Quality of life and health status in older adults

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common in older adults, with more than 70% of diagnoses in people aged [greater than or equal to]65 years. Despite this, there is a knowledge gap regarding longer-term outcomes in this population. Here, we identify those older people most at risk of poor quality of life (Q...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-07, Vol.17 (7)
Hauptverfasser: Cummings, Amanda, Foster, Rebecca, Calman, Lynn, Permyakova, Natalia V, Bridges, Jackie, Wiseman, Theresa, Corbett, Teresa, Smith, Peter W. F, Foster, Claire
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Cummings, Amanda
Foster, Rebecca
Calman, Lynn
Permyakova, Natalia V
Bridges, Jackie
Wiseman, Theresa
Corbett, Teresa
Smith, Peter W. F
Foster, Claire
description Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common in older adults, with more than 70% of diagnoses in people aged [greater than or equal to]65 years. Despite this, there is a knowledge gap regarding longer-term outcomes in this population. Here, we identify those older people most at risk of poor quality of life (QoL) and health status in the five years following CRC treatment. CREW is a UK longitudinal cohort study investigating factors associated with health and wellbeing recovery following curative-intent CRC surgery. Participants completed self-report questionnaires pre-surgery, then at least annually up to five years. Longitudinal analyses explored the prevalence and pre-surgery risk factors of poor QoL (QLACS-GSS) and health status (EQ-5D: presence/absence of problems in five domains) in older ([greater than or equal to]65 years) participants over five years. 501 participants aged [greater than or equal to]65years completed questionnaires pre-surgery; 45% completed questionnaires five years later. Oldest-old participants ([greater than or equal to]80 years) reported poorer QoL (18% higher QLACS-GSS) and 2-4 times higher odds of having problems with mobility or usual activities, compared with the youngest-old (65-69 years) over follow-up. Baseline higher self-efficacy was significantly associated with better QoL (10-30% lower QLACS-GSS scores compared to those with low self-efficacy) and lower odds of problems in all EQ-5D domains. Adequate social support was significantly associated with better QoL (8% lower QLACS-GSS) and lower odds of problems with usual activities (OR = 0.62) and anxiety/depression (OR = 0.56). There are important differences in QoL and health status outcomes for the oldest-old during CRC recovery. CREW reveals pre-surgery risk factors that are amenable to intervention including self-efficacy and social support.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0270033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A710213150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A710213150</galeid><sourcerecordid>A710213150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g990-fbc6e56999eef5836b5f6dbbfff9e0878a4356c3f1ffd2aeacd3cef48b52f2ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFz0tLAzEUBeAgCtbqP3CRleBiah5NZrIsxUehUNTidrgzc-90SkikyYD-exd1UVeuzll8HDiM3Uoxk7qUD_s4HgL42WcMOBOqFELrMzaRTqvCKqHPT_olu0ppL4TRlbUTJl9H8EP-5pG4Hwg5hI7vEHze8ZQhj4kPgUff4YFDN_qcrtkFgU9485tTtn163C5fivXmebVcrIveOVFQ01o01jmHSKbStjFku6YhIoeiKiuYa2NbTZKoU4DQdrpFmleNUaQQ9JTdH2d78FgPoY0h41fuYUypXr2_1YtSCiW1NOIfu_n4a-9O7PFpin7MQwzpFP4AO8JmMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of life and health status in older adults</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Cummings, Amanda ; Foster, Rebecca ; Calman, Lynn ; Permyakova, Natalia V ; Bridges, Jackie ; Wiseman, Theresa ; Corbett, Teresa ; Smith, Peter W. F ; Foster, Claire</creator><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Amanda ; Foster, Rebecca ; Calman, Lynn ; Permyakova, Natalia V ; Bridges, Jackie ; Wiseman, Theresa ; Corbett, Teresa ; Smith, Peter W. F ; Foster, Claire</creatorcontrib><description>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common in older adults, with more than 70% of diagnoses in people aged [greater than or equal to]65 years. Despite this, there is a knowledge gap regarding longer-term outcomes in this population. Here, we identify those older people most at risk of poor quality of life (QoL) and health status in the five years following CRC treatment. CREW is a UK longitudinal cohort study investigating factors associated with health and wellbeing recovery following curative-intent CRC surgery. Participants completed self-report questionnaires pre-surgery, then at least annually up to five years. Longitudinal analyses explored the prevalence and pre-surgery risk factors of poor QoL (QLACS-GSS) and health status (EQ-5D: presence/absence of problems in five domains) in older ([greater than or equal to]65 years) participants over five years. 501 participants aged [greater than or equal to]65years completed questionnaires pre-surgery; 45% completed questionnaires five years later. Oldest-old participants ([greater than or equal to]80 years) reported poorer QoL (18% higher QLACS-GSS) and 2-4 times higher odds of having problems with mobility or usual activities, compared with the youngest-old (65-69 years) over follow-up. Baseline higher self-efficacy was significantly associated with better QoL (10-30% lower QLACS-GSS scores compared to those with low self-efficacy) and lower odds of problems in all EQ-5D domains. Adequate social support was significantly associated with better QoL (8% lower QLACS-GSS) and lower odds of problems with usual activities (OR = 0.62) and anxiety/depression (OR = 0.56). There are important differences in QoL and health status outcomes for the oldest-old during CRC recovery. CREW reveals pre-surgery risk factors that are amenable to intervention including self-efficacy and social support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aged ; Care and treatment ; Colorectal cancer ; Health aspects ; Patient outcomes ; Quality of life ; Social aspects</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calman, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Permyakova, Natalia V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridges, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbett, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Peter W. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Claire</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of life and health status in older adults</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common in older adults, with more than 70% of diagnoses in people aged [greater than or equal to]65 years. Despite this, there is a knowledge gap regarding longer-term outcomes in this population. Here, we identify those older people most at risk of poor quality of life (QoL) and health status in the five years following CRC treatment. CREW is a UK longitudinal cohort study investigating factors associated with health and wellbeing recovery following curative-intent CRC surgery. Participants completed self-report questionnaires pre-surgery, then at least annually up to five years. Longitudinal analyses explored the prevalence and pre-surgery risk factors of poor QoL (QLACS-GSS) and health status (EQ-5D: presence/absence of problems in five domains) in older ([greater than or equal to]65 years) participants over five years. 501 participants aged [greater than or equal to]65years completed questionnaires pre-surgery; 45% completed questionnaires five years later. Oldest-old participants ([greater than or equal to]80 years) reported poorer QoL (18% higher QLACS-GSS) and 2-4 times higher odds of having problems with mobility or usual activities, compared with the youngest-old (65-69 years) over follow-up. Baseline higher self-efficacy was significantly associated with better QoL (10-30% lower QLACS-GSS scores compared to those with low self-efficacy) and lower odds of problems in all EQ-5D domains. Adequate social support was significantly associated with better QoL (8% lower QLACS-GSS) and lower odds of problems with usual activities (OR = 0.62) and anxiety/depression (OR = 0.56). There are important differences in QoL and health status outcomes for the oldest-old during CRC recovery. CREW reveals pre-surgery risk factors that are amenable to intervention including self-efficacy and social support.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFz0tLAzEUBeAgCtbqP3CRleBiah5NZrIsxUehUNTidrgzc-90SkikyYD-exd1UVeuzll8HDiM3Uoxk7qUD_s4HgL42WcMOBOqFELrMzaRTqvCKqHPT_olu0ppL4TRlbUTJl9H8EP-5pG4Hwg5hI7vEHze8ZQhj4kPgUff4YFDN_qcrtkFgU9485tTtn163C5fivXmebVcrIveOVFQ01o01jmHSKbStjFku6YhIoeiKiuYa2NbTZKoU4DQdrpFmleNUaQQ9JTdH2d78FgPoY0h41fuYUypXr2_1YtSCiW1NOIfu_n4a-9O7PFpin7MQwzpFP4AO8JmMw</recordid><startdate>20220714</startdate><enddate>20220714</enddate><creator>Cummings, Amanda</creator><creator>Foster, Rebecca</creator><creator>Calman, Lynn</creator><creator>Permyakova, Natalia V</creator><creator>Bridges, Jackie</creator><creator>Wiseman, Theresa</creator><creator>Corbett, Teresa</creator><creator>Smith, Peter W. F</creator><creator>Foster, Claire</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220714</creationdate><title>Quality of life and health status in older adults</title><author>Cummings, Amanda ; Foster, Rebecca ; Calman, Lynn ; Permyakova, Natalia V ; Bridges, Jackie ; Wiseman, Theresa ; Corbett, Teresa ; Smith, Peter W. F ; Foster, Claire</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g990-fbc6e56999eef5836b5f6dbbfff9e0878a4356c3f1ffd2aeacd3cef48b52f2ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calman, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Permyakova, Natalia V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bridges, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbett, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Peter W. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Claire</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cummings, Amanda</au><au>Foster, Rebecca</au><au>Calman, Lynn</au><au>Permyakova, Natalia V</au><au>Bridges, Jackie</au><au>Wiseman, Theresa</au><au>Corbett, Teresa</au><au>Smith, Peter W. F</au><au>Foster, Claire</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of life and health status in older adults</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-07-14</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common in older adults, with more than 70% of diagnoses in people aged [greater than or equal to]65 years. Despite this, there is a knowledge gap regarding longer-term outcomes in this population. Here, we identify those older people most at risk of poor quality of life (QoL) and health status in the five years following CRC treatment. CREW is a UK longitudinal cohort study investigating factors associated with health and wellbeing recovery following curative-intent CRC surgery. Participants completed self-report questionnaires pre-surgery, then at least annually up to five years. Longitudinal analyses explored the prevalence and pre-surgery risk factors of poor QoL (QLACS-GSS) and health status (EQ-5D: presence/absence of problems in five domains) in older ([greater than or equal to]65 years) participants over five years. 501 participants aged [greater than or equal to]65years completed questionnaires pre-surgery; 45% completed questionnaires five years later. Oldest-old participants ([greater than or equal to]80 years) reported poorer QoL (18% higher QLACS-GSS) and 2-4 times higher odds of having problems with mobility or usual activities, compared with the youngest-old (65-69 years) over follow-up. Baseline higher self-efficacy was significantly associated with better QoL (10-30% lower QLACS-GSS scores compared to those with low self-efficacy) and lower odds of problems in all EQ-5D domains. Adequate social support was significantly associated with better QoL (8% lower QLACS-GSS) and lower odds of problems with usual activities (OR = 0.62) and anxiety/depression (OR = 0.56). There are important differences in QoL and health status outcomes for the oldest-old during CRC recovery. CREW reveals pre-surgery risk factors that are amenable to intervention including self-efficacy and social support.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0270033</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7)
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A710213150
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Aged
Care and treatment
Colorectal cancer
Health aspects
Patient outcomes
Quality of life
Social aspects
title Quality of life and health status in older adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T05%3A26%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20life%20and%20health%20status%20in%20older%20adults&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Cummings,%20Amanda&rft.date=2022-07-14&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0270033&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA710213150%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A710213150&rfr_iscdi=true