Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages
•Neural variations in the processing of CSR by each consumer profile were identified.•Reluctant consumers show greater activation related to negative value and aversion.•Habitual consumers do not show greater negative or positive action.•These findings reveal the limited effect of CSR messages on co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business research 2021-03, Vol.126, p.99-112 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 112 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Journal of business research |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto Sánchez-Fernández, Juan |
description | •Neural variations in the processing of CSR by each consumer profile were identified.•Reluctant consumers show greater activation related to negative value and aversion.•Habitual consumers do not show greater negative or positive action.•These findings reveal the limited effect of CSR messages on consumer responses.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is progressively gaining in relevance in business management. CSR messages aimed at consumers have nonetheless not bolstered sales. Given this, the current study, a first of this type, turned to neuroimaging to evaluate the neural mechanisms involved when processing CSR messages (responsible business practices messages) among two opposing consumer profiles, notably those that avoid purchasing socially responsible products (reluctant consumers) and those that purchase them habitually (habitual consumers). The findings of the neural study reveal variations in the processing of CSR messages by each profile, results that were not identified through self-reports. CSR messages generate stronger neural activation among reluctant consumers in brain regions linked to negative value and aversion (the putamen and the ACC). CSR messages among habitual consumers, in turn, do not generate negative or positive neural reactions. The findings are then discussed from the perspective of deliberative and automated decision-making processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A652022548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A652022548</galeid><els_id>S0148296320308730</els_id><sourcerecordid>A652022548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4bcc05492305cac619b23f72f25fea52be70dcff3dba1937b0e6d11d9f8f87da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhesUvxI4mTVVVVPCpVIFFYW44zDo6apLIdHn-Po3bPakYz917NHIRuKVlQQvP7dtFWo3fgF4ywOGMLkqZnaEYLwRNRiuIczQhNi4SVOb9EV963hEQlKWao23hsA1Y9BucGh8OA9dB1Y2-1CoDXuze8Cy62jQW_xC8wOrXHtTUGHPQaPFbd0DfR1PuxA-fx9yf0-OCGuPM2bqaILvaqAX-NLozae7g51Tn6eHx4Xz8n29enzXq1TTQXLCRppTXJ0pJxkmmlc1pWjBvBDMsMqIxVIEitjeF1pWjJRUUgrymtS1OYQtSKz9HdMbdRe5C2j9cF-AmNGr2XcpVnERTL0iIKs6NQu8FHhEYenO2U-5WUyAmubOUJrpzgSspkhBt9y6MP4hdfFpz02k48autAB1kP9p-EP0tgh20</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto ; Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam ; Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto ; Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creator><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto ; Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam ; Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto ; Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creatorcontrib><description>•Neural variations in the processing of CSR by each consumer profile were identified.•Reluctant consumers show greater activation related to negative value and aversion.•Habitual consumers do not show greater negative or positive action.•These findings reveal the limited effect of CSR messages on consumer responses.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is progressively gaining in relevance in business management. CSR messages aimed at consumers have nonetheless not bolstered sales. Given this, the current study, a first of this type, turned to neuroimaging to evaluate the neural mechanisms involved when processing CSR messages (responsible business practices messages) among two opposing consumer profiles, notably those that avoid purchasing socially responsible products (reluctant consumers) and those that purchase them habitually (habitual consumers). The findings of the neural study reveal variations in the processing of CSR messages by each profile, results that were not identified through self-reports. CSR messages generate stronger neural activation among reluctant consumers in brain regions linked to negative value and aversion (the putamen and the ACC). CSR messages among habitual consumers, in turn, do not generate negative or positive neural reactions. The findings are then discussed from the perspective of deliberative and automated decision-making processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-2963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Consumer behavior ; Consumer neuroscience ; Corporate social responsibility ; CSR messages ; Fair-trade ; Habits ; Marketing research ; Neurosciences ; Personal orientation ; Responsible business practices</subject><ispartof>Journal of business research, 2021-03, Vol.126, p.99-112</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4bcc05492305cac619b23f72f25fea52be70dcff3dba1937b0e6d11d9f8f87da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4bcc05492305cac619b23f72f25fea52be70dcff3dba1937b0e6d11d9f8f87da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creatorcontrib><title>Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages</title><title>Journal of business research</title><description>•Neural variations in the processing of CSR by each consumer profile were identified.•Reluctant consumers show greater activation related to negative value and aversion.•Habitual consumers do not show greater negative or positive action.•These findings reveal the limited effect of CSR messages on consumer responses.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is progressively gaining in relevance in business management. CSR messages aimed at consumers have nonetheless not bolstered sales. Given this, the current study, a first of this type, turned to neuroimaging to evaluate the neural mechanisms involved when processing CSR messages (responsible business practices messages) among two opposing consumer profiles, notably those that avoid purchasing socially responsible products (reluctant consumers) and those that purchase them habitually (habitual consumers). The findings of the neural study reveal variations in the processing of CSR messages by each profile, results that were not identified through self-reports. CSR messages generate stronger neural activation among reluctant consumers in brain regions linked to negative value and aversion (the putamen and the ACC). CSR messages among habitual consumers, in turn, do not generate negative or positive neural reactions. The findings are then discussed from the perspective of deliberative and automated decision-making processes.</description><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer neuroscience</subject><subject>Corporate social responsibility</subject><subject>CSR messages</subject><subject>Fair-trade</subject><subject>Habits</subject><subject>Marketing research</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Personal orientation</subject><subject>Responsible business practices</subject><issn>0148-2963</issn><issn>1873-7978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhesUvxI4mTVVVVPCpVIFFYW44zDo6apLIdHn-Po3bPakYz917NHIRuKVlQQvP7dtFWo3fgF4ywOGMLkqZnaEYLwRNRiuIczQhNi4SVOb9EV963hEQlKWao23hsA1Y9BucGh8OA9dB1Y2-1CoDXuze8Cy62jQW_xC8wOrXHtTUGHPQaPFbd0DfR1PuxA-fx9yf0-OCGuPM2bqaILvaqAX-NLozae7g51Tn6eHx4Xz8n29enzXq1TTQXLCRppTXJ0pJxkmmlc1pWjBvBDMsMqIxVIEitjeF1pWjJRUUgrymtS1OYQtSKz9HdMbdRe5C2j9cF-AmNGr2XcpVnERTL0iIKs6NQu8FHhEYenO2U-5WUyAmubOUJrpzgSspkhBt9y6MP4hdfFpz02k48autAB1kP9p-EP0tgh20</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto</creator><creator>Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam</creator><creator>Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto</creator><creator>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages</title><author>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto ; Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam ; Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto ; Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4bcc05492305cac619b23f72f25fea52be70dcff3dba1937b0e6d11d9f8f87da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer neuroscience</topic><topic>Corporate social responsibility</topic><topic>CSR messages</topic><topic>Fair-trade</topic><topic>Habits</topic><topic>Marketing research</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Personal orientation</topic><topic>Responsible business practices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto</au><au>Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam</au><au>Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto</au><au>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><spage>99</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>99-112</pages><issn>0148-2963</issn><eissn>1873-7978</eissn><abstract>•Neural variations in the processing of CSR by each consumer profile were identified.•Reluctant consumers show greater activation related to negative value and aversion.•Habitual consumers do not show greater negative or positive action.•These findings reveal the limited effect of CSR messages on consumer responses.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is progressively gaining in relevance in business management. CSR messages aimed at consumers have nonetheless not bolstered sales. Given this, the current study, a first of this type, turned to neuroimaging to evaluate the neural mechanisms involved when processing CSR messages (responsible business practices messages) among two opposing consumer profiles, notably those that avoid purchasing socially responsible products (reluctant consumers) and those that purchase them habitually (habitual consumers). The findings of the neural study reveal variations in the processing of CSR messages by each profile, results that were not identified through self-reports. CSR messages generate stronger neural activation among reluctant consumers in brain regions linked to negative value and aversion (the putamen and the ACC). CSR messages among habitual consumers, in turn, do not generate negative or positive neural reactions. The findings are then discussed from the perspective of deliberative and automated decision-making processes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.044</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-2963 |
ispartof | Journal of business research, 2021-03, Vol.126, p.99-112 |
issn | 0148-2963 1873-7978 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A652022548 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Consumer behavior Consumer neuroscience Corporate social responsibility CSR messages Fair-trade Habits Marketing research Neurosciences Personal orientation Responsible business practices |
title | Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A00%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20it%20an%20error%20to%20communicate%20CSR%20Strategies?%20Neural%20differences%20among%20consumers%20when%20processing%20CSR%20messages&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20research&rft.au=Guerrero%20Medina,%20Carlos%20Alberto&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=126&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=99-112&rft.issn=0148-2963&rft.eissn=1873-7978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.044&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA652022548%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A652022548&rft_els_id=S0148296320308730&rfr_iscdi=true |