Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses
Research was undertaken to determine whether comparable grading standards are used in evaluating student performance at two-year community colleges and four-year universities. Examination of academic records of 417 students who took college level math at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | College student journal 2012-09, Vol.46 (3), p.526-532 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 532 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 526 |
container_title | College student journal |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Friedl, John Pittenger, David Sherman, Michael |
description | Research was undertaken to determine whether comparable grading standards are used in evaluating student performance at two-year community colleges and four-year universities. Examination of academic records of 417 students who took college level math at the University of Tennessee
at Chattanooga in fall 2009 compared the performance of those who had previously taken intermediate (high school level) algebra at a community college with those who had taken intermediate algebra at a four-year institution. Although students who transferred intermediate algebra from a community
college had earned significantly higher grades in that course, on average, than those who took the course at a four-year university, their subsequent performance in college-level math courses was substantially poorer. This suggests that grade inflation at the community college level may ultimately
result in lower graduation rates for students who transfer to four year universities with inadequate preparation for courses in the general education or major curriculum. As states seek to create incentives for four-year institutions to increase graduation rates and as they reduce subsidies
to higher education by encouraging more students to begin at a less expensive community college and then transfer to a four-year university, the public policy implications of the results of this research become increasingly important. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_ingen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A302464015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>prin/csj/2012/00000046/00000003/art00006</ingid><galeid>A302464015</galeid><ericid>EJ996951</ericid><sourcerecordid>A302464015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e3938-d12e6376677d668c77316c80746d54f8323404a09124344910bfa2d5e5b86cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1r3DAQhk1oIdtt_0EPhl7ag4u-LNu3hiXdpixJIcl5UKSx0WLLqSSHJr8-2vVeFral0mFGmmdGg-Y9yxZMNrTgdV29yRaEClnwhovz7F0IW0KI5LJcZPdrr4x1XX4blTPKm5Anm06TQRfzX-jb0Q_Kacyty1fjMEzOxufk9T12uIfvnX1CH-bryQcM77O3reoDfjjYZXb3_fJu9aPY3KyvVhebAlMrdWEoQ8krKavKSFnrquJU6ppUQppStDVnXBChSEOZ4EI0lDy0ipkSy4daasOX2ee57KMff08YIgw2aOx75XCcAlBaUiIEqeqEfprRTvUI1rVj9ErvcLjghAkpCC0TVZygOnToVT86bG26PuK_nuDTNjhYfTLhy1FCYiL-iZ2aQoCr2-v_Zuv15l-NH1g9TwnSp69ujvmPM4_eanj0dlD-GS5_No1sSprC3-ZwUkaSgYJtmqtLk9yhDnTYAiOUAdkvIQ8O4aB8JHtxLbPrv5SYH3Swk-ROkfAkpOOpIKOkYSxNjTZgsFVTHyEqD90LBMlfAf7R2lo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1151044078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Friedl, John ; Pittenger, David ; Sherman, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Friedl, John ; Pittenger, David ; Sherman, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Research was undertaken to determine whether comparable grading standards are used in evaluating student performance at two-year community colleges and four-year universities. Examination of academic records of 417 students who took college level math at the University of Tennessee
at Chattanooga in fall 2009 compared the performance of those who had previously taken intermediate (high school level) algebra at a community college with those who had taken intermediate algebra at a four-year institution. Although students who transferred intermediate algebra from a community
college had earned significantly higher grades in that course, on average, than those who took the course at a four-year university, their subsequent performance in college-level math courses was substantially poorer. This suggests that grade inflation at the community college level may ultimately
result in lower graduation rates for students who transfer to four year universities with inadequate preparation for courses in the general education or major curriculum. As states seek to create incentives for four-year institutions to increase graduation rates and as they reduce subsidies
to higher education by encouraging more students to begin at a less expensive community college and then transfer to a four-year university, the public policy implications of the results of this research become increasingly important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-3934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2691-3887</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CSJLAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Project Innovation</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Academic Records ; Algebra ; College Graduates ; College students ; College Transfer Students ; Colleges and universities ; Community Colleges ; Comparative Analysis ; Grade Inflation ; Grading ; Graduation Rate ; Incentives ; Inflation ; Mathematics Achievement ; Public Policy ; Student Evaluation ; Tennessee ; Testing ; Tests, problems and exercises ; Universities ; University of Tennessee</subject><ispartof>College student journal, 2012-09, Vol.46 (3), p.526-532</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Project Innovation (Alabama)</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Project Innovation (Alabama)</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ996951$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friedl, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittenger, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses</title><title>College student journal</title><addtitle>College Student Journal</addtitle><description>Research was undertaken to determine whether comparable grading standards are used in evaluating student performance at two-year community colleges and four-year universities. Examination of academic records of 417 students who took college level math at the University of Tennessee
at Chattanooga in fall 2009 compared the performance of those who had previously taken intermediate (high school level) algebra at a community college with those who had taken intermediate algebra at a four-year institution. Although students who transferred intermediate algebra from a community
college had earned significantly higher grades in that course, on average, than those who took the course at a four-year university, their subsequent performance in college-level math courses was substantially poorer. This suggests that grade inflation at the community college level may ultimately
result in lower graduation rates for students who transfer to four year universities with inadequate preparation for courses in the general education or major curriculum. As states seek to create incentives for four-year institutions to increase graduation rates and as they reduce subsidies
to higher education by encouraging more students to begin at a less expensive community college and then transfer to a four-year university, the public policy implications of the results of this research become increasingly important.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Academic Records</subject><subject>Algebra</subject><subject>College Graduates</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>College Transfer Students</subject><subject>Colleges and universities</subject><subject>Community Colleges</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Grade Inflation</subject><subject>Grading</subject><subject>Graduation Rate</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Inflation</subject><subject>Mathematics Achievement</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Tennessee</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Tests, problems and exercises</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>University of Tennessee</subject><issn>0146-3934</issn><issn>2691-3887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1r3DAQhk1oIdtt_0EPhl7ag4u-LNu3hiXdpixJIcl5UKSx0WLLqSSHJr8-2vVeFral0mFGmmdGg-Y9yxZMNrTgdV29yRaEClnwhovz7F0IW0KI5LJcZPdrr4x1XX4blTPKm5Anm06TQRfzX-jb0Q_Kacyty1fjMEzOxufk9T12uIfvnX1CH-bryQcM77O3reoDfjjYZXb3_fJu9aPY3KyvVhebAlMrdWEoQ8krKavKSFnrquJU6ppUQppStDVnXBChSEOZ4EI0lDy0ipkSy4daasOX2ee57KMff08YIgw2aOx75XCcAlBaUiIEqeqEfprRTvUI1rVj9ErvcLjghAkpCC0TVZygOnToVT86bG26PuK_nuDTNjhYfTLhy1FCYiL-iZ2aQoCr2-v_Zuv15l-NH1g9TwnSp69ujvmPM4_eanj0dlD-GS5_No1sSprC3-ZwUkaSgYJtmqtLk9yhDnTYAiOUAdkvIQ8O4aB8JHtxLbPrv5SYH3Swk-ROkfAkpOOpIKOkYSxNjTZgsFVTHyEqD90LBMlfAf7R2lo</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Friedl, John</creator><creator>Pittenger, David</creator><creator>Sherman, Michael</creator><general>Project Innovation</general><general>Project Innovation, Inc</general><general>Project Innovation (Alabama)</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses</title><author>Friedl, John ; Pittenger, David ; Sherman, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e3938-d12e6376677d668c77316c80746d54f8323404a09124344910bfa2d5e5b86cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Academic Records</topic><topic>Algebra</topic><topic>College Graduates</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>College Transfer Students</topic><topic>Colleges and universities</topic><topic>Community Colleges</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Grade Inflation</topic><topic>Grading</topic><topic>Graduation Rate</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Inflation</topic><topic>Mathematics Achievement</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Tennessee</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Tests, problems and exercises</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>University of Tennessee</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friedl, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittenger, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>College student journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friedl, John</au><au>Pittenger, David</au><au>Sherman, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ996951</ericid><atitle>Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses</atitle><jtitle>College student journal</jtitle><addtitle>College Student Journal</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>526</spage><epage>532</epage><pages>526-532</pages><issn>0146-3934</issn><eissn>2691-3887</eissn><coden>CSJLAO</coden><abstract>Research was undertaken to determine whether comparable grading standards are used in evaluating student performance at two-year community colleges and four-year universities. Examination of academic records of 417 students who took college level math at the University of Tennessee
at Chattanooga in fall 2009 compared the performance of those who had previously taken intermediate (high school level) algebra at a community college with those who had taken intermediate algebra at a four-year institution. Although students who transferred intermediate algebra from a community
college had earned significantly higher grades in that course, on average, than those who took the course at a four-year university, their subsequent performance in college-level math courses was substantially poorer. This suggests that grade inflation at the community college level may ultimately
result in lower graduation rates for students who transfer to four year universities with inadequate preparation for courses in the general education or major curriculum. As states seek to create incentives for four-year institutions to increase graduation rates and as they reduce subsidies
to higher education by encouraging more students to begin at a less expensive community college and then transfer to a four-year university, the public policy implications of the results of this research become increasingly important.</abstract><pub>Project Innovation</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-3934 |
ispartof | College student journal, 2012-09, Vol.46 (3), p.526-532 |
issn | 0146-3934 2691-3887 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A302464015 |
source | PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Academic achievement Academic Records Algebra College Graduates College students College Transfer Students Colleges and universities Community Colleges Comparative Analysis Grade Inflation Grading Graduation Rate Incentives Inflation Mathematics Achievement Public Policy Student Evaluation Tennessee Testing Tests, problems and exercises Universities University of Tennessee |
title | Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A55%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_ingen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grading%20Standards%20and%20Student%20Performance%20in%20Community%20College%20and%20University%20Courses&rft.jtitle=College%20student%20journal&rft.au=Friedl,%20John&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=526&rft.epage=532&rft.pages=526-532&rft.issn=0146-3934&rft.eissn=2691-3887&rft.coden=CSJLAO&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_ingen%3EA302464015%3C/gale_ingen%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1151044078&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A302464015&rft_ingid=prin/csj/2012/00000046/00000003/art00006&rft_ericid=EJ996951&rfr_iscdi=true |