Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses

Research was undertaken to determine whether comparable grading standards are used in evaluating student performance at two-year community colleges and four-year universities. Examination of academic records of 417 students who took college level math at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:College student journal 2012-09, Vol.46 (3), p.526-532
Hauptverfasser: Friedl, John, Pittenger, David, Sherman, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 532
container_issue 3
container_start_page 526
container_title College student journal
container_volume 46
creator Friedl, John
Pittenger, David
Sherman, Michael
description Research was undertaken to determine whether comparable grading standards are used in evaluating student performance at two-year community colleges and four-year universities. Examination of academic records of 417 students who took college level math at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in fall 2009 compared the performance of those who had previously taken intermediate (high school level) algebra at a community college with those who had taken intermediate algebra at a four-year institution. Although students who transferred intermediate algebra from a community college had earned significantly higher grades in that course, on average, than those who took the course at a four-year university, their subsequent performance in college-level math courses was substantially poorer. This suggests that grade inflation at the community college level may ultimately result in lower graduation rates for students who transfer to four year universities with inadequate preparation for courses in the general education or major curriculum. As states seek to create incentives for four-year institutions to increase graduation rates and as they reduce subsidies to higher education by encouraging more students to begin at a less expensive community college and then transfer to a four-year university, the public policy implications of the results of this research become increasingly important.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_ingen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A302464015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>prin/csj/2012/00000046/00000003/art00006</ingid><galeid>A302464015</galeid><ericid>EJ996951</ericid><sourcerecordid>A302464015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e3938-d12e6376677d668c77316c80746d54f8323404a09124344910bfa2d5e5b86cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1r3DAQhk1oIdtt_0EPhl7ag4u-LNu3hiXdpixJIcl5UKSx0WLLqSSHJr8-2vVeFral0mFGmmdGg-Y9yxZMNrTgdV29yRaEClnwhovz7F0IW0KI5LJcZPdrr4x1XX4blTPKm5Anm06TQRfzX-jb0Q_Kacyty1fjMEzOxufk9T12uIfvnX1CH-bryQcM77O3reoDfjjYZXb3_fJu9aPY3KyvVhebAlMrdWEoQ8krKavKSFnrquJU6ppUQppStDVnXBChSEOZ4EI0lDy0ipkSy4daasOX2ee57KMff08YIgw2aOx75XCcAlBaUiIEqeqEfprRTvUI1rVj9ErvcLjghAkpCC0TVZygOnToVT86bG26PuK_nuDTNjhYfTLhy1FCYiL-iZ2aQoCr2-v_Zuv15l-NH1g9TwnSp69ujvmPM4_eanj0dlD-GS5_No1sSprC3-ZwUkaSgYJtmqtLk9yhDnTYAiOUAdkvIQ8O4aB8JHtxLbPrv5SYH3Swk-ROkfAkpOOpIKOkYSxNjTZgsFVTHyEqD90LBMlfAf7R2lo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1151044078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Friedl, John ; Pittenger, David ; Sherman, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Friedl, John ; Pittenger, David ; Sherman, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Research was undertaken to determine whether comparable grading standards are used in evaluating student performance at two-year community colleges and four-year universities. Examination of academic records of 417 students who took college level math at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in fall 2009 compared the performance of those who had previously taken intermediate (high school level) algebra at a community college with those who had taken intermediate algebra at a four-year institution. Although students who transferred intermediate algebra from a community college had earned significantly higher grades in that course, on average, than those who took the course at a four-year university, their subsequent performance in college-level math courses was substantially poorer. This suggests that grade inflation at the community college level may ultimately result in lower graduation rates for students who transfer to four year universities with inadequate preparation for courses in the general education or major curriculum. As states seek to create incentives for four-year institutions to increase graduation rates and as they reduce subsidies to higher education by encouraging more students to begin at a less expensive community college and then transfer to a four-year university, the public policy implications of the results of this research become increasingly important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-3934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2691-3887</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CSJLAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Project Innovation</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Academic Records ; Algebra ; College Graduates ; College students ; College Transfer Students ; Colleges and universities ; Community Colleges ; Comparative Analysis ; Grade Inflation ; Grading ; Graduation Rate ; Incentives ; Inflation ; Mathematics Achievement ; Public Policy ; Student Evaluation ; Tennessee ; Testing ; Tests, problems and exercises ; Universities ; University of Tennessee</subject><ispartof>College student journal, 2012-09, Vol.46 (3), p.526-532</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Project Innovation (Alabama)</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Project Innovation (Alabama)</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ996951$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friedl, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittenger, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses</title><title>College student journal</title><addtitle>College Student Journal</addtitle><description>Research was undertaken to determine whether comparable grading standards are used in evaluating student performance at two-year community colleges and four-year universities. Examination of academic records of 417 students who took college level math at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in fall 2009 compared the performance of those who had previously taken intermediate (high school level) algebra at a community college with those who had taken intermediate algebra at a four-year institution. Although students who transferred intermediate algebra from a community college had earned significantly higher grades in that course, on average, than those who took the course at a four-year university, their subsequent performance in college-level math courses was substantially poorer. This suggests that grade inflation at the community college level may ultimately result in lower graduation rates for students who transfer to four year universities with inadequate preparation for courses in the general education or major curriculum. As states seek to create incentives for four-year institutions to increase graduation rates and as they reduce subsidies to higher education by encouraging more students to begin at a less expensive community college and then transfer to a four-year university, the public policy implications of the results of this research become increasingly important.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Academic Records</subject><subject>Algebra</subject><subject>College Graduates</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>College Transfer Students</subject><subject>Colleges and universities</subject><subject>Community Colleges</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Grade Inflation</subject><subject>Grading</subject><subject>Graduation Rate</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Inflation</subject><subject>Mathematics Achievement</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Tennessee</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Tests, problems and exercises</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>University of Tennessee</subject><issn>0146-3934</issn><issn>2691-3887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1r3DAQhk1oIdtt_0EPhl7ag4u-LNu3hiXdpixJIcl5UKSx0WLLqSSHJr8-2vVeFral0mFGmmdGg-Y9yxZMNrTgdV29yRaEClnwhovz7F0IW0KI5LJcZPdrr4x1XX4blTPKm5Anm06TQRfzX-jb0Q_Kacyty1fjMEzOxufk9T12uIfvnX1CH-bryQcM77O3reoDfjjYZXb3_fJu9aPY3KyvVhebAlMrdWEoQ8krKavKSFnrquJU6ppUQppStDVnXBChSEOZ4EI0lDy0ipkSy4daasOX2ee57KMff08YIgw2aOx75XCcAlBaUiIEqeqEfprRTvUI1rVj9ErvcLjghAkpCC0TVZygOnToVT86bG26PuK_nuDTNjhYfTLhy1FCYiL-iZ2aQoCr2-v_Zuv15l-NH1g9TwnSp69ujvmPM4_eanj0dlD-GS5_No1sSprC3-ZwUkaSgYJtmqtLk9yhDnTYAiOUAdkvIQ8O4aB8JHtxLbPrv5SYH3Swk-ROkfAkpOOpIKOkYSxNjTZgsFVTHyEqD90LBMlfAf7R2lo</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Friedl, John</creator><creator>Pittenger, David</creator><creator>Sherman, Michael</creator><general>Project Innovation</general><general>Project Innovation, Inc</general><general>Project Innovation (Alabama)</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses</title><author>Friedl, John ; Pittenger, David ; Sherman, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e3938-d12e6376677d668c77316c80746d54f8323404a09124344910bfa2d5e5b86cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Academic Records</topic><topic>Algebra</topic><topic>College Graduates</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>College Transfer Students</topic><topic>Colleges and universities</topic><topic>Community Colleges</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Grade Inflation</topic><topic>Grading</topic><topic>Graduation Rate</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Inflation</topic><topic>Mathematics Achievement</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Tennessee</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Tests, problems and exercises</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>University of Tennessee</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friedl, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittenger, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>College student journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friedl, John</au><au>Pittenger, David</au><au>Sherman, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ996951</ericid><atitle>Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses</atitle><jtitle>College student journal</jtitle><addtitle>College Student Journal</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>526</spage><epage>532</epage><pages>526-532</pages><issn>0146-3934</issn><eissn>2691-3887</eissn><coden>CSJLAO</coden><abstract>Research was undertaken to determine whether comparable grading standards are used in evaluating student performance at two-year community colleges and four-year universities. Examination of academic records of 417 students who took college level math at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in fall 2009 compared the performance of those who had previously taken intermediate (high school level) algebra at a community college with those who had taken intermediate algebra at a four-year institution. Although students who transferred intermediate algebra from a community college had earned significantly higher grades in that course, on average, than those who took the course at a four-year university, their subsequent performance in college-level math courses was substantially poorer. This suggests that grade inflation at the community college level may ultimately result in lower graduation rates for students who transfer to four year universities with inadequate preparation for courses in the general education or major curriculum. As states seek to create incentives for four-year institutions to increase graduation rates and as they reduce subsidies to higher education by encouraging more students to begin at a less expensive community college and then transfer to a four-year university, the public policy implications of the results of this research become increasingly important.</abstract><pub>Project Innovation</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-3934
ispartof College student journal, 2012-09, Vol.46 (3), p.526-532
issn 0146-3934
2691-3887
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A302464015
source PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Academic achievement
Academic Records
Algebra
College Graduates
College students
College Transfer Students
Colleges and universities
Community Colleges
Comparative Analysis
Grade Inflation
Grading
Graduation Rate
Incentives
Inflation
Mathematics Achievement
Public Policy
Student Evaluation
Tennessee
Testing
Tests, problems and exercises
Universities
University of Tennessee
title Grading Standards and Student Performance in Community College and University Courses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A55%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_ingen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grading%20Standards%20and%20Student%20Performance%20in%20Community%20College%20and%20University%20Courses&rft.jtitle=College%20student%20journal&rft.au=Friedl,%20John&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=526&rft.epage=532&rft.pages=526-532&rft.issn=0146-3934&rft.eissn=2691-3887&rft.coden=CSJLAO&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_ingen%3EA302464015%3C/gale_ingen%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1151044078&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A302464015&rft_ingid=prin/csj/2012/00000046/00000003/art00006&rft_ericid=EJ996951&rfr_iscdi=true