Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities
The present study was conducted in five different phytogeographic zones of the Brazilian state of Maranhão, three of which (the Amazon Forest, Cerrado, and Palm Groves) are more heterogeneous, whereas the other two (Marshlands and Mangroves) are more homogeneous. In each zone, nine sites were visite...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e0164826 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e0164826 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva Juen, Leandro Esposito, Maria Cristina |
description | The present study was conducted in five different phytogeographic zones of the Brazilian state of Maranhão, three of which (the Amazon Forest, Cerrado, and Palm Groves) are more heterogeneous, whereas the other two (Marshlands and Mangroves) are more homogeneous. In each zone, nine sites were visited for the collection of necrophagous flies using bait traps in 2010, 2011, and 2012. The calliphorid and sarcophagid communities observed at each site were compared in terms of species richness, composition, and abundance. The more heterogeneous zones had higher species richness, except in the case of the sarcophagids in the forest habitats. The calliphorids Chloroprocta idioidea (Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830), Mesembrinella bicolor (Fabricius, 1805), Hemilucilia semidiaphana (Rondani, 1850) and Lucilia eximia (Wiedemann, 1819) were more closely associated with the Cerrado, Palm Grove and Amazon Forest zones, and Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 194) with the Mangrove. In the sarcophagids, Peckia (Euboettcheria) subducta (Lopes, 1935) and P. (Pattonella) palidipilosa (Curran & Walley, 1934) were associated with the Amazon Forest, and P. (Sarcodexia) lambens (Wiedemann, 1830) and Tricharaea (Sarcophagula) occidua (Fabricius, 1794) with the Palm Grove and Cerrado zones. In the calliphorids, the greatest dissimilarity was recorded between the Amazon Forest and the Mangrove and Lowland grassland zones. In the sarcophagids, by contrast, the greatest dissimilarities were recorded between the Amazon Forest and all the other four zones. In general, then, the phytogeographic zones with the highest environmental heterogeneity were characterized by the greatest species richness and abundance of necrophagous flies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0164826 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A471785932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A471785932</galeid><sourcerecordid>A471785932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g992-33de56c284ed94fb5798b86acd9f9919605f5b2fd01a5fa6dd9a2ff2f27f67693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pf-AhJ8FDZ340aXMcc9PBcKBl15G1L21Hlowlle2_t6KHefL0vvA-fOE9hO4pGVGe0aet7w5O29HeOxgRKtOcyQs0oIqzRDLCL8_yNboJYUuI4LmUA1RMP7XtdGxdjWMDeGoMlDFgb_Bz2-cDuIhXUEPsjXe4OO2h3zr8BuXB7xtd-y7gmT3hid_tOtfGFsItujLaBrj7nUNUzKbF5DVZLF_mk_EiqZViCecVCFmyPIVKpWYjMpVvcqnLShmlqJJEGLFhpiJUC6NlVSnNjGGGZUZmUvEhevyprbWFdetK7yIcY627ENbzj_f1OM1olov-9H_scvXXPpzZBrSNTfC2-35AOIdfFE5yhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto ; Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva ; Juen, Leandro ; Esposito, Maria Cristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto ; Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva ; Juen, Leandro ; Esposito, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><description>The present study was conducted in five different phytogeographic zones of the Brazilian state of Maranhão, three of which (the Amazon Forest, Cerrado, and Palm Groves) are more heterogeneous, whereas the other two (Marshlands and Mangroves) are more homogeneous. In each zone, nine sites were visited for the collection of necrophagous flies using bait traps in 2010, 2011, and 2012. The calliphorid and sarcophagid communities observed at each site were compared in terms of species richness, composition, and abundance. The more heterogeneous zones had higher species richness, except in the case of the sarcophagids in the forest habitats. The calliphorids Chloroprocta idioidea (Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830), Mesembrinella bicolor (Fabricius, 1805), Hemilucilia semidiaphana (Rondani, 1850) and Lucilia eximia (Wiedemann, 1819) were more closely associated with the Cerrado, Palm Grove and Amazon Forest zones, and Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 194) with the Mangrove. In the sarcophagids, Peckia (Euboettcheria) subducta (Lopes, 1935) and P. (Pattonella) palidipilosa (Curran & Walley, 1934) were associated with the Amazon Forest, and P. (Sarcodexia) lambens (Wiedemann, 1830) and Tricharaea (Sarcophagula) occidua (Fabricius, 1794) with the Palm Grove and Cerrado zones. In the calliphorids, the greatest dissimilarity was recorded between the Amazon Forest and the Mangrove and Lowland grassland zones. In the sarcophagids, by contrast, the greatest dissimilarities were recorded between the Amazon Forest and all the other four zones. In general, then, the phytogeographic zones with the highest environmental heterogeneity were characterized by the greatest species richness and abundance of necrophagous flies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Blowflies ; Comparative analysis</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e0164826</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juen, Leandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposito, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities</title><title>PloS one</title><description>The present study was conducted in five different phytogeographic zones of the Brazilian state of Maranhão, three of which (the Amazon Forest, Cerrado, and Palm Groves) are more heterogeneous, whereas the other two (Marshlands and Mangroves) are more homogeneous. In each zone, nine sites were visited for the collection of necrophagous flies using bait traps in 2010, 2011, and 2012. The calliphorid and sarcophagid communities observed at each site were compared in terms of species richness, composition, and abundance. The more heterogeneous zones had higher species richness, except in the case of the sarcophagids in the forest habitats. The calliphorids Chloroprocta idioidea (Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830), Mesembrinella bicolor (Fabricius, 1805), Hemilucilia semidiaphana (Rondani, 1850) and Lucilia eximia (Wiedemann, 1819) were more closely associated with the Cerrado, Palm Grove and Amazon Forest zones, and Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 194) with the Mangrove. In the sarcophagids, Peckia (Euboettcheria) subducta (Lopes, 1935) and P. (Pattonella) palidipilosa (Curran & Walley, 1934) were associated with the Amazon Forest, and P. (Sarcodexia) lambens (Wiedemann, 1830) and Tricharaea (Sarcophagula) occidua (Fabricius, 1794) with the Palm Grove and Cerrado zones. In the calliphorids, the greatest dissimilarity was recorded between the Amazon Forest and the Mangrove and Lowland grassland zones. In the sarcophagids, by contrast, the greatest dissimilarities were recorded between the Amazon Forest and all the other four zones. In general, then, the phytogeographic zones with the highest environmental heterogeneity were characterized by the greatest species richness and abundance of necrophagous flies.</description><subject>Blowflies</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pf-AhJ8FDZ340aXMcc9PBcKBl15G1L21Hlowlle2_t6KHefL0vvA-fOE9hO4pGVGe0aet7w5O29HeOxgRKtOcyQs0oIqzRDLCL8_yNboJYUuI4LmUA1RMP7XtdGxdjWMDeGoMlDFgb_Bz2-cDuIhXUEPsjXe4OO2h3zr8BuXB7xtd-y7gmT3hid_tOtfGFsItujLaBrj7nUNUzKbF5DVZLF_mk_EiqZViCecVCFmyPIVKpWYjMpVvcqnLShmlqJJEGLFhpiJUC6NlVSnNjGGGZUZmUvEhevyprbWFdetK7yIcY627ENbzj_f1OM1olov-9H_scvXXPpzZBrSNTfC2-35AOIdfFE5yhA</recordid><startdate>20161031</startdate><enddate>20161031</enddate><creator>Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto</creator><creator>Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva</creator><creator>Juen, Leandro</creator><creator>Esposito, Maria Cristina</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161031</creationdate><title>Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities</title><author>Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto ; Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva ; Juen, Leandro ; Esposito, Maria Cristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g992-33de56c284ed94fb5798b86acd9f9919605f5b2fd01a5fa6dd9a2ff2f27f67693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Blowflies</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juen, Leandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposito, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira de Sousa, José Roberto</au><au>Carvalho-Filho, Fernando da Silva</au><au>Juen, Leandro</au><au>Esposito, Maria Cristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2016-10-31</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0164826</spage><pages>e0164826-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The present study was conducted in five different phytogeographic zones of the Brazilian state of Maranhão, three of which (the Amazon Forest, Cerrado, and Palm Groves) are more heterogeneous, whereas the other two (Marshlands and Mangroves) are more homogeneous. In each zone, nine sites were visited for the collection of necrophagous flies using bait traps in 2010, 2011, and 2012. The calliphorid and sarcophagid communities observed at each site were compared in terms of species richness, composition, and abundance. The more heterogeneous zones had higher species richness, except in the case of the sarcophagids in the forest habitats. The calliphorids Chloroprocta idioidea (Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830), Mesembrinella bicolor (Fabricius, 1805), Hemilucilia semidiaphana (Rondani, 1850) and Lucilia eximia (Wiedemann, 1819) were more closely associated with the Cerrado, Palm Grove and Amazon Forest zones, and Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 194) with the Mangrove. In the sarcophagids, Peckia (Euboettcheria) subducta (Lopes, 1935) and P. (Pattonella) palidipilosa (Curran & Walley, 1934) were associated with the Amazon Forest, and P. (Sarcodexia) lambens (Wiedemann, 1830) and Tricharaea (Sarcophagula) occidua (Fabricius, 1794) with the Palm Grove and Cerrado zones. In the calliphorids, the greatest dissimilarity was recorded between the Amazon Forest and the Mangrove and Lowland grassland zones. In the sarcophagids, by contrast, the greatest dissimilarities were recorded between the Amazon Forest and all the other four zones. In general, then, the phytogeographic zones with the highest environmental heterogeneity were characterized by the greatest species richness and abundance of necrophagous flies.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0164826</doi><tpages>e0164826</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e0164826 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A471785932 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Blowflies Comparative analysis |
title | Evaluating the Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Necrophagous Fly Communities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A27%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20Effects%20of%20Different%20Vegetation%20Types%20on%20Necrophagous%20Fly%20Communities&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pereira%20de%20Sousa,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Roberto&rft.date=2016-10-31&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0164826&rft.pages=e0164826-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0164826&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA471785932%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A471785932&rfr_iscdi=true |