Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte
This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ciência rural 2009-03, Vol.39 (2), p.522 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | por |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 522 |
container_title | Ciência rural |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi Cypriano, Lucas Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate |
description | This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P>0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P>0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P0,05) na conversao alimentar. Nenhuma diferenca (P>0,05) foi observada no rendimento e na composicao centesimal da carcaca. Com adicao do aditivo fitogenico, verificou-se aumento da saturacao dos lipidios da gordura abdominal, possivelmente, devido a menor inclusao de oleo de soja em tais dietas. Houve diferenca significativa (P |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A212210805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A212210805</galeid><sourcerecordid>A212210805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A2122108053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjk1Ow0AMhWcBEi1wB1-gZfKDmm2FQCxZsK_MxJMYEht5RiDO04syarNgi7x4kp_9vXfhVr7yzaZrd92VW6f07n29a9p25Y4v40_WgYQDYN9z5i8CTIACOGUywdMmKwym33mET9NZi5GABd5MeSKDMHL4IEl3-xNBIfICVQjl_g8LATUtFDVK0BOEooFnkhJDM0RDGfTsqGW6cZcRp0S3i1677dPj68PzZsCJDixRs2Eo09NcEoViKXXY11VdV77z982_H34BPX1m2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi ; Cypriano, Lucas ; Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creator><creatorcontrib>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi ; Cypriano, Lucas ; Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P>0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P>0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P<0.001) on ingredient consumption profile was observed between the treatments. All together, this study showed a possibility to reduce the cost of total feed used to produce a broilers or a ton of body weight by the utilization of the tested phytogenic additive. Key words: broiler chickens, phytogenic feed additive, antibiotic growth promoter. O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar a utilizacao de um aditivo fitogenico na dieta de frangos de corte. Um total de 1632 aves foram distribuidas em quatro tratamentos: controle negativo (sem antibiotico promotor de crescimento; controle positivo (com avilamicina, 100ppm + colistina, 15ppm), e dois tratamentos alternativos com 150ppm do aditivo fitogenico, um com niveis de Ca e P reduzidos (PA-R1) e outro tambem com menores niveis de energia e aminoacidos (PAR2). O experimento foi conduzido com 12 repeticoes, cada uma delas com 34 aves. As aves submetidas as dietas alternativas apresentaram peso corporal medio, intermediario aos tratamentos de controle, aos 42 dias de idade, nao se observando efeito significativo (P>0,05) na conversao alimentar. Nenhuma diferenca (P>0,05) foi observada no rendimento e na composicao centesimal da carcaca. Com adicao do aditivo fitogenico, verificou-se aumento da saturacao dos lipidios da gordura abdominal, possivelmente, devido a menor inclusao de oleo de soja em tais dietas. Houve diferenca significativa (P<0,001) no consumo de ingredientes entre os tratamentos. O conjunto dos dados mostrou que a utilizacao do aditivo fitogenico possibilita a reducao do custo da racao necessaria para produzir um frango ou uma tonelada de peso vivo. Palavras-chave: frangos de corte, aditivos fitogenicos, antibiotico promotor de crescimento.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0103-8478</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</publisher><ispartof>Ciência rural, 2009-03, Vol.39 (2), p.522</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cypriano, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creatorcontrib><title>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</title><title>Ciência rural</title><description>This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P>0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P>0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P<0.001) on ingredient consumption profile was observed between the treatments. All together, this study showed a possibility to reduce the cost of total feed used to produce a broilers or a ton of body weight by the utilization of the tested phytogenic additive. Key words: broiler chickens, phytogenic feed additive, antibiotic growth promoter. O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar a utilizacao de um aditivo fitogenico na dieta de frangos de corte. Um total de 1632 aves foram distribuidas em quatro tratamentos: controle negativo (sem antibiotico promotor de crescimento; controle positivo (com avilamicina, 100ppm + colistina, 15ppm), e dois tratamentos alternativos com 150ppm do aditivo fitogenico, um com niveis de Ca e P reduzidos (PA-R1) e outro tambem com menores niveis de energia e aminoacidos (PAR2). O experimento foi conduzido com 12 repeticoes, cada uma delas com 34 aves. As aves submetidas as dietas alternativas apresentaram peso corporal medio, intermediario aos tratamentos de controle, aos 42 dias de idade, nao se observando efeito significativo (P>0,05) na conversao alimentar. Nenhuma diferenca (P>0,05) foi observada no rendimento e na composicao centesimal da carcaca. Com adicao do aditivo fitogenico, verificou-se aumento da saturacao dos lipidios da gordura abdominal, possivelmente, devido a menor inclusao de oleo de soja em tais dietas. Houve diferenca significativa (P<0,001) no consumo de ingredientes entre os tratamentos. O conjunto dos dados mostrou que a utilizacao do aditivo fitogenico possibilita a reducao do custo da racao necessaria para produzir um frango ou uma tonelada de peso vivo. Palavras-chave: frangos de corte, aditivos fitogenicos, antibiotico promotor de crescimento.</description><issn>0103-8478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjk1Ow0AMhWcBEi1wB1-gZfKDmm2FQCxZsK_MxJMYEht5RiDO04syarNgi7x4kp_9vXfhVr7yzaZrd92VW6f07n29a9p25Y4v40_WgYQDYN9z5i8CTIACOGUywdMmKwym33mET9NZi5GABd5MeSKDMHL4IEl3-xNBIfICVQjl_g8LATUtFDVK0BOEooFnkhJDM0RDGfTsqGW6cZcRp0S3i1677dPj68PzZsCJDixRs2Eo09NcEoViKXXY11VdV77z982_H34BPX1m2Q</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</creator><creator>Cypriano, Lucas</creator><creator>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creator><general>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</title><author>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi ; Cypriano, Lucas ; Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A2122108053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cypriano, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Ciência rural</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</au><au>Cypriano, Lucas</au><au>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</atitle><jtitle>Ciência rural</jtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>522</spage><pages>522-</pages><issn>0103-8478</issn><abstract>This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P>0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P>0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P<0.001) on ingredient consumption profile was observed between the treatments. All together, this study showed a possibility to reduce the cost of total feed used to produce a broilers or a ton of body weight by the utilization of the tested phytogenic additive. Key words: broiler chickens, phytogenic feed additive, antibiotic growth promoter. O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar a utilizacao de um aditivo fitogenico na dieta de frangos de corte. Um total de 1632 aves foram distribuidas em quatro tratamentos: controle negativo (sem antibiotico promotor de crescimento; controle positivo (com avilamicina, 100ppm + colistina, 15ppm), e dois tratamentos alternativos com 150ppm do aditivo fitogenico, um com niveis de Ca e P reduzidos (PA-R1) e outro tambem com menores niveis de energia e aminoacidos (PAR2). O experimento foi conduzido com 12 repeticoes, cada uma delas com 34 aves. As aves submetidas as dietas alternativas apresentaram peso corporal medio, intermediario aos tratamentos de controle, aos 42 dias de idade, nao se observando efeito significativo (P>0,05) na conversao alimentar. Nenhuma diferenca (P>0,05) foi observada no rendimento e na composicao centesimal da carcaca. Com adicao do aditivo fitogenico, verificou-se aumento da saturacao dos lipidios da gordura abdominal, possivelmente, devido a menor inclusao de oleo de soja em tais dietas. Houve diferenca significativa (P<0,001) no consumo de ingredientes entre os tratamentos. O conjunto dos dados mostrou que a utilizacao do aditivo fitogenico possibilita a reducao do custo da racao necessaria para produzir um frango ou uma tonelada de peso vivo. Palavras-chave: frangos de corte, aditivos fitogenicos, antibiotico promotor de crescimento.</abstract><pub>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0103-8478 |
ispartof | Ciência rural, 2009-03, Vol.39 (2), p.522 |
issn | 0103-8478 |
language | por |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A212210805 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A25%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phytogenic%20additive%20as%20an%20alternative%20to%20growth%20promoters%20in%20broiler%20chickens/Aditivo%20fitogenico%20como%20alternativa%20aos%20promotores%20de%20crescimento%20em%20frangos%20de%20corte&rft.jtitle=Ci%C3%AAncia%20rural&rft.au=Scheuermann,%20Gerson%20Neudi&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=522&rft.pages=522-&rft.issn=0103-8478&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA212210805%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A212210805&rfr_iscdi=true |