Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height
Soil compaction often limits conifer regeneration on sites degraded by landings and roads, but inadequate understanding of the relationship between compaction and tree growth could lead to inappropriate soil conservation and rehabilitation efforts. We tested liquid and plastic limits, oxidizable org...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of forest research 2010-09, Vol.40 (9), p.1724-1735 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1735 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1724 |
container_title | Canadian journal of forest research |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Zhao, Yihai Krzic, Maja Bulmer, Chuck E Schmidt, Margaret G Simard, Suzanne W |
description | Soil compaction often limits conifer regeneration on sites degraded by landings and roads, but inadequate understanding of the relationship between compaction and tree growth could lead to inappropriate soil conservation and rehabilitation efforts. We tested liquid and plastic limits, oxidizable organic matter, total carbon, particle size distribution, and iron and aluminum oxides on soil samples collected from five forest experiments in interior British Columbia. These data were used to estimate soil maximum bulk density (MBD) and relative bulk density (RBD); our objective was to relate RBD to tree growth. Height of interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Bessin) Franco) was limited when RBD was >0.72. For lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) and hybrid white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.), RBDs of 0.60–0.68 corresponded to maximum height, whereas RBDs of 0.78–0.87 appeared to limit height growth. The presence of surface organic material mitigated compaction and was often associated with lower RBD. Our results illustrate the usefulness of RBD to assess compaction and suggest that soil rehabilitation should be considered on disturbed sites where soil RBD is >0.80. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/X10-115 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A240513330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A240513330</galeid><sourcerecordid>A240513330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-21e9d5242b369cb0c7cf6f81fa167f137db5126ae6d9c139fd91af77b7d16b683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0t9r1TAUB_AiCl6n-CcYJigKnSfNbXL7OIY_BkNxc7C3kKYnvZlt0iWpbP-90Yp48fogeUg4-eR7EkhRPKVwRClr3lxRKCmt7xUrWsGm5MDE_WIFsK7LGrh4WDyK8RoAGGewKj6f46CS_YaknYevpEMXbbojKhJFRlRxDki8IdqPk9LJekeU64hNkVhnhhmdzvuOpIBItmj7bXpcPDBqiPjk13xQXL57--XkQ3n26f3pyfFZqet1lcqKYtPV1bpqGW90C1pow82GGkW5MJSJrq1pxRXyrtH5XaZrqDJCtKKjvOUbdlAcLrlT8DczxiSv_RxcbilFnVtAJVhGzxfUqwFlvrJPQenRRi2PqzXUlDEGWZV7VI8Ogxq8Q2Nzeccf7vF6sjfyT3S0B-XR4Wj13tRXOweySXibejXHKE8vzv_Dfty1Lxerg48xoJFTsKMKd5KC_PFl5NXPRZ3li0W6oANGVEFvf-PbBcmpMxm-_jf8O_XZgo3yUvXBRnl5UQFlQBsAsWnYd4x50ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755420273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhao, Yihai ; Krzic, Maja ; Bulmer, Chuck E ; Schmidt, Margaret G ; Simard, Suzanne W</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yihai ; Krzic, Maja ; Bulmer, Chuck E ; Schmidt, Margaret G ; Simard, Suzanne W</creatorcontrib><description>Soil compaction often limits conifer regeneration on sites degraded by landings and roads, but inadequate understanding of the relationship between compaction and tree growth could lead to inappropriate soil conservation and rehabilitation efforts. We tested liquid and plastic limits, oxidizable organic matter, total carbon, particle size distribution, and iron and aluminum oxides on soil samples collected from five forest experiments in interior British Columbia. These data were used to estimate soil maximum bulk density (MBD) and relative bulk density (RBD); our objective was to relate RBD to tree growth. Height of interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Bessin) Franco) was limited when RBD was >0.72. For lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) and hybrid white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.), RBDs of 0.60–0.68 corresponded to maximum height, whereas RBDs of 0.78–0.87 appeared to limit height growth. The presence of surface organic material mitigated compaction and was often associated with lower RBD. Our results illustrate the usefulness of RBD to assess compaction and suggest that soil rehabilitation should be considered on disturbed sites where soil RBD is >0.80.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/X10-115</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Coniferous trees ; Density ; Environmental aspects ; Forestry ; Growth ; Organic matter ; Pine trees ; Plant growth ; Properties ; Soil compaction ; Soil conservation ; Soils ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2010-09, Vol.40 (9), p.1724-1735</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 NRC Research Press</rights><rights>Copyright National Research Council of Canada Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-21e9d5242b369cb0c7cf6f81fa167f137db5126ae6d9c139fd91af77b7d16b683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-21e9d5242b369cb0c7cf6f81fa167f137db5126ae6d9c139fd91af77b7d16b683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzic, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulmer, Chuck E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Margaret G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simard, Suzanne W</creatorcontrib><title>Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><description>Soil compaction often limits conifer regeneration on sites degraded by landings and roads, but inadequate understanding of the relationship between compaction and tree growth could lead to inappropriate soil conservation and rehabilitation efforts. We tested liquid and plastic limits, oxidizable organic matter, total carbon, particle size distribution, and iron and aluminum oxides on soil samples collected from five forest experiments in interior British Columbia. These data were used to estimate soil maximum bulk density (MBD) and relative bulk density (RBD); our objective was to relate RBD to tree growth. Height of interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Bessin) Franco) was limited when RBD was >0.72. For lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) and hybrid white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.), RBDs of 0.60–0.68 corresponded to maximum height, whereas RBDs of 0.78–0.87 appeared to limit height growth. The presence of surface organic material mitigated compaction and was often associated with lower RBD. Our results illustrate the usefulness of RBD to assess compaction and suggest that soil rehabilitation should be considered on disturbed sites where soil RBD is >0.80.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Coniferous trees</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Soil compaction</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqV0t9r1TAUB_AiCl6n-CcYJigKnSfNbXL7OIY_BkNxc7C3kKYnvZlt0iWpbP-90Yp48fogeUg4-eR7EkhRPKVwRClr3lxRKCmt7xUrWsGm5MDE_WIFsK7LGrh4WDyK8RoAGGewKj6f46CS_YaknYevpEMXbbojKhJFRlRxDki8IdqPk9LJekeU64hNkVhnhhmdzvuOpIBItmj7bXpcPDBqiPjk13xQXL57--XkQ3n26f3pyfFZqet1lcqKYtPV1bpqGW90C1pow82GGkW5MJSJrq1pxRXyrtH5XaZrqDJCtKKjvOUbdlAcLrlT8DczxiSv_RxcbilFnVtAJVhGzxfUqwFlvrJPQenRRi2PqzXUlDEGWZV7VI8Ogxq8Q2Nzeccf7vF6sjfyT3S0B-XR4Wj13tRXOweySXibejXHKE8vzv_Dfty1Lxerg48xoJFTsKMKd5KC_PFl5NXPRZ3li0W6oANGVEFvf-PbBcmpMxm-_jf8O_XZgo3yUvXBRnl5UQFlQBsAsWnYd4x50ZA</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Zhao, Yihai</creator><creator>Krzic, Maja</creator><creator>Bulmer, Chuck E</creator><creator>Schmidt, Margaret G</creator><creator>Simard, Suzanne W</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height</title><author>Zhao, Yihai ; Krzic, Maja ; Bulmer, Chuck E ; Schmidt, Margaret G ; Simard, Suzanne W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-21e9d5242b369cb0c7cf6f81fa167f137db5126ae6d9c139fd91af77b7d16b683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Coniferous trees</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Soil compaction</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzic, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulmer, Chuck E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Margaret G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simard, Suzanne W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Yihai</au><au>Krzic, Maja</au><au>Bulmer, Chuck E</au><au>Schmidt, Margaret G</au><au>Simard, Suzanne W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1724</spage><epage>1735</epage><pages>1724-1735</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>Soil compaction often limits conifer regeneration on sites degraded by landings and roads, but inadequate understanding of the relationship between compaction and tree growth could lead to inappropriate soil conservation and rehabilitation efforts. We tested liquid and plastic limits, oxidizable organic matter, total carbon, particle size distribution, and iron and aluminum oxides on soil samples collected from five forest experiments in interior British Columbia. These data were used to estimate soil maximum bulk density (MBD) and relative bulk density (RBD); our objective was to relate RBD to tree growth. Height of interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Bessin) Franco) was limited when RBD was >0.72. For lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) and hybrid white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.), RBDs of 0.60–0.68 corresponded to maximum height, whereas RBDs of 0.78–0.87 appeared to limit height growth. The presence of surface organic material mitigated compaction and was often associated with lower RBD. Our results illustrate the usefulness of RBD to assess compaction and suggest that soil rehabilitation should be considered on disturbed sites where soil RBD is >0.80.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/X10-115</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-5067 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of forest research, 2010-09, Vol.40 (9), p.1724-1735 |
issn | 0045-5067 1208-6037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A240513330 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aluminum Coniferous trees Density Environmental aspects Forestry Growth Organic matter Pine trees Plant growth Properties Soil compaction Soil conservation Soils Trees |
title | Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its influence on tree height |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A40%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20bulk%20density%20as%20a%20measure%20of%20compaction%20and%20its%20influence%20on%20tree%20height&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Zhao,%20Yihai&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1724&rft.epage=1735&rft.pages=1724-1735&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/X10-115&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA240513330%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755420273&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A240513330&rfr_iscdi=true |