Getting to Results: A Tool and Lessons from the Annie E. Casey Foundation's K-12 Education Portfolio

· In 2002, the Annie E. Casey Foundation adopted a results-based accountability (RBA) framework to track and report on the results of their philanthropic investments. · The RBA tool was piloted in a few program areas, including its K-12 education portfolio. · Grantees were highly engaged in an itera...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Foundation Review 2011-01, Vol.3 (3), p.24-35
Hauptverfasser: Manno, Bruno, Read, Tory
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue 3
container_start_page 24
container_title The Foundation Review
container_volume 3
creator Manno, Bruno
Read, Tory
description · In 2002, the Annie E. Casey Foundation adopted a results-based accountability (RBA) framework to track and report on the results of their philanthropic investments. · The RBA tool was piloted in a few program areas, including its K-12 education portfolio. · Grantees were highly engaged in an iterative process to determine appropriate measures, refine the theory of change, and how to track progress. · Overall, the RBA tool enabled staff to get a sense of how grantees were doing and therefore how the foundation was doing in a way that hadn’t been possible before. · The K-12 program got a much clearer sense of what it wanted to achieve in its program area and a deeper understanding of how individual grantee work contributed to the foundation’s overall goals. · Lessons learned about implementing the RBA include the importance of grantee involvement, accepting that not every project will achieve every goal, and the importance of a communications strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.4087/FOUNDATIONREVIEW-D-11-00005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_bepre</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A351304038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A351304038</galeid><sourcerecordid>A351304038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b322t-2ea908ff844d96dedbdf6e22f4c7025fe9cd6ae83a85e8a0f0d22a6bd674d90a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFPwjAUxxejiQT5CqaJB0_Dtuu2Tk8LDCQSMAT0uHTrK86M1rTlwLd3gOHge4f38s_7vcMvCB4IHjLM06fJcrMY5-vZcrEqPmbFZzgOCQlxV_FV0CMZY2GcpNn1ZU_wbTBw7vt4ElGeJawXyCl43-gt8gatwO1b755RjtbGtEhoiebgnNEOKWt2yH8ByrVuABVDNBIODmhi9loK3xj96NBbSCgq5L4-BejdWK9M25i74EaJ1sHgb_aDzaRYj17D-XI6G-XzsIoo9SEFkWGuFGdMZokEWUmVAKWK1SmmsYKslokAHgkeAxdYYUmpSCqZpB2ARdQPhue_W9FC2WhlvBV11xJ2TW00qKbL8ygmEWY44h3wcgZqa5yzoMof2-yEPZQEl0fJ5X_J5bgkpDxJ7uj7M13Bj-08XWCvLMExi34BPfh9JA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Getting to Results: A Tool and Lessons from the Annie E. Casey Foundation's K-12 Education Portfolio</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Manno, Bruno ; Read, Tory</creator><creatorcontrib>Manno, Bruno ; Read, Tory</creatorcontrib><description>· In 2002, the Annie E. Casey Foundation adopted a results-based accountability (RBA) framework to track and report on the results of their philanthropic investments. · The RBA tool was piloted in a few program areas, including its K-12 education portfolio. · Grantees were highly engaged in an iterative process to determine appropriate measures, refine the theory of change, and how to track progress. · Overall, the RBA tool enabled staff to get a sense of how grantees were doing and therefore how the foundation was doing in a way that hadn’t been possible before. · The K-12 program got a much clearer sense of what it wanted to achieve in its program area and a deeper understanding of how individual grantee work contributed to the foundation’s overall goals. · Lessons learned about implementing the RBA include the importance of grantee involvement, accepting that not every project will achieve every goal, and the importance of a communications strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-5660</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-5679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4087/FOUNDATIONREVIEW-D-11-00005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Grand Valley State University</publisher><subject>Education</subject><ispartof>The Foundation Review, 2011-01, Vol.3 (3), p.24-35</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Grand Valley State University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manno, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Tory</creatorcontrib><title>Getting to Results: A Tool and Lessons from the Annie E. Casey Foundation's K-12 Education Portfolio</title><title>The Foundation Review</title><description>· In 2002, the Annie E. Casey Foundation adopted a results-based accountability (RBA) framework to track and report on the results of their philanthropic investments. · The RBA tool was piloted in a few program areas, including its K-12 education portfolio. · Grantees were highly engaged in an iterative process to determine appropriate measures, refine the theory of change, and how to track progress. · Overall, the RBA tool enabled staff to get a sense of how grantees were doing and therefore how the foundation was doing in a way that hadn’t been possible before. · The K-12 program got a much clearer sense of what it wanted to achieve in its program area and a deeper understanding of how individual grantee work contributed to the foundation’s overall goals. · Lessons learned about implementing the RBA include the importance of grantee involvement, accepting that not every project will achieve every goal, and the importance of a communications strategy.</description><subject>Education</subject><issn>1944-5660</issn><issn>1944-5679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEFPwjAUxxejiQT5CqaJB0_Dtuu2Tk8LDCQSMAT0uHTrK86M1rTlwLd3gOHge4f38s_7vcMvCB4IHjLM06fJcrMY5-vZcrEqPmbFZzgOCQlxV_FV0CMZY2GcpNn1ZU_wbTBw7vt4ElGeJawXyCl43-gt8gatwO1b755RjtbGtEhoiebgnNEOKWt2yH8ByrVuABVDNBIODmhi9loK3xj96NBbSCgq5L4-BejdWK9M25i74EaJ1sHgb_aDzaRYj17D-XI6G-XzsIoo9SEFkWGuFGdMZokEWUmVAKWK1SmmsYKslokAHgkeAxdYYUmpSCqZpB2ARdQPhue_W9FC2WhlvBV11xJ2TW00qKbL8ygmEWY44h3wcgZqa5yzoMof2-yEPZQEl0fJ5X_J5bgkpDxJ7uj7M13Bj-08XWCvLMExi34BPfh9JA</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Manno, Bruno</creator><creator>Read, Tory</creator><general>Grand Valley State University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Getting to Results: A Tool and Lessons from the Annie E. Casey Foundation's K-12 Education Portfolio</title><author>Manno, Bruno ; Read, Tory</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b322t-2ea908ff844d96dedbdf6e22f4c7025fe9cd6ae83a85e8a0f0d22a6bd674d90a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manno, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Tory</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Foundation Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manno, Bruno</au><au>Read, Tory</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Getting to Results: A Tool and Lessons from the Annie E. Casey Foundation's K-12 Education Portfolio</atitle><jtitle>The Foundation Review</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>24-35</pages><issn>1944-5660</issn><eissn>1944-5679</eissn><abstract>· In 2002, the Annie E. Casey Foundation adopted a results-based accountability (RBA) framework to track and report on the results of their philanthropic investments. · The RBA tool was piloted in a few program areas, including its K-12 education portfolio. · Grantees were highly engaged in an iterative process to determine appropriate measures, refine the theory of change, and how to track progress. · Overall, the RBA tool enabled staff to get a sense of how grantees were doing and therefore how the foundation was doing in a way that hadn’t been possible before. · The K-12 program got a much clearer sense of what it wanted to achieve in its program area and a deeper understanding of how individual grantee work contributed to the foundation’s overall goals. · Lessons learned about implementing the RBA include the importance of grantee involvement, accepting that not every project will achieve every goal, and the importance of a communications strategy.</abstract><pub>Grand Valley State University</pub><doi>10.4087/FOUNDATIONREVIEW-D-11-00005</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1944-5660
ispartof The Foundation Review, 2011-01, Vol.3 (3), p.24-35
issn 1944-5660
1944-5679
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A351304038
source Business Source Complete
subjects Education
title Getting to Results: A Tool and Lessons from the Annie E. Casey Foundation's K-12 Education Portfolio
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T16%3A49%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_bepre&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Getting%20to%20Results:%20A%20Tool%20and%20Lessons%20from%20the%20Annie%20E.%20Casey%20Foundation's%20K-12%20Education%20Portfolio&rft.jtitle=The%20Foundation%20Review&rft.au=Manno,%20Bruno&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=24-35&rft.issn=1944-5660&rft.eissn=1944-5679&rft_id=info:doi/10.4087/FOUNDATIONREVIEW-D-11-00005&rft_dat=%3Cgale_bepre%3EA351304038%3C/gale_bepre%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A351304038&rfr_iscdi=true