Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks?
This paper examines the differences in the behaviors of high (HIT) and low inventory turnover (LIT) retailers in responding to demand shocks. We identify quantity and price responsiveness as two mediating mechanisms that distinguish how high and low inventory turnover retailers manage demand shocks....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Manufacturing & service operations management 2016-03, Vol.18 (2), p.198-215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 215 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | Manufacturing & service operations management |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Kesavan, Saravanan Kushwaha, Tarun Gaur, Vishal |
description | This paper examines the differences in the behaviors of high (HIT) and low inventory turnover (LIT) retailers in responding to demand shocks. We identify quantity and price responsiveness as two mediating mechanisms that distinguish how high and low inventory turnover retailers manage demand shocks. Using quarterly firm-level data of 183 U.S. retailers between 1985 and 2012, we find that HIT retailers are able to respond quickly by changing their purchase quantities in response to demand shocks, whereas LIT retailers primarily rely on price changes to manage demand shocks. In addition, we examine the differential implications of these mechanisms on the financial performance of HIT and LIT retailers. We find price responsiveness to be a less effective strategy, compared to quantity responsiveness, in reducing excesses and shortages of inventory. Finally, the negative financial impact of a given amount of excess and shortage of inventory is eight times more severe for LIT retailers compared to HIT retailers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/msom.2015.0571 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A453293065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453293065</galeid><sourcerecordid>A453293065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-99fbceca3aa375bd04e515fb8e2f0af3263c97ddc9b16b28df533e58de813ad83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt1r2zAUxc1YYV261z0bBnuaU31Ytvw0SrM2hUChH89Clq9Sd7aV6Spd899XbgppIFAEV_fhd67ORSdJvlMypUyWpz26fsoIFVMiSvopOaaCFZnIK_n5tedZXtD8S_IV8ZEQQiVhx8nNzKXzdvmQ6qFJF-5_ejU8wRCc36R3az-4J_DpDQTdduAxdrhyEZy11oKPXLdJg0tn0I_y2wdn_uLvk-TI6g7h29s9Se4v_tydz7PF9eXV-dkiMwWRIasqWxswmmvNS1E3JAdBha0lMEu05azgpiqbxlQ1LWomGys4ByEbkJTrRvJJ8mM7d-XdvzVgUI8uWo5PKlaUkpKyLIsdtdQdqHawLnht-haNOssFZxUnhYhUdoBawgBed24AG_ff56cH-Hga6FtzUPBzTxCZAM9hqdeIah_89Q6s19gOgLFg_KSAW_6QEeMdogerVr7ttd8oStQYCzXGQo2xUGMsdpuOpn2PH_Evb3O3ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678107776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks?</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Kesavan, Saravanan ; Kushwaha, Tarun ; Gaur, Vishal</creator><creatorcontrib>Kesavan, Saravanan ; Kushwaha, Tarun ; Gaur, Vishal</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the differences in the behaviors of high (HIT) and low inventory turnover (LIT) retailers in responding to demand shocks. We identify quantity and price responsiveness as two mediating mechanisms that distinguish how high and low inventory turnover retailers manage demand shocks. Using quarterly firm-level data of 183 U.S. retailers between 1985 and 2012, we find that HIT retailers are able to respond quickly by changing their purchase quantities in response to demand shocks, whereas LIT retailers primarily rely on price changes to manage demand shocks. In addition, we examine the differential implications of these mechanisms on the financial performance of HIT and LIT retailers. We find price responsiveness to be a less effective strategy, compared to quantity responsiveness, in reducing excesses and shortages of inventory. Finally, the negative financial impact of a given amount of excess and shortage of inventory is eight times more severe for LIT retailers compared to HIT retailers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-4614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/msom.2015.0571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Analysis ; demand shock ; econometric analyses ; Economic aspects ; financial performance ; Forecasts and trends ; Inventory ; Inventory management ; inventory turnover ; Prices ; Prices and rates ; Retail stores ; retailing ; Retailing industry ; Stocks ; Supply chains ; Turnover</subject><ispartof>Manufacturing & service operations management, 2016-03, Vol.18 (2), p.198-215</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Spring 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-99fbceca3aa375bd04e515fb8e2f0af3263c97ddc9b16b28df533e58de813ad83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-99fbceca3aa375bd04e515fb8e2f0af3263c97ddc9b16b28df533e58de813ad83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/msom.2015.0571$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3679,27905,27906,62595</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kesavan, Saravanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushwaha, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaur, Vishal</creatorcontrib><title>Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks?</title><title>Manufacturing & service operations management</title><description>This paper examines the differences in the behaviors of high (HIT) and low inventory turnover (LIT) retailers in responding to demand shocks. We identify quantity and price responsiveness as two mediating mechanisms that distinguish how high and low inventory turnover retailers manage demand shocks. Using quarterly firm-level data of 183 U.S. retailers between 1985 and 2012, we find that HIT retailers are able to respond quickly by changing their purchase quantities in response to demand shocks, whereas LIT retailers primarily rely on price changes to manage demand shocks. In addition, we examine the differential implications of these mechanisms on the financial performance of HIT and LIT retailers. We find price responsiveness to be a less effective strategy, compared to quantity responsiveness, in reducing excesses and shortages of inventory. Finally, the negative financial impact of a given amount of excess and shortage of inventory is eight times more severe for LIT retailers compared to HIT retailers.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>demand shock</subject><subject>econometric analyses</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>financial performance</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Inventory management</subject><subject>inventory turnover</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Prices and rates</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>retailing</subject><subject>Retailing industry</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Turnover</subject><issn>1523-4614</issn><issn>1526-5498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt1r2zAUxc1YYV261z0bBnuaU31Ytvw0SrM2hUChH89Clq9Sd7aV6Spd899XbgppIFAEV_fhd67ORSdJvlMypUyWpz26fsoIFVMiSvopOaaCFZnIK_n5tedZXtD8S_IV8ZEQQiVhx8nNzKXzdvmQ6qFJF-5_ejU8wRCc36R3az-4J_DpDQTdduAxdrhyEZy11oKPXLdJg0tn0I_y2wdn_uLvk-TI6g7h29s9Se4v_tydz7PF9eXV-dkiMwWRIasqWxswmmvNS1E3JAdBha0lMEu05azgpiqbxlQ1LWomGys4ByEbkJTrRvJJ8mM7d-XdvzVgUI8uWo5PKlaUkpKyLIsdtdQdqHawLnht-haNOssFZxUnhYhUdoBawgBed24AG_ff56cH-Hga6FtzUPBzTxCZAM9hqdeIah_89Q6s19gOgLFg_KSAW_6QEeMdogerVr7ttd8oStQYCzXGQo2xUGMsdpuOpn2PH_Evb3O3ig</recordid><startdate>20160322</startdate><enddate>20160322</enddate><creator>Kesavan, Saravanan</creator><creator>Kushwaha, Tarun</creator><creator>Gaur, Vishal</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160322</creationdate><title>Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks?</title><author>Kesavan, Saravanan ; Kushwaha, Tarun ; Gaur, Vishal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-99fbceca3aa375bd04e515fb8e2f0af3263c97ddc9b16b28df533e58de813ad83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>demand shock</topic><topic>econometric analyses</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>financial performance</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Inventory management</topic><topic>inventory turnover</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Prices and rates</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>retailing</topic><topic>Retailing industry</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Turnover</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kesavan, Saravanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushwaha, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaur, Vishal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><jtitle>Manufacturing & service operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kesavan, Saravanan</au><au>Kushwaha, Tarun</au><au>Gaur, Vishal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks?</atitle><jtitle>Manufacturing & service operations management</jtitle><date>2016-03-22</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>198-215</pages><issn>1523-4614</issn><eissn>1526-5498</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the differences in the behaviors of high (HIT) and low inventory turnover (LIT) retailers in responding to demand shocks. We identify quantity and price responsiveness as two mediating mechanisms that distinguish how high and low inventory turnover retailers manage demand shocks. Using quarterly firm-level data of 183 U.S. retailers between 1985 and 2012, we find that HIT retailers are able to respond quickly by changing their purchase quantities in response to demand shocks, whereas LIT retailers primarily rely on price changes to manage demand shocks. In addition, we examine the differential implications of these mechanisms on the financial performance of HIT and LIT retailers. We find price responsiveness to be a less effective strategy, compared to quantity responsiveness, in reducing excesses and shortages of inventory. Finally, the negative financial impact of a given amount of excess and shortage of inventory is eight times more severe for LIT retailers compared to HIT retailers.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/msom.2015.0571</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1523-4614 |
ispartof | Manufacturing & service operations management, 2016-03, Vol.18 (2), p.198-215 |
issn | 1523-4614 1526-5498 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_incontextgauss__A453293065 |
source | INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Analysis demand shock econometric analyses Economic aspects financial performance Forecasts and trends Inventory Inventory management inventory turnover Prices Prices and rates Retail stores retailing Retailing industry Stocks Supply chains Turnover |
title | Do High and Low Inventory Turnover Retailers Respond Differently to Demand Shocks? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A23%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20High%20and%20Low%20Inventory%20Turnover%20Retailers%20Respond%20Differently%20to%20Demand%20Shocks?&rft.jtitle=Manufacturing%20&%20service%20operations%20management&rft.au=Kesavan,%20Saravanan&rft.date=2016-03-22&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=198-215&rft.issn=1523-4614&rft.eissn=1526-5498&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/msom.2015.0571&rft_dat=%3Cgale_infor%3EA453293065%3C/gale_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678107776&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A453293065&rfr_iscdi=true |