Does the integration of personalized ultrasound change patient management in critical care medicine? Observational trials
Objective. To test the influence of personalized ultrasound (PersUS) on patient management in critical care. Design of the Study. Prospective, observational, and critical care setting. Four substudies compared PersUS and mobile ultrasound, work distribution, and diagnostic and procedural quality. Pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Emergency Medicine International 2014 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Emergency Medicine International |
container_volume | |
creator | Breitkreutz, Raoul dell' Orto, Marco Campo Hamm, Christian Cuca, Colleen Zechner, Peter M Stenger, Tanja Walcher, Felix Seeger, Florian H |
description | Objective. To test the influence of personalized ultrasound (PersUS) on patient management in critical care. Design of the Study. Prospective, observational, and critical care setting. Four substudies compared PersUS and mobile ultrasound, work distribution, and diagnostic and procedural quality. Patients and Interventions. 640 patient ultrasound exams including 548 focused diagnostic exams and 92 interventional procedures. Main Outcome Measures. Number of studies, physician's judgement of feasibility, time of usage per patient, and referrals to echo lab. Results. Randomized availability of PersUS increased its application in ICU work shifts more than two fold from 33 to 68 exams mainly for detection and therapy of effusions. Diagnostic and procedural quality was rated as excellent/very good in PersUS-guided puncture in 95% of cases. Integrating PersUS within an initial physical examination of 48 randomized cases in an emergency department, PersUS extended the examination time by 100 seconds. Interestingly, PersUS integration into 53 randomized regular ward rounds of 1007 patients significantly reduced average contact time per patient by 103 seconds from 8.9 to 7.2 minutes. Moreover, it lowered the patient referral rate to an echo lab from 20% to 2% within the study population. Conclusions. We propose the development of novel ultrasound-based clinical pathways by integration of PersUS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2013/946059 |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A417310742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A417310742</galeid><sourcerecordid>A417310742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A4173107423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVTctOAzEMzAGkVtATP-AfaOvsZltyQoiHuHHhjkzWuzXadaokRYKvJyB-gPFhRh6Px5grixtru27boG233u2w82dm2aDHdXPtcGFWOb9jRYfovVuaz_vIGcqBQbTwmKhIVIgDHDnlqDTJF_dwmkqiHE_aQziQjgzHeshaYCalkecfKQohSZFAEwRKDDP3EkT5Bp7fMqeP39_VLEloypfmfKjEqz--MJvHh5e7p_VIE7-KDrF2hjo9zxKi8iB1f-vsvrW4d03778A3ABxbUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Does the integration of personalized ultrasound change patient management in critical care medicine? Observational trials</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Breitkreutz, Raoul ; dell' Orto, Marco Campo ; Hamm, Christian ; Cuca, Colleen ; Zechner, Peter M ; Stenger, Tanja ; Walcher, Felix ; Seeger, Florian H</creator><creatorcontrib>Breitkreutz, Raoul ; dell' Orto, Marco Campo ; Hamm, Christian ; Cuca, Colleen ; Zechner, Peter M ; Stenger, Tanja ; Walcher, Felix ; Seeger, Florian H</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To test the influence of personalized ultrasound (PersUS) on patient management in critical care. Design of the Study. Prospective, observational, and critical care setting. Four substudies compared PersUS and mobile ultrasound, work distribution, and diagnostic and procedural quality. Patients and Interventions. 640 patient ultrasound exams including 548 focused diagnostic exams and 92 interventional procedures. Main Outcome Measures. Number of studies, physician's judgement of feasibility, time of usage per patient, and referrals to echo lab. Results. Randomized availability of PersUS increased its application in ICU work shifts more than two fold from 33 to 68 exams mainly for detection and therapy of effusions. Diagnostic and procedural quality was rated as excellent/very good in PersUS-guided puncture in 95% of cases. Integrating PersUS within an initial physical examination of 48 randomized cases in an emergency department, PersUS extended the examination time by 100 seconds. Interestingly, PersUS integration into 53 randomized regular ward rounds of 1007 patients significantly reduced average contact time per patient by 103 seconds from 8.9 to 7.2 minutes. Moreover, it lowered the patient referral rate to an echo lab from 20% to 2% within the study population. Conclusions. We propose the development of novel ultrasound-based clinical pathways by integration of PersUS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2013/946059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Critical care medicine ; Ultrasound imaging</subject><ispartof>Emergency Medicine International, 2014</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,860,4476,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Breitkreutz, Raoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dell' Orto, Marco Campo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamm, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuca, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zechner, Peter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenger, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walcher, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeger, Florian H</creatorcontrib><title>Does the integration of personalized ultrasound change patient management in critical care medicine? Observational trials</title><title>Emergency Medicine International</title><description>Objective. To test the influence of personalized ultrasound (PersUS) on patient management in critical care. Design of the Study. Prospective, observational, and critical care setting. Four substudies compared PersUS and mobile ultrasound, work distribution, and diagnostic and procedural quality. Patients and Interventions. 640 patient ultrasound exams including 548 focused diagnostic exams and 92 interventional procedures. Main Outcome Measures. Number of studies, physician's judgement of feasibility, time of usage per patient, and referrals to echo lab. Results. Randomized availability of PersUS increased its application in ICU work shifts more than two fold from 33 to 68 exams mainly for detection and therapy of effusions. Diagnostic and procedural quality was rated as excellent/very good in PersUS-guided puncture in 95% of cases. Integrating PersUS within an initial physical examination of 48 randomized cases in an emergency department, PersUS extended the examination time by 100 seconds. Interestingly, PersUS integration into 53 randomized regular ward rounds of 1007 patients significantly reduced average contact time per patient by 103 seconds from 8.9 to 7.2 minutes. Moreover, it lowered the patient referral rate to an echo lab from 20% to 2% within the study population. Conclusions. We propose the development of novel ultrasound-based clinical pathways by integration of PersUS.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Critical care medicine</subject><subject>Ultrasound imaging</subject><issn>2090-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVTctOAzEMzAGkVtATP-AfaOvsZltyQoiHuHHhjkzWuzXadaokRYKvJyB-gPFhRh6Px5grixtru27boG233u2w82dm2aDHdXPtcGFWOb9jRYfovVuaz_vIGcqBQbTwmKhIVIgDHDnlqDTJF_dwmkqiHE_aQziQjgzHeshaYCalkecfKQohSZFAEwRKDDP3EkT5Bp7fMqeP39_VLEloypfmfKjEqz--MJvHh5e7p_VIE7-KDrF2hjo9zxKi8iB1f-vsvrW4d03778A3ABxbUA</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Breitkreutz, Raoul</creator><creator>dell' Orto, Marco Campo</creator><creator>Hamm, Christian</creator><creator>Cuca, Colleen</creator><creator>Zechner, Peter M</creator><creator>Stenger, Tanja</creator><creator>Walcher, Felix</creator><creator>Seeger, Florian H</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Does the integration of personalized ultrasound change patient management in critical care medicine? Observational trials</title><author>Breitkreutz, Raoul ; dell' Orto, Marco Campo ; Hamm, Christian ; Cuca, Colleen ; Zechner, Peter M ; Stenger, Tanja ; Walcher, Felix ; Seeger, Florian H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A4173107423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Critical care medicine</topic><topic>Ultrasound imaging</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Breitkreutz, Raoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dell' Orto, Marco Campo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamm, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuca, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zechner, Peter M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenger, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walcher, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeger, Florian H</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Breitkreutz, Raoul</au><au>dell' Orto, Marco Campo</au><au>Hamm, Christian</au><au>Cuca, Colleen</au><au>Zechner, Peter M</au><au>Stenger, Tanja</au><au>Walcher, Felix</au><au>Seeger, Florian H</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Does the integration of personalized ultrasound change patient management in critical care medicine? Observational trials</atitle><jtitle>Emergency Medicine International</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><issn>2090-2840</issn><abstract>Objective. To test the influence of personalized ultrasound (PersUS) on patient management in critical care. Design of the Study. Prospective, observational, and critical care setting. Four substudies compared PersUS and mobile ultrasound, work distribution, and diagnostic and procedural quality. Patients and Interventions. 640 patient ultrasound exams including 548 focused diagnostic exams and 92 interventional procedures. Main Outcome Measures. Number of studies, physician's judgement of feasibility, time of usage per patient, and referrals to echo lab. Results. Randomized availability of PersUS increased its application in ICU work shifts more than two fold from 33 to 68 exams mainly for detection and therapy of effusions. Diagnostic and procedural quality was rated as excellent/very good in PersUS-guided puncture in 95% of cases. Integrating PersUS within an initial physical examination of 48 randomized cases in an emergency department, PersUS extended the examination time by 100 seconds. Interestingly, PersUS integration into 53 randomized regular ward rounds of 1007 patients significantly reduced average contact time per patient by 103 seconds from 8.9 to 7.2 minutes. Moreover, it lowered the patient referral rate to an echo lab from 20% to 2% within the study population. Conclusions. We propose the development of novel ultrasound-based clinical pathways by integration of PersUS.</abstract><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1155/2013/946059</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2090-2840 |
ispartof | Emergency Medicine International, 2014 |
issn | 2090-2840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A417310742 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Analysis Critical care medicine Ultrasound imaging |
title | Does the integration of personalized ultrasound change patient management in critical care medicine? Observational trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A11%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20integration%20of%20personalized%20ultrasound%20change%20patient%20management%20in%20critical%20care%20medicine?%20Observational%20trials&rft.jtitle=Emergency%20Medicine%20International&rft.au=Breitkreutz,%20Raoul&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.issn=2090-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2013/946059&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA417310742%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A417310742&rfr_iscdi=true |