Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: experience with 142 cases in a high-volume center

Background and Purpose: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (LDP) is a minimally invasive approach that is becoming standard management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). It provides similar results when compared with open surgery. The main goal of LDP is to meet the standard of open dis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Endourology 2010, Vol.24 (9), p.1431
Hauptverfasser: Singh, Onkar, Gupta, Shilpi Singh, Hastir, Ankur, Arvind, Nand Kishore
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1431
container_title Journal of Endourology
container_volume 24
creator Singh, Onkar
Gupta, Shilpi Singh
Hastir, Ankur
Arvind, Nand Kishore
description Background and Purpose: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (LDP) is a minimally invasive approach that is becoming standard management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). It provides similar results when compared with open surgery. The main goal of LDP is to meet the standard of open dismembered pyeloplasty with reduced trauma for the patients. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the postoperative and functional results of LDP. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 142 cases of LDP performed at our center over a period of 7 years (January 2003 to December 2009) for UPJO with dilatation of the renal pelvis. Patients' profiles and perioperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters, such as time of surgery, blood loss, complications, duration of hospital stay, and outcomes of the procedure, were all evaluated and analyzed. Results: The mean operative time for LDP was 145 minutes (range 110-180 min), and the mean estimated blood loss was negligible in all patients. The mean hospital stay was 3.5 days (3-6 d). Two conversions to open surgery occurred because of difficulty to complete the anastomosis. In one patient, shock caused by bleeding from inferior epigastric vessels near the port site developed and had to be explored. The success rate was 96.8%. Conclusion: When performed by expert surgeons, LDP can safely achieve success rates that are comparable to those of open surgery described in the literature, with fewer complications and less morbidity to the patients. The few important difficulties with their management that we encountered are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/end.2010.0002
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A238094248</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A238094248</galeid><sourcerecordid>A238094248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A2380942483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVTLtOxDAQdAESx6Ok3x9I2DgRl9AhBKKgpEc-Z3PZk-O1bOfgGr4dC_EDaIp5aGaUum2wbrAf7siPtcbiEFGfqU3JdLXdDnihLlM6IDbtfdNu1PebCSZKshLYwshpoWVHkUYIJ3ISnEn5BJNEWCNlihLIHUvzsHqbWTzILuW4_uoHoK9Akclbgk_OMzSdBmsSJWAPBmbez9VR3LoQWPLl7lqdT8YluvnjK1W_PL8_vVZ74-iD_SQ5Glsw0sJWPE1c8kfd9jh0uuvbfw9-AIxmXYU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: experience with 142 cases in a high-volume center</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Singh, Onkar ; Gupta, Shilpi Singh ; Hastir, Ankur ; Arvind, Nand Kishore</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Onkar ; Gupta, Shilpi Singh ; Hastir, Ankur ; Arvind, Nand Kishore</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Purpose: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (LDP) is a minimally invasive approach that is becoming standard management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). It provides similar results when compared with open surgery. The main goal of LDP is to meet the standard of open dismembered pyeloplasty with reduced trauma for the patients. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the postoperative and functional results of LDP. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 142 cases of LDP performed at our center over a period of 7 years (January 2003 to December 2009) for UPJO with dilatation of the renal pelvis. Patients' profiles and perioperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters, such as time of surgery, blood loss, complications, duration of hospital stay, and outcomes of the procedure, were all evaluated and analyzed. Results: The mean operative time for LDP was 145 minutes (range 110-180 min), and the mean estimated blood loss was negligible in all patients. The mean hospital stay was 3.5 days (3-6 d). Two conversions to open surgery occurred because of difficulty to complete the anastomosis. In one patient, shock caused by bleeding from inferior epigastric vessels near the port site developed and had to be explored. The success rate was 96.8%. Conclusion: When performed by expert surgeons, LDP can safely achieve success rates that are comparable to those of open surgery described in the literature, with fewer complications and less morbidity to the patients. The few important difficulties with their management that we encountered are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-7790</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Laparoscopic surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Methods ; Obstructions ; Ureters</subject><ispartof>Journal of Endourology, 2010, Vol.24 (9), p.1431</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,4476,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Onkar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Shilpi Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastir, Ankur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arvind, Nand Kishore</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: experience with 142 cases in a high-volume center</title><title>Journal of Endourology</title><description>Background and Purpose: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (LDP) is a minimally invasive approach that is becoming standard management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). It provides similar results when compared with open surgery. The main goal of LDP is to meet the standard of open dismembered pyeloplasty with reduced trauma for the patients. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the postoperative and functional results of LDP. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 142 cases of LDP performed at our center over a period of 7 years (January 2003 to December 2009) for UPJO with dilatation of the renal pelvis. Patients' profiles and perioperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters, such as time of surgery, blood loss, complications, duration of hospital stay, and outcomes of the procedure, were all evaluated and analyzed. Results: The mean operative time for LDP was 145 minutes (range 110-180 min), and the mean estimated blood loss was negligible in all patients. The mean hospital stay was 3.5 days (3-6 d). Two conversions to open surgery occurred because of difficulty to complete the anastomosis. In one patient, shock caused by bleeding from inferior epigastric vessels near the port site developed and had to be explored. The success rate was 96.8%. Conclusion: When performed by expert surgeons, LDP can safely achieve success rates that are comparable to those of open surgery described in the literature, with fewer complications and less morbidity to the patients. The few important difficulties with their management that we encountered are discussed.</description><subject>Laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Obstructions</subject><subject>Ureters</subject><issn>0892-7790</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVTLtOxDAQdAESx6Ok3x9I2DgRl9AhBKKgpEc-Z3PZk-O1bOfgGr4dC_EDaIp5aGaUum2wbrAf7siPtcbiEFGfqU3JdLXdDnihLlM6IDbtfdNu1PebCSZKshLYwshpoWVHkUYIJ3ISnEn5BJNEWCNlihLIHUvzsHqbWTzILuW4_uoHoK9Akclbgk_OMzSdBmsSJWAPBmbez9VR3LoQWPLl7lqdT8YluvnjK1W_PL8_vVZ74-iD_SQ5Glsw0sJWPE1c8kfd9jh0uuvbfw9-AIxmXYU</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Singh, Onkar</creator><creator>Gupta, Shilpi Singh</creator><creator>Hastir, Ankur</creator><creator>Arvind, Nand Kishore</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: experience with 142 cases in a high-volume center</title><author>Singh, Onkar ; Gupta, Shilpi Singh ; Hastir, Ankur ; Arvind, Nand Kishore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A2380942483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Obstructions</topic><topic>Ureters</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Onkar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Shilpi Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastir, Ankur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arvind, Nand Kishore</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Onkar</au><au>Gupta, Shilpi Singh</au><au>Hastir, Ankur</au><au>Arvind, Nand Kishore</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: experience with 142 cases in a high-volume center</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Endourology</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1431</spage><pages>1431-</pages><issn>0892-7790</issn><abstract>Background and Purpose: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (LDP) is a minimally invasive approach that is becoming standard management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). It provides similar results when compared with open surgery. The main goal of LDP is to meet the standard of open dismembered pyeloplasty with reduced trauma for the patients. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the postoperative and functional results of LDP. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 142 cases of LDP performed at our center over a period of 7 years (January 2003 to December 2009) for UPJO with dilatation of the renal pelvis. Patients' profiles and perioperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters, such as time of surgery, blood loss, complications, duration of hospital stay, and outcomes of the procedure, were all evaluated and analyzed. Results: The mean operative time for LDP was 145 minutes (range 110-180 min), and the mean estimated blood loss was negligible in all patients. The mean hospital stay was 3.5 days (3-6 d). Two conversions to open surgery occurred because of difficulty to complete the anastomosis. In one patient, shock caused by bleeding from inferior epigastric vessels near the port site developed and had to be explored. The success rate was 96.8%. Conclusion: When performed by expert surgeons, LDP can safely achieve success rates that are comparable to those of open surgery described in the literature, with fewer complications and less morbidity to the patients. The few important difficulties with their management that we encountered are discussed.</abstract><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><doi>10.1089/end.2010.0002</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-7790
ispartof Journal of Endourology, 2010, Vol.24 (9), p.1431
issn 0892-7790
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A238094248
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopy
Methods
Obstructions
Ureters
title Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: experience with 142 cases in a high-volume center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T11%3A38%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20dismembered%20pyeloplasty%20for%20ureteropelvic%20junction%20obstruction:%20experience%20with%20142%20cases%20in%20a%20high-volume%20center&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Endourology&rft.au=Singh,%20Onkar&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1431&rft.pages=1431-&rft.issn=0892-7790&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/end.2010.0002&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA238094248%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A238094248&rfr_iscdi=true