Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks?

This paper examines the differences in the behaviors of high (HIT) and low inventory turnover (LIT) retailers in responding to demand shocks. We identify quantity and price responsiveness as two mediating mechanisms that distinguish how high and low inventory turnover retailers manage demand shocks....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Manufacturing & service operations management 2016-03, Vol.18 (2), p.198-215
Hauptverfasser: Kesavan, Saravanan, Kushwaha, Tarun, Gaur, Vishal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 215
container_issue 2
container_start_page 198
container_title Manufacturing & service operations management
container_volume 18
creator Kesavan, Saravanan
Kushwaha, Tarun
Gaur, Vishal
description This paper examines the differences in the behaviors of high (HIT) and low inventory turnover (LIT) retailers in responding to demand shocks. We identify quantity and price responsiveness as two mediating mechanisms that distinguish how high and low inventory turnover retailers manage demand shocks. Using quarterly firm-level data of 183 U.S. retailers between 1985 and 2012, we find that HIT retailers are able to respond quickly by changing their purchase quantities in response to demand shocks, whereas LIT retailers primarily rely on price changes to manage demand shocks. In addition, we examine the differential implications of these mechanisms on the financial performance of HIT and LIT retailers. We find price responsiveness to be a less effective strategy, compared to quantity responsiveness, in reducing excesses and shortages of inventory. Finally, the negative financial impact of a given amount of excess and shortage of inventory is eight times more severe for LIT retailers compared to HIT retailers.
doi_str_mv 10.1287/msom.2015.0571
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A453293065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453293065</galeid><sourcerecordid>A453293065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-99fbceca3aa375bd04e515fb8e2f0af3263c97ddc9b16b28df533e58de813ad83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt1r2zAUxc1YYV261z0bBnuaU31Ytvw0SrM2hUChH89Clq9Sd7aV6Spd899XbgppIFAEV_fhd67ORSdJvlMypUyWpz26fsoIFVMiSvopOaaCFZnIK_n5tedZXtD8S_IV8ZEQQiVhx8nNzKXzdvmQ6qFJF-5_ejU8wRCc36R3az-4J_DpDQTdduAxdrhyEZy11oKPXLdJg0tn0I_y2wdn_uLvk-TI6g7h29s9Se4v_tydz7PF9eXV-dkiMwWRIasqWxswmmvNS1E3JAdBha0lMEu05azgpiqbxlQ1LWomGys4ByEbkJTrRvJJ8mM7d-XdvzVgUI8uWo5PKlaUkpKyLIsdtdQdqHawLnht-haNOssFZxUnhYhUdoBawgBed24AG_ff56cH-Hga6FtzUPBzTxCZAM9hqdeIah_89Q6s19gOgLFg_KSAW_6QEeMdogerVr7ttd8oStQYCzXGQo2xUGMsdpuOpn2PH_Evb3O3ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678107776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks?</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Kesavan, Saravanan ; Kushwaha, Tarun ; Gaur, Vishal</creator><creatorcontrib>Kesavan, Saravanan ; Kushwaha, Tarun ; Gaur, Vishal</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the differences in the behaviors of high (HIT) and low inventory turnover (LIT) retailers in responding to demand shocks. We identify quantity and price responsiveness as two mediating mechanisms that distinguish how high and low inventory turnover retailers manage demand shocks. Using quarterly firm-level data of 183 U.S. retailers between 1985 and 2012, we find that HIT retailers are able to respond quickly by changing their purchase quantities in response to demand shocks, whereas LIT retailers primarily rely on price changes to manage demand shocks. In addition, we examine the differential implications of these mechanisms on the financial performance of HIT and LIT retailers. We find price responsiveness to be a less effective strategy, compared to quantity responsiveness, in reducing excesses and shortages of inventory. Finally, the negative financial impact of a given amount of excess and shortage of inventory is eight times more severe for LIT retailers compared to HIT retailers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-4614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/msom.2015.0571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Analysis ; demand shock ; econometric analyses ; Economic aspects ; financial performance ; Forecasts and trends ; Inventory ; Inventory management ; inventory turnover ; Prices ; Prices and rates ; Retail stores ; retailing ; Retailing industry ; Stocks ; Supply chains ; Turnover</subject><ispartof>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management, 2016-03, Vol.18 (2), p.198-215</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Spring 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-99fbceca3aa375bd04e515fb8e2f0af3263c97ddc9b16b28df533e58de813ad83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-99fbceca3aa375bd04e515fb8e2f0af3263c97ddc9b16b28df533e58de813ad83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/msom.2015.0571$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3679,27905,27906,62595</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kesavan, Saravanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushwaha, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaur, Vishal</creatorcontrib><title>Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks?</title><title>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management</title><description>This paper examines the differences in the behaviors of high (HIT) and low inventory turnover (LIT) retailers in responding to demand shocks. We identify quantity and price responsiveness as two mediating mechanisms that distinguish how high and low inventory turnover retailers manage demand shocks. Using quarterly firm-level data of 183 U.S. retailers between 1985 and 2012, we find that HIT retailers are able to respond quickly by changing their purchase quantities in response to demand shocks, whereas LIT retailers primarily rely on price changes to manage demand shocks. In addition, we examine the differential implications of these mechanisms on the financial performance of HIT and LIT retailers. We find price responsiveness to be a less effective strategy, compared to quantity responsiveness, in reducing excesses and shortages of inventory. Finally, the negative financial impact of a given amount of excess and shortage of inventory is eight times more severe for LIT retailers compared to HIT retailers.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>demand shock</subject><subject>econometric analyses</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>financial performance</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Inventory management</subject><subject>inventory turnover</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Prices and rates</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>retailing</subject><subject>Retailing industry</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Turnover</subject><issn>1523-4614</issn><issn>1526-5498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt1r2zAUxc1YYV261z0bBnuaU31Ytvw0SrM2hUChH89Clq9Sd7aV6Spd899XbgppIFAEV_fhd67ORSdJvlMypUyWpz26fsoIFVMiSvopOaaCFZnIK_n5tedZXtD8S_IV8ZEQQiVhx8nNzKXzdvmQ6qFJF-5_ejU8wRCc36R3az-4J_DpDQTdduAxdrhyEZy11oKPXLdJg0tn0I_y2wdn_uLvk-TI6g7h29s9Se4v_tydz7PF9eXV-dkiMwWRIasqWxswmmvNS1E3JAdBha0lMEu05azgpiqbxlQ1LWomGys4ByEbkJTrRvJJ8mM7d-XdvzVgUI8uWo5PKlaUkpKyLIsdtdQdqHawLnht-haNOssFZxUnhYhUdoBawgBed24AG_ff56cH-Hga6FtzUPBzTxCZAM9hqdeIah_89Q6s19gOgLFg_KSAW_6QEeMdogerVr7ttd8oStQYCzXGQo2xUGMsdpuOpn2PH_Evb3O3ig</recordid><startdate>20160322</startdate><enddate>20160322</enddate><creator>Kesavan, Saravanan</creator><creator>Kushwaha, Tarun</creator><creator>Gaur, Vishal</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160322</creationdate><title>Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks?</title><author>Kesavan, Saravanan ; Kushwaha, Tarun ; Gaur, Vishal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-99fbceca3aa375bd04e515fb8e2f0af3263c97ddc9b16b28df533e58de813ad83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>demand shock</topic><topic>econometric analyses</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>financial performance</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Inventory management</topic><topic>inventory turnover</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Prices and rates</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>retailing</topic><topic>Retailing industry</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Turnover</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kesavan, Saravanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushwaha, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaur, Vishal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><jtitle>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kesavan, Saravanan</au><au>Kushwaha, Tarun</au><au>Gaur, Vishal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks?</atitle><jtitle>Manufacturing &amp; service operations management</jtitle><date>2016-03-22</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>198-215</pages><issn>1523-4614</issn><eissn>1526-5498</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the differences in the behaviors of high (HIT) and low inventory turnover (LIT) retailers in responding to demand shocks. We identify quantity and price responsiveness as two mediating mechanisms that distinguish how high and low inventory turnover retailers manage demand shocks. Using quarterly firm-level data of 183 U.S. retailers between 1985 and 2012, we find that HIT retailers are able to respond quickly by changing their purchase quantities in response to demand shocks, whereas LIT retailers primarily rely on price changes to manage demand shocks. In addition, we examine the differential implications of these mechanisms on the financial performance of HIT and LIT retailers. We find price responsiveness to be a less effective strategy, compared to quantity responsiveness, in reducing excesses and shortages of inventory. Finally, the negative financial impact of a given amount of excess and shortage of inventory is eight times more severe for LIT retailers compared to HIT retailers.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/msom.2015.0571</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1523-4614
ispartof Manufacturing & service operations management, 2016-03, Vol.18 (2), p.198-215
issn 1523-4614
1526-5498
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A453293065
source INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete
subjects Analysis
demand shock
econometric analyses
Economic aspects
financial performance
Forecasts and trends
Inventory
Inventory management
inventory turnover
Prices
Prices and rates
Retail stores
retailing
Retailing industry
Stocks
Supply chains
Turnover
title Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A23%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20High%20and%20Low%20Inventory%20Turnover%20Retailers%20Respond%20Differently%20to%20Demand%20Shocks?&rft.jtitle=Manufacturing%20&%20service%20operations%20management&rft.au=Kesavan,%20Saravanan&rft.date=2016-03-22&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=198-215&rft.issn=1523-4614&rft.eissn=1526-5498&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/msom.2015.0571&rft_dat=%3Cgale_infor%3EA453293065%3C/gale_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678107776&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A453293065&rfr_iscdi=true