Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages

•Neural variations in the processing of CSR by each consumer profile were identified.•Reluctant consumers show greater activation related to negative value and aversion.•Habitual consumers do not show greater negative or positive action.•These findings reveal the limited effect of CSR messages on co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of business research 2021-03, Vol.126, p.99-112
Hauptverfasser: Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto, Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam, Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto, Sánchez-Fernández, Juan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 112
container_issue
container_start_page 99
container_title Journal of business research
container_volume 126
creator Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto
Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam
Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto
Sánchez-Fernández, Juan
description •Neural variations in the processing of CSR by each consumer profile were identified.•Reluctant consumers show greater activation related to negative value and aversion.•Habitual consumers do not show greater negative or positive action.•These findings reveal the limited effect of CSR messages on consumer responses. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is progressively gaining in relevance in business management. CSR messages aimed at consumers have nonetheless not bolstered sales. Given this, the current study, a first of this type, turned to neuroimaging to evaluate the neural mechanisms involved when processing CSR messages (responsible business practices messages) among two opposing consumer profiles, notably those that avoid purchasing socially responsible products (reluctant consumers) and those that purchase them habitually (habitual consumers). The findings of the neural study reveal variations in the processing of CSR messages by each profile, results that were not identified through self-reports. CSR messages generate stronger neural activation among reluctant consumers in brain regions linked to negative value and aversion (the putamen and the ACC). CSR messages among habitual consumers, in turn, do not generate negative or positive neural reactions. The findings are then discussed from the perspective of deliberative and automated decision-making processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A652022548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A652022548</galeid><els_id>S0148296320308730</els_id><sourcerecordid>A652022548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4bcc05492305cac619b23f72f25fea52be70dcff3dba1937b0e6d11d9f8f87da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhesUvxI4mTVVVVPCpVIFFYW44zDo6apLIdHn-Po3bPakYz917NHIRuKVlQQvP7dtFWo3fgF4ywOGMLkqZnaEYLwRNRiuIczQhNi4SVOb9EV963hEQlKWao23hsA1Y9BucGh8OA9dB1Y2-1CoDXuze8Cy62jQW_xC8wOrXHtTUGHPQaPFbd0DfR1PuxA-fx9yf0-OCGuPM2bqaILvaqAX-NLozae7g51Tn6eHx4Xz8n29enzXq1TTQXLCRppTXJ0pJxkmmlc1pWjBvBDMsMqIxVIEitjeF1pWjJRUUgrymtS1OYQtSKz9HdMbdRe5C2j9cF-AmNGr2XcpVnERTL0iIKs6NQu8FHhEYenO2U-5WUyAmubOUJrpzgSspkhBt9y6MP4hdfFpz02k48autAB1kP9p-EP0tgh20</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto ; Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam ; Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto ; Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creator><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto ; Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam ; Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto ; Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creatorcontrib><description>•Neural variations in the processing of CSR by each consumer profile were identified.•Reluctant consumers show greater activation related to negative value and aversion.•Habitual consumers do not show greater negative or positive action.•These findings reveal the limited effect of CSR messages on consumer responses. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is progressively gaining in relevance in business management. CSR messages aimed at consumers have nonetheless not bolstered sales. Given this, the current study, a first of this type, turned to neuroimaging to evaluate the neural mechanisms involved when processing CSR messages (responsible business practices messages) among two opposing consumer profiles, notably those that avoid purchasing socially responsible products (reluctant consumers) and those that purchase them habitually (habitual consumers). The findings of the neural study reveal variations in the processing of CSR messages by each profile, results that were not identified through self-reports. CSR messages generate stronger neural activation among reluctant consumers in brain regions linked to negative value and aversion (the putamen and the ACC). CSR messages among habitual consumers, in turn, do not generate negative or positive neural reactions. The findings are then discussed from the perspective of deliberative and automated decision-making processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-2963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Consumer behavior ; Consumer neuroscience ; Corporate social responsibility ; CSR messages ; Fair-trade ; Habits ; Marketing research ; Neurosciences ; Personal orientation ; Responsible business practices</subject><ispartof>Journal of business research, 2021-03, Vol.126, p.99-112</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4bcc05492305cac619b23f72f25fea52be70dcff3dba1937b0e6d11d9f8f87da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4bcc05492305cac619b23f72f25fea52be70dcff3dba1937b0e6d11d9f8f87da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creatorcontrib><title>Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages</title><title>Journal of business research</title><description>•Neural variations in the processing of CSR by each consumer profile were identified.•Reluctant consumers show greater activation related to negative value and aversion.•Habitual consumers do not show greater negative or positive action.•These findings reveal the limited effect of CSR messages on consumer responses. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is progressively gaining in relevance in business management. CSR messages aimed at consumers have nonetheless not bolstered sales. Given this, the current study, a first of this type, turned to neuroimaging to evaluate the neural mechanisms involved when processing CSR messages (responsible business practices messages) among two opposing consumer profiles, notably those that avoid purchasing socially responsible products (reluctant consumers) and those that purchase them habitually (habitual consumers). The findings of the neural study reveal variations in the processing of CSR messages by each profile, results that were not identified through self-reports. CSR messages generate stronger neural activation among reluctant consumers in brain regions linked to negative value and aversion (the putamen and the ACC). CSR messages among habitual consumers, in turn, do not generate negative or positive neural reactions. The findings are then discussed from the perspective of deliberative and automated decision-making processes.</description><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer neuroscience</subject><subject>Corporate social responsibility</subject><subject>CSR messages</subject><subject>Fair-trade</subject><subject>Habits</subject><subject>Marketing research</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Personal orientation</subject><subject>Responsible business practices</subject><issn>0148-2963</issn><issn>1873-7978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhesUvxI4mTVVVVPCpVIFFYW44zDo6apLIdHn-Po3bPakYz917NHIRuKVlQQvP7dtFWo3fgF4ywOGMLkqZnaEYLwRNRiuIczQhNi4SVOb9EV963hEQlKWao23hsA1Y9BucGh8OA9dB1Y2-1CoDXuze8Cy62jQW_xC8wOrXHtTUGHPQaPFbd0DfR1PuxA-fx9yf0-OCGuPM2bqaILvaqAX-NLozae7g51Tn6eHx4Xz8n29enzXq1TTQXLCRppTXJ0pJxkmmlc1pWjBvBDMsMqIxVIEitjeF1pWjJRUUgrymtS1OYQtSKz9HdMbdRe5C2j9cF-AmNGr2XcpVnERTL0iIKs6NQu8FHhEYenO2U-5WUyAmubOUJrpzgSspkhBt9y6MP4hdfFpz02k48autAB1kP9p-EP0tgh20</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto</creator><creator>Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam</creator><creator>Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto</creator><creator>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages</title><author>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto ; Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam ; Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto ; Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4bcc05492305cac619b23f72f25fea52be70dcff3dba1937b0e6d11d9f8f87da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer neuroscience</topic><topic>Corporate social responsibility</topic><topic>CSR messages</topic><topic>Fair-trade</topic><topic>Habits</topic><topic>Marketing research</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Personal orientation</topic><topic>Responsible business practices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guerrero Medina, Carlos Alberto</au><au>Martínez-Fiestas, Myriam</au><au>Casado Aranda, Luis Alberto</au><au>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><spage>99</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>99-112</pages><issn>0148-2963</issn><eissn>1873-7978</eissn><abstract>•Neural variations in the processing of CSR by each consumer profile were identified.•Reluctant consumers show greater activation related to negative value and aversion.•Habitual consumers do not show greater negative or positive action.•These findings reveal the limited effect of CSR messages on consumer responses. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is progressively gaining in relevance in business management. CSR messages aimed at consumers have nonetheless not bolstered sales. Given this, the current study, a first of this type, turned to neuroimaging to evaluate the neural mechanisms involved when processing CSR messages (responsible business practices messages) among two opposing consumer profiles, notably those that avoid purchasing socially responsible products (reluctant consumers) and those that purchase them habitually (habitual consumers). The findings of the neural study reveal variations in the processing of CSR messages by each profile, results that were not identified through self-reports. CSR messages generate stronger neural activation among reluctant consumers in brain regions linked to negative value and aversion (the putamen and the ACC). CSR messages among habitual consumers, in turn, do not generate negative or positive neural reactions. The findings are then discussed from the perspective of deliberative and automated decision-making processes.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.044</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-2963
ispartof Journal of business research, 2021-03, Vol.126, p.99-112
issn 0148-2963
1873-7978
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A652022548
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Consumer behavior
Consumer neuroscience
Corporate social responsibility
CSR messages
Fair-trade
Habits
Marketing research
Neurosciences
Personal orientation
Responsible business practices
title Is it an error to communicate CSR Strategies? Neural differences among consumers when processing CSR messages
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A00%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20it%20an%20error%20to%20communicate%20CSR%20Strategies?%20Neural%20differences%20among%20consumers%20when%20processing%20CSR%20messages&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20research&rft.au=Guerrero%20Medina,%20Carlos%20Alberto&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=126&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=99-112&rft.issn=0148-2963&rft.eissn=1873-7978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.044&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA652022548%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A652022548&rft_els_id=S0148296320308730&rfr_iscdi=true