Establishing the measurement and psychometrics of medical student feedback literacy
Current feedback models advocate learner autonomy in seeking, processing, and responding to feedback so that medical students can become feedback-literate. Feedback literacy improves learners' motivation, engagement, and satisfaction, which in turn enhance their competencies. However, there is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2024-11, Vol.19 (11), p.e0313332 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0313332 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Mohd Noor, Mohamad Nabil Cockburn, Jessica Grace Foong, Chan Choong Thiam, Chiann Ni Abdul Aziz, Yang Faridah Hong, Wei-Han Pallath, Vinod Vadivelu, Jamuna |
description | Current feedback models advocate learner autonomy in seeking, processing, and responding to feedback so that medical students can become feedback-literate. Feedback literacy improves learners' motivation, engagement, and satisfaction, which in turn enhance their competencies. However, there is a lack of an objective method of measuring medical student feedback literacy in the empirical literature. Such an instrument is required to determine the level of feedback literacy amongst medical students and whether they would benefit from an intervention. Therefore, this research protocol addresses the methodology aimed at the development of a comprehensive instrument for medical student feedback literacy, which is divided into three phases, beginning with a systematic review. Available instruments in health profession education will be examined to create an interview protocol to define medical students' feedback literacy from the perspectives of medical students, educators, and patients. A thematic analysis will form the basis for item generation, which will subsequently undergo expert validation and cognitive interviews to establish content validity. Next, we will conduct a national survey to gather evidence of construct validity, internal consistency, hypothesis testing, and test-retest reliability. In the final phase, we will distribute the instrument to other countries in an international survey to assess its cross-cultural validity. This protocol will help develop an instrument that can assist educators in assessing student feedback literacy and evaluating their behavior in terms of managing feedback. Ultimately, educators can identify strengths, and improve communication with students, as well as feedback literacy and the feedback process. In conclusion, this study protocol outlined a systematic, evidence-based methodology to develop a medical student feedback literacy instrument. This study protocol will not only apply to medical and local cultural contexts, but it has the potential for application in other educational disciplines and cross-cultural studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0313332 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A815164630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A815164630</galeid><sourcerecordid>A815164630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g990-9cd1c72e823765b33b53d997e6573a21c09210422d74fedcc883535471671a843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFzM9LwzAYxvEgCs7pf-ChJ8FDZ5K3TdrjGHMOBgM3vI40eftjZsloUnD_vYoe5snT8z18eAi5Z3TCQLKnvR96p-zk6B1OKDAA4BdkxErgqeAULs_6mtyEsKc0h0KIEdnMQ1SV7ULbuSaJLSYHVGHo8YAuJsqZ5BhOuvUHjH2nQ-LrL2A6rWwS4mC-UY1oKqXfE9tF7JU-3ZKrWtmAd787Jtvn-Xb2kq7Wi-VsukqbsqRpqQ3TkmPBQYq8AqhyMGUpUeQSFGealpzRjHMjsxqN1kUBOeSZZEIyVWQwJo8_t42yuOuc9i7iR2zUEMJuuXndTQuWM5EJoP_Y9dtf-3BmW1Q2tsHbIXbehXP4CT1xcOM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishing the measurement and psychometrics of medical student feedback literacy</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Mohd Noor, Mohamad Nabil ; Cockburn, Jessica Grace ; Foong, Chan Choong ; Thiam, Chiann Ni ; Abdul Aziz, Yang Faridah ; Hong, Wei-Han ; Pallath, Vinod ; Vadivelu, Jamuna</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohd Noor, Mohamad Nabil ; Cockburn, Jessica Grace ; Foong, Chan Choong ; Thiam, Chiann Ni ; Abdul Aziz, Yang Faridah ; Hong, Wei-Han ; Pallath, Vinod ; Vadivelu, Jamuna</creatorcontrib><description>Current feedback models advocate learner autonomy in seeking, processing, and responding to feedback so that medical students can become feedback-literate. Feedback literacy improves learners' motivation, engagement, and satisfaction, which in turn enhance their competencies. However, there is a lack of an objective method of measuring medical student feedback literacy in the empirical literature. Such an instrument is required to determine the level of feedback literacy amongst medical students and whether they would benefit from an intervention. Therefore, this research protocol addresses the methodology aimed at the development of a comprehensive instrument for medical student feedback literacy, which is divided into three phases, beginning with a systematic review. Available instruments in health profession education will be examined to create an interview protocol to define medical students' feedback literacy from the perspectives of medical students, educators, and patients. A thematic analysis will form the basis for item generation, which will subsequently undergo expert validation and cognitive interviews to establish content validity. Next, we will conduct a national survey to gather evidence of construct validity, internal consistency, hypothesis testing, and test-retest reliability. In the final phase, we will distribute the instrument to other countries in an international survey to assess its cross-cultural validity. This protocol will help develop an instrument that can assist educators in assessing student feedback literacy and evaluating their behavior in terms of managing feedback. Ultimately, educators can identify strengths, and improve communication with students, as well as feedback literacy and the feedback process. In conclusion, this study protocol outlined a systematic, evidence-based methodology to develop a medical student feedback literacy instrument. This study protocol will not only apply to medical and local cultural contexts, but it has the potential for application in other educational disciplines and cross-cultural studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313332</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Clinical competence ; Curricula ; Evaluation ; Feedback (Psychology) ; Health aspects ; Literacy ; Literacy programs ; Malaysia ; Measurement ; Medical colleges ; Medical students ; Psychological aspects ; Psychometrics ; Publishing industry ; Social aspects ; Study and teaching ; United States</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-11, Vol.19 (11), p.e0313332</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohd Noor, Mohamad Nabil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cockburn, Jessica Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foong, Chan Choong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiam, Chiann Ni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Aziz, Yang Faridah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Wei-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallath, Vinod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vadivelu, Jamuna</creatorcontrib><title>Establishing the measurement and psychometrics of medical student feedback literacy</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Current feedback models advocate learner autonomy in seeking, processing, and responding to feedback so that medical students can become feedback-literate. Feedback literacy improves learners' motivation, engagement, and satisfaction, which in turn enhance their competencies. However, there is a lack of an objective method of measuring medical student feedback literacy in the empirical literature. Such an instrument is required to determine the level of feedback literacy amongst medical students and whether they would benefit from an intervention. Therefore, this research protocol addresses the methodology aimed at the development of a comprehensive instrument for medical student feedback literacy, which is divided into three phases, beginning with a systematic review. Available instruments in health profession education will be examined to create an interview protocol to define medical students' feedback literacy from the perspectives of medical students, educators, and patients. A thematic analysis will form the basis for item generation, which will subsequently undergo expert validation and cognitive interviews to establish content validity. Next, we will conduct a national survey to gather evidence of construct validity, internal consistency, hypothesis testing, and test-retest reliability. In the final phase, we will distribute the instrument to other countries in an international survey to assess its cross-cultural validity. This protocol will help develop an instrument that can assist educators in assessing student feedback literacy and evaluating their behavior in terms of managing feedback. Ultimately, educators can identify strengths, and improve communication with students, as well as feedback literacy and the feedback process. In conclusion, this study protocol outlined a systematic, evidence-based methodology to develop a medical student feedback literacy instrument. This study protocol will not only apply to medical and local cultural contexts, but it has the potential for application in other educational disciplines and cross-cultural studies.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Clinical competence</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feedback (Psychology)</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Literacy programs</subject><subject>Malaysia</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical colleges</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Publishing industry</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFzM9LwzAYxvEgCs7pf-ChJ8FDZ5K3TdrjGHMOBgM3vI40eftjZsloUnD_vYoe5snT8z18eAi5Z3TCQLKnvR96p-zk6B1OKDAA4BdkxErgqeAULs_6mtyEsKc0h0KIEdnMQ1SV7ULbuSaJLSYHVGHo8YAuJsqZ5BhOuvUHjH2nQ-LrL2A6rWwS4mC-UY1oKqXfE9tF7JU-3ZKrWtmAd787Jtvn-Xb2kq7Wi-VsukqbsqRpqQ3TkmPBQYq8AqhyMGUpUeQSFGealpzRjHMjsxqN1kUBOeSZZEIyVWQwJo8_t42yuOuc9i7iR2zUEMJuuXndTQuWM5EJoP_Y9dtf-3BmW1Q2tsHbIXbehXP4CT1xcOM</recordid><startdate>20241107</startdate><enddate>20241107</enddate><creator>Mohd Noor, Mohamad Nabil</creator><creator>Cockburn, Jessica Grace</creator><creator>Foong, Chan Choong</creator><creator>Thiam, Chiann Ni</creator><creator>Abdul Aziz, Yang Faridah</creator><creator>Hong, Wei-Han</creator><creator>Pallath, Vinod</creator><creator>Vadivelu, Jamuna</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241107</creationdate><title>Establishing the measurement and psychometrics of medical student feedback literacy</title><author>Mohd Noor, Mohamad Nabil ; Cockburn, Jessica Grace ; Foong, Chan Choong ; Thiam, Chiann Ni ; Abdul Aziz, Yang Faridah ; Hong, Wei-Han ; Pallath, Vinod ; Vadivelu, Jamuna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g990-9cd1c72e823765b33b53d997e6573a21c09210422d74fedcc883535471671a843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Clinical competence</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feedback (Psychology)</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Literacy programs</topic><topic>Malaysia</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical colleges</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Publishing industry</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohd Noor, Mohamad Nabil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cockburn, Jessica Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foong, Chan Choong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiam, Chiann Ni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Aziz, Yang Faridah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Wei-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallath, Vinod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vadivelu, Jamuna</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohd Noor, Mohamad Nabil</au><au>Cockburn, Jessica Grace</au><au>Foong, Chan Choong</au><au>Thiam, Chiann Ni</au><au>Abdul Aziz, Yang Faridah</au><au>Hong, Wei-Han</au><au>Pallath, Vinod</au><au>Vadivelu, Jamuna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishing the measurement and psychometrics of medical student feedback literacy</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2024-11-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0313332</spage><pages>e0313332-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Current feedback models advocate learner autonomy in seeking, processing, and responding to feedback so that medical students can become feedback-literate. Feedback literacy improves learners' motivation, engagement, and satisfaction, which in turn enhance their competencies. However, there is a lack of an objective method of measuring medical student feedback literacy in the empirical literature. Such an instrument is required to determine the level of feedback literacy amongst medical students and whether they would benefit from an intervention. Therefore, this research protocol addresses the methodology aimed at the development of a comprehensive instrument for medical student feedback literacy, which is divided into three phases, beginning with a systematic review. Available instruments in health profession education will be examined to create an interview protocol to define medical students' feedback literacy from the perspectives of medical students, educators, and patients. A thematic analysis will form the basis for item generation, which will subsequently undergo expert validation and cognitive interviews to establish content validity. Next, we will conduct a national survey to gather evidence of construct validity, internal consistency, hypothesis testing, and test-retest reliability. In the final phase, we will distribute the instrument to other countries in an international survey to assess its cross-cultural validity. This protocol will help develop an instrument that can assist educators in assessing student feedback literacy and evaluating their behavior in terms of managing feedback. Ultimately, educators can identify strengths, and improve communication with students, as well as feedback literacy and the feedback process. In conclusion, this study protocol outlined a systematic, evidence-based methodology to develop a medical student feedback literacy instrument. This study protocol will not only apply to medical and local cultural contexts, but it has the potential for application in other educational disciplines and cross-cultural studies.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0313332</doi><tpages>e0313332</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2024-11, Vol.19 (11), p.e0313332 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A815164630 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Analysis Clinical competence Curricula Evaluation Feedback (Psychology) Health aspects Literacy Literacy programs Malaysia Measurement Medical colleges Medical students Psychological aspects Psychometrics Publishing industry Social aspects Study and teaching United States |
title | Establishing the measurement and psychometrics of medical student feedback literacy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T06%3A01%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishing%20the%20measurement%20and%20psychometrics%20of%20medical%20student%20feedback%20literacy&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Mohd%20Noor,%20Mohamad%20Nabil&rft.date=2024-11-07&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0313332&rft.pages=e0313332-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0313332&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA815164630%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A815164630&rfr_iscdi=true |