Differential effects of pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity on prosocial behavior
This research conceptualizes the distinction between pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity tendency from a construal level perspective, and examines such differences in three studies. Study 1 develops Pay-It-Forward Tendency scale and validates it in both the U.S. and India. Study 2 uses the scale t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business research 2020-12, Vol.121, p.400-408 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 408 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 400 |
container_title | Journal of business research |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Yang, Zhiyong Janakiraman, Narayan Hossain, Mehdi T. Grisaffe, Douglas B. |
description | This research conceptualizes the distinction between pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity tendency from a construal level perspective, and examines such differences in three studies. Study 1 develops Pay-It-Forward Tendency scale and validates it in both the U.S. and India. Study 2 uses the scale to gather data from software engineers in both the U.S. and India, showing that Indian software professionals have a lower pay-it-forward (vs. direct-reciprocity) tendency, which in turn leads to more pay-it-forward behavior, whereas American software professionals have similar levels of pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity tendency. Consistent with the construal level account, Study 3 shows that individuals high (vs. low) in direct-reciprocity have lower preferences for charitable causes with delayed (vs. immediate) impact, whereas those high and low in pay-it-forward show equal preferences for these causes. Similarly, donation intention-behavior consistency is positively related to pay-it-forward, but negatively associated with direct-reciprocity. Theoretical contributions and managerial implications of these findings are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.050 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A648516931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A648516931</galeid><els_id>S0148296318306027</els_id><sourcerecordid>A648516931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fc38341f2ea87f943ebbb897330eb39abcaa99ed47048e0c5b1e992216b0b71b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhZsUuYifOwV6gqT6kSC2Bt2c6kOCpJZaeF_j2uwp7NPDRzr2YOY9cIGQJWt13WmV3wFLIcUGSIGZRwwmYoap7WshanbAZYiDSXFT9nFyF0AJADiBl7u3dtS5760elNQrG2Y0iGNtnqQ-rGtB38t_ZNovsmaZyP0zQGt_WDdeMhGfokliE2UW3oU-_d4C_ZWas3ga7-8px9PD68L5_T1evTy3KxSm2BMlpbLniBbU5a1K0sOBljhKw5BzJcamO1lpKaooZCENjSIEmZ51gZMDUaPmc3k-9ab0i53g79SD_jWu9CUGpRFaLESnKMi-W0aOOtEVSrtt59aX9QCOqIUHXqD6E6IlSIKiKMurtJR_GLvSOvgnXUW5pIqGZw_zj8Au6gfig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential effects of pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity on prosocial behavior</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Yang, Zhiyong ; Janakiraman, Narayan ; Hossain, Mehdi T. ; Grisaffe, Douglas B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhiyong ; Janakiraman, Narayan ; Hossain, Mehdi T. ; Grisaffe, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><description>This research conceptualizes the distinction between pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity tendency from a construal level perspective, and examines such differences in three studies. Study 1 develops Pay-It-Forward Tendency scale and validates it in both the U.S. and India. Study 2 uses the scale to gather data from software engineers in both the U.S. and India, showing that Indian software professionals have a lower pay-it-forward (vs. direct-reciprocity) tendency, which in turn leads to more pay-it-forward behavior, whereas American software professionals have similar levels of pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity tendency. Consistent with the construal level account, Study 3 shows that individuals high (vs. low) in direct-reciprocity have lower preferences for charitable causes with delayed (vs. immediate) impact, whereas those high and low in pay-it-forward show equal preferences for these causes. Similarly, donation intention-behavior consistency is positively related to pay-it-forward, but negatively associated with direct-reciprocity. Theoretical contributions and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-2963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Business schools ; Construal level ; Cross-cultural ; Direct-reciprocity ; Pay-it-forward ; Sales promotions ; Scale development ; Travel industry</subject><ispartof>Journal of business research, 2020-12, Vol.121, p.400-408</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fc38341f2ea87f943ebbb897330eb39abcaa99ed47048e0c5b1e992216b0b71b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fc38341f2ea87f943ebbb897330eb39abcaa99ed47048e0c5b1e992216b0b71b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.050$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janakiraman, Narayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossain, Mehdi T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grisaffe, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><title>Differential effects of pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity on prosocial behavior</title><title>Journal of business research</title><description>This research conceptualizes the distinction between pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity tendency from a construal level perspective, and examines such differences in three studies. Study 1 develops Pay-It-Forward Tendency scale and validates it in both the U.S. and India. Study 2 uses the scale to gather data from software engineers in both the U.S. and India, showing that Indian software professionals have a lower pay-it-forward (vs. direct-reciprocity) tendency, which in turn leads to more pay-it-forward behavior, whereas American software professionals have similar levels of pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity tendency. Consistent with the construal level account, Study 3 shows that individuals high (vs. low) in direct-reciprocity have lower preferences for charitable causes with delayed (vs. immediate) impact, whereas those high and low in pay-it-forward show equal preferences for these causes. Similarly, donation intention-behavior consistency is positively related to pay-it-forward, but negatively associated with direct-reciprocity. Theoretical contributions and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Business schools</subject><subject>Construal level</subject><subject>Cross-cultural</subject><subject>Direct-reciprocity</subject><subject>Pay-it-forward</subject><subject>Sales promotions</subject><subject>Scale development</subject><subject>Travel industry</subject><issn>0148-2963</issn><issn>1873-7978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhZsUuYifOwV6gqT6kSC2Bt2c6kOCpJZaeF_j2uwp7NPDRzr2YOY9cIGQJWt13WmV3wFLIcUGSIGZRwwmYoap7WshanbAZYiDSXFT9nFyF0AJADiBl7u3dtS5760elNQrG2Y0iGNtnqQ-rGtB38t_ZNovsmaZyP0zQGt_WDdeMhGfokliE2UW3oU-_d4C_ZWas3ga7-8px9PD68L5_T1evTy3KxSm2BMlpbLniBbU5a1K0sOBljhKw5BzJcamO1lpKaooZCENjSIEmZ51gZMDUaPmc3k-9ab0i53g79SD_jWu9CUGpRFaLESnKMi-W0aOOtEVSrtt59aX9QCOqIUHXqD6E6IlSIKiKMurtJR_GLvSOvgnXUW5pIqGZw_zj8Au6gfig</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Yang, Zhiyong</creator><creator>Janakiraman, Narayan</creator><creator>Hossain, Mehdi T.</creator><creator>Grisaffe, Douglas B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Differential effects of pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity on prosocial behavior</title><author>Yang, Zhiyong ; Janakiraman, Narayan ; Hossain, Mehdi T. ; Grisaffe, Douglas B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fc38341f2ea87f943ebbb897330eb39abcaa99ed47048e0c5b1e992216b0b71b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Business schools</topic><topic>Construal level</topic><topic>Cross-cultural</topic><topic>Direct-reciprocity</topic><topic>Pay-it-forward</topic><topic>Sales promotions</topic><topic>Scale development</topic><topic>Travel industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janakiraman, Narayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossain, Mehdi T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grisaffe, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Zhiyong</au><au>Janakiraman, Narayan</au><au>Hossain, Mehdi T.</au><au>Grisaffe, Douglas B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential effects of pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity on prosocial behavior</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>121</volume><spage>400</spage><epage>408</epage><pages>400-408</pages><issn>0148-2963</issn><eissn>1873-7978</eissn><abstract>This research conceptualizes the distinction between pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity tendency from a construal level perspective, and examines such differences in three studies. Study 1 develops Pay-It-Forward Tendency scale and validates it in both the U.S. and India. Study 2 uses the scale to gather data from software engineers in both the U.S. and India, showing that Indian software professionals have a lower pay-it-forward (vs. direct-reciprocity) tendency, which in turn leads to more pay-it-forward behavior, whereas American software professionals have similar levels of pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity tendency. Consistent with the construal level account, Study 3 shows that individuals high (vs. low) in direct-reciprocity have lower preferences for charitable causes with delayed (vs. immediate) impact, whereas those high and low in pay-it-forward show equal preferences for these causes. Similarly, donation intention-behavior consistency is positively related to pay-it-forward, but negatively associated with direct-reciprocity. Theoretical contributions and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.050</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-2963 |
ispartof | Journal of business research, 2020-12, Vol.121, p.400-408 |
issn | 0148-2963 1873-7978 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A648516931 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Analysis Business schools Construal level Cross-cultural Direct-reciprocity Pay-it-forward Sales promotions Scale development Travel industry |
title | Differential effects of pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity on prosocial behavior |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T04%3A46%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20effects%20of%20pay-it-forward%20and%20direct-reciprocity%20on%20prosocial%20behavior&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20research&rft.au=Yang,%20Zhiyong&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=400&rft.epage=408&rft.pages=400-408&rft.issn=0148-2963&rft.eissn=1873-7978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.050&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA648516931%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A648516931&rft_els_id=S0148296318306027&rfr_iscdi=true |