Transatlantic data privacy law
International flows of personal information are more significant than ever, but differences in transatlantic data privacy law imperil this data trade. The resulting policy debate has led the EU to set strict limits on transfers of personal data to any non-EU country - including the United States - t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Georgetown law journal 2017-11, Vol.106 (1), p.115-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | The Georgetown law journal |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Schwartz, Paul M Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus |
description | International flows of personal information are more significant than ever, but differences in transatlantic data privacy law imperil this data trade. The resulting policy debate has led the EU to set strict limits on transfers of personal data to any non-EU country - including the United States - that lacks sufficient privacy protections. Bridging the transatlantic data divide is therefore a matter of the greatest significance. In exploring this issue, this article analyzes the respective legal identities constructed around data privacy in the EU and the United States. It identifies profound differences in the two systems' images of the individual as bearer of legal interests. The EU has created a privacy culture around "rights talk" that protects its "data subjects." In the EU, moreover, rights talk forms a critical part of the postwar European project of creating the identity of a European citizen. In the United States, in contrast, the focus is on a "marketplace discourse" about personal information and the safeguarding of "privacy consumers." In the United States, data privacy law focuses on protecting consumers in a data marketplace.
This article uses its models of rights talk and marketplace discourse to analyze how the EU and United States protect their respective data subjects and privacy consumers. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A518029404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A518029404</galeid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20191011018331</informt_id><sourcerecordid>A518029404</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g493t-36384927e3fff135abe3275724141820e4a873c6594a337244931f35fed1702d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV1LwzAUhnuh4Jz-BRl4JVhJctKPXI6hbjDYzfQ2nLVpl9G1NUn9-Pdmm6LF3UhCDnnzvO85kJNgQAiNw5QIdhacW7vxVwIMBsHV0mBt0VVYO52NcnQ4ao1-xexjVOHbRXBaYGXV5VcdBk8P98vJNJwvHmeT8TwsuQAXQgwpFyxRUBQFhQhXClgSJYxTTlNGFMc0gSyOBEcAL3sXLSAqVE4TwnIYBteH3NY0L52yTm6aztS-paQi5SShAvgPVWKlpK6LxhnMttpmchzRlDDByY4Kj1ClqpXBqqlVob3c4--O8H7laquzo4abnsEzTr27Ejtr5Wzx3Gdvf7GrzupaWX9YXa6dPVh6-PyAm612EkttWyfXzrVW7r5mP93-qTGlzBstKZEANP5GGaGCEup36mUfN_0bZxWabP3fqE_qnrDZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1984071934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transatlantic data privacy law</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Schwartz, Paul M ; Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Paul M ; Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</creatorcontrib><description>International flows of personal information are more significant than ever, but differences in transatlantic data privacy law imperil this data trade. The resulting policy debate has led the EU to set strict limits on transfers of personal data to any non-EU country - including the United States - that lacks sufficient privacy protections. Bridging the transatlantic data divide is therefore a matter of the greatest significance. In exploring this issue, this article analyzes the respective legal identities constructed around data privacy in the EU and the United States. It identifies profound differences in the two systems' images of the individual as bearer of legal interests. The EU has created a privacy culture around "rights talk" that protects its "data subjects." In the EU, moreover, rights talk forms a critical part of the postwar European project of creating the identity of a European citizen. In the United States, in contrast, the focus is on a "marketplace discourse" about personal information and the safeguarding of "privacy consumers." In the United States, data privacy law focuses on protecting consumers in a data marketplace.
This article uses its models of rights talk and marketplace discourse to analyze how the EU and United States protect their respective data subjects and privacy consumers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-8092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Georgetown University Law Center</publisher><subject>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ; CONSUMERS ; Data integrity ; DATA PROTECTION ; Data security ; INFORMATION FLOW ; International unification ; Law ; Law and legislation ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Personal information ; Personal information management ; PRIVACY ; Privacy, Right of ; Right of privacy ; Services for ; Transborder data flow</subject><ispartof>The Georgetown law journal, 2017-11, Vol.106 (1), p.115-179</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Georgetown University Law Center</rights><rights>Copyright Georgetown University Law Center Nov 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</creatorcontrib><title>Transatlantic data privacy law</title><title>The Georgetown law journal</title><description>International flows of personal information are more significant than ever, but differences in transatlantic data privacy law imperil this data trade. The resulting policy debate has led the EU to set strict limits on transfers of personal data to any non-EU country - including the United States - that lacks sufficient privacy protections. Bridging the transatlantic data divide is therefore a matter of the greatest significance. In exploring this issue, this article analyzes the respective legal identities constructed around data privacy in the EU and the United States. It identifies profound differences in the two systems' images of the individual as bearer of legal interests. The EU has created a privacy culture around "rights talk" that protects its "data subjects." In the EU, moreover, rights talk forms a critical part of the postwar European project of creating the identity of a European citizen. In the United States, in contrast, the focus is on a "marketplace discourse" about personal information and the safeguarding of "privacy consumers." In the United States, data privacy law focuses on protecting consumers in a data marketplace.
This article uses its models of rights talk and marketplace discourse to analyze how the EU and United States protect their respective data subjects and privacy consumers.</description><subject>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW</subject><subject>CONSUMERS</subject><subject>Data integrity</subject><subject>DATA PROTECTION</subject><subject>Data security</subject><subject>INFORMATION FLOW</subject><subject>International unification</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law and legislation</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Personal information</subject><subject>Personal information management</subject><subject>PRIVACY</subject><subject>Privacy, Right of</subject><subject>Right of privacy</subject><subject>Services for</subject><subject>Transborder data flow</subject><issn>0016-8092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV1LwzAUhnuh4Jz-BRl4JVhJctKPXI6hbjDYzfQ2nLVpl9G1NUn9-Pdmm6LF3UhCDnnzvO85kJNgQAiNw5QIdhacW7vxVwIMBsHV0mBt0VVYO52NcnQ4ao1-xexjVOHbRXBaYGXV5VcdBk8P98vJNJwvHmeT8TwsuQAXQgwpFyxRUBQFhQhXClgSJYxTTlNGFMc0gSyOBEcAL3sXLSAqVE4TwnIYBteH3NY0L52yTm6aztS-paQi5SShAvgPVWKlpK6LxhnMttpmchzRlDDByY4Kj1ClqpXBqqlVob3c4--O8H7laquzo4abnsEzTr27Ejtr5Wzx3Gdvf7GrzupaWX9YXa6dPVh6-PyAm612EkttWyfXzrVW7r5mP93-qTGlzBstKZEANP5GGaGCEup36mUfN_0bZxWabP3fqE_qnrDZ</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Schwartz, Paul M</creator><creator>Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</creator><general>Georgetown University Law Center</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Transatlantic data privacy law</title><author>Schwartz, Paul M ; Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g493t-36384927e3fff135abe3275724141820e4a873c6594a337244931f35fed1702d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW</topic><topic>CONSUMERS</topic><topic>Data integrity</topic><topic>DATA PROTECTION</topic><topic>Data security</topic><topic>INFORMATION FLOW</topic><topic>International unification</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law and legislation</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Personal information</topic><topic>Personal information management</topic><topic>PRIVACY</topic><topic>Privacy, Right of</topic><topic>Right of privacy</topic><topic>Services for</topic><topic>Transborder data flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>The Georgetown law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwartz, Paul M</au><au>Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transatlantic data privacy law</atitle><jtitle>The Georgetown law journal</jtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>115-179</pages><issn>0016-8092</issn><abstract>International flows of personal information are more significant than ever, but differences in transatlantic data privacy law imperil this data trade. The resulting policy debate has led the EU to set strict limits on transfers of personal data to any non-EU country - including the United States - that lacks sufficient privacy protections. Bridging the transatlantic data divide is therefore a matter of the greatest significance. In exploring this issue, this article analyzes the respective legal identities constructed around data privacy in the EU and the United States. It identifies profound differences in the two systems' images of the individual as bearer of legal interests. The EU has created a privacy culture around "rights talk" that protects its "data subjects." In the EU, moreover, rights talk forms a critical part of the postwar European project of creating the identity of a European citizen. In the United States, in contrast, the focus is on a "marketplace discourse" about personal information and the safeguarding of "privacy consumers." In the United States, data privacy law focuses on protecting consumers in a data marketplace.
This article uses its models of rights talk and marketplace discourse to analyze how the EU and United States protect their respective data subjects and privacy consumers.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Georgetown University Law Center</pub><tpages>65</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-8092 |
ispartof | The Georgetown law journal, 2017-11, Vol.106 (1), p.115-179 |
issn | 0016-8092 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A518029404 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CONSUMERS Data integrity DATA PROTECTION Data security INFORMATION FLOW International unification Law Law and legislation Laws, regulations and rules Personal information Personal information management PRIVACY Privacy, Right of Right of privacy Services for Transborder data flow |
title | Transatlantic data privacy law |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A47%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transatlantic%20data%20privacy%20law&rft.jtitle=The%20Georgetown%20law%20journal&rft.au=Schwartz,%20Paul%20M&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=115-179&rft.issn=0016-8092&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_rmit_%3EA518029404%3C/gale_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1984071934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A518029404&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20191011018331&rfr_iscdi=true |