Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study

We consider a class of sequential observation and selection decision problems in which applicants are interviewed one at a time, decision makers only learn the applicant's quality relative to the applicants that have been interviewed and rejected, only a single applicant is selected, and payoff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management science 2006-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1437-1449
Hauptverfasser: Bearden, J. Neil, Rapoport, Amnon, Murphy, Ryan O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1449
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1437
container_title Management science
container_volume 52
creator Bearden, J. Neil
Rapoport, Amnon
Murphy, Ryan O
description We consider a class of sequential observation and selection decision problems in which applicants are interviewed one at a time, decision makers only learn the applicant's quality relative to the applicants that have been interviewed and rejected, only a single applicant is selected, and payoffs increase in the absolute quality of the selected applicant. Compared to the optimal decision policy, which we compute numerically, results from two experiments show that subjects terminated their search too early. We competitively test three behavioral decision rules and find that a multithreshold rule, which has the same form as the optimal decision policy but is parameterized differently, best accounts for the data. Results from a probability estimation task show that subjects tend to overestimate the absolute quality of early applicants and give insufficient consideration to the yet-to-be-seen applicants.
doi_str_mv 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0535
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A152421131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A152421131</galeid><jstor_id>20110615</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A152421131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-b04692db8b603c1a47876b3699d22524c5a2b00fe22a101a72eb1286385e9d813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdGL1DAQxosouJ6--iYUQfGl6yRp0sa35bxTYeHEVXwMaZruZm3TXtK9c__7m16POxBRyjQ0_X3DfN8kyUsCS0LL4n3no1kSELAEzvijZEE4FRnnQB4nCwDKMyJBPk2exbgHgKIsxCL5ubGXB-tHp9v0ooo2XOnR9T7Vvk43trXm9uvajbv0m_a_so92sL5GQfpVH_umiR_SlU_Pfg82uA6vsc1mPNTH58mTRrfRvrg7T5If52ffTz9n64tPX05X68xwIcasglxIWldlJYAZovNpqooJKWtKOc0N17QCaCylmgDRBbUVmhWs5FbWJWEnydu57xB6NBJH1blobNtqb_tDVEzknFAuEXz9B7jvD8HjbIoSRgpGyhyhbIa2urXK-aYfgzZb623Qbe9t4_B6hbnmlKAI-eVfeHxq2znzL4EJfYzBNmrA3HQ4KgJq2qKatqimLappiyhYz4KAwZt72vmuD7folWKaU3wdsSiAwMNhSawBi-SsUCTPpdqNHbZ7c5eCjka3TdDeuPgwREkAJBXIvZq5fRz7cP-fAsHRCH8IavIcuvh_G-9mfue2u2sX5rAmYaeRdAotSDXNym4A6Z_a8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213173184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bearden, J. Neil ; Rapoport, Amnon ; Murphy, Ryan O</creator><creatorcontrib>Bearden, J. Neil ; Rapoport, Amnon ; Murphy, Ryan O</creatorcontrib><description>We consider a class of sequential observation and selection decision problems in which applicants are interviewed one at a time, decision makers only learn the applicant's quality relative to the applicants that have been interviewed and rejected, only a single applicant is selected, and payoffs increase in the absolute quality of the selected applicant. Compared to the optimal decision policy, which we compute numerically, results from two experiments show that subjects terminated their search too early. We competitively test three behavioral decision rules and find that a multithreshold rule, which has the same form as the optimal decision policy but is parameterized differently, best accounts for the data. Results from a probability estimation task show that subjects tend to overestimate the absolute quality of early applicants and give insufficient consideration to the yet-to-be-seen applicants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-1909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0535</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MSCIAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum, MD: INFORMS</publisher><subject>alternative decision rules ; Alternatives ; Applied sciences ; Behavioral decision theory ; Business studies ; Criminal solicitation ; Decision making ; Decision making models ; Decision theory ; Decision theory. Utility theory ; Enterprises ; Estimate reliability ; Exact sciences and technology ; Experimentation ; Experiments ; Heuristics ; Hiring ; Human behaviour ; Information search behavior ; Interviews ; Management science ; Operational research and scientific management ; Operational research. Management science ; Optimal policy ; optimal stopping ; Overestimates ; Personnel selection ; Probability ; Recruitment ; secretary problem ; Sequential analysis ; sequential search ; Stopping distances ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Management science, 2006-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1437-1449</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 INFORMS</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2006 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Sep 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-b04692db8b603c1a47876b3699d22524c5a2b00fe22a101a72eb1286385e9d813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-b04692db8b603c1a47876b3699d22524c5a2b00fe22a101a72eb1286385e9d813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20110615$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0535$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3679,3994,27901,27902,57992,58225,62589</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18100926$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/inmormnsc/v_3a52_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a9_3ap_3a1437-1449.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bearden, J. Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapoport, Amnon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Ryan O</creatorcontrib><title>Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study</title><title>Management science</title><description>We consider a class of sequential observation and selection decision problems in which applicants are interviewed one at a time, decision makers only learn the applicant's quality relative to the applicants that have been interviewed and rejected, only a single applicant is selected, and payoffs increase in the absolute quality of the selected applicant. Compared to the optimal decision policy, which we compute numerically, results from two experiments show that subjects terminated their search too early. We competitively test three behavioral decision rules and find that a multithreshold rule, which has the same form as the optimal decision policy but is parameterized differently, best accounts for the data. Results from a probability estimation task show that subjects tend to overestimate the absolute quality of early applicants and give insufficient consideration to the yet-to-be-seen applicants.</description><subject>alternative decision rules</subject><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Behavioral decision theory</subject><subject>Business studies</subject><subject>Criminal solicitation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Decision theory. Utility theory</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>Estimate reliability</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Hiring</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>Information search behavior</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Management science</subject><subject>Operational research and scientific management</subject><subject>Operational research. Management science</subject><subject>Optimal policy</subject><subject>optimal stopping</subject><subject>Overestimates</subject><subject>Personnel selection</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>secretary problem</subject><subject>Sequential analysis</subject><subject>sequential search</subject><subject>Stopping distances</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0025-1909</issn><issn>1526-5501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdGL1DAQxosouJ6--iYUQfGl6yRp0sa35bxTYeHEVXwMaZruZm3TXtK9c__7m16POxBRyjQ0_X3DfN8kyUsCS0LL4n3no1kSELAEzvijZEE4FRnnQB4nCwDKMyJBPk2exbgHgKIsxCL5ubGXB-tHp9v0ooo2XOnR9T7Vvk43trXm9uvajbv0m_a_so92sL5GQfpVH_umiR_SlU_Pfg82uA6vsc1mPNTH58mTRrfRvrg7T5If52ffTz9n64tPX05X68xwIcasglxIWldlJYAZovNpqooJKWtKOc0N17QCaCylmgDRBbUVmhWs5FbWJWEnydu57xB6NBJH1blobNtqb_tDVEzknFAuEXz9B7jvD8HjbIoSRgpGyhyhbIa2urXK-aYfgzZb623Qbe9t4_B6hbnmlKAI-eVfeHxq2znzL4EJfYzBNmrA3HQ4KgJq2qKatqimLappiyhYz4KAwZt72vmuD7folWKaU3wdsSiAwMNhSawBi-SsUCTPpdqNHbZ7c5eCjka3TdDeuPgwREkAJBXIvZq5fRz7cP-fAsHRCH8IavIcuvh_G-9mfue2u2sX5rAmYaeRdAotSDXNym4A6Z_a8Q</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Bearden, J. Neil</creator><creator>Rapoport, Amnon</creator><creator>Murphy, Ryan O</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study</title><author>Bearden, J. Neil ; Rapoport, Amnon ; Murphy, Ryan O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-b04692db8b603c1a47876b3699d22524c5a2b00fe22a101a72eb1286385e9d813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>alternative decision rules</topic><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Behavioral decision theory</topic><topic>Business studies</topic><topic>Criminal solicitation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Decision theory. Utility theory</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>Estimate reliability</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Hiring</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>Information search behavior</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Management science</topic><topic>Operational research and scientific management</topic><topic>Operational research. Management science</topic><topic>Optimal policy</topic><topic>optimal stopping</topic><topic>Overestimates</topic><topic>Personnel selection</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>secretary problem</topic><topic>Sequential analysis</topic><topic>sequential search</topic><topic>Stopping distances</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bearden, J. Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapoport, Amnon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Ryan O</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bearden, J. Neil</au><au>Rapoport, Amnon</au><au>Murphy, Ryan O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study</atitle><jtitle>Management science</jtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1437</spage><epage>1449</epage><pages>1437-1449</pages><issn>0025-1909</issn><eissn>1526-5501</eissn><coden>MSCIAM</coden><abstract>We consider a class of sequential observation and selection decision problems in which applicants are interviewed one at a time, decision makers only learn the applicant's quality relative to the applicants that have been interviewed and rejected, only a single applicant is selected, and payoffs increase in the absolute quality of the selected applicant. Compared to the optimal decision policy, which we compute numerically, results from two experiments show that subjects terminated their search too early. We competitively test three behavioral decision rules and find that a multithreshold rule, which has the same form as the optimal decision policy but is parameterized differently, best accounts for the data. Results from a probability estimation task show that subjects tend to overestimate the absolute quality of early applicants and give insufficient consideration to the yet-to-be-seen applicants.</abstract><cop>Linthicum, MD</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/mnsc.1060.0535</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-1909
ispartof Management science, 2006-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1437-1449
issn 0025-1909
1526-5501
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A152421131
source Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete
subjects alternative decision rules
Alternatives
Applied sciences
Behavioral decision theory
Business studies
Criminal solicitation
Decision making
Decision making models
Decision theory
Decision theory. Utility theory
Enterprises
Estimate reliability
Exact sciences and technology
Experimentation
Experiments
Heuristics
Hiring
Human behaviour
Information search behavior
Interviews
Management science
Operational research and scientific management
Operational research. Management science
Optimal policy
optimal stopping
Overestimates
Personnel selection
Probability
Recruitment
secretary problem
Sequential analysis
sequential search
Stopping distances
Studies
title Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T19%3A31%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sequential%20Observation%20and%20Selection%20with%20Rank-Dependent%20Payoffs:%20An%20Experimental%20Study&rft.jtitle=Management%20science&rft.au=Bearden,%20J.%20Neil&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1437&rft.epage=1449&rft.pages=1437-1449&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.eissn=1526-5501&rft.coden=MSCIAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0535&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pasca%3EA152421131%3C/gale_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213173184&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A152421131&rft_jstor_id=20110615&rfr_iscdi=true