Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature-based interventions
Several systematic reviews support the use of nature-based interventions (NBIs) as a mechanism of enhancing mental health and wellbeing. However, the available evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions is fragmentary and mixed. The heterogeneity of existing evidence and significant fragm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0273139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0273139 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Shrestha, Topaz Chi, Cheryl Voon Yi Cassarino, Marica Foley, Sarah Di Blasi, Zelda |
description | Several systematic reviews support the use of nature-based interventions (NBIs) as a mechanism of enhancing mental health and wellbeing. However, the available evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions is fragmentary and mixed. The heterogeneity of existing evidence and significant fragmentation of knowledge within the field make it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness of NBIs. This mixed method umbrella review aims to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of nature-based interventions through a summative review of existing published systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A systematic search in PsycINFO, PubMed, Greenfile, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Academic Search Complete (EBSCO), Environment Complete (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Health Policy Reference Centre and Google Scholar will be performed from inception to present. The search strategy will aim to find published systematic reviews of nature-based interventions (NBIs) where improving health and wellbeing is an explicit goal. This is a mixed method review, and systematic reviews with both quantitative and qualitative data synthesis will be considered. Two authors will independently perform the literature search, record screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of each included systematic review and meta-analysis. The individual qualitative and quantitative syntheses will be conducted in parallel and combined in an overarching narrative synthesis. The quantitative evidence will be used to assess the strength and direction of the effect of nature-based interventions on mental health and wellbeing outcomes. Evidence drawn from qualitative studies will be analysed and synthesised to understand the various pathways to engagement, involvement process and experiential factors that may mediate experiences. The risk of bias of the systematic reviews will be assessed using a 16-item Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) checklist. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0273139 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A757995842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A757995842</galeid><sourcerecordid>A757995842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g992-1bc3193f035b707e7f9f679ae037824e84cadc123a804c64e1297a21458537953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFz01LxDAQBuAgCq6r_8BDT4KH1nw2zXEpri4sLOjitaTZSdslJNKk4s-3qIf15GkG5uHlHYRuCS4Ik-ThGKbRa1e8Bw8FppIRps7QgihG85Jidn6yX6KrGI8YC1aV5QLVa21SGGM2eOsm8GbwXZZ6yMBaMGn4AA8xZsFmXqdphLzVEQ6zTjDOtzQEH6_RhdUuws3vXKL9-nFfP-fb3dOmXm3zTimak9awuYXFTLQSS5BW2VIqDZjJinKouNEHQyjTFeam5ECokpoSLirBpBJsie5_YjvtoBm8CXOJz9TpKcZm8_rSrKSQSomK03_s7u2vvTuxPWiX-hjc9P3bKfwCWxJrdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature-based interventions</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Shrestha, Topaz ; Chi, Cheryl Voon Yi ; Cassarino, Marica ; Foley, Sarah ; Di Blasi, Zelda</creator><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, Topaz ; Chi, Cheryl Voon Yi ; Cassarino, Marica ; Foley, Sarah ; Di Blasi, Zelda</creatorcontrib><description>Several systematic reviews support the use of nature-based interventions (NBIs) as a mechanism of enhancing mental health and wellbeing. However, the available evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions is fragmentary and mixed. The heterogeneity of existing evidence and significant fragmentation of knowledge within the field make it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness of NBIs. This mixed method umbrella review aims to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of nature-based interventions through a summative review of existing published systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A systematic search in PsycINFO, PubMed, Greenfile, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Academic Search Complete (EBSCO), Environment Complete (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Health Policy Reference Centre and Google Scholar will be performed from inception to present. The search strategy will aim to find published systematic reviews of nature-based interventions (NBIs) where improving health and wellbeing is an explicit goal. This is a mixed method review, and systematic reviews with both quantitative and qualitative data synthesis will be considered. Two authors will independently perform the literature search, record screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of each included systematic review and meta-analysis. The individual qualitative and quantitative syntheses will be conducted in parallel and combined in an overarching narrative synthesis. The quantitative evidence will be used to assess the strength and direction of the effect of nature-based interventions on mental health and wellbeing outcomes. Evidence drawn from qualitative studies will be analysed and synthesised to understand the various pathways to engagement, involvement process and experiential factors that may mediate experiences. The risk of bias of the systematic reviews will be assessed using a 16-item Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) checklist.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Care and treatment ; Mental health ; Nature ; Psychological aspects</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0273139</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, Topaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Cheryl Voon Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassarino, Marica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Blasi, Zelda</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature-based interventions</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Several systematic reviews support the use of nature-based interventions (NBIs) as a mechanism of enhancing mental health and wellbeing. However, the available evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions is fragmentary and mixed. The heterogeneity of existing evidence and significant fragmentation of knowledge within the field make it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness of NBIs. This mixed method umbrella review aims to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of nature-based interventions through a summative review of existing published systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A systematic search in PsycINFO, PubMed, Greenfile, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Academic Search Complete (EBSCO), Environment Complete (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Health Policy Reference Centre and Google Scholar will be performed from inception to present. The search strategy will aim to find published systematic reviews of nature-based interventions (NBIs) where improving health and wellbeing is an explicit goal. This is a mixed method review, and systematic reviews with both quantitative and qualitative data synthesis will be considered. Two authors will independently perform the literature search, record screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of each included systematic review and meta-analysis. The individual qualitative and quantitative syntheses will be conducted in parallel and combined in an overarching narrative synthesis. The quantitative evidence will be used to assess the strength and direction of the effect of nature-based interventions on mental health and wellbeing outcomes. Evidence drawn from qualitative studies will be analysed and synthesised to understand the various pathways to engagement, involvement process and experiential factors that may mediate experiences. The risk of bias of the systematic reviews will be assessed using a 16-item Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) checklist.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFz01LxDAQBuAgCq6r_8BDT4KH1nw2zXEpri4sLOjitaTZSdslJNKk4s-3qIf15GkG5uHlHYRuCS4Ik-ThGKbRa1e8Bw8FppIRps7QgihG85Jidn6yX6KrGI8YC1aV5QLVa21SGGM2eOsm8GbwXZZ6yMBaMGn4AA8xZsFmXqdphLzVEQ6zTjDOtzQEH6_RhdUuws3vXKL9-nFfP-fb3dOmXm3zTimak9awuYXFTLQSS5BW2VIqDZjJinKouNEHQyjTFeam5ECokpoSLirBpBJsie5_YjvtoBm8CXOJz9TpKcZm8_rSrKSQSomK03_s7u2vvTuxPWiX-hjc9P3bKfwCWxJrdg</recordid><startdate>20230721</startdate><enddate>20230721</enddate><creator>Shrestha, Topaz</creator><creator>Chi, Cheryl Voon Yi</creator><creator>Cassarino, Marica</creator><creator>Foley, Sarah</creator><creator>Di Blasi, Zelda</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230721</creationdate><title>Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature-based interventions</title><author>Shrestha, Topaz ; Chi, Cheryl Voon Yi ; Cassarino, Marica ; Foley, Sarah ; Di Blasi, Zelda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g992-1bc3193f035b707e7f9f679ae037824e84cadc123a804c64e1297a21458537953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, Topaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Cheryl Voon Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassarino, Marica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Blasi, Zelda</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shrestha, Topaz</au><au>Chi, Cheryl Voon Yi</au><au>Cassarino, Marica</au><au>Foley, Sarah</au><au>Di Blasi, Zelda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature-based interventions</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2023-07-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0273139</spage><pages>e0273139-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Several systematic reviews support the use of nature-based interventions (NBIs) as a mechanism of enhancing mental health and wellbeing. However, the available evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions is fragmentary and mixed. The heterogeneity of existing evidence and significant fragmentation of knowledge within the field make it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness of NBIs. This mixed method umbrella review aims to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of nature-based interventions through a summative review of existing published systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A systematic search in PsycINFO, PubMed, Greenfile, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Academic Search Complete (EBSCO), Environment Complete (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Health Policy Reference Centre and Google Scholar will be performed from inception to present. The search strategy will aim to find published systematic reviews of nature-based interventions (NBIs) where improving health and wellbeing is an explicit goal. This is a mixed method review, and systematic reviews with both quantitative and qualitative data synthesis will be considered. Two authors will independently perform the literature search, record screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of each included systematic review and meta-analysis. The individual qualitative and quantitative syntheses will be conducted in parallel and combined in an overarching narrative synthesis. The quantitative evidence will be used to assess the strength and direction of the effect of nature-based interventions on mental health and wellbeing outcomes. Evidence drawn from qualitative studies will be analysed and synthesised to understand the various pathways to engagement, involvement process and experiential factors that may mediate experiences. The risk of bias of the systematic reviews will be assessed using a 16-item Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) checklist.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0273139</doi><tpages>e0273139</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0273139 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A757995842 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Analysis Care and treatment Mental health Nature Psychological aspects |
title | Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature-based interventions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A18%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20nature-based%20interventions&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Shrestha,%20Topaz&rft.date=2023-07-21&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0273139&rft.pages=e0273139-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0273139&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA757995842%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A757995842&rfr_iscdi=true |