Transatlantic data privacy law

International flows of personal information are more significant than ever, but differences in transatlantic data privacy law imperil this data trade. The resulting policy debate has led the EU to set strict limits on transfers of personal data to any non-EU country - including the United States - t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Georgetown law journal 2017-11, Vol.106 (1), p.115-179
Hauptverfasser: Schwartz, Paul M, Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 1
container_start_page 115
container_title The Georgetown law journal
container_volume 106
creator Schwartz, Paul M
Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus
description International flows of personal information are more significant than ever, but differences in transatlantic data privacy law imperil this data trade. The resulting policy debate has led the EU to set strict limits on transfers of personal data to any non-EU country - including the United States - that lacks sufficient privacy protections. Bridging the transatlantic data divide is therefore a matter of the greatest significance. In exploring this issue, this article analyzes the respective legal identities constructed around data privacy in the EU and the United States. It identifies profound differences in the two systems' images of the individual as bearer of legal interests. The EU has created a privacy culture around "rights talk" that protects its "data subjects." In the EU, moreover, rights talk forms a critical part of the postwar European project of creating the identity of a European citizen. In the United States, in contrast, the focus is on a "marketplace discourse" about personal information and the safeguarding of "privacy consumers." In the United States, data privacy law focuses on protecting consumers in a data marketplace. This article uses its models of rights talk and marketplace discourse to analyze how the EU and United States protect their respective data subjects and privacy consumers.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A518029404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A518029404</galeid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20191011018331</informt_id><sourcerecordid>A518029404</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g493t-36384927e3fff135abe3275724141820e4a873c6594a337244931f35fed1702d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV1LwzAUhnuh4Jz-BRl4JVhJctKPXI6hbjDYzfQ2nLVpl9G1NUn9-Pdmm6LF3UhCDnnzvO85kJNgQAiNw5QIdhacW7vxVwIMBsHV0mBt0VVYO52NcnQ4ao1-xexjVOHbRXBaYGXV5VcdBk8P98vJNJwvHmeT8TwsuQAXQgwpFyxRUBQFhQhXClgSJYxTTlNGFMc0gSyOBEcAL3sXLSAqVE4TwnIYBteH3NY0L52yTm6aztS-paQi5SShAvgPVWKlpK6LxhnMttpmchzRlDDByY4Kj1ClqpXBqqlVob3c4--O8H7laquzo4abnsEzTr27Ejtr5Wzx3Gdvf7GrzupaWX9YXa6dPVh6-PyAm612EkttWyfXzrVW7r5mP93-qTGlzBstKZEANP5GGaGCEup36mUfN_0bZxWabP3fqE_qnrDZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1984071934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transatlantic data privacy law</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Schwartz, Paul M ; Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Paul M ; Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</creatorcontrib><description>International flows of personal information are more significant than ever, but differences in transatlantic data privacy law imperil this data trade. The resulting policy debate has led the EU to set strict limits on transfers of personal data to any non-EU country - including the United States - that lacks sufficient privacy protections. Bridging the transatlantic data divide is therefore a matter of the greatest significance. In exploring this issue, this article analyzes the respective legal identities constructed around data privacy in the EU and the United States. It identifies profound differences in the two systems' images of the individual as bearer of legal interests. The EU has created a privacy culture around "rights talk" that protects its "data subjects." In the EU, moreover, rights talk forms a critical part of the postwar European project of creating the identity of a European citizen. In the United States, in contrast, the focus is on a "marketplace discourse" about personal information and the safeguarding of "privacy consumers." In the United States, data privacy law focuses on protecting consumers in a data marketplace. This article uses its models of rights talk and marketplace discourse to analyze how the EU and United States protect their respective data subjects and privacy consumers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-8092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Georgetown University Law Center</publisher><subject>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ; CONSUMERS ; Data integrity ; DATA PROTECTION ; Data security ; INFORMATION FLOW ; International unification ; Law ; Law and legislation ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Personal information ; Personal information management ; PRIVACY ; Privacy, Right of ; Right of privacy ; Services for ; Transborder data flow</subject><ispartof>The Georgetown law journal, 2017-11, Vol.106 (1), p.115-179</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Georgetown University Law Center</rights><rights>Copyright Georgetown University Law Center Nov 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</creatorcontrib><title>Transatlantic data privacy law</title><title>The Georgetown law journal</title><description>International flows of personal information are more significant than ever, but differences in transatlantic data privacy law imperil this data trade. The resulting policy debate has led the EU to set strict limits on transfers of personal data to any non-EU country - including the United States - that lacks sufficient privacy protections. Bridging the transatlantic data divide is therefore a matter of the greatest significance. In exploring this issue, this article analyzes the respective legal identities constructed around data privacy in the EU and the United States. It identifies profound differences in the two systems' images of the individual as bearer of legal interests. The EU has created a privacy culture around "rights talk" that protects its "data subjects." In the EU, moreover, rights talk forms a critical part of the postwar European project of creating the identity of a European citizen. In the United States, in contrast, the focus is on a "marketplace discourse" about personal information and the safeguarding of "privacy consumers." In the United States, data privacy law focuses on protecting consumers in a data marketplace. This article uses its models of rights talk and marketplace discourse to analyze how the EU and United States protect their respective data subjects and privacy consumers.</description><subject>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW</subject><subject>CONSUMERS</subject><subject>Data integrity</subject><subject>DATA PROTECTION</subject><subject>Data security</subject><subject>INFORMATION FLOW</subject><subject>International unification</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law and legislation</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Personal information</subject><subject>Personal information management</subject><subject>PRIVACY</subject><subject>Privacy, Right of</subject><subject>Right of privacy</subject><subject>Services for</subject><subject>Transborder data flow</subject><issn>0016-8092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV1LwzAUhnuh4Jz-BRl4JVhJctKPXI6hbjDYzfQ2nLVpl9G1NUn9-Pdmm6LF3UhCDnnzvO85kJNgQAiNw5QIdhacW7vxVwIMBsHV0mBt0VVYO52NcnQ4ao1-xexjVOHbRXBaYGXV5VcdBk8P98vJNJwvHmeT8TwsuQAXQgwpFyxRUBQFhQhXClgSJYxTTlNGFMc0gSyOBEcAL3sXLSAqVE4TwnIYBteH3NY0L52yTm6aztS-paQi5SShAvgPVWKlpK6LxhnMttpmchzRlDDByY4Kj1ClqpXBqqlVob3c4--O8H7laquzo4abnsEzTr27Ejtr5Wzx3Gdvf7GrzupaWX9YXa6dPVh6-PyAm612EkttWyfXzrVW7r5mP93-qTGlzBstKZEANP5GGaGCEup36mUfN_0bZxWabP3fqE_qnrDZ</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Schwartz, Paul M</creator><creator>Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</creator><general>Georgetown University Law Center</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Transatlantic data privacy law</title><author>Schwartz, Paul M ; Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g493t-36384927e3fff135abe3275724141820e4a873c6594a337244931f35fed1702d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW</topic><topic>CONSUMERS</topic><topic>Data integrity</topic><topic>DATA PROTECTION</topic><topic>Data security</topic><topic>INFORMATION FLOW</topic><topic>International unification</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law and legislation</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Personal information</topic><topic>Personal information management</topic><topic>PRIVACY</topic><topic>Privacy, Right of</topic><topic>Right of privacy</topic><topic>Services for</topic><topic>Transborder data flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>The Georgetown law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwartz, Paul M</au><au>Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transatlantic data privacy law</atitle><jtitle>The Georgetown law journal</jtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>115-179</pages><issn>0016-8092</issn><abstract>International flows of personal information are more significant than ever, but differences in transatlantic data privacy law imperil this data trade. The resulting policy debate has led the EU to set strict limits on transfers of personal data to any non-EU country - including the United States - that lacks sufficient privacy protections. Bridging the transatlantic data divide is therefore a matter of the greatest significance. In exploring this issue, this article analyzes the respective legal identities constructed around data privacy in the EU and the United States. It identifies profound differences in the two systems' images of the individual as bearer of legal interests. The EU has created a privacy culture around "rights talk" that protects its "data subjects." In the EU, moreover, rights talk forms a critical part of the postwar European project of creating the identity of a European citizen. In the United States, in contrast, the focus is on a "marketplace discourse" about personal information and the safeguarding of "privacy consumers." In the United States, data privacy law focuses on protecting consumers in a data marketplace. This article uses its models of rights talk and marketplace discourse to analyze how the EU and United States protect their respective data subjects and privacy consumers.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Georgetown University Law Center</pub><tpages>65</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-8092
ispartof The Georgetown law journal, 2017-11, Vol.106 (1), p.115-179
issn 0016-8092
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A518029404
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
CONSUMERS
Data integrity
DATA PROTECTION
Data security
INFORMATION FLOW
International unification
Law
Law and legislation
Laws, regulations and rules
Personal information
Personal information management
PRIVACY
Privacy, Right of
Right of privacy
Services for
Transborder data flow
title Transatlantic data privacy law
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A47%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transatlantic%20data%20privacy%20law&rft.jtitle=The%20Georgetown%20law%20journal&rft.au=Schwartz,%20Paul%20M&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=115-179&rft.issn=0016-8092&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_rmit_%3EA518029404%3C/gale_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1984071934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A518029404&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20191011018331&rfr_iscdi=true