Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe
Oaks (Quercus spp.) are becoming increasingly important for future forest management as the climate in central Europe warms. Owing to the high costs of conventional row planting, artificial oak stand establishment in the form of “clusters” became popular in central Europe beginning in the 1970s. In...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of forest research 2017-02, Vol.47 (2), p.139-148 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 148 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | Canadian journal of forest research |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Saha, Somidh Kuehne, Christian Bauhus, Jürgen |
description | Oaks (Quercus spp.) are becoming increasingly important for future forest management as the climate in central Europe warms. Owing to the high costs of conventional row planting, artificial oak stand establishment in the form of “clusters” became popular in central Europe beginning in the 1970s. In cluster plantings, oaks are planted either in groups of ca. 20–25 at 1 m spacing between trees (i.e., group planting) or in denser groups with 20–30 oaks·m
−2
(i.e., nest planting). In both cases, the clusters are spaced apart at a distance that represents the target density of future crop trees. A comprehensive review of the history, growth, tree quality development, and economic aspects of oak cluster plantings suggests that initial growing space was the most important factor influencing development of oaks in clusters. Consequently, survival, growth, quality, and biomass production were comparable in group and row plantings but lower in nest plantings. In addition, group plantings resulted in greater stand-level tree species diversity than nest or row plantings. We conclude that oak group planting is a comparatively inexpensive option for the artificial regeneration of oak-dominated broadleaved forests for a range of situations such as reforestation of disturbed areas or the afforestation of abandoned agricultural land. Future research needs regarding development and tending of forests established by oak group planting are highlighted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0265 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A480489308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A480489308</galeid><sourcerecordid>A480489308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-d462f2328c65f1ed38dd8c81f539509657bcab996bc08120ca39bcc8cf63e5433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVksFrFDEUxoMouFavnge96GFqMplkkmMtVQtLhVbPIfvmZc06m0yTGaj_vRla0C0LIjk8SH7fx5fHR8hrRk8Z4_oD7FyqG8pkTRspnpAVa6iqJeXdU7KitBW1oLJ7Tl7kvKOUcsnpinxcY84x5GpAmwL2lUtxX0X7s4JhzhOmahxsmHzYVlPydsiVDxVgmJIdqos5xRFfkmeuPOCrh3lCvn-6-Hb-pV5__Xx5frauQahmqvtWNq7hjQIpHMOeq75XoJgTXAuqpeg2YDdayw1QVaKD5XoDoMBJjqLl_IS8u_cdU7ydMU9m7zPgUPJhnLNhSireCKHbgr59hO7inEJJt1AtbbtO6z_U1g5ofHCx_AoWU3PWKtoqzakqVH2E2mLAsoIY0PlyfcC_OcLD6G_N39DpEaicHvcejrq-PxAUZsK7aWvnnM3lzfV_sFeH7EMQSDHnhM6Mye9t-mUYNUutzFIrs9TKLLUqAnYvCAkS5tIa-PEvzW8CHMri</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1864047799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Saha, Somidh ; Kuehne, Christian ; Bauhus, Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Saha, Somidh ; Kuehne, Christian ; Bauhus, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>Oaks (Quercus spp.) are becoming increasingly important for future forest management as the climate in central Europe warms. Owing to the high costs of conventional row planting, artificial oak stand establishment in the form of “clusters” became popular in central Europe beginning in the 1970s. In cluster plantings, oaks are planted either in groups of ca. 20–25 at 1 m spacing between trees (i.e., group planting) or in denser groups with 20–30 oaks·m
−2
(i.e., nest planting). In both cases, the clusters are spaced apart at a distance that represents the target density of future crop trees. A comprehensive review of the history, growth, tree quality development, and economic aspects of oak cluster plantings suggests that initial growing space was the most important factor influencing development of oaks in clusters. Consequently, survival, growth, quality, and biomass production were comparable in group and row plantings but lower in nest plantings. In addition, group plantings resulted in greater stand-level tree species diversity than nest or row plantings. We conclude that oak group planting is a comparatively inexpensive option for the artificial regeneration of oak-dominated broadleaved forests for a range of situations such as reforestation of disturbed areas or the afforestation of abandoned agricultural land. Future research needs regarding development and tending of forests established by oak group planting are highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0265</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural research ; compétition végétale ; croissance et qualité des arbres ; diversité et productivité des espèces ; Environmental aspects ; Forest management ; forest restoration ; Forestry ; Global warming ; Growth ; Methods ; oak regeneration ; Oaks ; plant competition ; Plant diversity ; Plant growth ; Plant species ; Planting ; Quercus ; Reforestation ; restauration forestière ; régénération du chêne ; Species diversity ; species diversity and productivity ; tree quality and growth ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2017-02, Vol.47 (2), p.139-148</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 NRC Research Press</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press Feb 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-d462f2328c65f1ed38dd8c81f539509657bcab996bc08120ca39bcc8cf63e5433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-d462f2328c65f1ed38dd8c81f539509657bcab996bc08120ca39bcc8cf63e5433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saha, Somidh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehne, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauhus, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><description>Oaks (Quercus spp.) are becoming increasingly important for future forest management as the climate in central Europe warms. Owing to the high costs of conventional row planting, artificial oak stand establishment in the form of “clusters” became popular in central Europe beginning in the 1970s. In cluster plantings, oaks are planted either in groups of ca. 20–25 at 1 m spacing between trees (i.e., group planting) or in denser groups with 20–30 oaks·m
−2
(i.e., nest planting). In both cases, the clusters are spaced apart at a distance that represents the target density of future crop trees. A comprehensive review of the history, growth, tree quality development, and economic aspects of oak cluster plantings suggests that initial growing space was the most important factor influencing development of oaks in clusters. Consequently, survival, growth, quality, and biomass production were comparable in group and row plantings but lower in nest plantings. In addition, group plantings resulted in greater stand-level tree species diversity than nest or row plantings. We conclude that oak group planting is a comparatively inexpensive option for the artificial regeneration of oak-dominated broadleaved forests for a range of situations such as reforestation of disturbed areas or the afforestation of abandoned agricultural land. Future research needs regarding development and tending of forests established by oak group planting are highlighted.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural research</subject><subject>compétition végétale</subject><subject>croissance et qualité des arbres</subject><subject>diversité et productivité des espèces</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>forest restoration</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>oak regeneration</subject><subject>Oaks</subject><subject>plant competition</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Quercus</subject><subject>Reforestation</subject><subject>restauration forestière</subject><subject>régénération du chêne</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>species diversity and productivity</subject><subject>tree quality and growth</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVksFrFDEUxoMouFavnge96GFqMplkkmMtVQtLhVbPIfvmZc06m0yTGaj_vRla0C0LIjk8SH7fx5fHR8hrRk8Z4_oD7FyqG8pkTRspnpAVa6iqJeXdU7KitBW1oLJ7Tl7kvKOUcsnpinxcY84x5GpAmwL2lUtxX0X7s4JhzhOmahxsmHzYVlPydsiVDxVgmJIdqos5xRFfkmeuPOCrh3lCvn-6-Hb-pV5__Xx5frauQahmqvtWNq7hjQIpHMOeq75XoJgTXAuqpeg2YDdayw1QVaKD5XoDoMBJjqLl_IS8u_cdU7ydMU9m7zPgUPJhnLNhSireCKHbgr59hO7inEJJt1AtbbtO6z_U1g5ofHCx_AoWU3PWKtoqzakqVH2E2mLAsoIY0PlyfcC_OcLD6G_N39DpEaicHvcejrq-PxAUZsK7aWvnnM3lzfV_sFeH7EMQSDHnhM6Mye9t-mUYNUutzFIrs9TKLLUqAnYvCAkS5tIa-PEvzW8CHMri</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Saha, Somidh</creator><creator>Kuehne, Christian</creator><creator>Bauhus, Jürgen</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe</title><author>Saha, Somidh ; Kuehne, Christian ; Bauhus, Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-d462f2328c65f1ed38dd8c81f539509657bcab996bc08120ca39bcc8cf63e5433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural research</topic><topic>compétition végétale</topic><topic>croissance et qualité des arbres</topic><topic>diversité et productivité des espèces</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>forest restoration</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>oak regeneration</topic><topic>Oaks</topic><topic>plant competition</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Quercus</topic><topic>Reforestation</topic><topic>restauration forestière</topic><topic>régénération du chêne</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>species diversity and productivity</topic><topic>tree quality and growth</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saha, Somidh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehne, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauhus, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saha, Somidh</au><au>Kuehne, Christian</au><au>Bauhus, Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>139-148</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>Oaks (Quercus spp.) are becoming increasingly important for future forest management as the climate in central Europe warms. Owing to the high costs of conventional row planting, artificial oak stand establishment in the form of “clusters” became popular in central Europe beginning in the 1970s. In cluster plantings, oaks are planted either in groups of ca. 20–25 at 1 m spacing between trees (i.e., group planting) or in denser groups with 20–30 oaks·m
−2
(i.e., nest planting). In both cases, the clusters are spaced apart at a distance that represents the target density of future crop trees. A comprehensive review of the history, growth, tree quality development, and economic aspects of oak cluster plantings suggests that initial growing space was the most important factor influencing development of oaks in clusters. Consequently, survival, growth, quality, and biomass production were comparable in group and row plantings but lower in nest plantings. In addition, group plantings resulted in greater stand-level tree species diversity than nest or row plantings. We conclude that oak group planting is a comparatively inexpensive option for the artificial regeneration of oak-dominated broadleaved forests for a range of situations such as reforestation of disturbed areas or the afforestation of abandoned agricultural land. Future research needs regarding development and tending of forests established by oak group planting are highlighted.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/cjfr-2016-0265</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-5067 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of forest research, 2017-02, Vol.47 (2), p.139-148 |
issn | 0045-5067 1208-6037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A480489308 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agricultural land Agricultural research compétition végétale croissance et qualité des arbres diversité et productivité des espèces Environmental aspects Forest management forest restoration Forestry Global warming Growth Methods oak regeneration Oaks plant competition Plant diversity Plant growth Plant species Planting Quercus Reforestation restauration forestière régénération du chêne Species diversity species diversity and productivity tree quality and growth Trees |
title | Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A10%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20learned%20from%20oak%20cluster%20planting%20trials%20in%20central%20Europe&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Saha,%20Somidh&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=139-148&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0265&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA480489308%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1864047799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A480489308&rfr_iscdi=true |