Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height

Soil compaction often limits conifer regeneration on sites degraded by landings and roads, but inadequate understanding of the relationship between compaction and tree growth could lead to inappropriate soil conservation and rehabilitation efforts. We tested liquid and plastic limits, oxidizable org...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of forest research 2010-09, Vol.40 (9), p.1724-1735
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Yihai, Krzic, Maja, Bulmer, Chuck E, Schmidt, Margaret G, Simard, Suzanne W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1735
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1724
container_title Canadian journal of forest research
container_volume 40
creator Zhao, Yihai
Krzic, Maja
Bulmer, Chuck E
Schmidt, Margaret G
Simard, Suzanne W
description Soil compaction often limits conifer regeneration on sites degraded by landings and roads, but inadequate understanding of the relationship between compaction and tree growth could lead to inappropriate soil conservation and rehabilitation efforts. We tested liquid and plastic limits, oxidizable organic matter, total carbon, particle size distribution, and iron and aluminum oxides on soil samples collected from five forest experiments in interior British Columbia. These data were used to estimate soil maximum bulk density (MBD) and relative bulk density (RBD); our objective was to relate RBD to tree growth. Height of interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Bessin) Franco) was limited when RBD was >0.72. For lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) and hybrid white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.), RBDs of 0.60–0.68 corresponded to maximum height, whereas RBDs of 0.78–0.87 appeared to limit height growth. The presence of surface organic material mitigated compaction and was often associated with lower RBD. Our results illustrate the usefulness of RBD to assess compaction and suggest that soil rehabilitation should be considered on disturbed sites where soil RBD is >0.80.
doi_str_mv 10.1139/X10-115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A240513330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A240513330</galeid><sourcerecordid>A240513330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-21e9d5242b369cb0c7cf6f81fa167f137db5126ae6d9c139fd91af77b7d16b683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0t9r1TAUB_AiCl6n-CcYJigKnSfNbXL7OIY_BkNxc7C3kKYnvZlt0iWpbP-90Yp48fogeUg4-eR7EkhRPKVwRClr3lxRKCmt7xUrWsGm5MDE_WIFsK7LGrh4WDyK8RoAGGewKj6f46CS_YaknYevpEMXbbojKhJFRlRxDki8IdqPk9LJekeU64hNkVhnhhmdzvuOpIBItmj7bXpcPDBqiPjk13xQXL57--XkQ3n26f3pyfFZqet1lcqKYtPV1bpqGW90C1pow82GGkW5MJSJrq1pxRXyrtH5XaZrqDJCtKKjvOUbdlAcLrlT8DczxiSv_RxcbilFnVtAJVhGzxfUqwFlvrJPQenRRi2PqzXUlDEGWZV7VI8Ogxq8Q2Nzeccf7vF6sjfyT3S0B-XR4Wj13tRXOweySXibejXHKE8vzv_Dfty1Lxerg48xoJFTsKMKd5KC_PFl5NXPRZ3li0W6oANGVEFvf-PbBcmpMxm-_jf8O_XZgo3yUvXBRnl5UQFlQBsAsWnYd4x50ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755420273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhao, Yihai ; Krzic, Maja ; Bulmer, Chuck E ; Schmidt, Margaret G ; Simard, Suzanne W</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yihai ; Krzic, Maja ; Bulmer, Chuck E ; Schmidt, Margaret G ; Simard, Suzanne W</creatorcontrib><description>Soil compaction often limits conifer regeneration on sites degraded by landings and roads, but inadequate understanding of the relationship between compaction and tree growth could lead to inappropriate soil conservation and rehabilitation efforts. We tested liquid and plastic limits, oxidizable organic matter, total carbon, particle size distribution, and iron and aluminum oxides on soil samples collected from five forest experiments in interior British Columbia. These data were used to estimate soil maximum bulk density (MBD) and relative bulk density (RBD); our objective was to relate RBD to tree growth. Height of interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Bessin) Franco) was limited when RBD was &gt;0.72. For lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) and hybrid white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.), RBDs of 0.60–0.68 corresponded to maximum height, whereas RBDs of 0.78–0.87 appeared to limit height growth. The presence of surface organic material mitigated compaction and was often associated with lower RBD. Our results illustrate the usefulness of RBD to assess compaction and suggest that soil rehabilitation should be considered on disturbed sites where soil RBD is &gt;0.80.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/X10-115</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Coniferous trees ; Density ; Environmental aspects ; Forestry ; Growth ; Organic matter ; Pine trees ; Plant growth ; Properties ; Soil compaction ; Soil conservation ; Soils ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2010-09, Vol.40 (9), p.1724-1735</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 NRC Research Press</rights><rights>Copyright National Research Council of Canada Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-21e9d5242b369cb0c7cf6f81fa167f137db5126ae6d9c139fd91af77b7d16b683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-21e9d5242b369cb0c7cf6f81fa167f137db5126ae6d9c139fd91af77b7d16b683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzic, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulmer, Chuck E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Margaret G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simard, Suzanne W</creatorcontrib><title>Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><description>Soil compaction often limits conifer regeneration on sites degraded by landings and roads, but inadequate understanding of the relationship between compaction and tree growth could lead to inappropriate soil conservation and rehabilitation efforts. We tested liquid and plastic limits, oxidizable organic matter, total carbon, particle size distribution, and iron and aluminum oxides on soil samples collected from five forest experiments in interior British Columbia. These data were used to estimate soil maximum bulk density (MBD) and relative bulk density (RBD); our objective was to relate RBD to tree growth. Height of interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Bessin) Franco) was limited when RBD was &gt;0.72. For lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) and hybrid white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.), RBDs of 0.60–0.68 corresponded to maximum height, whereas RBDs of 0.78–0.87 appeared to limit height growth. The presence of surface organic material mitigated compaction and was often associated with lower RBD. Our results illustrate the usefulness of RBD to assess compaction and suggest that soil rehabilitation should be considered on disturbed sites where soil RBD is &gt;0.80.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Coniferous trees</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Soil compaction</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqV0t9r1TAUB_AiCl6n-CcYJigKnSfNbXL7OIY_BkNxc7C3kKYnvZlt0iWpbP-90Yp48fogeUg4-eR7EkhRPKVwRClr3lxRKCmt7xUrWsGm5MDE_WIFsK7LGrh4WDyK8RoAGGewKj6f46CS_YaknYevpEMXbbojKhJFRlRxDki8IdqPk9LJekeU64hNkVhnhhmdzvuOpIBItmj7bXpcPDBqiPjk13xQXL57--XkQ3n26f3pyfFZqet1lcqKYtPV1bpqGW90C1pow82GGkW5MJSJrq1pxRXyrtH5XaZrqDJCtKKjvOUbdlAcLrlT8DczxiSv_RxcbilFnVtAJVhGzxfUqwFlvrJPQenRRi2PqzXUlDEGWZV7VI8Ogxq8Q2Nzeccf7vF6sjfyT3S0B-XR4Wj13tRXOweySXibejXHKE8vzv_Dfty1Lxerg48xoJFTsKMKd5KC_PFl5NXPRZ3li0W6oANGVEFvf-PbBcmpMxm-_jf8O_XZgo3yUvXBRnl5UQFlQBsAsWnYd4x50ZA</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Zhao, Yihai</creator><creator>Krzic, Maja</creator><creator>Bulmer, Chuck E</creator><creator>Schmidt, Margaret G</creator><creator>Simard, Suzanne W</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height</title><author>Zhao, Yihai ; Krzic, Maja ; Bulmer, Chuck E ; Schmidt, Margaret G ; Simard, Suzanne W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-21e9d5242b369cb0c7cf6f81fa167f137db5126ae6d9c139fd91af77b7d16b683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Coniferous trees</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Soil compaction</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzic, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulmer, Chuck E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Margaret G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simard, Suzanne W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Yihai</au><au>Krzic, Maja</au><au>Bulmer, Chuck E</au><au>Schmidt, Margaret G</au><au>Simard, Suzanne W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1724</spage><epage>1735</epage><pages>1724-1735</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>Soil compaction often limits conifer regeneration on sites degraded by landings and roads, but inadequate understanding of the relationship between compaction and tree growth could lead to inappropriate soil conservation and rehabilitation efforts. We tested liquid and plastic limits, oxidizable organic matter, total carbon, particle size distribution, and iron and aluminum oxides on soil samples collected from five forest experiments in interior British Columbia. These data were used to estimate soil maximum bulk density (MBD) and relative bulk density (RBD); our objective was to relate RBD to tree growth. Height of interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Bessin) Franco) was limited when RBD was &gt;0.72. For lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) and hybrid white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.), RBDs of 0.60–0.68 corresponded to maximum height, whereas RBDs of 0.78–0.87 appeared to limit height growth. The presence of surface organic material mitigated compaction and was often associated with lower RBD. Our results illustrate the usefulness of RBD to assess compaction and suggest that soil rehabilitation should be considered on disturbed sites where soil RBD is &gt;0.80.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/X10-115</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-5067
ispartof Canadian journal of forest research, 2010-09, Vol.40 (9), p.1724-1735
issn 0045-5067
1208-6037
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A240513330
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aluminum
Coniferous trees
Density
Environmental aspects
Forestry
Growth
Organic matter
Pine trees
Plant growth
Properties
Soil compaction
Soil conservation
Soils
Trees
title Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A40%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20bulk%20density%20as%20a%20measure%20of%20compaction%20and%20its%20influence%20on%20tree%20height&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Zhao,%20Yihai&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1724&rft.epage=1735&rft.pages=1724-1735&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/X10-115&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA240513330%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755420273&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A240513330&rfr_iscdi=true