Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine immunosuppression

We compared protection of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) against acute cellular rejection (ACR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion maintenance immunosuppression. ATHENA, a pragmatic, p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS medicine 2021-06, Vol.18 (6)
Hauptverfasser: Ruggenenti, Piero, Cravedi, Paolo, Gotti, Eliana, Plati, Annarita, Marasà, Maddalena, Sandrini, Silvio, Bossini, Nicola, Citterio, Franco, Minetti, Enrico, Montanaro, Domenico, Sabadini, Ettore, Tardanico, Regina, Martinetti, Davide, Gaspari, Flavio, Villa, Alessandro, Perna, Annalisa, Peraro, Francesco, Remuzzi, Giuseppe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title PLoS medicine
container_volume 18
creator Ruggenenti, Piero
Cravedi, Paolo
Gotti, Eliana
Plati, Annarita
Marasà, Maddalena
Sandrini, Silvio
Bossini, Nicola
Citterio, Franco
Minetti, Enrico
Montanaro, Domenico
Sabadini, Ettore
Tardanico, Regina
Martinetti, Davide
Gaspari, Flavio
Villa, Alessandro
Perna, Annalisa
Peraro, Francesco
Remuzzi, Giuseppe
description We compared protection of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) against acute cellular rejection (ACR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion maintenance immunosuppression. ATHENA, a pragmatic, prospective, multicenter trial conducted by 6 Italian transplant centers, compared the outcomes of 233 consenting recipients of a first deceased donor kidney transplant induced with low-dose thymoglobulin and basiliximab and randomized to MMF (750 mg twice/day, n = 119) or AZA (75 to 125 mg/day, n = 114) added-on maintenance low-dose CsA microemulsion and 1-week steroid. In patients without acute clinical or subclinical rejections, CsA dose was progressively halved. Primary endpoint was biopsy-proven CAN. Analysis was by intention to treat. Chronicity scores other than CAN predict long-term graft outcome. Study limitations include small sample size and unblinded design. In this study, we found that in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients on low-dose CsA and no steroids, MMF had no significant benefits over AZA. This finding suggests that AZA, due to its lower costs, could safely replace MMF in combination with minimized immunosuppression.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003668
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A667304332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A667304332</galeid><sourcerecordid>A667304332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1332-7b3c6a5fb123088a91debb6f03ca9943d7b472603d9708b1209793a9550d580e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0M1LwzAYBvAiCs7pf-AhJ0GwM2napDmO4cdgOvDrOtL27ZaZJaVvqs6jf7mDKehJT-9z-PE88EbRMaMDxiU7X_quddoOmhVUA0YpFyLfiXosS1XMhBS73zmRcj86QFxSmiiqaC_6uFmXvlmA81YHICtfQzCWvECLHRL9rsPC-KY1Dohx5NlUDtYktNphY7ULpIXSNAZcQOIdwQCtN1VctwBnxPrXuPIIpFyX1mPjtzWrVec8dk3TAqLx7jDaq7VFOPq6_ejx8uJhdB1Pplfj0XASzxnnSSwLXgqd1QVLOM1zrVgFRSFqykutVMorWaQyEZRXStJ8o6iSimuVZbTKcgq8H51ue-fawsy40rsAb2GuO8TZ-P5uNhRCcppuxv6yt_-306ff9uSHXYC2YYHedmHzB_wJPwEG8pJ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine immunosuppression</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ruggenenti, Piero ; Cravedi, Paolo ; Gotti, Eliana ; Plati, Annarita ; Marasà, Maddalena ; Sandrini, Silvio ; Bossini, Nicola ; Citterio, Franco ; Minetti, Enrico ; Montanaro, Domenico ; Sabadini, Ettore ; Tardanico, Regina ; Martinetti, Davide ; Gaspari, Flavio ; Villa, Alessandro ; Perna, Annalisa ; Peraro, Francesco ; Remuzzi, Giuseppe</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruggenenti, Piero ; Cravedi, Paolo ; Gotti, Eliana ; Plati, Annarita ; Marasà, Maddalena ; Sandrini, Silvio ; Bossini, Nicola ; Citterio, Franco ; Minetti, Enrico ; Montanaro, Domenico ; Sabadini, Ettore ; Tardanico, Regina ; Martinetti, Davide ; Gaspari, Flavio ; Villa, Alessandro ; Perna, Annalisa ; Peraro, Francesco ; Remuzzi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><description>We compared protection of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) against acute cellular rejection (ACR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion maintenance immunosuppression. ATHENA, a pragmatic, prospective, multicenter trial conducted by 6 Italian transplant centers, compared the outcomes of 233 consenting recipients of a first deceased donor kidney transplant induced with low-dose thymoglobulin and basiliximab and randomized to MMF (750 mg twice/day, n = 119) or AZA (75 to 125 mg/day, n = 114) added-on maintenance low-dose CsA microemulsion and 1-week steroid. In patients without acute clinical or subclinical rejections, CsA dose was progressively halved. Primary endpoint was biopsy-proven CAN. Analysis was by intention to treat. Chronicity scores other than CAN predict long-term graft outcome. Study limitations include small sample size and unblinded design. In this study, we found that in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients on low-dose CsA and no steroids, MMF had no significant benefits over AZA. This finding suggests that AZA, due to its lower costs, could safely replace MMF in combination with minimized immunosuppression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-1277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Azathioprine ; Comparative analysis ; Dosage and administration ; Drug therapy ; Graft rejection ; Kidneys ; Mycophenolate mofetil ; Organ transplant recipients ; Patient outcomes ; Prevention ; Risk factors ; Transplantation</subject><ispartof>PLoS medicine, 2021-06, Vol.18 (6)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruggenenti, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cravedi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotti, Eliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plati, Annarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marasà, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandrini, Silvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossini, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Citterio, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minetti, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montanaro, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabadini, Ettore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tardanico, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinetti, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspari, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villa, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perna, Annalisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peraro, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remuzzi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><title>Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine immunosuppression</title><title>PLoS medicine</title><description>We compared protection of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) against acute cellular rejection (ACR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion maintenance immunosuppression. ATHENA, a pragmatic, prospective, multicenter trial conducted by 6 Italian transplant centers, compared the outcomes of 233 consenting recipients of a first deceased donor kidney transplant induced with low-dose thymoglobulin and basiliximab and randomized to MMF (750 mg twice/day, n = 119) or AZA (75 to 125 mg/day, n = 114) added-on maintenance low-dose CsA microemulsion and 1-week steroid. In patients without acute clinical or subclinical rejections, CsA dose was progressively halved. Primary endpoint was biopsy-proven CAN. Analysis was by intention to treat. Chronicity scores other than CAN predict long-term graft outcome. Study limitations include small sample size and unblinded design. In this study, we found that in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients on low-dose CsA and no steroids, MMF had no significant benefits over AZA. This finding suggests that AZA, due to its lower costs, could safely replace MMF in combination with minimized immunosuppression.</description><subject>Azathioprine</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Graft rejection</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Mycophenolate mofetil</subject><subject>Organ transplant recipients</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><issn>1549-1277</issn><issn>1549-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0M1LwzAYBvAiCs7pf-AhJ0GwM2napDmO4cdgOvDrOtL27ZaZJaVvqs6jf7mDKehJT-9z-PE88EbRMaMDxiU7X_quddoOmhVUA0YpFyLfiXosS1XMhBS73zmRcj86QFxSmiiqaC_6uFmXvlmA81YHICtfQzCWvECLHRL9rsPC-KY1Dohx5NlUDtYktNphY7ULpIXSNAZcQOIdwQCtN1VctwBnxPrXuPIIpFyX1mPjtzWrVec8dk3TAqLx7jDaq7VFOPq6_ejx8uJhdB1Pplfj0XASzxnnSSwLXgqd1QVLOM1zrVgFRSFqykutVMorWaQyEZRXStJ8o6iSimuVZbTKcgq8H51ue-fawsy40rsAb2GuO8TZ-P5uNhRCcppuxv6yt_-306ff9uSHXYC2YYHedmHzB_wJPwEG8pJ4</recordid><startdate>20210624</startdate><enddate>20210624</enddate><creator>Ruggenenti, Piero</creator><creator>Cravedi, Paolo</creator><creator>Gotti, Eliana</creator><creator>Plati, Annarita</creator><creator>Marasà, Maddalena</creator><creator>Sandrini, Silvio</creator><creator>Bossini, Nicola</creator><creator>Citterio, Franco</creator><creator>Minetti, Enrico</creator><creator>Montanaro, Domenico</creator><creator>Sabadini, Ettore</creator><creator>Tardanico, Regina</creator><creator>Martinetti, Davide</creator><creator>Gaspari, Flavio</creator><creator>Villa, Alessandro</creator><creator>Perna, Annalisa</creator><creator>Peraro, Francesco</creator><creator>Remuzzi, Giuseppe</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210624</creationdate><title>Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine immunosuppression</title><author>Ruggenenti, Piero ; Cravedi, Paolo ; Gotti, Eliana ; Plati, Annarita ; Marasà, Maddalena ; Sandrini, Silvio ; Bossini, Nicola ; Citterio, Franco ; Minetti, Enrico ; Montanaro, Domenico ; Sabadini, Ettore ; Tardanico, Regina ; Martinetti, Davide ; Gaspari, Flavio ; Villa, Alessandro ; Perna, Annalisa ; Peraro, Francesco ; Remuzzi, Giuseppe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1332-7b3c6a5fb123088a91debb6f03ca9943d7b472603d9708b1209793a9550d580e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Azathioprine</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Graft rejection</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Mycophenolate mofetil</topic><topic>Organ transplant recipients</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruggenenti, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cravedi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotti, Eliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plati, Annarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marasà, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandrini, Silvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossini, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Citterio, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minetti, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montanaro, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabadini, Ettore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tardanico, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinetti, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspari, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villa, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perna, Annalisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peraro, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remuzzi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruggenenti, Piero</au><au>Cravedi, Paolo</au><au>Gotti, Eliana</au><au>Plati, Annarita</au><au>Marasà, Maddalena</au><au>Sandrini, Silvio</au><au>Bossini, Nicola</au><au>Citterio, Franco</au><au>Minetti, Enrico</au><au>Montanaro, Domenico</au><au>Sabadini, Ettore</au><au>Tardanico, Regina</au><au>Martinetti, Davide</au><au>Gaspari, Flavio</au><au>Villa, Alessandro</au><au>Perna, Annalisa</au><au>Peraro, Francesco</au><au>Remuzzi, Giuseppe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine immunosuppression</atitle><jtitle>PLoS medicine</jtitle><date>2021-06-24</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>1549-1277</issn><eissn>1549-1676</eissn><abstract>We compared protection of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) against acute cellular rejection (ACR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion maintenance immunosuppression. ATHENA, a pragmatic, prospective, multicenter trial conducted by 6 Italian transplant centers, compared the outcomes of 233 consenting recipients of a first deceased donor kidney transplant induced with low-dose thymoglobulin and basiliximab and randomized to MMF (750 mg twice/day, n = 119) or AZA (75 to 125 mg/day, n = 114) added-on maintenance low-dose CsA microemulsion and 1-week steroid. In patients without acute clinical or subclinical rejections, CsA dose was progressively halved. Primary endpoint was biopsy-proven CAN. Analysis was by intention to treat. Chronicity scores other than CAN predict long-term graft outcome. Study limitations include small sample size and unblinded design. In this study, we found that in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients on low-dose CsA and no steroids, MMF had no significant benefits over AZA. This finding suggests that AZA, due to its lower costs, could safely replace MMF in combination with minimized immunosuppression.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pmed.1003668</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-1277
ispartof PLoS medicine, 2021-06, Vol.18 (6)
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A667304332
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Azathioprine
Comparative analysis
Dosage and administration
Drug therapy
Graft rejection
Kidneys
Mycophenolate mofetil
Organ transplant recipients
Patient outcomes
Prevention
Risk factors
Transplantation
title Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free, low-dose cyclosporine immunosuppression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T15%3A09%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mycophenolate%20mofetil%20versus%20azathioprine%20in%20kidney%20transplant%20recipients%20on%20steroid-free,%20low-dose%20cyclosporine%20immunosuppression&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20medicine&rft.au=Ruggenenti,%20Piero&rft.date=2021-06-24&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=1549-1277&rft.eissn=1549-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003668&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA667304332%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A667304332&rfr_iscdi=true