Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia knowledge instrument in Malaysia

Background Patient's knowledge on diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia and its medications can be used as one of the outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of educational intervention. To date, no such instrument has been validated in Malaysia. Therefore, the aim of this study was t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC Medical Research Methodology 2012, Vol.12, p.18
Hauptverfasser: Lai, Pauline SM, Chua, Siew Siang, Tan, Ching Hooi, Chan, Siew Pheng
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 18
container_title BMC Medical Research Methodology
container_volume 12
creator Lai, Pauline SM
Chua, Siew Siang
Tan, Ching Hooi
Chan, Siew Pheng
description Background Patient's knowledge on diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia and its medications can be used as one of the outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of educational intervention. To date, no such instrument has been validated in Malaysia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Diabetes, Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument for assessing the knowledge of patients with type 2 diabetes in Malaysia. Methods A 28-item instrument which comprised of 5 domains: diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, medications and general issues was designed and tested. One point was given for every correct answer, whilst zero was given for incorrect answers. Scores ranged from 0 to 28, which were then converted into percentage. This was administered to 77 patients with type 2 diabetes in a tertiary hospital, who were on medication(s) for diabetes and who could understand English (patient group), and to 40 pharmacists (professional group). The DHL knowledge instrument was administered again to the patient group after one month. Excluded were patients less than 18 years old. Results Flesch reading ease was 60, which is satisfactory, while the mean difficulty factor(SD) was 0.74(0.21), indicating that DHL knowledge instrument was moderately easy. Internal consistency of the instrument was good, with Cronbach's [alpha] = 0.791. The test-retest scores showed no significant difference for 26 out of the 28 items, indicating that the questionnaire has achieved stable reliability. The overall mean(SD) knowledge scores was significantly different between the patient and professional groups [74.35(14.88) versus 93.84(6.47), p [less than] 0.001]. This means that the DHL knowledge instrument could differentiate the knowledge levels of participants. The DHL knowledge instrument shows similar psychometric properties as other validated questionnaires. Conclusions The DHL knowledge instrument shows good promise to be adopted as an instrument for assessing diabetic patients' knowledge concerning their disease conditions and medications in Malaysia.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2288-12-18
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A289774802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A289774802</galeid><sourcerecordid>A289774802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A2897748023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjD8LwjAUxIMo-Hd2zQew2qRi4yiiuLiJkyDP5rU-jYk0EfHbW1HEVW6443fcMdYX8VAINRmJcSoiKZWKhIyEqrHWl9R_cpO1vT_FsUhVMmmx3RYMaQjkLHc5D0fkmuCAAf2AHx9XLANa_2rB6jcwdCWNFwJ-tu5uUBfIyfpQ3i5oQxX5Ggw8PEGXNXIwHnsf77DhcrGZr6ICDO7J5i6UkFV63WXOYk4Vn0k1TdOximXy9-AJi5NSiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia knowledge instrument in Malaysia</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Lai, Pauline SM ; Chua, Siew Siang ; Tan, Ching Hooi ; Chan, Siew Pheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lai, Pauline SM ; Chua, Siew Siang ; Tan, Ching Hooi ; Chan, Siew Pheng</creatorcontrib><description>Background Patient's knowledge on diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia and its medications can be used as one of the outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of educational intervention. To date, no such instrument has been validated in Malaysia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Diabetes, Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument for assessing the knowledge of patients with type 2 diabetes in Malaysia. Methods A 28-item instrument which comprised of 5 domains: diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, medications and general issues was designed and tested. One point was given for every correct answer, whilst zero was given for incorrect answers. Scores ranged from 0 to 28, which were then converted into percentage. This was administered to 77 patients with type 2 diabetes in a tertiary hospital, who were on medication(s) for diabetes and who could understand English (patient group), and to 40 pharmacists (professional group). The DHL knowledge instrument was administered again to the patient group after one month. Excluded were patients less than 18 years old. Results Flesch reading ease was 60, which is satisfactory, while the mean difficulty factor(SD) was 0.74(0.21), indicating that DHL knowledge instrument was moderately easy. Internal consistency of the instrument was good, with Cronbach's [alpha] = 0.791. The test-retest scores showed no significant difference for 26 out of the 28 items, indicating that the questionnaire has achieved stable reliability. The overall mean(SD) knowledge scores was significantly different between the patient and professional groups [74.35(14.88) versus 93.84(6.47), p [less than] 0.001]. This means that the DHL knowledge instrument could differentiate the knowledge levels of participants. The DHL knowledge instrument shows similar psychometric properties as other validated questionnaires. Conclusions The DHL knowledge instrument shows good promise to be adopted as an instrument for assessing diabetic patients' knowledge concerning their disease conditions and medications in Malaysia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-18</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Diabetics ; Evaluation ; Questionnaires ; Testing</subject><ispartof>BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2012, Vol.12, p.18</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,860,4476,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lai, Pauline SM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chua, Siew Siang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ching Hooi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Siew Pheng</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia knowledge instrument in Malaysia</title><title>BMC Medical Research Methodology</title><description>Background Patient's knowledge on diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia and its medications can be used as one of the outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of educational intervention. To date, no such instrument has been validated in Malaysia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Diabetes, Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument for assessing the knowledge of patients with type 2 diabetes in Malaysia. Methods A 28-item instrument which comprised of 5 domains: diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, medications and general issues was designed and tested. One point was given for every correct answer, whilst zero was given for incorrect answers. Scores ranged from 0 to 28, which were then converted into percentage. This was administered to 77 patients with type 2 diabetes in a tertiary hospital, who were on medication(s) for diabetes and who could understand English (patient group), and to 40 pharmacists (professional group). The DHL knowledge instrument was administered again to the patient group after one month. Excluded were patients less than 18 years old. Results Flesch reading ease was 60, which is satisfactory, while the mean difficulty factor(SD) was 0.74(0.21), indicating that DHL knowledge instrument was moderately easy. Internal consistency of the instrument was good, with Cronbach's [alpha] = 0.791. The test-retest scores showed no significant difference for 26 out of the 28 items, indicating that the questionnaire has achieved stable reliability. The overall mean(SD) knowledge scores was significantly different between the patient and professional groups [74.35(14.88) versus 93.84(6.47), p [less than] 0.001]. This means that the DHL knowledge instrument could differentiate the knowledge levels of participants. The DHL knowledge instrument shows similar psychometric properties as other validated questionnaires. Conclusions The DHL knowledge instrument shows good promise to be adopted as an instrument for assessing diabetic patients' knowledge concerning their disease conditions and medications in Malaysia.</description><subject>Diabetics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>1471-2288</issn><issn>1471-2288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjD8LwjAUxIMo-Hd2zQew2qRi4yiiuLiJkyDP5rU-jYk0EfHbW1HEVW6443fcMdYX8VAINRmJcSoiKZWKhIyEqrHWl9R_cpO1vT_FsUhVMmmx3RYMaQjkLHc5D0fkmuCAAf2AHx9XLANa_2rB6jcwdCWNFwJ-tu5uUBfIyfpQ3i5oQxX5Ggw8PEGXNXIwHnsf77DhcrGZr6ICDO7J5i6UkFV63WXOYk4Vn0k1TdOximXy9-AJi5NSiQ</recordid><startdate>20120224</startdate><enddate>20120224</enddate><creator>Lai, Pauline SM</creator><creator>Chua, Siew Siang</creator><creator>Tan, Ching Hooi</creator><creator>Chan, Siew Pheng</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20120224</creationdate><title>Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia knowledge instrument in Malaysia</title><author>Lai, Pauline SM ; Chua, Siew Siang ; Tan, Ching Hooi ; Chan, Siew Pheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A2897748023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Diabetics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lai, Pauline SM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chua, Siew Siang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ching Hooi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Siew Pheng</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lai, Pauline SM</au><au>Chua, Siew Siang</au><au>Tan, Ching Hooi</au><au>Chan, Siew Pheng</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia knowledge instrument in Malaysia</atitle><jtitle>BMC Medical Research Methodology</jtitle><date>2012-02-24</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>18</spage><pages>18-</pages><issn>1471-2288</issn><eissn>1471-2288</eissn><abstract>Background Patient's knowledge on diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia and its medications can be used as one of the outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of educational intervention. To date, no such instrument has been validated in Malaysia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Diabetes, Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia (DHL) knowledge instrument for assessing the knowledge of patients with type 2 diabetes in Malaysia. Methods A 28-item instrument which comprised of 5 domains: diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, medications and general issues was designed and tested. One point was given for every correct answer, whilst zero was given for incorrect answers. Scores ranged from 0 to 28, which were then converted into percentage. This was administered to 77 patients with type 2 diabetes in a tertiary hospital, who were on medication(s) for diabetes and who could understand English (patient group), and to 40 pharmacists (professional group). The DHL knowledge instrument was administered again to the patient group after one month. Excluded were patients less than 18 years old. Results Flesch reading ease was 60, which is satisfactory, while the mean difficulty factor(SD) was 0.74(0.21), indicating that DHL knowledge instrument was moderately easy. Internal consistency of the instrument was good, with Cronbach's [alpha] = 0.791. The test-retest scores showed no significant difference for 26 out of the 28 items, indicating that the questionnaire has achieved stable reliability. The overall mean(SD) knowledge scores was significantly different between the patient and professional groups [74.35(14.88) versus 93.84(6.47), p [less than] 0.001]. This means that the DHL knowledge instrument could differentiate the knowledge levels of participants. The DHL knowledge instrument shows similar psychometric properties as other validated questionnaires. Conclusions The DHL knowledge instrument shows good promise to be adopted as an instrument for assessing diabetic patients' knowledge concerning their disease conditions and medications in Malaysia.</abstract><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/1471-2288-12-18</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2288
ispartof BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2012, Vol.12, p.18
issn 1471-2288
1471-2288
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A289774802
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Diabetics
Evaluation
Questionnaires
Testing
title Validation of the diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia knowledge instrument in Malaysia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T15%3A39%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20diabetes,%20hypertension%20and%20hyperlipidemia%20knowledge%20instrument%20in%20Malaysia&rft.jtitle=BMC%20Medical%20Research%20Methodology&rft.au=Lai,%20Pauline%20SM&rft.date=2012-02-24&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=18&rft.pages=18-&rft.issn=1471-2288&rft.eissn=1471-2288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2288-12-18&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA289774802%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A289774802&rfr_iscdi=true