpgVbBNGT3p2vlDpEK0_tDRYu_dTqsmelW-sqrWTYhmJmgfhZ5tKuVLfZzeYgjpz9d3B9ndFbgwqmr15IRj8H6_WM8f4tXL8nE-W8U5ZizEAhVUIJrSnAnCEVGpJkJxKkhBNxkrCMrFBhPINTY8Y8hgYiBLITGc5ZxlZAyS4W6pKi1tY1zwquhqo2tbuEYb281njBDGOe38jsF0EBTeta3XRu68rZU_SARln6LsU5R9ivKYYqe4GRTbNjj_t47795TBjo8HPve2quTW7X3TWf733i8wRXx_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009)</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Perchoc, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Perchoc, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>In 2004, the accession of ten new member states to the European Union has a significant impact on the continuing debate about the European narrative. The Western European view on the Second World War and the Holocaust is contested by other claims focusing on the Stalinist crimes and other Cold War events. The European Parliament becomes a forum for this symbolic struggle about European memory. An in-depth analysis shows that the enlargement conducts the Parliament to include new historical events in the European narrative and leads to news debates about the hierarchy of events. In these debates, a coalition of Baltic-Polish member states and nationalist eurosceptics is particularly dominating the European scene.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2196-6923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2196-7415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3224/eris.v2i2.20678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Barbara Budrich Verlag</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Memory</subject><ispartof>European review of international studies, 2015-12, Vol.2 (2), p.19-39</ispartof><rights>Barbara Budrich Verlag, 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Barbara Budrich Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b255t-71c471484b573613a8e37a6473c4d95c31b7d2306e2f6951f23f05803f65b6593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26593450$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26593450$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perchoc, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009)</title><title>European review of international studies</title><description>In 2004, the accession of ten new member states to the European Union has a significant impact on the continuing debate about the European narrative. The Western European view on the Second World War and the Holocaust is contested by other claims focusing on the Stalinist crimes and other Cold War events. The European Parliament becomes a forum for this symbolic struggle about European memory. An in-depth analysis shows that the enlargement conducts the Parliament to include new historical events in the European narrative and leads to news debates about the hierarchy of events. In these debates, a coalition of Baltic-Polish member states and nationalist eurosceptics is particularly dominating the European scene.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Memory</subject><issn>2196-6923</issn><issn>2196-7415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBUnv2JOSoh6T7vcmxlFqF-gX1vGzS3bglyZbNVujN_-A_9JeYNMWbzOEN8-bN8B4A1wgmBGM61d62ySe2OMGQi_QMjDDKeCwoYuennmeYXIJJ224hhAgjQjkcgbdnXbpgVbBNGT3p2vlDpEK0_tDRYu_dTqsmelW-sqrWTYhmJmgfhZ5tKuVLfZzeYgjpz9d3B9ndFbgwqmr15IRj8H6_WM8f4tXL8nE-W8U5ZizEAhVUIJrSnAnCEVGpJkJxKkhBNxkrCMrFBhPINTY8Y8hgYiBLITGc5ZxlZAyS4W6pKi1tY1zwquhqo2tbuEYb281njBDGOe38jsF0EBTeta3XRu68rZU_SARln6LsU5R9ivKYYqe4GRTbNjj_t47795TBjo8HPve2quTW7X3TWf733i8wRXx_</recordid><startdate>20151217</startdate><enddate>20151217</enddate><creator>Perchoc, Philippe</creator><general>Barbara Budrich Verlag</general><general>Canterbury Christ Church University</general><general>Barbara Budrich Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151217</creationdate><title>Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009)</title><author>Perchoc, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b255t-71c471484b573613a8e37a6473c4d95c31b7d2306e2f6951f23f05803f65b6593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perchoc, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European review of international studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perchoc, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009)</atitle><jtitle>European review of international studies</jtitle><date>2015-12-17</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>19-39</pages><issn>2196-6923</issn><eissn>2196-7415</eissn><abstract>In 2004, the accession of ten new member states to the European Union has a significant impact on the continuing debate about the European narrative. The Western European view on the Second World War and the Holocaust is contested by other claims focusing on the Stalinist crimes and other Cold War events. The European Parliament becomes a forum for this symbolic struggle about European memory. An in-depth analysis shows that the enlargement conducts the Parliament to include new historical events in the European narrative and leads to news debates about the hierarchy of events. In these debates, a coalition of Baltic-Polish member states and nationalist eurosceptics is particularly dominating the European scene.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Barbara Budrich Verlag</pub><doi>10.3224/eris.v2i2.20678</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2196-6923
ispartof European review of international studies, 2015-12, Vol.2 (2), p.19-39
issn 2196-6923
2196-7415
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A533566421
source Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Analysis
Memory
title Negotiating Memory at The European Parliament After the Enlargement (2004–2009)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A34%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Negotiating%20Memory%20at%20The%20European%20Parliament%20After%20the%20Enlargement%20(2004%E2%80%932009)&rft.jtitle=European%20review%20of%20international%20studies&rft.au=Perchoc,%20Philippe&rft.date=2015-12-17&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=19-39&rft.issn=2196-6923&rft.eissn=2196-7415&rft_id=info:doi/10.3224/eris.v2i2.20678&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA533566421%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A533566421&rft_jstor_id=26593450&rfr_iscdi=true