Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe

Oaks (Quercus spp.) are becoming increasingly important for future forest management as the climate in central Europe warms. Owing to the high costs of conventional row planting, artificial oak stand establishment in the form of “clusters” became popular in central Europe beginning in the 1970s. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of forest research 2017-02, Vol.47 (2), p.139-148
Hauptverfasser: Saha, Somidh, Kuehne, Christian, Bauhus, Jürgen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 148
container_issue 2
container_start_page 139
container_title Canadian journal of forest research
container_volume 47
creator Saha, Somidh
Kuehne, Christian
Bauhus, Jürgen
description Oaks (Quercus spp.) are becoming increasingly important for future forest management as the climate in central Europe warms. Owing to the high costs of conventional row planting, artificial oak stand establishment in the form of “clusters” became popular in central Europe beginning in the 1970s. In cluster plantings, oaks are planted either in groups of ca. 20–25 at 1 m spacing between trees (i.e., group planting) or in denser groups with 20–30 oaks·m −2 (i.e., nest planting). In both cases, the clusters are spaced apart at a distance that represents the target density of future crop trees. A comprehensive review of the history, growth, tree quality development, and economic aspects of oak cluster plantings suggests that initial growing space was the most important factor influencing development of oaks in clusters. Consequently, survival, growth, quality, and biomass production were comparable in group and row plantings but lower in nest plantings. In addition, group plantings resulted in greater stand-level tree species diversity than nest or row plantings. We conclude that oak group planting is a comparatively inexpensive option for the artificial regeneration of oak-dominated broadleaved forests for a range of situations such as reforestation of disturbed areas or the afforestation of abandoned agricultural land. Future research needs regarding development and tending of forests established by oak group planting are highlighted.
doi_str_mv 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0265
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A480489308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A480489308</galeid><sourcerecordid>A480489308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-d462f2328c65f1ed38dd8c81f539509657bcab996bc08120ca39bcc8cf63e5433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVksFrFDEUxoMouFavnge96GFqMplkkmMtVQtLhVbPIfvmZc06m0yTGaj_vRla0C0LIjk8SH7fx5fHR8hrRk8Z4_oD7FyqG8pkTRspnpAVa6iqJeXdU7KitBW1oLJ7Tl7kvKOUcsnpinxcY84x5GpAmwL2lUtxX0X7s4JhzhOmahxsmHzYVlPydsiVDxVgmJIdqos5xRFfkmeuPOCrh3lCvn-6-Hb-pV5__Xx5frauQahmqvtWNq7hjQIpHMOeq75XoJgTXAuqpeg2YDdayw1QVaKD5XoDoMBJjqLl_IS8u_cdU7ydMU9m7zPgUPJhnLNhSireCKHbgr59hO7inEJJt1AtbbtO6z_U1g5ofHCx_AoWU3PWKtoqzakqVH2E2mLAsoIY0PlyfcC_OcLD6G_N39DpEaicHvcejrq-PxAUZsK7aWvnnM3lzfV_sFeH7EMQSDHnhM6Mye9t-mUYNUutzFIrs9TKLLUqAnYvCAkS5tIa-PEvzW8CHMri</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1864047799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Saha, Somidh ; Kuehne, Christian ; Bauhus, Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Saha, Somidh ; Kuehne, Christian ; Bauhus, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>Oaks (Quercus spp.) are becoming increasingly important for future forest management as the climate in central Europe warms. Owing to the high costs of conventional row planting, artificial oak stand establishment in the form of “clusters” became popular in central Europe beginning in the 1970s. In cluster plantings, oaks are planted either in groups of ca. 20–25 at 1 m spacing between trees (i.e., group planting) or in denser groups with 20–30 oaks·m −2 (i.e., nest planting). In both cases, the clusters are spaced apart at a distance that represents the target density of future crop trees. A comprehensive review of the history, growth, tree quality development, and economic aspects of oak cluster plantings suggests that initial growing space was the most important factor influencing development of oaks in clusters. Consequently, survival, growth, quality, and biomass production were comparable in group and row plantings but lower in nest plantings. In addition, group plantings resulted in greater stand-level tree species diversity than nest or row plantings. We conclude that oak group planting is a comparatively inexpensive option for the artificial regeneration of oak-dominated broadleaved forests for a range of situations such as reforestation of disturbed areas or the afforestation of abandoned agricultural land. Future research needs regarding development and tending of forests established by oak group planting are highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0265</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural research ; compétition végétale ; croissance et qualité des arbres ; diversité et productivité des espèces ; Environmental aspects ; Forest management ; forest restoration ; Forestry ; Global warming ; Growth ; Methods ; oak regeneration ; Oaks ; plant competition ; Plant diversity ; Plant growth ; Plant species ; Planting ; Quercus ; Reforestation ; restauration forestière ; régénération du chêne ; Species diversity ; species diversity and productivity ; tree quality and growth ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2017-02, Vol.47 (2), p.139-148</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 NRC Research Press</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press Feb 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-d462f2328c65f1ed38dd8c81f539509657bcab996bc08120ca39bcc8cf63e5433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-d462f2328c65f1ed38dd8c81f539509657bcab996bc08120ca39bcc8cf63e5433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saha, Somidh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehne, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauhus, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><description>Oaks (Quercus spp.) are becoming increasingly important for future forest management as the climate in central Europe warms. Owing to the high costs of conventional row planting, artificial oak stand establishment in the form of “clusters” became popular in central Europe beginning in the 1970s. In cluster plantings, oaks are planted either in groups of ca. 20–25 at 1 m spacing between trees (i.e., group planting) or in denser groups with 20–30 oaks·m −2 (i.e., nest planting). In both cases, the clusters are spaced apart at a distance that represents the target density of future crop trees. A comprehensive review of the history, growth, tree quality development, and economic aspects of oak cluster plantings suggests that initial growing space was the most important factor influencing development of oaks in clusters. Consequently, survival, growth, quality, and biomass production were comparable in group and row plantings but lower in nest plantings. In addition, group plantings resulted in greater stand-level tree species diversity than nest or row plantings. We conclude that oak group planting is a comparatively inexpensive option for the artificial regeneration of oak-dominated broadleaved forests for a range of situations such as reforestation of disturbed areas or the afforestation of abandoned agricultural land. Future research needs regarding development and tending of forests established by oak group planting are highlighted.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural research</subject><subject>compétition végétale</subject><subject>croissance et qualité des arbres</subject><subject>diversité et productivité des espèces</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>forest restoration</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>oak regeneration</subject><subject>Oaks</subject><subject>plant competition</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Quercus</subject><subject>Reforestation</subject><subject>restauration forestière</subject><subject>régénération du chêne</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>species diversity and productivity</subject><subject>tree quality and growth</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVksFrFDEUxoMouFavnge96GFqMplkkmMtVQtLhVbPIfvmZc06m0yTGaj_vRla0C0LIjk8SH7fx5fHR8hrRk8Z4_oD7FyqG8pkTRspnpAVa6iqJeXdU7KitBW1oLJ7Tl7kvKOUcsnpinxcY84x5GpAmwL2lUtxX0X7s4JhzhOmahxsmHzYVlPydsiVDxVgmJIdqos5xRFfkmeuPOCrh3lCvn-6-Hb-pV5__Xx5frauQahmqvtWNq7hjQIpHMOeq75XoJgTXAuqpeg2YDdayw1QVaKD5XoDoMBJjqLl_IS8u_cdU7ydMU9m7zPgUPJhnLNhSireCKHbgr59hO7inEJJt1AtbbtO6z_U1g5ofHCx_AoWU3PWKtoqzakqVH2E2mLAsoIY0PlyfcC_OcLD6G_N39DpEaicHvcejrq-PxAUZsK7aWvnnM3lzfV_sFeH7EMQSDHnhM6Mye9t-mUYNUutzFIrs9TKLLUqAnYvCAkS5tIa-PEvzW8CHMri</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Saha, Somidh</creator><creator>Kuehne, Christian</creator><creator>Bauhus, Jürgen</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe</title><author>Saha, Somidh ; Kuehne, Christian ; Bauhus, Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-d462f2328c65f1ed38dd8c81f539509657bcab996bc08120ca39bcc8cf63e5433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural research</topic><topic>compétition végétale</topic><topic>croissance et qualité des arbres</topic><topic>diversité et productivité des espèces</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>forest restoration</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>oak regeneration</topic><topic>Oaks</topic><topic>plant competition</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Quercus</topic><topic>Reforestation</topic><topic>restauration forestière</topic><topic>régénération du chêne</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>species diversity and productivity</topic><topic>tree quality and growth</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saha, Somidh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehne, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauhus, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saha, Somidh</au><au>Kuehne, Christian</au><au>Bauhus, Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>139-148</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>Oaks (Quercus spp.) are becoming increasingly important for future forest management as the climate in central Europe warms. Owing to the high costs of conventional row planting, artificial oak stand establishment in the form of “clusters” became popular in central Europe beginning in the 1970s. In cluster plantings, oaks are planted either in groups of ca. 20–25 at 1 m spacing between trees (i.e., group planting) or in denser groups with 20–30 oaks·m −2 (i.e., nest planting). In both cases, the clusters are spaced apart at a distance that represents the target density of future crop trees. A comprehensive review of the history, growth, tree quality development, and economic aspects of oak cluster plantings suggests that initial growing space was the most important factor influencing development of oaks in clusters. Consequently, survival, growth, quality, and biomass production were comparable in group and row plantings but lower in nest plantings. In addition, group plantings resulted in greater stand-level tree species diversity than nest or row plantings. We conclude that oak group planting is a comparatively inexpensive option for the artificial regeneration of oak-dominated broadleaved forests for a range of situations such as reforestation of disturbed areas or the afforestation of abandoned agricultural land. Future research needs regarding development and tending of forests established by oak group planting are highlighted.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/cjfr-2016-0265</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-5067
ispartof Canadian journal of forest research, 2017-02, Vol.47 (2), p.139-148
issn 0045-5067
1208-6037
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A480489308
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agricultural land
Agricultural research
compétition végétale
croissance et qualité des arbres
diversité et productivité des espèces
Environmental aspects
Forest management
forest restoration
Forestry
Global warming
Growth
Methods
oak regeneration
Oaks
plant competition
Plant diversity
Plant growth
Plant species
Planting
Quercus
Reforestation
restauration forestière
régénération du chêne
Species diversity
species diversity and productivity
tree quality and growth
Trees
title Lessons learned from oak cluster planting trials in central Europe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A10%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20learned%20from%20oak%20cluster%20planting%20trials%20in%20central%20Europe&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Saha,%20Somidh&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=139-148&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0265&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA480489308%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1864047799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A480489308&rfr_iscdi=true