The Grass Snake and the Basilisk: From Pre-Christian Protective House God to the Antichrist

The grass snake owes its far northern distribution in Europe to the production and hoarding of dung from stock breeding. Dung heaps appear to be perfect breeding sites that surpass 'natural' reproduction sites in quality. Here we point out that the grass snake's dependency on manure g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment and history 2014-08, Vol.20 (3), p.319-346
Hauptverfasser: Lenders, H.J. Rob, Janssen, Ingo A. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 346
container_issue 3
container_start_page 319
container_title Environment and history
container_volume 20
creator Lenders, H.J. Rob
Janssen, Ingo A. W.
description The grass snake owes its far northern distribution in Europe to the production and hoarding of dung from stock breeding. Dung heaps appear to be perfect breeding sites that surpass 'natural' reproduction sites in quality. Here we point out that the grass snake's dependency on manure goes back to Neolithic times and that it had a reciprocal cultural effect. Moreover, the positive influence of humans on the species not only resulted from physical opportunities offered by agriculture, but also from the fact that grass snakes were considered to be chthonic deities not to be harmed. The conversion of Europe to Christianity, however, marked the turning of the cultural tide for the species. From being a divine creature originally, the grass snake evolved into the number one symbol of the Anti-Christ: the basilisk. In spite of the subsequent witch-hunt motivated by Christian belief, the overall historical human influence on the species was certainly not detrimental as regarded geographical distribution opportunities. This historical perspective on grass snake-human relationships adds to the discussion of whether nature conservation is better served by a strategy of land sparing or of land sharing. It also makes clear not only that co-dependency of species is a matter of mutual biophysical advantages but that metaphysical considerations may also play a role. In this case it leads to the conclusion that bringing back the grass snake into our direct everyday surroundings is both favourable to the grass snake and reinstates the species in our own cultural environment.
doi_str_mv 10.3197/096734014X14031694156367
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A432496898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>whp/eh/2014/00000020/00000003/art00003</ingid><galeid>A432496898</galeid><jstor_id>43298555</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A432496898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-75ce0905d8b84e7825c87dd0230e440d7d22f1abc259e0f84ebb6156d90134083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU2LFDEQbUTBcfUnCH300ms-O4kHZRzcXWFBwRUEDyGTrt7JbE8yJhnFf2_N9KIn0eSQStV7Ly9VTdNScs6pUS-J6RUXhIovVBBOeyOo7HmvHjQLqiTrFGH8YbM4wjrEqcfNk1K2hLCeMbJovt5soL3MrpT2U3R30Lo4tBVzb10JUyh3r9qLnHbtxwzdapNDqcFFvKUKvobv0F6lQ0GFhKx0Ii5jDf6EfNo8Gt1U4Nn9edZ8vnh3s7rqrj9cvl8trzsvhaqdkh6IIXLQay1AaSa9VsOAvgkIQQY1MDZSt_ZMGiAjYtbrHj85GELxR5qfNS9m3X1O3w5Qqt2F4mGaXAR0Z2kvqOb8CP8nFHtndG-MQuj5DL11E9gQx1Sz87gH2AWfIowB80vBmTC9Nkcbeib4nErJMNp9DjuXf1pK7HFW9m-zQuqbmTphS_M-pWmfoRS7TYccsXX_o_B8VtiWmvLvl9Gd0VJKrL-e6yHeQqzuj_SPzd7CxjIUteS0GLkPCLcu11PAfwFHJbTJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1563986997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Grass Snake and the Basilisk: From Pre-Christian Protective House God to the Antichrist</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Lenders, H.J. Rob ; Janssen, Ingo A. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lenders, H.J. Rob ; Janssen, Ingo A. W.</creatorcontrib><description>The grass snake owes its far northern distribution in Europe to the production and hoarding of dung from stock breeding. Dung heaps appear to be perfect breeding sites that surpass 'natural' reproduction sites in quality. Here we point out that the grass snake's dependency on manure goes back to Neolithic times and that it had a reciprocal cultural effect. Moreover, the positive influence of humans on the species not only resulted from physical opportunities offered by agriculture, but also from the fact that grass snakes were considered to be chthonic deities not to be harmed. The conversion of Europe to Christianity, however, marked the turning of the cultural tide for the species. From being a divine creature originally, the grass snake evolved into the number one symbol of the Anti-Christ: the basilisk. In spite of the subsequent witch-hunt motivated by Christian belief, the overall historical human influence on the species was certainly not detrimental as regarded geographical distribution opportunities. This historical perspective on grass snake-human relationships adds to the discussion of whether nature conservation is better served by a strategy of land sparing or of land sharing. It also makes clear not only that co-dependency of species is a matter of mutual biophysical advantages but that metaphysical considerations may also play a role. In this case it leads to the conclusion that bringing back the grass snake into our direct everyday surroundings is both favourable to the grass snake and reinstates the species in our own cultural environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-3407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-7023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3197/096734014X14031694156367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Isle of Harris, UK: The White Horse Press</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal tales ; Christian symbolism ; Christianity ; Eggs ; Environment ; Europe ; Feces ; Folk Tales ; Folktales ; Grasses ; Historical analysis ; Human ecology ; Iron age ; Lenders ; Metaphysics ; Methods ; Motivation ; Natrix Natrix ; Nature conservation ; Nature Conservation Strategies ; Religion ; Religious beliefs ; Snakes ; Symbolism</subject><ispartof>Environment and history, 2014-08, Vol.20 (3), p.319-346</ispartof><rights>2014 The White Horse Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 The White Horse Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-75ce0905d8b84e7825c87dd0230e440d7d22f1abc259e0f84ebb6156d90134083</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43298555$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43298555$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lenders, H.J. Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Ingo A. W.</creatorcontrib><title>The Grass Snake and the Basilisk: From Pre-Christian Protective House God to the Antichrist</title><title>Environment and history</title><description>The grass snake owes its far northern distribution in Europe to the production and hoarding of dung from stock breeding. Dung heaps appear to be perfect breeding sites that surpass 'natural' reproduction sites in quality. Here we point out that the grass snake's dependency on manure goes back to Neolithic times and that it had a reciprocal cultural effect. Moreover, the positive influence of humans on the species not only resulted from physical opportunities offered by agriculture, but also from the fact that grass snakes were considered to be chthonic deities not to be harmed. The conversion of Europe to Christianity, however, marked the turning of the cultural tide for the species. From being a divine creature originally, the grass snake evolved into the number one symbol of the Anti-Christ: the basilisk. In spite of the subsequent witch-hunt motivated by Christian belief, the overall historical human influence on the species was certainly not detrimental as regarded geographical distribution opportunities. This historical perspective on grass snake-human relationships adds to the discussion of whether nature conservation is better served by a strategy of land sparing or of land sharing. It also makes clear not only that co-dependency of species is a matter of mutual biophysical advantages but that metaphysical considerations may also play a role. In this case it leads to the conclusion that bringing back the grass snake into our direct everyday surroundings is both favourable to the grass snake and reinstates the species in our own cultural environment.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal tales</subject><subject>Christian symbolism</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Folk Tales</subject><subject>Folktales</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Historical analysis</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Iron age</subject><subject>Lenders</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Natrix Natrix</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Nature Conservation Strategies</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious beliefs</subject><subject>Snakes</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><issn>0967-3407</issn><issn>1752-7023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU2LFDEQbUTBcfUnCH300ms-O4kHZRzcXWFBwRUEDyGTrt7JbE8yJhnFf2_N9KIn0eSQStV7Ly9VTdNScs6pUS-J6RUXhIovVBBOeyOo7HmvHjQLqiTrFGH8YbM4wjrEqcfNk1K2hLCeMbJovt5soL3MrpT2U3R30Lo4tBVzb10JUyh3r9qLnHbtxwzdapNDqcFFvKUKvobv0F6lQ0GFhKx0Ii5jDf6EfNo8Gt1U4Nn9edZ8vnh3s7rqrj9cvl8trzsvhaqdkh6IIXLQay1AaSa9VsOAvgkIQQY1MDZSt_ZMGiAjYtbrHj85GELxR5qfNS9m3X1O3w5Qqt2F4mGaXAR0Z2kvqOb8CP8nFHtndG-MQuj5DL11E9gQx1Sz87gH2AWfIowB80vBmTC9Nkcbeib4nErJMNp9DjuXf1pK7HFW9m-zQuqbmTphS_M-pWmfoRS7TYccsXX_o_B8VtiWmvLvl9Gd0VJKrL-e6yHeQqzuj_SPzd7CxjIUteS0GLkPCLcu11PAfwFHJbTJ</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Lenders, H.J. Rob</creator><creator>Janssen, Ingo A. W.</creator><general>The White Horse Press</general><general>White Horse Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>The Grass Snake and the Basilisk: From Pre-Christian Protective House God to the Antichrist</title><author>Lenders, H.J. Rob ; Janssen, Ingo A. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-75ce0905d8b84e7825c87dd0230e440d7d22f1abc259e0f84ebb6156d90134083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal tales</topic><topic>Christian symbolism</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Folk Tales</topic><topic>Folktales</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Historical analysis</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Iron age</topic><topic>Lenders</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Natrix Natrix</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Nature Conservation Strategies</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious beliefs</topic><topic>Snakes</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenders, H.J. Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Ingo A. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Environment and history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenders, H.J. Rob</au><au>Janssen, Ingo A. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Grass Snake and the Basilisk: From Pre-Christian Protective House God to the Antichrist</atitle><jtitle>Environment and history</jtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>319-346</pages><issn>0967-3407</issn><eissn>1752-7023</eissn><abstract>The grass snake owes its far northern distribution in Europe to the production and hoarding of dung from stock breeding. Dung heaps appear to be perfect breeding sites that surpass 'natural' reproduction sites in quality. Here we point out that the grass snake's dependency on manure goes back to Neolithic times and that it had a reciprocal cultural effect. Moreover, the positive influence of humans on the species not only resulted from physical opportunities offered by agriculture, but also from the fact that grass snakes were considered to be chthonic deities not to be harmed. The conversion of Europe to Christianity, however, marked the turning of the cultural tide for the species. From being a divine creature originally, the grass snake evolved into the number one symbol of the Anti-Christ: the basilisk. In spite of the subsequent witch-hunt motivated by Christian belief, the overall historical human influence on the species was certainly not detrimental as regarded geographical distribution opportunities. This historical perspective on grass snake-human relationships adds to the discussion of whether nature conservation is better served by a strategy of land sparing or of land sharing. It also makes clear not only that co-dependency of species is a matter of mutual biophysical advantages but that metaphysical considerations may also play a role. In this case it leads to the conclusion that bringing back the grass snake into our direct everyday surroundings is both favourable to the grass snake and reinstates the species in our own cultural environment.</abstract><cop>Isle of Harris, UK</cop><pub>The White Horse Press</pub><doi>10.3197/096734014X14031694156367</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0967-3407
ispartof Environment and history, 2014-08, Vol.20 (3), p.319-346
issn 0967-3407
1752-7023
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A432496898
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Agriculture
Animal tales
Christian symbolism
Christianity
Eggs
Environment
Europe
Feces
Folk Tales
Folktales
Grasses
Historical analysis
Human ecology
Iron age
Lenders
Metaphysics
Methods
Motivation
Natrix Natrix
Nature conservation
Nature Conservation Strategies
Religion
Religious beliefs
Snakes
Symbolism
title The Grass Snake and the Basilisk: From Pre-Christian Protective House God to the Antichrist
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A56%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Grass%20Snake%20and%20the%20Basilisk:%20From%20Pre-Christian%20Protective%20House%20God%20to%20the%20Antichrist&rft.jtitle=Environment%20and%20history&rft.au=Lenders,%20H.J.%20Rob&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=319-346&rft.issn=0967-3407&rft.eissn=1752-7023&rft_id=info:doi/10.3197/096734014X14031694156367&rft_dat=%3Cgale_jstor%3EA432496898%3C/gale_jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1563986997&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A432496898&rft_ingid=whp/eh/2014/00000020/00000003/art00003&rft_jstor_id=43298555&rfr_iscdi=true