Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study
We consider a class of sequential observation and selection decision problems in which applicants are interviewed one at a time, decision makers only learn the applicant's quality relative to the applicants that have been interviewed and rejected, only a single applicant is selected, and payoff...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Management science 2006-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1437-1449 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1449 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1437 |
container_title | Management science |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Bearden, J. Neil Rapoport, Amnon Murphy, Ryan O |
description | We consider a class of sequential observation and selection decision problems in which applicants are interviewed one at a time, decision makers only learn the applicant's quality relative to the applicants that have been interviewed and rejected, only a single applicant is selected, and payoffs increase in the absolute quality of the selected applicant. Compared to the optimal decision policy, which we compute numerically, results from two experiments show that subjects terminated their search too early. We competitively test three behavioral decision rules and find that a multithreshold rule, which has the same form as the optimal decision policy but is parameterized differently, best accounts for the data. Results from a probability estimation task show that subjects tend to overestimate the absolute quality of early applicants and give insufficient consideration to the yet-to-be-seen applicants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0535 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A152421131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A152421131</galeid><jstor_id>20110615</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A152421131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-b04692db8b603c1a47876b3699d22524c5a2b00fe22a101a72eb1286385e9d813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdGL1DAQxosouJ6--iYUQfGl6yRp0sa35bxTYeHEVXwMaZruZm3TXtK9c__7m16POxBRyjQ0_X3DfN8kyUsCS0LL4n3no1kSELAEzvijZEE4FRnnQB4nCwDKMyJBPk2exbgHgKIsxCL5ubGXB-tHp9v0ooo2XOnR9T7Vvk43trXm9uvajbv0m_a_so92sL5GQfpVH_umiR_SlU_Pfg82uA6vsc1mPNTH58mTRrfRvrg7T5If52ffTz9n64tPX05X68xwIcasglxIWldlJYAZovNpqooJKWtKOc0N17QCaCylmgDRBbUVmhWs5FbWJWEnydu57xB6NBJH1blobNtqb_tDVEzknFAuEXz9B7jvD8HjbIoSRgpGyhyhbIa2urXK-aYfgzZb623Qbe9t4_B6hbnmlKAI-eVfeHxq2znzL4EJfYzBNmrA3HQ4KgJq2qKatqimLappiyhYz4KAwZt72vmuD7folWKaU3wdsSiAwMNhSawBi-SsUCTPpdqNHbZ7c5eCjka3TdDeuPgwREkAJBXIvZq5fRz7cP-fAsHRCH8IavIcuvh_G-9mfue2u2sX5rAmYaeRdAotSDXNym4A6Z_a8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213173184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bearden, J. Neil ; Rapoport, Amnon ; Murphy, Ryan O</creator><creatorcontrib>Bearden, J. Neil ; Rapoport, Amnon ; Murphy, Ryan O</creatorcontrib><description>We consider a class of sequential observation and selection decision problems in which applicants are interviewed one at a time, decision makers only learn the applicant's quality relative to the applicants that have been interviewed and rejected, only a single applicant is selected, and payoffs increase in the absolute quality of the selected applicant. Compared to the optimal decision policy, which we compute numerically, results from two experiments show that subjects terminated their search too early. We competitively test three behavioral decision rules and find that a multithreshold rule, which has the same form as the optimal decision policy but is parameterized differently, best accounts for the data. Results from a probability estimation task show that subjects tend to overestimate the absolute quality of early applicants and give insufficient consideration to the yet-to-be-seen applicants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-1909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0535</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MSCIAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum, MD: INFORMS</publisher><subject>alternative decision rules ; Alternatives ; Applied sciences ; Behavioral decision theory ; Business studies ; Criminal solicitation ; Decision making ; Decision making models ; Decision theory ; Decision theory. Utility theory ; Enterprises ; Estimate reliability ; Exact sciences and technology ; Experimentation ; Experiments ; Heuristics ; Hiring ; Human behaviour ; Information search behavior ; Interviews ; Management science ; Operational research and scientific management ; Operational research. Management science ; Optimal policy ; optimal stopping ; Overestimates ; Personnel selection ; Probability ; Recruitment ; secretary problem ; Sequential analysis ; sequential search ; Stopping distances ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Management science, 2006-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1437-1449</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 INFORMS</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2006 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Sep 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-b04692db8b603c1a47876b3699d22524c5a2b00fe22a101a72eb1286385e9d813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-b04692db8b603c1a47876b3699d22524c5a2b00fe22a101a72eb1286385e9d813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20110615$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0535$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3679,3994,27901,27902,57992,58225,62589</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18100926$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/inmormnsc/v_3a52_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a9_3ap_3a1437-1449.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bearden, J. Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapoport, Amnon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Ryan O</creatorcontrib><title>Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study</title><title>Management science</title><description>We consider a class of sequential observation and selection decision problems in which applicants are interviewed one at a time, decision makers only learn the applicant's quality relative to the applicants that have been interviewed and rejected, only a single applicant is selected, and payoffs increase in the absolute quality of the selected applicant. Compared to the optimal decision policy, which we compute numerically, results from two experiments show that subjects terminated their search too early. We competitively test three behavioral decision rules and find that a multithreshold rule, which has the same form as the optimal decision policy but is parameterized differently, best accounts for the data. Results from a probability estimation task show that subjects tend to overestimate the absolute quality of early applicants and give insufficient consideration to the yet-to-be-seen applicants.</description><subject>alternative decision rules</subject><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Behavioral decision theory</subject><subject>Business studies</subject><subject>Criminal solicitation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Decision theory. Utility theory</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>Estimate reliability</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>Hiring</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>Information search behavior</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Management science</subject><subject>Operational research and scientific management</subject><subject>Operational research. Management science</subject><subject>Optimal policy</subject><subject>optimal stopping</subject><subject>Overestimates</subject><subject>Personnel selection</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>secretary problem</subject><subject>Sequential analysis</subject><subject>sequential search</subject><subject>Stopping distances</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0025-1909</issn><issn>1526-5501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdGL1DAQxosouJ6--iYUQfGl6yRp0sa35bxTYeHEVXwMaZruZm3TXtK9c__7m16POxBRyjQ0_X3DfN8kyUsCS0LL4n3no1kSELAEzvijZEE4FRnnQB4nCwDKMyJBPk2exbgHgKIsxCL5ubGXB-tHp9v0ooo2XOnR9T7Vvk43trXm9uvajbv0m_a_so92sL5GQfpVH_umiR_SlU_Pfg82uA6vsc1mPNTH58mTRrfRvrg7T5If52ffTz9n64tPX05X68xwIcasglxIWldlJYAZovNpqooJKWtKOc0N17QCaCylmgDRBbUVmhWs5FbWJWEnydu57xB6NBJH1blobNtqb_tDVEzknFAuEXz9B7jvD8HjbIoSRgpGyhyhbIa2urXK-aYfgzZb623Qbe9t4_B6hbnmlKAI-eVfeHxq2znzL4EJfYzBNmrA3HQ4KgJq2qKatqimLappiyhYz4KAwZt72vmuD7folWKaU3wdsSiAwMNhSawBi-SsUCTPpdqNHbZ7c5eCjka3TdDeuPgwREkAJBXIvZq5fRz7cP-fAsHRCH8IavIcuvh_G-9mfue2u2sX5rAmYaeRdAotSDXNym4A6Z_a8Q</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Bearden, J. Neil</creator><creator>Rapoport, Amnon</creator><creator>Murphy, Ryan O</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study</title><author>Bearden, J. Neil ; Rapoport, Amnon ; Murphy, Ryan O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-b04692db8b603c1a47876b3699d22524c5a2b00fe22a101a72eb1286385e9d813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>alternative decision rules</topic><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Behavioral decision theory</topic><topic>Business studies</topic><topic>Criminal solicitation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Decision theory. Utility theory</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>Estimate reliability</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>Hiring</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>Information search behavior</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Management science</topic><topic>Operational research and scientific management</topic><topic>Operational research. Management science</topic><topic>Optimal policy</topic><topic>optimal stopping</topic><topic>Overestimates</topic><topic>Personnel selection</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>secretary problem</topic><topic>Sequential analysis</topic><topic>sequential search</topic><topic>Stopping distances</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bearden, J. Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapoport, Amnon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Ryan O</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bearden, J. Neil</au><au>Rapoport, Amnon</au><au>Murphy, Ryan O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study</atitle><jtitle>Management science</jtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1437</spage><epage>1449</epage><pages>1437-1449</pages><issn>0025-1909</issn><eissn>1526-5501</eissn><coden>MSCIAM</coden><abstract>We consider a class of sequential observation and selection decision problems in which applicants are interviewed one at a time, decision makers only learn the applicant's quality relative to the applicants that have been interviewed and rejected, only a single applicant is selected, and payoffs increase in the absolute quality of the selected applicant. Compared to the optimal decision policy, which we compute numerically, results from two experiments show that subjects terminated their search too early. We competitively test three behavioral decision rules and find that a multithreshold rule, which has the same form as the optimal decision policy but is parameterized differently, best accounts for the data. Results from a probability estimation task show that subjects tend to overestimate the absolute quality of early applicants and give insufficient consideration to the yet-to-be-seen applicants.</abstract><cop>Linthicum, MD</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/mnsc.1060.0535</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-1909 |
ispartof | Management science, 2006-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1437-1449 |
issn | 0025-1909 1526-5501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A152421131 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete |
subjects | alternative decision rules Alternatives Applied sciences Behavioral decision theory Business studies Criminal solicitation Decision making Decision making models Decision theory Decision theory. Utility theory Enterprises Estimate reliability Exact sciences and technology Experimentation Experiments Heuristics Hiring Human behaviour Information search behavior Interviews Management science Operational research and scientific management Operational research. Management science Optimal policy optimal stopping Overestimates Personnel selection Probability Recruitment secretary problem Sequential analysis sequential search Stopping distances Studies |
title | Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T19%3A31%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sequential%20Observation%20and%20Selection%20with%20Rank-Dependent%20Payoffs:%20An%20Experimental%20Study&rft.jtitle=Management%20science&rft.au=Bearden,%20J.%20Neil&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1437&rft.epage=1449&rft.pages=1437-1449&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.eissn=1526-5501&rft.coden=MSCIAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0535&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pasca%3EA152421131%3C/gale_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213173184&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A152421131&rft_jstor_id=20110615&rfr_iscdi=true |