Seroepidemiology of pandemic influenza A

In India, Pune was one of the badly affected cities during the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic. We undertook serosurveys among the risk groups and general population to determine the extent of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infections. Pre-pandemic sera from the archives, collected during J...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC infectious diseases 2010-08, Vol.10, p.255
Hauptverfasser: Tandale, Babasaheb V, Pawar, Shailesh D, Gurav, Yogesh K, Chadha, Mandeep S, Koratkar, Santosh S, Shelke, Vijay N, Mishra, Akhilesh C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 255
container_title BMC infectious diseases
container_volume 10
creator Tandale, Babasaheb V
Pawar, Shailesh D
Gurav, Yogesh K
Chadha, Mandeep S
Koratkar, Santosh S
Shelke, Vijay N
Mishra, Akhilesh C
description In India, Pune was one of the badly affected cities during the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic. We undertook serosurveys among the risk groups and general population to determine the extent of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infections. Pre-pandemic sera from the archives, collected during January 2005 to March 2009, were assayed for the determination of baseline seropositivity. Serosurveys were undertaken among the risk groups such as hospital staff, general practitioners, school children and staff and general population between 15.sup.th .sup.August and 11.sup.th .sup.December 2009. In addition, the PCR-confirmed pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 cases and their household contacts were also investigated. Haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assays were performed using turkey red blood cells employing standard protocols. A titre of [greater than or equal to]1:40 was considered seropositive. Only 2 (0.9%) of the 222 pre-pandemic sera were positive. The test-retest reliability of HI assay in 101 sera was 98% for pandemic H1N1, 93.1% for seasonal H1N1 and 94% for seasonal H3N2. The sera from 48 (73.8%) of 65 PCR-confirmed pandemic H1N1 cases in 2009 were positive. Seropositivity among general practitioners increased from 4.9% in August to 9.4% in November and 15.1% in December. Among hospital staff, seropositivity increased from 2.8% in August to 12% in November. Seropositivity among the schools increased from 2% in August to 10.7% in September. The seropositivity among students (25%) was higher than the school staff in September. In a general population survey in October 2009, seropositivity was higher in children (9.1%) than adults (4.3%). The 15-19 years age group showed the highest seropositivity of 20.3%. Seropositivity of seasonal H3N2 (55.3%) and H1N1 (26.4%) was higher than pandemic H1N1 (5.7%) (n = 2328). In households of 74 PCR-confirmed pandemic H1N1 cases, 25.6% contacts were seropositive. Almost 90% pandemic H1N1 infections were asymptomatic or mild. Considering a titre cut off of 1:10, seropositivity was 1.5-3 times as compared to 1:40. Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infection was widespread in all sections of community. However, infection was significantly higher in school children and general practitioners. Hospital staff had the lowest infections suggesting the efficacy of infection-control measures.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2334-10-255
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A236741730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A236741730</galeid><sourcerecordid>A236741730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g680-83dcaa82f363919652e5e66d1c67d997868b00c3149e3d88e3ee695eba26cc323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjE1LAzEURYMoWKt7l7PURTQvb_KSLIfiR6FQsMXtkCZvhpFxppgW1F8vokh3ru69h8MV4hLUDYCjWygtSI1YSlBSG3MkJn_o-KCfirOcX5QC67SfiKsVv4287RK_dmM_th_F2BTbMHzvWHRD0-95-AxFdS5OmtBnvvjNqVjf361nj3KxfJjPqoVsySnpMMUQnG6Q0IMno9kwUYJINnlvHbmNUhGh9IzJOUZm8oY3QVOMqHEqrn9u29Bz3Q1xHHb8vmvDPud6vnqqK41kS7Co_nGXz4fuF9sJURE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seroepidemiology of pandemic influenza A</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tandale, Babasaheb V ; Pawar, Shailesh D ; Gurav, Yogesh K ; Chadha, Mandeep S ; Koratkar, Santosh S ; Shelke, Vijay N ; Mishra, Akhilesh C</creator><creatorcontrib>Tandale, Babasaheb V ; Pawar, Shailesh D ; Gurav, Yogesh K ; Chadha, Mandeep S ; Koratkar, Santosh S ; Shelke, Vijay N ; Mishra, Akhilesh C</creatorcontrib><description>In India, Pune was one of the badly affected cities during the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic. We undertook serosurveys among the risk groups and general population to determine the extent of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infections. Pre-pandemic sera from the archives, collected during January 2005 to March 2009, were assayed for the determination of baseline seropositivity. Serosurveys were undertaken among the risk groups such as hospital staff, general practitioners, school children and staff and general population between 15.sup.th .sup.August and 11.sup.th .sup.December 2009. In addition, the PCR-confirmed pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 cases and their household contacts were also investigated. Haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assays were performed using turkey red blood cells employing standard protocols. A titre of [greater than or equal to]1:40 was considered seropositive. Only 2 (0.9%) of the 222 pre-pandemic sera were positive. The test-retest reliability of HI assay in 101 sera was 98% for pandemic H1N1, 93.1% for seasonal H1N1 and 94% for seasonal H3N2. The sera from 48 (73.8%) of 65 PCR-confirmed pandemic H1N1 cases in 2009 were positive. Seropositivity among general practitioners increased from 4.9% in August to 9.4% in November and 15.1% in December. Among hospital staff, seropositivity increased from 2.8% in August to 12% in November. Seropositivity among the schools increased from 2% in August to 10.7% in September. The seropositivity among students (25%) was higher than the school staff in September. In a general population survey in October 2009, seropositivity was higher in children (9.1%) than adults (4.3%). The 15-19 years age group showed the highest seropositivity of 20.3%. Seropositivity of seasonal H3N2 (55.3%) and H1N1 (26.4%) was higher than pandemic H1N1 (5.7%) (n = 2328). In households of 74 PCR-confirmed pandemic H1N1 cases, 25.6% contacts were seropositive. Almost 90% pandemic H1N1 infections were asymptomatic or mild. Considering a titre cut off of 1:10, seropositivity was 1.5-3 times as compared to 1:40. Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infection was widespread in all sections of community. However, infection was significantly higher in school children and general practitioners. Hospital staff had the lowest infections suggesting the efficacy of infection-control measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2334</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Demographic aspects ; Diagnosis ; Prevention ; Risk factors ; Swine influenza</subject><ispartof>BMC infectious diseases, 2010-08, Vol.10, p.255</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tandale, Babasaheb V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawar, Shailesh D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurav, Yogesh K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadha, Mandeep S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koratkar, Santosh S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelke, Vijay N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, Akhilesh C</creatorcontrib><title>Seroepidemiology of pandemic influenza A</title><title>BMC infectious diseases</title><description>In India, Pune was one of the badly affected cities during the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic. We undertook serosurveys among the risk groups and general population to determine the extent of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infections. Pre-pandemic sera from the archives, collected during January 2005 to March 2009, were assayed for the determination of baseline seropositivity. Serosurveys were undertaken among the risk groups such as hospital staff, general practitioners, school children and staff and general population between 15.sup.th .sup.August and 11.sup.th .sup.December 2009. In addition, the PCR-confirmed pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 cases and their household contacts were also investigated. Haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assays were performed using turkey red blood cells employing standard protocols. A titre of [greater than or equal to]1:40 was considered seropositive. Only 2 (0.9%) of the 222 pre-pandemic sera were positive. The test-retest reliability of HI assay in 101 sera was 98% for pandemic H1N1, 93.1% for seasonal H1N1 and 94% for seasonal H3N2. The sera from 48 (73.8%) of 65 PCR-confirmed pandemic H1N1 cases in 2009 were positive. Seropositivity among general practitioners increased from 4.9% in August to 9.4% in November and 15.1% in December. Among hospital staff, seropositivity increased from 2.8% in August to 12% in November. Seropositivity among the schools increased from 2% in August to 10.7% in September. The seropositivity among students (25%) was higher than the school staff in September. In a general population survey in October 2009, seropositivity was higher in children (9.1%) than adults (4.3%). The 15-19 years age group showed the highest seropositivity of 20.3%. Seropositivity of seasonal H3N2 (55.3%) and H1N1 (26.4%) was higher than pandemic H1N1 (5.7%) (n = 2328). In households of 74 PCR-confirmed pandemic H1N1 cases, 25.6% contacts were seropositive. Almost 90% pandemic H1N1 infections were asymptomatic or mild. Considering a titre cut off of 1:10, seropositivity was 1.5-3 times as compared to 1:40. Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infection was widespread in all sections of community. However, infection was significantly higher in school children and general practitioners. Hospital staff had the lowest infections suggesting the efficacy of infection-control measures.</description><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Swine influenza</subject><issn>1471-2334</issn><issn>1471-2334</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjE1LAzEURYMoWKt7l7PURTQvb_KSLIfiR6FQsMXtkCZvhpFxppgW1F8vokh3ru69h8MV4hLUDYCjWygtSI1YSlBSG3MkJn_o-KCfirOcX5QC67SfiKsVv4287RK_dmM_th_F2BTbMHzvWHRD0-95-AxFdS5OmtBnvvjNqVjf361nj3KxfJjPqoVsySnpMMUQnG6Q0IMno9kwUYJINnlvHbmNUhGh9IzJOUZm8oY3QVOMqHEqrn9u29Bz3Q1xHHb8vmvDPud6vnqqK41kS7Co_nGXz4fuF9sJURE</recordid><startdate>20100825</startdate><enddate>20100825</enddate><creator>Tandale, Babasaheb V</creator><creator>Pawar, Shailesh D</creator><creator>Gurav, Yogesh K</creator><creator>Chadha, Mandeep S</creator><creator>Koratkar, Santosh S</creator><creator>Shelke, Vijay N</creator><creator>Mishra, Akhilesh C</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100825</creationdate><title>Seroepidemiology of pandemic influenza A</title><author>Tandale, Babasaheb V ; Pawar, Shailesh D ; Gurav, Yogesh K ; Chadha, Mandeep S ; Koratkar, Santosh S ; Shelke, Vijay N ; Mishra, Akhilesh C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g680-83dcaa82f363919652e5e66d1c67d997868b00c3149e3d88e3ee695eba26cc323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Swine influenza</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tandale, Babasaheb V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawar, Shailesh D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurav, Yogesh K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadha, Mandeep S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koratkar, Santosh S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelke, Vijay N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, Akhilesh C</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>BMC infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tandale, Babasaheb V</au><au>Pawar, Shailesh D</au><au>Gurav, Yogesh K</au><au>Chadha, Mandeep S</au><au>Koratkar, Santosh S</au><au>Shelke, Vijay N</au><au>Mishra, Akhilesh C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seroepidemiology of pandemic influenza A</atitle><jtitle>BMC infectious diseases</jtitle><date>2010-08-25</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>255</spage><pages>255-</pages><issn>1471-2334</issn><eissn>1471-2334</eissn><abstract>In India, Pune was one of the badly affected cities during the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic. We undertook serosurveys among the risk groups and general population to determine the extent of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infections. Pre-pandemic sera from the archives, collected during January 2005 to March 2009, were assayed for the determination of baseline seropositivity. Serosurveys were undertaken among the risk groups such as hospital staff, general practitioners, school children and staff and general population between 15.sup.th .sup.August and 11.sup.th .sup.December 2009. In addition, the PCR-confirmed pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 cases and their household contacts were also investigated. Haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assays were performed using turkey red blood cells employing standard protocols. A titre of [greater than or equal to]1:40 was considered seropositive. Only 2 (0.9%) of the 222 pre-pandemic sera were positive. The test-retest reliability of HI assay in 101 sera was 98% for pandemic H1N1, 93.1% for seasonal H1N1 and 94% for seasonal H3N2. The sera from 48 (73.8%) of 65 PCR-confirmed pandemic H1N1 cases in 2009 were positive. Seropositivity among general practitioners increased from 4.9% in August to 9.4% in November and 15.1% in December. Among hospital staff, seropositivity increased from 2.8% in August to 12% in November. Seropositivity among the schools increased from 2% in August to 10.7% in September. The seropositivity among students (25%) was higher than the school staff in September. In a general population survey in October 2009, seropositivity was higher in children (9.1%) than adults (4.3%). The 15-19 years age group showed the highest seropositivity of 20.3%. Seropositivity of seasonal H3N2 (55.3%) and H1N1 (26.4%) was higher than pandemic H1N1 (5.7%) (n = 2328). In households of 74 PCR-confirmed pandemic H1N1 cases, 25.6% contacts were seropositive. Almost 90% pandemic H1N1 infections were asymptomatic or mild. Considering a titre cut off of 1:10, seropositivity was 1.5-3 times as compared to 1:40. Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infection was widespread in all sections of community. However, infection was significantly higher in school children and general practitioners. Hospital staff had the lowest infections suggesting the efficacy of infection-control measures.</abstract><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/1471-2334-10-255</doi><tpages>255</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2334
ispartof BMC infectious diseases, 2010-08, Vol.10, p.255
issn 1471-2334
1471-2334
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A236741730
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Demographic aspects
Diagnosis
Prevention
Risk factors
Swine influenza
title Seroepidemiology of pandemic influenza A
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A31%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seroepidemiology%20of%20pandemic%20influenza%20A&rft.jtitle=BMC%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Tandale,%20Babasaheb%20V&rft.date=2010-08-25&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=255&rft.pages=255-&rft.issn=1471-2334&rft.eissn=1471-2334&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2334-10-255&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA236741730%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A236741730&rfr_iscdi=true